Qingdao Institute of marine geology, China Geological SurveyHost
Advanced Search
Previous Article Next Article
2023 Vol. 39, No. 7
Article Contents
Article navigation > Marine Geology Frontiers > 2023 > 39(7): 58-69
Next Article Previous Article

YALIKUN·Rexiti, SHAN Xuanlong, HAO Guoli, LI Kang. Mud-fluid diapir and its development conditions in Xijiang Main Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(7): 58-69. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.288
Citation: YALIKUN·Rexiti, SHAN Xuanlong, HAO Guoli, LI Kang. Mud-fluid diapir and its development conditions in Xijiang Main Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(7): 58-69. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.288
shu

Mud-fluid diapir and its development conditions in Xijiang Main Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin

  • College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China

More Information
Received Date:  15 December 2022
Accepted Date:  28 March 2023
Publish Date:  28 July 2023
    Abstract

  • The Xijiang Main Sag in the Pearl River Mouth Basin contains fuzzy areas in vertical reflection imaging, and the geological origin of the fuzzy areas is often related to the basin diapiric activity. Having studied the seismic profile and seismic impedance of the vertical fuzzy area in the Paleogene seismic data from the 33W Subsag in the Xijiang Main Sag in combination with the development and evolution of the basin, we believed that the fuzzy area has a dual structure with different deep-and-shallow reflections indicating a mud-fluid diapir structure. The Paleogene Wenchang Formation in the Xijiang Main Sag is a deep lacustrine facies widely distributed as mud source-materials for mud fluid diapir. A high-pressure anomaly was detected in the fourth member of the Enping Formation at the bottom of the 33W Subsag drilling well. The Xijiang Main Sag has the overpressure conditions to form a seal box that is covered by a widely-developed mudstone mudstone at the top of the Enping Formation. The magma intrusion in the Zhuhai period destroyed the sealing, activated mud fluid diapir in the basin, and formed a deeply-buried and weakly punctured conical mud fluid diapir in the Paleogene strata of the 33W Subsag.

    • FullText(HTML)
  • 加载中
    • References
  • [1] 何家雄,李福元,王后金,等. 南海北部大陆边缘深水盆地成因机制与油气资源效应[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2020,36(3):1-11. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2019.213

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] 黄春菊,陈开远,李思田. 莺歌海盆地泥底辟活动期次分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2002,29(4):44-46,71. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2002.04.013

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] 何家雄,夏斌,张树林,等. 莺歌海盆地泥底辟成因、展布特征及其与天然气运聚成藏关系[J]. 中国地质,2006,33(6):1336-1344. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2006.06.017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] 董冬冬,孙运宝,吴时国. 珠江口盆地深水区地层超压演化的数值模拟:以ODP1148站位为例[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2015,35(5):165-172.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 吴娟. 珠江口盆地珠一坳陷油气富集规律[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学（武汉）, 2013: 1-124.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 单玄龙, 郝国丽, 徐宏节, 等. 珠一坳陷受岩浆改造型洼陷烃源潜力及有利勘探方向[R]. 深圳: 中海石油（中国）有限公司深圳分公司, 2021.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 钟佳,尤丽,张迎朝,等. 琼东南盆地乐东-陵水凹陷黄流组峡谷水道储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J]. 天然气地球科学,2018,29(5):708-718.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 宋瑞有. 南海北部陆缘声浑浊体成因机制及地震响应特征[J]. 中国海上油气,2020,32(3):43-50.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 邓勇,潘光超,李辉,等. 莺歌海盆地底辟模糊区成因分析及成像对策[J]. 中国海上油气,2020,32(3):59-68.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 韩文明. 尼日尔三角洲深水区地震模糊区成因及与油气成藏的关系[J]. 海洋石油,2013,33(1):54-58. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2013.01.054

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] 蔡国富,张向涛,彭光荣,等. 南海北部阳江-一统暗沙断裂带与新近纪岩浆活动[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2021,45(1):40-52. doi: 10.16539/j.ddgzyckx.2021.01.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] 龚承林,王英民,雷怀彦,等. 侵入岩的地震信息识别及其与油气的关系[J]. 天然气地球科学,2009,20(5):749-753.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 谭俊敏,孙志信. 火成岩侵入形成的构造物理模拟实验及实例[J]. 石油实验地质,2007,29(3):324-328. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2007.03.020

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] 孙志信. 火成岩侵入形成的构造物理模拟实验[J]. 油气地球物理,2007,29(3):324-328.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 杨帆,胡望水,蔡文杰,等. Burgos盆地Perdido构造带盐泥底辟构造特征及形成机制[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2020,39(6):31-38. doi: 10.19597/j.issn.1000-3754.201908004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] 孙和风,彭文绪,周心怀. 渤海海域莱州湾凹陷盐构造成因探讨[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2009,33(3):352-358. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2009.03.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] 何家雄,祝有海,翁荣南,等. 南海北部边缘盆地泥底辟及泥火山特征及其与油气运聚关系[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2012,64(2):15-18.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 王翠丽,周文,谢玉洪,等. 莺歌海盆地泥底辟带高温热事件与储层成岩作用[J]. 地质科技情报,2015,34(4):35-42.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 张伟. 南海北部主要盆地泥底辟/泥火山发育演化与油气及天然气水合物成矿成藏[D]. 广州: 中国科学院研究生院（广州地球化学研究所）, 2016: 1-165.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 赵宝峰,陈红汉,孔令涛,等. 莺歌海盆地流体垂向输导体系及其对天然气成藏控制作用[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2014,39(9):1323-1332.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 杨东升,赵志刚,杨海长,等. 琼东南盆地乐东-陵水凹陷底辟构造及其油气地质意义[J]. 中国石油勘探,2018,23(3):64-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.03.008

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] 张伟,梁金强,何家雄,等. 南海北部陆坡泥底辟/气烟囱基本特征及其与油气和水合物成藏关系[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2017,33(7):11-23. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2017.07002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] 李进,王淑红,颜文. 海底泥火山及其与油气和天然气水合物的关系[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2017,37(6):204-214. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2017.06.022

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] 张树林,黄耀琴,黄雄伟. 流体底辟构造及其成因探讨[J]. 地质科技情报,1999,18(2):20-23.

    Google Scholar

    [25] HE H Y,ZHOU H Z,FU D D. Multicomponent seismic exploration in Yinggehai Basin[J]. The Leading Edge,2002,21(9):914-920. doi: 10.1190/1.1508947

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] 王家豪,庞雄,王存武,等. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷中央底辟带的发现及识别[J]. 地球科学,2006,31(2):209-213. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-2383.2006.02.010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] 满晓,朱继田,姚哲,等. 琼东南盆地深水区泥-流体底辟发育特征与天然气成藏[J]. 地质找矿论丛,2018,33(2):257-263. doi: 10.6053/j.issn.1001-1412.2018.02.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] 王潇,阎贫,于俊辉,等. 东沙岛西南泥火山区的地震烃类检测[J]. 地球科学,2021,46(2):621-631.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 培根, 希姆, 莱德肖. 程远锋, 王廷光, 译. 三维地震解释[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2013: 1-179.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 刘仕友,宋炜,应明雄,等. 基于密度的含噪声角道集波形聚类地震相分析[J]. 石油物探,2019,58(5):773-782. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2019.05.017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] 刘亚茹. 地震反射对含气饱和度敏感性分析[J]. 内蒙古石油化工,2007,10(10):112-113. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7981.2007.10.047

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] 雷超. 南海北部莺歌海-琼东南盆地新生代构造变形格局及其演化过程分析[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学（武汉）, 2012, 1-114.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 丘斌煌,晏红艳,李三福,等. 底辟模糊区地震资料处理关键技术[J]. 工程地球物理学报,2014,11(6):824-831. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7940.2014.06.015

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] 周家雄,刘巍. 乐东气田断层分布特征及其对产能的影响[J]. 天然气工业,2013,33(11):56-61. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2013.11.010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] 杨瑞召,李洋,庞海玲,等. 倾角导向体控制的气烟囱识别技术及其在海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷中的应用[J]. 现代地质,2013,27(1):223-230. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2013.01.026

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] 张伟,梁金强,何家雄,等. 南海北部神狐海域GMGS1和GMGS3钻探区天然气水合物运聚成藏的差异性[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(3):138-149. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.03.017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] 彭靖淞,徐长贵,韦阿娟,等. 渤海湾盆地辽中南洼压力封存箱的破裂与油气运移[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2016,43(3):386-395.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 沙志彬,王宏斌,张光学,等. 底辟构造与天然气水合物的成矿关系[J]. 地学前缘,2005,12(3):283-288. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2005.03.032

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] 张伟,何家雄,卢振权,等. 琼东南盆地疑似泥底辟与天然气水合物成矿成藏关系初探[J]. 天然气地球科学,2015,26(11):2185-2197. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.11.2185

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] 宗奕,梁建设,郭刚. 珠江口盆地番禺低隆起文昌组断裂活动性特征及其对沉积的影响[J]. 地球科学与环境学报,2012,34(4):30-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6561.2012.04.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [41] 丁亮,郭刚,郝建荣,等. 珠一坳陷西江主洼古近系文昌组烃源岩特征及生烃潜力[J]. 中国海上油气,2015,27(5):21-26.

    Google Scholar

    [42] 刘强虎. 断陷盆地低角度正断层控制下层序构型及其定量模拟: 以恩平凹陷古近系文昌组为例[D], 武汉: 中国地质大学（武汉）, 2013: 1-68.

    Google Scholar

    [43] 张启明,董伟良. 中国含油气盆地中的超压体系[J]. 石油学报,2000,21(6):1-11. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2000.06.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] 田立新,张忠涛,庞雄,等. 白云凹陷中深层超压发育特征及油气勘探新启示[J]. 中国海上油气,2020,32(6):1-11.

    Google Scholar

    [45] 何敏,雷永昌,于水明,等. 南海北部浅水区低地温断陷成藏特征及勘探启示[J]. 中国石油勘探,2016,21(4):75-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2016.04.008

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] 曹爱武. 西江主洼生油潜力分析[J]. 中国海上油气,1999,13(3):54-57.

    Google Scholar

    [47] 向巧维,李小平,丁琳,等. 珠江口盆地珠一坳陷古近系高自然伽马砂岩形成机制及油气地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏,2021,33(2):93-103. doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20210210

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] 谢玉洪. 莺琼盆地区中央峡谷源头沉积特征及油气勘探前景[J]. 地质科技通报,2020,39(5):69-78.

    Google Scholar

    [49] 曹立成. 莺歌海-琼东南盆地区新近纪物源演化研究: 来自稀土元素、重矿物和锆石U-Pb年龄的证据[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学（武汉）, 2014: 1-69.

    Google Scholar

    [50] CURTIS M L, RILEY T R. Mobilization of fluidized sediment during sill emplacement, western Dronning Maud Land, East Antarctica[J], Antarctic Science, 2003, 15（3）: 393-398.

    Google Scholar

    [51] 黄苓渝,张昌民,刘江艳,等. 东海西湖凹陷古近系砂岩侵入体及其地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏,2015,27(5):74-80. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2015.05.013

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    • Relative Articles
  • Cited by
  • Supplements
    • Proportional views
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(10)

Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(439) PDF downloads(27) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020