Tectonic division and plane restoration of Kaiping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin

LI Zhi; ZHANG Zhiye; HE Dengfa; NIE Guoquan; HE Min

doi:10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.041

2023 Vol. 39, No. 7

Article Contents

Article navigation > Marine Geology Frontiers > 2023 > 39(7): 70-78

Next Article Previous Article

LI Zhi, ZHANG Zhiye, HE Dengfa, NIE Guoquan, HE Min. Tectonic division and plane restoration of Kaiping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(7): 70-78. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.041

Citation:

LI Zhi, ZHANG Zhiye, HE Dengfa, NIE Guoquan, HE Min. Tectonic division and plane restoration of Kaiping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(7): 70-78. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.041

Tectonic division and plane restoration of Kaiping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin

1.
SINOPEC Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, Beijing 100083, China
2.
SINOPEC Henan Oilfield Company, Nanyang 473400, China
3.
School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
4.
Shenzhen Branch of CNOOC (China) Ltd., Shenzhen 518054, China

Received Date: 13 February 2022

Accepted Date: 17 March 2023

Publish Date: 28 July 2023

Abstract

Abstract

The tectonic division and the analysis of their plane restoration are basic geological issues, and also main tasks during basin survey for regional scrutiny. Based on 2D/3D seismic and drilling data, according to the distribution of faults, the T₀ structural maps of reflection layers, and the ΔT₀ and strata pinch-out line, the Kaiping Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin could divided into five sub-sags (the west sub-sag, north sub-sag, southwest sub-sag, main sub-sag, and east sub-sag) and five tectonic zones (Nos. 1–5). On this basis, combined with the balance profile analysis, the structural evolution of the Wenchang Formation during depression period of the Kaiping Sag could be divided into six developmental stages in two episodes, during which the sag evolved from the “north dip fault” to the “south dip fault”. The early isolated sags began to expand, and interconnected gradually. The periodic activity of boundary faults controlled the sedimentary development and distribution. The center of structural activity of the sag trended to shift southwestward, and so did the sedimentary center of the main sag body. The main sub-sag and the north sub-sag in the middle of the sag have the largest extension, followed by the southwest sub-sag and the east sub-sag, and the west sub-sag has the smallest extension. The tectonic division of the sag in this study could be verified dynamically by plane restoration and shall be more reasonable; and provides a new scientific basis for the study of dynamic evolution and the distribution of hydrocarbon generation center and sand body in the Kaiping Sag.
- Kaiping Sag /
- tectonic units /
- plane restoration /
- boundary fault /
- deposit thickness /
- extensional rate /
- Pearl River Mouth Basin

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	张志业, 何登发, 李智, 等. 珠江口盆地开平凹陷边界断层三维几何学与运动学[J]. 地球物理学报, 2018, 61（10）: 4296-4307. Google Scholar
[2]	王步清,黄智斌,马培领,等. 塔里木盆地构造单元划分标准、依据和原则的建立[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2009,33(1):86-93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1552.2009.01.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	周心怀,余一欣,汤良杰,等. 渤海海域新生代盆地结构与构造单元划分[J]. 中国海上油气,2010,22(5):285-289. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2010.05.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	杨超,陈清华,任来义,等. 柴达木盆地构造单元划分[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2012,34(1):25-33. Google Scholar
[5]	马庆佑,吕海涛,蒋华山,等. 塔里木盆地台盆区构造单元划分方案[J]. 海相油气地质,2015,20(1):1-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2015.01.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	张吉光,王英武. 沉积盆地构造单元划分与命名规范化讨论[J]. 石油实验地质,2010,32(4):309-318. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2010.04.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	董冬冬. 南海北部陆缘深水区构造演化及其资源效应[D]. 青岛: 中国科学院研究生院（中国科学院海洋研究所）, 2008. Google Scholar
[8]	庞雄,陈隽,戴一丁,等. 珠江口盆地白云西-开平凹陷油气聚集及勘探目标研究[J]. 中国海上油气(地质),1995,9(4):237-245. Google Scholar
[9]	戴一丁,庞雄,李平鲁. 珠江口盆地开平凹陷油气聚集条件分析[J]. 中国海上油气(地质),1998,12(1):12-18. Google Scholar
[10]	王升兰,刘晖. 珠江口盆地开平凹陷恩平组地震反射特征与沉积体系展布[J]. 科技导报,2014,32(28/29):64-69. Google Scholar
[11]	曹敬贺,夏少红,孙金龙,等. 珠江口盆地北部断裂构造特征对比及其地质学意义[J]. 地球物理学进展,2014,29(5):2364-2369. doi: 10.6038/pg20140555 CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	石万忠,宋志峰,王晓龙,等. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷底辟构造类型及其成因[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2009,34(5):778-784. Google Scholar
[13]	龚再升, 李思田. 南海北部大陆边缘盆地油气成藏动力学研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004. Google Scholar
[14]	朱伟林,张功成,高乐. 南海北部大陆边缘盆地油气地质特征与勘探方向[J]. 石油学报,2008,29(1):1-9. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2008.01.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	施和生,何敏,张丽丽,等. 珠江口盆地(东部)油气地质特征、成藏规律及下一步勘探策略[J]. 中国海上油气,2014,26(3):11-22. Google Scholar
[16]	CHAMBERLIN R T. The Appalachian folds of central Pennsylvania[J]. Geology,1910,18:228-251. Google Scholar
[17]	CHAMBERLIN R T. The building of the Colorado Rockies[J]. Geology,1919,27:225-251. Google Scholar
[18]	BUCHER W H. The Deformation of the Earth’s Crust[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1933. Google Scholar
[19]	DAHLSTROM C D. A balanced cross sections[J]. Geosciences,1969,6:743-759. Google Scholar
[20]	张功成. 平衡剖面正演模拟技术在松辽盆地构造分析中的应用[J]. 西安石油学院报(自然科学版),1999,14(2):1-4. Google Scholar
[21]	张荣强,吴时国,周雁,等. 平衡剖面技术及其在济阳坳陷桩海地区的应用[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2008,28(6):135-141. Google Scholar
[22]	任建业,庞雄,于鹏,等. 南海北部陆缘深水-超深水盆地成因机制分析[J]. 地球物理学报,2018,61(12):4901-4920. Google Scholar
[23]	庞雄,郑金云,梅廉夫,等. 先存俯冲陆缘背景下珠江口盆地断陷结构的多样性[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2021,48(4):1-11. Google Scholar
[24]	陆蕾蕾,姜素华,索艳慧,等. 南海珠江口盆地走滑构造与油气成藏机制[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2021,45(1):108-122. doi: 10.16539/j.ddgzyckx.2021.01.009 CrossRef Google Scholar
[25]	蔡国富,张向涛,彭光荣,等. 南海北部阳江-一统暗沙断裂带与新近纪岩浆活动[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2021,45(1):40-52. doi: 10.16539/j.ddgzyckx.2021.01.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[26]	熊连桥. 开平凹陷文昌组沉积特征及半深湖空间分布[J]. 中国海上油气,2021,33(5):51-61. Google Scholar