Effect of Gas Flow Rates in Laser Ablation System on Accuracy and Precision of Zircon U-Pb Dating Analysis by LA-ICP-MS

TAN Xijuan; GUO Chao; FENG Yonggang; ZHOU Yi; LIANG Ting

doi:10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202110020140

2022 Vol. 41, No. 4

Article Contents

Article navigation > Rock and Mineral Analysis > 2022 > 41(4): 554-563

Next Article Previous Article

TAN Xijuan, GUO Chao, FENG Yonggang, ZHOU Yi, LIANG Ting. Effect of Gas Flow Rates in Laser Ablation System on Accuracy and Precision of Zircon U-Pb Dating Analysis by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(4): 554-563. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202110020140

Citation:

TAN Xijuan, GUO Chao, FENG Yonggang, ZHOU Yi, LIANG Ting. Effect of Gas Flow Rates in Laser Ablation System on Accuracy and Precision of Zircon U-Pb Dating Analysis by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2022, 41(4): 554-563. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.202110020140

Effect of Gas Flow Rates in Laser Ablation System on Accuracy and Precision of Zircon U-Pb Dating Analysis by LA-ICP-MS

1.
College of Earth Sciences and Land Resources, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China
2.
Laboratory of Mineralization and Dynamics, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China

More Information

Corresponding author: LIANG Ting, liangt@chd.edu.cn

Received Date: 02 October 2021

Revised Date: 20 April 2022

Accepted Date: 30 April 2022

Publish Date: 28 July 2022

Abstract

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Despite zircon U-Pb dating analysis by LA-ICP-MS receiving wide acceptance, it remains a challenge to obtain results with high accuracy and precision. It is known that gas flow rates of LA system can affect the signal stability of ICP-MS and thus result in impacts on analytical uncertainty of zircon U-Pb dating. However, the exact effects and mechanism of gas flow rates on zircon U-Pb dating analysis are still unclear.
OBJECTIVES
To thoroughly understand the influence of gas flow rates on the analytical uncertainty of zircon U-Pb dating, and to provide valuable information to propose a reliable and robust LA-ICP-MS approach for zircon U-Pb dating analysis.
METHODS
By applying zircon standard samples of Harvard 91500 and Plešovice as researching subjects, ICP-MS connected to a 193nm nanosecond laser ablation system was used to investigate the influence of gas flow rate settings on accuracy and precision of U-Pb dating analysis. RESULTS: With fixed make-up gas (Ar) of 1.0L/min, the average ²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U ages of Harvard 91500 were found to increase from 1002.0±10.4Ma (1σ) to 1083.0±6.8Ma (1σ) with increasing carrier gas (He) from 0.2 to 1.2L/min. Thus, it was clear that the sample aerosol transportation efficiency can greatly affect the analytical accuracy of zircon U-Pb dating. Furthermore, when the He flow rate was higher than 0.8L/min, the analytical accuracy and precision of zircon U-Pb dating decreased due to the increased signal intensity oscillations and formation of oxides from the introduction of large particles of sample aerosols. The comparison of the data of Plešovice obtained under 0.95/0.8, 0.80/0.8 and 0.8/0.6L/min for He/Ar gas flow rate patterns indicated that there were no significant differences in U/Pb weighted average age. However, the relative deviation of 1σ single-point analysis was the smallest (1.4%) when the Ar and He flow rates were both 0.8L/min.
CONCLUSIONS
The analytical accuracy and precision of zircon U-Pb dating by LA-ICP-MS can be improved by optimizing the gas flow rate setting of carrier gas and make-up gas, and highly recommending 0.8L/min of both Ar and He.
- carrier gas (He) flow rate /
- make-up gas (Ar) flow rate /
- aerosol transportation efficiency /
- zircon U-Pb dating /
- analytical accuracy and precision /
- LA-ICP-MS

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Lee J, Williams I, Ellis D. Pb, U and Th diffusion in nature zircon[J]. Nature, 1997, 390: 159-162. doi: 10.1038/36554 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	Wu Y B, Zheng Y F. Genesis of zircon and its constraints on interpretation of U-Pb age[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004, 49(15): 1554-1569. doi: 10.1007/BF03184122 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	Cherniak D J, Watson E B. Pb diffusion in zircon[J]. Chemical Geology, 2000, 172(1-2): 5-24. Google Scholar
[4]	Nardi L V S, Formoso M L L, Müller I F, et al. Zircon/rock partition coefficients of REEs, Y, Th, U, Nb, and Ta in granitic rocks: Uses for provenance and mineral exploration purposes[J]. Chemical Geology, 2013, 335: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.10.043 CrossRef Google Scholar
[5]	王先广, 刘战庆, 刘善宝, 等. 江西朱溪铜钨矿细粒花岗岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb定年和岩石地球化学研究[J]. 岩矿测试, 2015, 34(5): 592-599. Google Scholar Wang X G, Liu Z Q, Liu S B, et al. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating and petrologic geochemistry of fine-grained granite from Zhuxi Cu-W deposit, Jiangxi Province and its geological significance[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2015, 34(5): 592-599. Google Scholar
[6]	Schaltegger U, Schmitt A K, Horstwood M S A. U-Th-Pb zircon geochronology by ID-TIMS, SIMS, and laser ablation ICP-MS: Recipes, interpretations, and opportunities[J]. Chemical Geology, 2015, 402: 89-110. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.02.028 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	Kröner A, Wan Y S, Liu X M, et al. Dating of zircon from high-grade rocks: Which is the most reliable method?[J]. Geoscience Frontiers, 2014, 5(4): 515-523. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2014.03.012 CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	Liu Y, Li X H, Li Q L, et al. Precise U-Pb zircon dating at a scale of <5micron by the CAMECA 1280 SIMS using a Gaussian illumination probe[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2011, 26(4): 845-851. doi: 10.1039/c0ja00113a CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	Fryer B J, Jackson S E, Longerich H P. The application of laser ablation microprobe-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (LAM-ICP-MS) to in situ (U)-Pb geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 1993, 109(1-4): 1049-1064. Google Scholar
[10]	Klotzli U, Klotzli E, Gunes Z, et al. Accuracy of laser ablation U-Pb zircon dating: Results from a test using five different reference zircons[J]. Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research, 2009, 33(1): 5-15. Google Scholar
[11]	范晨子, 胡明月, 赵令浩, 等. 锆石铀-铅定年激光剥蚀-电感耦合等离子体质谱原位微区分析进展[J]. 岩矿测试, 2012, 31(1): 29-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2012.01.004 CrossRef Google Scholar Fan C Z, Hu M Y, Zhao L H, et al. Advances in in situ microanalysis of U-Pb zircon geochronology using laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2012, 31(1): 29-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0254-5357.2012.01.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	Solari L A, Ortega-Obregón C, Bernal J P. U-Pb zircon geochronology by LA-ICPMS combined with thermal annealing: Achievements in precision and accuracy on dating standard and unknown samples[J]. Chemical Geology, 2015, 414: 109-123. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.09.008 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	Li X H, Liu X M, Liu Y S, et al. Accuracy of LA-ICPMS zircon U-Pb age determination: An inter-laboratory comparison[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2015, 58(10): 1722-1730. doi: 10.1007/s11430-015-5110-x CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	Allen C M, Campbell I H. Identification and elimination of a matrix-induced systematic error in LA-ICP-MS ²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U dating of zircon[J]. Chemical Geology, 2012, 332-333: 157-165. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.09.038 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	Luo T, Hu Z C, Zhang W, et al. Water vapor-assisted "universal" nonmatrix-matched analytical method for the in situ U-Pb dating of zircon, monazite, titanite, and xenotime by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 90(15): 9016-9024. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01231 CrossRef in situ U-Pb dating of zircon, monazite, titanite, and xenotime by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry" target="_blank">Google Scholar
[16]	Košler J, Jackson S, Yang Z, et al. Effect of oxygen in sample carrier gas on laser-induced elemental fractionation in U-Th-Pb zircon dating by laser ablation ICP-MS[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2014, 29(5): 832-840. doi: 10.1039/C3JA50386K CrossRef Google Scholar
[17]	王辉, 汪方跃, 关炳庭, 等. 激光能量密度对LA-ICP-MS分析数据质量的影响研究[J]. 岩矿测试, 2019, 38(6): 609-619. Google Scholar Wang H, Wang F Y, Guan B T, et al. Effect of laser energy density on data quality during LA-ICP-MS measurement[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019, 38(6): 609-619. Google Scholar
[18]	周亮亮, 魏均启, 王芳, 等. LA-ICP-MS工作参数优化及在锆石U-Pb定年分析中的应用[J]. 岩矿测试, 2017, 36(4): 350-359. Google Scholar Zhou L L, Wei J Q, Wang F, et al. Optimization of the working parameters of LA-ICP-MS and its application to zircon U-Pb dating[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2017, 36(4): 350-359. Google Scholar
[19]	于超, 杨志明, 周利敏, 等. 激光焦平面变化对LA-ICPMS锆石U-Pb定年准确度的影响[J]. 矿床地质, 2019, 38(1): 21-28. Google Scholar Yu C, Yang Z M, Zhou L M, et al. Impact of laser focus on accuracy of U-Pb dating of zircons by LA-ICPMS[J]. Mineral Deposits, 2019, 38(1): 21-28. Google Scholar
[20]	Günther D, Horn I, Hattendorf B. Recent trends and developments in laser ablation-ICP-mass spectrometry[J]. Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2000, 368(1): 4-14. doi: 10.1007/s002160000495 CrossRef Google Scholar
[21]	Schilling G D, Andrade F J, Barnes J H, et al. Contin-uous simultaneous detection in mass spectrometry[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2007, 79(20): 7662-7668. doi: 10.1021/ac070785s CrossRef Google Scholar
[22]	Hattendorf B, Hartfelder U, Günther D. Skip the beat: Minimizing aliasing error in LA-ICP-MS measurements[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2019, 411(3): 591-602. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1314-1 CrossRef Google Scholar
[23]	Norris C A, Danyushevsky L, Olin P, et al. Elimination of aliasing in LA-ICP-MS by alignment of laser and mass spectrometer[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2021, 36(4): 733-739. doi: 10.1039/D0JA00488J CrossRef Google Scholar
[24]	Tan X J, Koch J, Günther D, et al. In situ element analy-sis of spodumenes by fs-LA-ICPMS with non-matrix-matched calibration: Signal beat and accuracy[J]. Chemical Geology, 2021, 583: 120463. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120463 CrossRef Google Scholar
[25]	Tunheng A, Hirata T. Development of signal smoothing device for precise elemental analysis using laser ablation-ICP-mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2004, 19(7): 932-934. doi: 10.1039/b402493a CrossRef Google Scholar
[26]	Müller W, Shelley M, Miller P, et al. Initial performance metrics of a new custom-designed ArF excimer LA-ICP-MS system coupled to a two-volume laser-ablation cell[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2009, 24(2): 209-214. doi: 10.1039/B805995K CrossRef Google Scholar
[27]	Hu Z C, Liu Y S, Gao S, et al. A "wire" signal smoo-thing device for laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis[J]. Spectrochimica Acta: Part B, 2012, 78: 50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.sab.2012.09.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
[28]	Kon Y, Yokoyama T D, Ohata M. Analytical efficacy of a gas mixer and stabilizer for laser ablation ICP mass spectrometry[J]. ACS Omega, 2020, 5(43): 28073-28079. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c03658 CrossRef Google Scholar
[29]	Günther D, Heinrich C A. Enhanced sensitivity in laser ablation-ICP mass spectrometry using helium-argon mixtures as aerosol carrier[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 1999, 14(9): 1363-1368. doi: 10.1039/A901648A CrossRef Google Scholar
[30]	Liu Y S, Hu Z C, Gao S, et al. In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard[J]. Chemical Geology, 2008, 257(1-2): 34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.08.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[31]	Ludwig K R. User's manual for Isoplot/Ex, version 3.75. A geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel[R]. Berkeley: Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2012: 1-75. Google Scholar
[32]	Horn I, Günther D. The influence of ablation carrier gasses Ar, He and Ne on the particle size distribution and transport efficiencies of laser ablation-induced aerosols: Implications for LA-ICP-MS[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2003, 207(1-4): 144-157. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(02)01324-7 CrossRef Google Scholar
[33]	Wiedenbeck M, Allé P, Corfu F, et al. Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb, Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses[J]. Geostandards Newsletter, 1995, 19(1): 1-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.1995.tb00147.x CrossRef Google Scholar
[34]	Sláma J, Košler J, Condon D J, et al. Plešovice zircon—A new natural reference material for U-Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis[J]. Chemical Geology, 2008, 249(1-2): 1-35. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.11.005 CrossRef Google Scholar
[35]	Luo T, Hu Z C, Zhang W, et al. Reassessment of the influence of carrier gases He and Ar on signal intensities in 193nm excimer LA-ICP-MS analysis[J]. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2018, 33(10): 1655-1663. doi: 10.1039/C8JA00163D CrossRef Google Scholar
[36]	栾燕, 何克, 谭细娟. LA-ICP-MS标准锆石原位微区U-Pb定年及微量元素的分析测定[J]. 地质通报, 2019, 38(7): 1206-1218. Google Scholar Luan Y, He K, Tan X J. In situ U-Pb dating and trace element determination of standard zircons by LA-ICP-MS[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(7): 1206-1218. Google Scholar
[37]	李艳广, 汪双双, 刘民武, 等. 斜锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年方法及应用[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89(12): 2400-2418. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2015.12.015 CrossRef Google Scholar Li Y G, Wang S S, Liu M W, et al. U-Pb dating study of baddeleyite by LA-ICP-MS: Technique and application[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89(12): 2400-2418. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2015.12.015 CrossRef Google Scholar
[38]	汪双双, 韩延兵, 李艳广, 等. 利用LA-ICP-MS在16μm和10μm激光束斑条件下测定独居石U-Th-Pb年龄[J]. 岩矿测试, 2016, 35(4): 349-357. Google Scholar Wang S S, Han Y B, Li Y G, et al. U-Th-Pb dating of monazite by LA-ICP-MS using ablation spot sizes of 16μm and 10μm[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2016, 35(4): 349-357. Google Scholar
[39]	Xiong D Y, Guo L F, Liu C X, et al. Analytical effect of stabilizer volume and shape on zircon U-Pb dating by nanosecond LA-ICP-QMS[J]. Journal of Analytical Science and Technology, 2022, 13(13): 1-12. Google Scholar