China Geological SurveyHost
Advanced Search
Previous Article Next Article
2024 Vol. 43, No. 7
Article Contents
Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2024 > 43(7): 1149-1157
Next Article Previous Article

YE Jianling, SU Qiongyu, LI Fenqiang, YANG Hanyuan. 2024. Geothermal geological characteristics and resource potential of Hot Dry Rock in Rucheng, Hunan Province. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(7): 1149-1157. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2023.02.027
Citation: YE Jianling, SU Qiongyu, LI Fenqiang, YANG Hanyuan. 2024. Geothermal geological characteristics and resource potential of Hot Dry Rock in Rucheng, Hunan Province. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(7): 1149-1157. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2023.02.027
shu

Geothermal geological characteristics and resource potential of Hot Dry Rock in Rucheng, Hunan Province

  • Engineering and Mine Geological Survey and Monitor Institute of Hunan Province, Changsha 410014, Hunan, China

Received Date:  14 February 2023
Revised Date:  17 December 2023
Publish Date:  15 July 2024
    Abstract

  • Although there are abundant geothermal resources in Rucheng, Hunan, research on Hot Dry Rock (HDR) geothermal resources is still in its early stages. In order to learn more about the geothermal characteristics and resource potential of HDR in the Rucheng area, this paper analyzes the geothermal occurrence conditions of HDR in this area using a field geological survey, sampling test, and geothermal resource genesis analysis. According to the site selection standard of the HDR exploration target area in China, the HDR target area in the area is evaluated, and the volume method is employed to estimate the amount of HDR resources. The research indicates that the Rucheng area has a well-developed intermediate-acid magmatic rock mass with a good geothermal geological background. The heat generation rate of granite is 6.45 μW/m3, which makes it a highly radioactive granite. It belongs to the 'hot crust and cold mantle' thermal structure type and is rated as the suitable area for the target area of HDR resources. At a depth of 2~6 km, the total amount of HDR resources is 13.06 × 1017 kilocalories, equivalent to 445.60×108 tons of standard coal, with good resource potential. This study provides a scientific basis and technical support for the development of HDR geothermal resources in the Rucheng area, lays the foundation for the sustainable utilization of geothermal energy, and has good guiding significance.

    • FullText(HTML)
  • 加载中
    • References
  • [1] Lin B Q, Li Z. 2022. Towards world's low carbon development: The role of clean energy[J]. Appl Energy, 307: 118160. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118160

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Abbady A G E, Al−Ghamdi A H. 2018. Heat production rate from radioactive elements of granite rocks in north and southeastern Arabian shield Kingdom of Saudi Arabia[J]. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 11(4): 281−290. doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2018.03.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] 曹锐, 多吉, 李玉彬, 等. 2022. 我国中深层地热资源赋存特征、发展现状及展望[J]. 工程科学学报, 44(10): 1623−1631. doi: 10.3321/j.issn.1001-053X.2022.10.bjkjdxxb202210002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] 段平国, 王兴光. 2016. 湖南省地热水资源勘查开发利用现状及规划建议[J]. 地下水, 38(2): 64−66.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 甘浩男, 王贵玲, 蔺文静, 等. 2015. 中国干热岩资源主要赋存类型与成因模式[J]. 科技导报, 33(19): 22−27.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 何建军. 2013. 长沙市地下热水资源形成条件及潜力研究[D]. 中国地质大学(北京)硕士学位论文.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 何淼, 龚武镇, 许明标, 等. 2021. 干热岩开发技术研究现状与展望分析[J]. 可再生能源, 39(11): 1447−1454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-5292.2021.11.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] 胡圣标, 何丽娟, 汪集旸. 2001. 中国大陆地区大地热流数据汇编(第三版)[J]. 地球物理学报, 44(5): 611−626. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5733.2001.05.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] 湖南省地质调查院. 2017. 中国区域地质志·湖南志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社: 1001-1008.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 姜光政, 高堋, 饶松, 等. 2016. 中国大陆地区大地热流数据汇编(第四版)[J]. 地球物理学报, 59(8): 2892−2910.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 李超文, 彭头平. 2001. 湖南地热资源分布及远景区划[J]. 湖南地质, 20(4): 272−276.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 李福. 2010. 海南陵水地区深层干热岩地热发电项目的勘查选址[J]. 地热能, 3(1): 21−27.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 李胜涛, 张森琦, 贾小丰, 等. 2018. 干热岩勘查开发工程场地选址评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国地质调查, 5(2): 64−72.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 李亭昕, 蔺文静, 甘浩男, 等. 2020. 东南沿海干热岩资源成因模式探讨及勘查进展[J]. 地质力学学报, 26(2): 187−200. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.02.018

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] 李统桂, 沈松林, 刘振忠. 1981. 湖南省汝城县热水圩地热田水文地质普查报告[R]. 长沙: 湖南省地质局水文队.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 李佐海. 1985. 湖南省地下热水特征及其成因类型和开发利用[J]. 湖南地质, 4(3): 36−49.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 林乐夫, 孙占学, 王安东, 等. 2017. 南岭地区与东南沿海地区中生代花岗岩放射性地球化学特征及岩石圈热结构对比研究[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 36(4): 488−500. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2017.04.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] 蔺文静, 王凤元, 甘浩男, 等. 2015. 福建漳州干热岩资源选址与开发前景分析[J]. 科技导报, 33(19): 28−34.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 蔺文静, 王贵玲, 甘浩男. 2023. 华南陆缘火成岩区差异性地壳热结构及地热意义[J]. 地质学报, 97: 1−14.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 龙西亭, 袁瑞强, 邓新平, 等. 2015. 汝城干热岩地热资源研究[J]. 科技导报, 33(19): 68−73.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 马峰, 孙红丽, 蔺文静, 等. 2015. 中国EGS示范工程靶区选址与指标矩阵评价[J]. 科技导报, 33(8): 41−47.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 毛翔, 国殿斌, 罗璐, 等. 2019. 世界干热岩地热资源开发进展与地质背景分析[J]. 地质论评, 65(6): 1462−1472.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 彭头平, 李超文, 彭冰霞. 2002. 湖南地热资源的构造制约与勘查标

    Google Scholar

    志[J]. 湖南地质, (1): 56−60.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 齐晓飞, 上官拴通, 张国斌, 等. 2020. 河北省乐亭县马头营区干热岩资源孔位选址及开发前景分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2020,27(1): 94−102.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 苏正, 王晓星, 胡剑, 等. 2014. 我国增强型地热系统选址问题探讨[J]. 地球物理学进展, 29(1): 0386−0391.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 王安东, 孙占学, 刘金辉, 等. 2015. 漳州地区岩石放射性地球化学特征及岩石圈热结构[J]. 科技导报, 33(24): 41−45.

    Google Scholar

    [27] 王贵玲, 陆川. 2022. 碳中和目标驱动下地热资源开采利用技术进展[J]. 地质与资源, 31(3): 412−425.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 王文中, 邵东云, 程新科, 等. 2022. 中国浅层和中深层地热能的开发和利用[J]. 水电与新能源, 36(3): 21−25.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 许崇鑫. 2022. 汝城水热型地热储层的温度场反演[D]. 中南大学硕士学位论文.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 杨汉元. 2020. 湖南汝城地区干热岩资源前景及参数孔选址研究[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 32(6): 41−47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1803.2020.06.07

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] 杨立中, 刘金辉, 孙占学, 等. 2016. 漳州岩体放射性生热率特征及干热岩资源潜力[J]. 现代矿业, 32(3): 123−127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-6082.2016.03.045

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] 杨支援, 叶见玲. 2021. 湖南汝城干热岩赋存条件及资源类型分析[J]. 湘潭大学学报(自然科学版), 43(6): 107−116.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 张保建, 李燕燕, 高俊, 等. 2020. 河北省马头营干热岩的成因机制及其示范意义[J]. 地质学报, 94(7): 2036−2051. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2020.07.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] 张超, 胡圣标, 黄荣华, 等. 2022. 干热岩地热资源热源机制研究现状及其对成因机制研究的启示[J]. 地球物理学进展, 37(5): 1907−1919. doi: 10.6038/pg2022FF0441

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] 张超, 胡圣标, 宋荣彩, 等. 2020. 共和盆地干热岩地热资源的成因机制: 来自岩石放射性生热率的约束[J]. 地球物理学报, 63(7): 2697−2709. doi: 10.6038/cjg2020N0381

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [36] 张森琦, 文冬光, 许天福, 等. 2019. 美国干热岩“地热能前沿瞭望台研究计划”与中美典型 EGS 场地勘查现状对比[J]. 地学前缘, 26(2): 2−18.

    Google Scholar

    [37] 章邦桐, 凌洪飞, 陈培荣, 等. 2010. 岩石古放射性生热率的校正及其地球化学意义[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 29(2): 181−184. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2010.02.010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [38] 赵宝峰, 汪启年, 官大维, 等. 2022. 带状热储地热田温度场特征及控热因素——以湖南省汝城县热水圩地热田为例[J]. 地质通报, 41(11): 2035−2046. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2022.11.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    • Relative Articles
  • Cited by
  • Supplements
    • Proportional views
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(5)

Tables(6)

Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(808) PDF downloads(201) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020