Sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of Changxing—Feixianguan Formations in Yilong—Pingchang area, Sichuan Province

LIAO Xinyu; XIAO Yunpeng; SONG Zhenyu

doi:10.12097/gbc.2022.02.027

2024 Vol. 43, No. 2~3

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2024 > 43(2~3): 350-362

Next Article Previous Article

LIAO Xinyu, XIAO Yunpeng, SONG Zhenyu. 2024. Sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of Changxing—Feixianguan Formations in Yilong—Pingchang area, Sichuan Province. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(2~3): 350-362. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2022.02.027

Citation:

LIAO Xinyu, XIAO Yunpeng, SONG Zhenyu. 2024. Sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of Changxing—Feixianguan Formations in Yilong—Pingchang area, Sichuan Province. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(2~3): 350-362. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2022.02.027

Sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of Changxing—Feixianguan Formations in Yilong—Pingchang area, Sichuan Province

1.
CNOOC Energy Company Limited, Engineering Technology Hainan Compang, Chengmai 571999, Hainan, China
2.
CNOOC China Limited , Hai Nan Branch, Haikou 570300, Hainan, China
3.
Geosciences School of Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, Hubei, China

More Information

Corresponding author: XIAO Yunpeng, xiaoyp4@cnooc.com.cn

Received Date: 26 February 2022

Revised Date: 28 August 2022

Publish Date: 15 March 2024

Abstract

Abstract

The Yilong—Pingchang area in Sichuan, especially the Changxing—Feixianguan Formations in the region surrounding the Kaijiang-Liangping trough, contains a large amount of oil and gas resources, but the third class sequence classification scheme needs to be unified. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the latest drilling core, well logging, and field outcrop data, two types of type II sequence interfaces, including the lithologic facies abrupt interface and the partial exposure unconformity interface, were identified. The Changxing—Feixianguan Formations in the study area were divided into 4 third class sequences, and a sequence stratigraphic framework was established. The target stratum in the study area mainly developed a typical rimmed platform sedimentary system. In the late stage, the trough disappeared, and the open platform and evaporate platform of the epicontinental sea platform system developed. During the deposition of the Changxing Formation, the Kaijiang-Liangping trough gradually expanded, and the highstand system tract was a favorable stage for the development of reefs. Due to the rapid decline in sea level in the late SQ2 period, the scope of the reefs was reduced compared to the SQ1 period. The sea level rose rapidly in the early depositional stage of the Feixianguan Formation, and it was difficult to form oolitic shoals, and then entered the overall regression stage, and to the highstand system tract of SQ3, the oolitic shoals developed contiguously. The sequence classification scheme matches the development characteristics of reef and shoal reservoirs and can be applied to the next step of oil and gas exploration.
- Changxing Formation /
- Feixianguan Formation /
- sequence classification /
- sedimentary evolution /
- Yilong—Pingchang area /
- Sichuan Province

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Ma Y S, Zhang S C, Guo T L, et al. 2008. Petroleum geology of the Puguang sour gas field in the Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 25(4): 357−370. Google Scholar
[2]	Sarg J F. 1988. Carbonate sequence stratigraphy [C]//Wilgus C K, Hastings B S, Kendall C G St C, et al. Sea level changes: An integrated approach. SEPM Special Publication No, 42: 155−181. Google Scholar
[3]	Schlager W. 2005. Carbonate sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy: SEPM concepts in sedimentology and paleontology No. 8 [M]. Tulsa: Society for Sedimentary Geology. Google Scholar
[4]	Wang G W, Li P P, Hao F, et al. 2015. Impact of sedimentology, diagenesis, and solid bitumen on the development of a tight gas grainstone reservoir in the Feixianguan Formation, Jiannan area, China: Implications for gas exploration in tight carbonate reservoirs[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 65: 250−265. Google Scholar
[5]	Wang Z L, Jiang C, Jiang Y Q, et al. 2018. Distribution patterns and controlling factors for reservoir characteristic difference of oolitic shoals, Feixianguan Formation, eastern Longgang area, SW China[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11(23): 751−764. doi: 10.1007/s12517-018-4082-5 CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	陈斐然, 魏祥峰, 刘珠江, 等. 2020. 四川盆地二叠系龙潭组页岩孔隙发育特征及主控因素[J]天然气地球科学, 31(11): 1593−1602. Google Scholar
[7]	陈洪德, 钟怡江, 侯明才, 等. 2009. 川东北地区长兴组-飞仙关组碳酸盐岩台地层序充填结构及成藏效应[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 30(5): 539−547. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2009.05.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	陈中强. 1995. 二叠纪末期的全球淹没事件[J]. 岩相古地理, 3: 34−39. Google Scholar
[9]	董庆民, 胡忠贵, 陈世悦, 等. 2021. 川东地区长兴组台内礁滩储层特征与形成机制[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 50(5): 1−18. Google Scholar
[10]	董霞, 郑荣才, 罗爱军, 等. 2009. 开江−梁平台内海槽东段长兴组层序−岩相古地理特征[J]. 沉积学报, 27(6): 1124−1130. Google Scholar
[11]	冯林杰, 蒋裕强, 刘菲, 等. 2021. 川东地区开江−梁平海槽南段飞仙关组鲕滩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 石油学报, 42(10): 1287−1298. doi: 10.7623/syxb202110003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	高梅生, 郑荣才, 文华国, 等. 2007. 川东北下三叠统飞仙关组白云岩成因——来自岩石结构的证据[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 3: 297−304. Google Scholar
[13]	韩克猷, 孙玮. 2014. 四川盆地海相大气田和气田群成藏条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 35(1): 10−18. doi: 10.11743/ogg20140102 CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	郝毅, 姚倩颖, 田瀚, 等. 2020. 四川盆地二叠系茅口组沉积特征及储层主控因素[J]. 海相油气地质, 25(3): 202−209. Google Scholar
[15]	何金海. 2013. 川东北地区长兴组层序、沉积相及储层发育分布规律研究[D]. 成都理工大学硕士学位论文. Google Scholar
[16]	何治亮, 高志前, 张军涛, 等. 2014. 层序界面类型及其对优质碳酸盐岩储层形成与分布的控制[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 35(6): 853−859. doi: 10.11743/ogg20140612 CrossRef Google Scholar
[17]	厚东琳. 2019. 白云石化对储层发育的控制作用——以普光、元坝气田飞仙关组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 26(4): 449−452. Google Scholar
[18]	姜华, 汪泽成, 杜宏宇, 等. 2014. 乐山−龙女寺古隆起构造演化与新元古界震旦系天然气成藏[J]. 天然气地球科学, 25(2): 192−200. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2014.02.0192 CrossRef Google Scholar
[19]	蒋裕强, 谷一凡, 徐昌海, 等. 2018. 开江−梁平海槽东侧飞仙关组岩相分区及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 29(8): 1067−1077. Google Scholar
[20]	晋达, 杜浩坤, 孟凡冰, 等. 2020. 普光地区长兴组生物礁储层分布预测[J]. 物探与化探, 44(1): 50−58. Google Scholar
[21]	景小燕, 张小青, 高蕾, 等. 2021. 元坝气田长兴组生物礁储层特征及主控因素研究[J]. 西北地质, 54(3): 188−197. Google Scholar
[22]	李国军, 郑荣才, 唐玉林, 等. 2007. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序−岩相古地理特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 4: 64−70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2007.04.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[23]	李宏涛. 2016. 台内鲕粒滩气藏成藏过程与模式——以川东北河坝地区下三叠统飞仙关组三段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 43(5): 723−732. Google Scholar
[24]	马永生, 牟传龙, 谭钦银, 等. 2006. 关于开江−梁平海槽的认识[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 3: 326−331. doi: 10.11743/ogg20060306 CrossRef Google Scholar
[25]	马永生, 储昭宏. 2008. 普光气田台地建造过程及其礁滩储层高精度层序地层学研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 29(5): 548−556. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2008.05.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
[26]	马永生, 陈洪德, 王国力. 2009. 中国南方构造−层序岩相古地理图集(震旦纪—新近纪)[M]. 北京: 地质出版社: 246−278. Google Scholar
[27]	谭先锋, 李洁, 何金平, 等. 2012. 开江−梁平海槽区带南段飞仙关组层序-岩相古地理特征[J]. 中国地质, 39(3): 612−622. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2012.03.005 CrossRef Google Scholar
[28]	汪泽成, 赵文智, 张林, 等. 2002. 四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M]. 北京: 地质出版社: 111−333. Google Scholar
[29]	王素荣. 2003. 川东北地区下三叠统飞仙关组沉积相及其对储层的控制[D]. 西南石油大学硕士学位论文. Google Scholar
[30]	王兴志, 张帆, 马青, 等. 2002. 四川盆地东部晚二叠世—早三叠世飞仙关期礁、滩特征与海平面变化[J]. 沉积学报, 2: 249−254. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2002.02.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[31]	王一刚, 文应初, 张帆, 等. 1998. 川东地区上二叠统长兴组生物礁分布规律[J]. 天然气工业, 6: 25−30. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.1998.01.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
[32]	王一刚, 洪海涛, 夏茂龙, 等. 2008. 四川盆地二叠、三叠系环海槽礁、滩富气带勘探[J]. 天然气工业, 1: 22−27,161−162. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2008.11.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
[33]	吴小奇, 刘光祥, 刘全有, 等. 2015. 四川盆地元坝气田长兴组−飞仙关组天然气地球化学特征及成因类型[J]. 天然气地球科学, 26(11): 2155−2165. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.11.2155 CrossRef Google Scholar
[34]	张建勇, 周进高, 郝毅, 等. 2011. 四川盆地环开江−梁平海槽长兴组−飞仙关组沉积模式[J]. 海相油气地质, 16(3): 45−54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2011.03.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
[35]	张水昌, 朱光有. 2006. 四川盆地海相天然气富集成藏特征与勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 5: 1−8. doi: 10.7623/syxb2006S1001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[36]	张延充, 杨爱国, 梅燕, 等. 2009. 泛开江−梁平海槽及勘探有利相带地震预测[J]. 天然气工业, 29(10): 28−30, 136−137. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.10.008 CrossRef Google Scholar
[37]	张勇, 李彦婧, 潘兰, 等. 2023. 构造特征对重庆南川地区页岩气保存条件的影响[J]. 地质通报, 42(5): 680−686. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.05.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
[38]	赵培荣, 高波, 郭战峰, 等. 2020. 四川盆地上二叠统海陆过渡相和深水陆棚相页岩气的勘探潜力[J]. 石油实验地质, 42(3): 335−344. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202003335 CrossRef Google Scholar
[39]	赵文智, 张光亚, 河海清, 等. 2002. 中国海相石油地质与叠合含油气盆地[M]. 北京: 地质出版社: 201−219. Google Scholar
[40]	郑荣才, 胡忠贵, 冯青平, 等. 2007. 川东北地区长兴组白云岩储层的成因研究[J]. 矿物岩石, 4: 78−84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6872.2007.01.013 CrossRef Google Scholar
[41]	郑荣才, 罗平, 文其兵, 等. 2009. 川东北地区飞仙关组层序−岩相古地理特征和鲕滩预测[J]. 沉积学报, 27(1): 1−8. Google Scholar