Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological SciencesHost
Advanced Search
Previous Article Next Article
2020 Vol. 26, No. 1
Article Contents
Article navigation > Journal of Geomechanics > 2020 > 26(1): 13-32
Next Article Previous Article

ZHAO Genmo, WU Zhonghai, LIU Jie. 2020. The types, characteristics and mechanism of seismic migration. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(1): 13-32. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.002
Citation: ZHAO Genmo, WU Zhonghai, LIU Jie. 2020. The types, characteristics and mechanism of seismic migration. Journal of Geomechanics, 26(1): 13-32. doi: 10.12090/j.issn.1006-6616.2020.26.01.002
shu

The types, characteristics and mechanism of seismic migration

  • 1.

    Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

  • 2.

    Earthquake Administration of Tianjin Municipality, Tianjin 300201, China

  • 3.

    Key Laboratory of Active Tectonics and Crustal Stability Assessment, Beijing 100081, China

  • 4.

    Mapping Technical Review Center, National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation, Beijing 100830, China

More Information
Received Date:  11 June 2019
Revised Date:  18 November 2019
Publish Date:  29 February 2020
    Abstract

  • The migration of seismicity refers to the sequential occurrence of earthquakes in a certain direction, which is the ordered structure in the local area in the overall disorder of seismicity. Through the systematic analysis of the typical seismic migration phenomena in the region, it can be found that the migrations can be divided into three categories:longitudinal migration along the fault strike, transverse migration along the vertical fault strike and deep source migration on the lithosphere scale. Combined with the analysis of specific examples, the main characteristics of vertical migration (including one-way, two-way, repeated and jumping migration), horizontal migration and deep source earthquake migration can be preliminarily summarized, and the velocity values of different types of migrations can be preliminarily estimated, among which the average velocity of vertical migration along the global plate boundary is about 569 km/a, the average velocity along the sub plate boundary is about 120 km/a, and the average velocity along the continental internal fault zone is about 34 km/a. The horizontal migration is relatively complex. It is found that there are two kinds of migration phenomena in East Asia, one is about 20 km/a, the other is about 50 km/a. The global average migration velocity of deep source earthquakes is about 360 km/a. There are different levels and grades of vertical and horizontal migration of earthquakes, and there are also many kinds of deformation waves and migration phenomena with different frequencies, energy and velocities, which may be the result of the interaction of interruption layers in the process of large earthquake clustering activity, the triggering of seismic stress and the propagation of deformation waves on the scale of lithosphere, and it is obvious that the existence and regularity of this kind of earthquake migration phenomenon on the scale of large space can provide new ideas and method reference for regional seismic risk analysis.

    • FullText(HTML)
  • 加载中
    • References
  • BOTT M H P, DEAN D S, 1973. Stress diffusion from plate boundaries[J]. Nature, 243(5406):339-341.

    Google Scholar

    Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, CEA. 1995. Catalogue of Chinese Historical Strong Earthquakes(beginning from the 23rd century B.C. and ending at 1911). Beijing:Seismological Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar

    Department of Earthquake Disaster Prevention, CEA. 1999. Catalogue of modern earthquakes in China (1912-1990)[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar

    DONG J, WEN H J, LIU H L, 2019. The inner deformation in the earth caused by the 2015 Nepal earthquake Mw 7.9[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 44(6):52-58, 71. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    ENGDAHL E R, VILLASENOR A, 2002. Global seismicity:1900-1999[M]//LEE W H K, KANAMORI H, JENNINGS P C, et al. International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology. San Diego:Academic Press, 665-690.

    Google Scholar

    FENG C J, QI B S, ZHANG P, et al., 2018. Crustal stress field and its tectonic significance near the Longmenshan belt, after the Wenchuan MS8.0 earthquake[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 24(4):439-451. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    GU G X, 1983. Earthquake catalog of China[M]. Beijing:Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    HONG H J, WANG Y P, SHEN J, et al., 2001. The average image and its dynamic significance of the crustal block movement in the Chinese mainland[J]. (6): 17-30. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    HUO J H, MA J Q, ZHANG R, 2020. GPS time series analysis of post earthquake displacement in Nepal[J]. Journal of Geomatics, 45(1):40-43. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    KANAMORI H, BOSCHI E. 1992. Earthquake:observation, theory, and interpretation[M]. Seismological Press, 3:11-394. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    KASAHARA R, 1979. Migration of crustal deformation[J]. Tectonophysics, 52(1-4):329-341.

    Google Scholar

    KAZUO MINO. 1988. Migration of Great Earthquakes along the Subduction Zone of the Japan Arc[J]. Earthquake, 41(2):375-380. (in Japanese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    LEE J S, 1981. China earthquake[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press:532. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    LIU J, ZHAO G M, WU Z H, 2017. The evolution of seismic activity image in the HIMALAYA BELT before and after 2015 nepal M8.1 great earthquake[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 23(1):173-181. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    MA Z J, LI X Z, JIN J Y, 1992. The law interpretation and prediction of earthquake migration--earthquake migration of four seismic belts in China mainland[J]. Seismology and Geology, 14(2):129-139. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    MOGI K, 1968. Migration of seismic activity[J]. Migration, 46:53-74.

    Google Scholar

    RICHTER C F, 1958. Elementary seismology[M]. San Francisco:WH Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar

    SCHOLZ C H, 1977. A physical interpretation of the Haicheng earthquake prediction[J]. Nature, 267(5607):121-124. doi: 10.1038/267121a0

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    SHI Z L, 1986. The world's earthquake catalog[M]. Beijing:Map Press:327. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    SOLOVIEV S L, GO C N, 1974. Catalog of tsunamis on the western shore of the Pacific Ocean[R]. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House.

    Google Scholar

    SONG Z P, ZHANG G M, LIU J, et al., 2011. Global earthquake catalog[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    USAMI T. 1979. Study of Historical Earthquakes in Japan.Bulletin of the Earthquake Research institute, 54, 399-439.

    Google Scholar

    WANG Y P, Ma J, LI C Y, 2007. The migration characteristics of strong earthquakes on the North-South seismic belt and its relation with the South Asia seismic belt[J]. Seismology and Geology, 29(1):1-14. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.1897/06-646

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    WU Z H, ZHAO G M, LIU J, 2016. Tectonic genesis of the 2015 Ms8.1 nepal great earthquake and its influence on future strong earthquake tendency of Tibetan Plateau and its adjacent region[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 90(6):1062-1085. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    WU Z H, ZHAO G M, LONG C X, et al., 2014. Characteristics and trends of present-day large earthquakes in the southeast margin of the Qinghai Tibet Plateau:preliminary analysis results from the perspective of active tectonic system[J]. Journal of geology, 88(08):1401-1416. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    XIE Y S, CAI M B, 1983. Collection of hisrorical earthquake data of China[M]. Beijing:Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    XU S X, 2011. Earthquake should be able to predict the[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    ZHAO G M, LIU J, WU Z H, 2015. 2015 Nepal earthquake and the future seismic trend of Himalaya orogenic belt[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 21(3):351-358. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    ZHAO G M, LIU Y Y, WANG D H, 2005. Retrospect to the migration of Sumatra-Mongolia Earthquakes from 1935 to 1957[J]. Recent Developments in World Seismology, (9):6-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    ZHAO G M, WU Z H, LIU J, et al., 2019. The time space distribution characteristics and migration law of large earthquakes in the Indiam-Eurasian plate collision deformation area[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 25(3):324-340. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    ZHAO G M, YAO L Y, 1995. Chinese journal of earthquake migration in East Asia continent[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 17(4):440-447. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Google Scholar

    見野和夫, 1988.日本列島の海溝に沿う巨大地震の移動[J].地震, 41(3):375-380.

    Google Scholar

    董杰, 文汉江, 刘焕玲, 2019. 2015年尼泊尔地震Mw 7.9产生的地球内部变形[J].测绘科学, 44(6):52-58, 71.

    Google Scholar

    丰成君, 戚帮申, 张鹏, 等, 2018.汶川Ms 8.0地震后龙门山断裂带地壳应力场及其构造意义[J].地质力学学报, 24(4):439-451.

    Google Scholar

    顾功叙, 1983.中国地震目录:公元前1831年-公元1969年[M].北京:科学出版社.

    Google Scholar

    洪汉净, 汪一鹏, 沈军, 等, 2001.我国大陆地壳块体运动的平均图像及其动力学意义[J].活动断裂研究理论与应用, (6):17-30.

    Google Scholar

    霍景焕, 马进全, 张睿, 2020. GPS时间序列分析尼泊尔地震震后位移[J].测绘地理信息, 45(1):40-43.

    Google Scholar

    金森博雄, 博斯基. 1992.地震:观测、理论和解释[M].北京:地震出版社, 3:11-394.

    Google Scholar

    李善邦, 1981.中国地震[M].北京:地震出版社:532.

    Google Scholar

    刘杰, 赵根模, 吴中海, 2017. 2015年尼泊尔8.1级大地震前后喜马拉雅带地震活动图像演变[J].地质力学学报, 23(1):173-181.

    Google Scholar

    马宗晋, 李献智, 金继宇, 1992.地震迁移的规律、解释和预报:中国大陆四条地震带的地震迁移[J].地震地质, 14(2):129-139.

    Google Scholar

    时振梁, 1986.世界地震目录[M].北京:地图出版社:327.

    Google Scholar

    宋治平, 张国民, 刘杰, 等, 2011.全球地震目录[M].北京:地震出版社.

    Google Scholar

    汪一鹏, 马瑾, 李传友, 2007.南北地震带强震迁移特征及其与南亚地震带的联系[J].地震地质, 29(1):1-14.

    Google Scholar

    吴中海, 赵根模, 刘杰, 2016. 2015年尼泊尔Ms8.1地震构造成因及对青藏高原及邻区未来强震趋势的影响[J].地质学报, 90(6):1062-1085.

    Google Scholar

    吴中海, 赵根模, 龙长兴, 等, 2014.青藏高原东南缘现今大震活动特征及其趋势:活动构造体系角度的初步分析结果[J].地质学报, 88(08):1401-1416.

    Google Scholar

    谢毓寿, 蔡美彪, 1983.中国地震历史资料汇编(Vol. 3, No. 2)[M].北京:科学出版社.

    Google Scholar

    许绍燮, 2011.地震应可预测[M].北京:地震出版社.

    Google Scholar

    赵根模, 姚兰予, 1995.东亚大陆的地震迁移(一):从西太平洋海沟到中国大陆内部的巨震及火山活动迁移[J].地震学报, 17(4):440-447. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/12/7/010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    赵根模, 刘砚越, 王大宏, 2005.苏门答腊-蒙古(1935-1957)地震大迁移的回顾[J].国际地震动态, (9):6-9.

    Google Scholar

    赵根模, 刘杰, 吴中海, 2015. 2015尼泊尔大地震及喜马拉雅造山带未来地震趋势[J].地质力学学报, 21(3):351-358.

    Google Scholar

    赵根模, 吴中海, 刘杰, 等, 2019.印度-欧亚板块碰撞变形区的大地震时空分布特征与迁移规律[J].地质力学学报, 25(3):324-340.

    Google Scholar

    中国地震局震害防御司. 1995.中国历史强震目录: 公元前23世纪-公元1911年[M].地震出版社.

    Google Scholar

    中国地震局震害防御司. 1999.中国近代地震目录(公元1912-1990年)[M].地震出版社.

    Google Scholar

    • Relative Articles
  • Cited by
  • Supplements
    • Proportional views
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(20)

Tables(1)

Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(2361) PDF downloads(41) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020