Professional Committee of Rock and Mineral Testing Technology of the Geological Society of China, National Geological Experiment and Testing CenterHost
2014 Vol. 33, No. 4
Article Contents

Qing-xia LI, Ya-xuan LIU, Wei-ming CHEN, Bin LIU, Qin ZHANG. Analysis of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Oil and Gas Geochemical Exploration Samples by Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2014, 33(4): 561-569.
Citation: Qing-xia LI, Ya-xuan LIU, Wei-ming CHEN, Bin LIU, Qin ZHANG. Analysis of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Oil and Gas Geochemical Exploration Samples by Fluorescence Spectrometry[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2014, 33(4): 561-569.

Analysis of Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Oil and Gas Geochemical Exploration Samples by Fluorescence Spectrometry

  • Fluorescence spectrometry, with the characteristics of high sensitivity, low detection limits and rapid analysis, avoids complex separating work in the chromatography method, and is suitable for oil and gas geochemical exploration samples requiring a large number of assays. In this paper, sample pretreatment methods and analytical conditions that were optimized in order to analyse aromatic hydrocarbons in oil samples by fluorescence spectrometry are reported. Ultra pesticide residue grade n-hexane was selected as the extraction solvent, which simplified the purification operation, and intermittent oscillation was selected to improve the extraction effect of aromatics. Through selecting proper standard materials (naphthalene, phenanthrene and chrysene) and adopting an external standard method, aromatic hydrocarbon in the samples was determined under the optimal analytical conditions. With the excitation wavelength of 265 nm and the emission wavelength of 320 nm, 360 nm and 405 nm, the fluorescent spectra of aromatic hydrocarbon were studied. The relative intensities were converted into the concentration of a certain standard material, which could then be used to compare the fluorescence data between different laboratories and different instruments. The detection limit of the method was 1.8 ng/g (naphthalene), which was lower than the limit of the national industry standard (2.0 ng/g, SY/T 6009.8—2003). The precision results of the method (RSD, n=12) were 4.5% (320 nm), 9.6% (360 nm) and 14.7% (405 nm), respectively. Through improving the quality control and management, the proposed method has been conducted successfully in the Daqin oil field, and it was found that the fluorescent data could effectively indicate sampling depth and anomalies.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 朱扬明.塔里木原油芳烃的地球化学特征[J].地球化学,1996,25(1):10-18.

    Google Scholar

    [2] Requejo A G, Sassen R, Mcdonald T, Denoux G, Kennicutt Ⅱ M C, Brooks J M.Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) as indicators of the source and maturity of marine crude oils[J].Organic Geochemistry, 1996,25(11):1017-1033.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 刘洛夫,王伟华,徐新德,毛东风.塔里木盆地群5井原油芳烃地球化学研究[J].沉积学报,1996,14(2):49-57.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 宋继梅,胡刚.芳烃分析在油气化探中的作用和意义[J].物探与化探,2003,27(2):97-100.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 宋继海,黄建军.油气化探样品芳烃分析中干扰因素的识别[J].化学通报,2004(9):695-699.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 蒋涛,汤玉平,李武,张恒启.分析和认识我国油气化探技术[J].物探与化探,2011,35(1):7-11.

    Google Scholar

    [7] Jonny B, Grete J, Cinta P, Margaret M K, Freek A.Analytical methods for determining metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) pollutants in fish bile: A review[J].Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2010, 35:224-244.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 李庆霞,刘亚轩,王正武,陈卫明,张勤.微波辅助萃取及其联用技术在有机污染物分析中的应用[J].物探与化探,2010,34(2):134-140.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 胡斌,李武,程桂.HPLC-DAD-FD联用检测油气化探样品的芳烃[J].物探与化探,2003,27(2):101-103.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 李武,雍克岚.三维荧光光谱指纹技术应用研究[J].石油勘探与开发,1996,23(4):32-34.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 孙忠军.真武油田水中紫外荧光异常与油气关系[J].世界地质,1990(3):94-97.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 崔树宝.紫外分光光度法测定石油产品中芳烃含量[J].天津化工,2006,20(6):51-52.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 宁丽荣,汤玉平,赵克斌,李吉鹏,陈浙春,蒋涛.油气勘探荧光光谱法在土壤与其上方积雪的对比实验[J].物探与化探,2011,35(3):337-339.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 程军,刘伟,程正发,宋明水,李学田.近地表荧光光谱特征及其与烃源岩关系初探——以合肥盆地为例[J].安徽地质,2004,14(4):277-281.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 程同锦,戴联善.油气化探技术的现状与发展、问题与对策[C]//第四届全国油气化探学术会议论文集.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1998:7-13.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 陈国珍,黄贤纠,郑朱梓.荧光分析法(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,1990:31-57.

    Google Scholar

    [17] Hegazi E, Hamdan A, Mastromarino J.New approach for spectral characterization of crude oil using time-resolved fluorescence spectra[J].Applied Spectroscopy,2001,55(2):202-207. doi: 10.1366/0003702011951515

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] 宁丽荣,沈洪久,李武,张庆珍,王波舫.影响荧光光谱分析质量的因素[J].物探与化探,2008,32(6):675-677.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 胡斌,赵淑华,王凌峰,程桂英.油气化探荧光指标量化方法初探[J].物探与化探,2001,25(1):132-134.

    Google Scholar

    [20] SY/T 6009.8—2003,油气化探试样测定方法;第8部分:稠环芳烃测定;荧光法[S].

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(5)

Tables(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(489) PDF downloads(1) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint