2022 Vol. 41, No. 4
Article Contents

LIU Qing, LIN Tianyi, YANG Miao, KE Bailin, XIANG Yuexin, YANG Xiting. Micropore structure and physical property of geothermal reservoir of Wumishan Formation in Beijing area[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2022, 41(4): 657-668. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2022.04.010
Citation: LIU Qing, LIN Tianyi, YANG Miao, KE Bailin, XIANG Yuexin, YANG Xiting. Micropore structure and physical property of geothermal reservoir of Wumishan Formation in Beijing area[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2022, 41(4): 657-668. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2022.04.010

Micropore structure and physical property of geothermal reservoir of Wumishan Formation in Beijing area

More Information
  • Taking the carbonate geothermal reservoir in Wumishan Formation of Mesoproterozoic Jixian System in Beijing as the research object, the micro-pore types of samples are classified with SEM visualization and slice identification, and the density and size development characteristics of micro fractures are quantified with the help of MATLAB image processing technology.The micro-medium-macro pore volume distribution of dolomite in Wumishan Formation is quantified by combining capillary force test and low-temperature liquid nitrogen adsorption experiment.Based on the macro porosity and permeability test results, the analysis concluded that the more developed microfractures, the more gas permeable pores and the better pore throat homogeneity, the greater the influence law of porosity and permeability, and the empirical relationship between porosity and permeability is fitted.Finally, a method of dividing favorable development intervals based on logging data is established.The results show that the connectivity of matrix pores of dolomite in Wumishan Formation is poor, and micro fractures and dissolution pores provide the main seepage channels.The overall pore distribution frequency is normally distributed with the pore size, which distributes at 50~60 nm most likely.The research results can provide basic data support for the development of geothermal resources in the Wuzhishan Formation in North China.

  • 加载中
  • [1] Jiurong L, Kun W. Experience of Geothermal Reinjection in Beijing and Tianjin[C]//Workshop for Decision Makers on Direct Heating Use of Geothermal Resources in Asia. 2008: 5.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 刘东林, 李义曼, 庞忠和, 等. 碳酸盐岩热储对湖水回灌的响应[J]. 工程地质学报, 2019, 27(1): 178-183.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 阮传侠, 沈健, 李立亮, 等. 天津市滨海新区东丽湖地区基岩热储回灌研究[J]. 地质通报, 2017, 36(8): 1439-1449. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2017.08.013

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Axelsson G. Sustainable geothermal utilization—Case histories, definitions, research issues and modelling[J]. Geothermics, 2010, 39(4): 283-291. doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2010.08.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] 柯柏林, 林天懿, 李文, 等. 北京西山谷积山背斜地热系统成因模式及远景区预测[J]. 地质通报, 2019, 38(8): 1378-1385.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 刘凯, 王珊珊, 孙颖, 等. 北京地区地热资源特征与区划研究[J]. 中国地质, 2017, 44(6): 1128-1139.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 于豪, 李劲松, 晏信飞, 等. 非均质碳酸盐岩储层微观孔隙结构表征与气藏检测——以阿姆河右岸灰岩气藏为例[J]. 石油物探, 2017, 56(4): 472-482. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2017.04.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] 张敏, 王正允, 张紫光, 等. 碳酸盐岩宏观储集空间研究——以冀北坳陷中元古界蓟县系雾迷山组和铁岭组为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2008, 22(5): 37-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2008.05.010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] 李朋威, 何治亮, 罗平, 等. 华北北部地区蓟县系高于庄组-雾迷山组白云岩储层特征与形成主控因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(1): 26-36.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 金廷福. 天津蓟县雾迷山组微生物碳酸盐岩沉积与储层特征[D]. 成都理工大学硕士学位论文, 2014.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 韩宝平. 任丘油田雾迷山组白云岩储集层的渗透性试验研究[J]. 地质科学, 2000, (4): 396-403. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0563-5020.2000.04.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Xu S, Payne M A. Modeling elastic properties in carbonate rocks[J]. Geophysics: The Leading Edge of Exploration, 2009, 28(1): 66-68, 70-74. doi: 10.1190/1.3064148

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] 张浩. 基于微观孔隙结构的碳酸盐岩渗透率计算方法研究[D]. 长江大学硕士学位论文, 2018.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 柯柏林. 北京城区地热田西北部地热地质特征[J]. 现代地质, 2009, 23(1): 49-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2009.01.008

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] 吕金波, 郑桂森, 李安宁, 等. 北京百年地质调查的传承与发展——《北京市区域地质志》修编[J]. 地质通报, 2016, 35(11): 1906-1917. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2016.11.013

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] 天津市地质矿产局. 天津市区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1992.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 陈杰, 周改英, 赵喜亮, 等. 储层岩石孔隙结构特征研究方法综述[J]. 特种油气藏, 2005, (4): 11-14 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2005.04.003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] 鲁洪江, 邢正岩, 王永诗. 压汞和退汞资料在储层评价中的综合应用探讨[J]. 油气采收率技术, 1997, (2): 53-58.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 蔺亚兵, 贾雪梅, 马东民. 煤层气解吸滞后效应及其评判方法研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2016, 44(S1): 160-163.

    Google Scholar

    [20] Loucks R G, Reed R M, Ruppel S C, et al. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(6): 1071-1098. doi: 10.1306/08171111061

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] 侯科锋, 李浮萍, 罗川又, 等. 苏里格气田东南部碳酸盐岩储层特征及分类评价[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2019, 39(2): 276-285.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(11)

Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(1355) PDF downloads(89) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint