Suitability evaluation of Xiong’an New Area engineering construction based on multi-factor grading weighted index sum method

XIA Yubo; GUO Xu; MA Zhen; WANG Bing; HAN bo; ZHAO Changrong; LI Haitao; MENG Qinghua

2024 Vol. 47, No. 3

Article Contents

Article navigation > North China Geology > 2024 > 47(3): 63-73

Next Article Previous Article

XIA Yubo, GUO Xu, MA Zhen, WANG Bing, HAN bo, ZHAO Changrong, LI Haitao, MENG Qinghua. 2024. Suitability evaluation of Xiong’an New Area engineering construction based on multi-factor grading weighted index sum method. North China Geology, 47(3): 63-73.

Citation:

Suitability evaluation of Xiong’an New Area engineering construction based on multi-factor grading weighted index sum method

1. Tianjin Center(North China Center for Geoscience Innovation), China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China;
2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Coast Geological Processes and Environmental Safety, Tianjin 300170, China;
3. Xiong'an Urban Geological Research Center, China Geological Survey, Tianjin 300170, China;
4. Tianjin Geothermal Exploration and Development-Designing Institute, Tianjin 300250, China;
5. China Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring, Beijing 100081, China

More Information

Corresponding author: MENG Qinghua

Received Date: 26 February 2024

Abstract

Abstract

This paper is the research on the suitability evaluation of engineering construction.[Objective] Xiongan New Area of Hebei Province is a city to be built soon.To ensure the geological safety of the planning and construction of the new area, the suitability evaluation of the Xiong'an New Area engineering construction is carried out.[Methods]A customized evaluation index system for the suitability of engineering construction has been developed based on the geological conditions of Xiong'an New Area and in alignment with the millennium plan for planning and construction.The evaluation of engineering construction suitability in Xiong'an New Area was conducted using a multi-factor graded weighted index sum method.[Results]The engineering construction suitability in Xiong'an New Area is favorable, with both suitable areas covering 925 km² and relatively suitable areas covering 845 km².The more suitable areas are primarily located in the central and southern parts of the research area, while other areas are classified as suitable.Some parts of Xiong'an New Area face environmental geological challenges such as ground subsidence, sand liquefaction, soft soil, soil and water pollution, soil and water corrosiveness.These environmental geological issues directly impact the overall evaluation results, although they do not completely rule out the feasibility of construction in the comprehensive evaluation.[Conclusion] A comprehensive parameter system has been developed for evaluating the suitability of engineering construction in Xiong'an New Area.The evaluation factors have been quantified, reasonable weight values have been determined, and a geological survey evaluation method system has been established.The system is designed to serve national spatial layout, engineering construction and underground space development, offering valuable insights for relevant urban planning and construction.

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	白耀楠,马震,张竞,等.2019.廊坊北三县工程建设适宜性评价[J].地质调查与研究,42(02):117-122. Google Scholar
[2]	杜亚楠,李传金,朱辉云,等.2023.雄安新区岩土标准地层序列划分[J].地质通报,42(09):1494-1504. Google Scholar
[3]	韩博,高伊航,马震,等.2024a.雄安至北京大兴国际机场快线起步区地下段结构抗浮设防水位取值研究[J].地球学报,45(03):397-409. Google Scholar
[4]	韩博,马震,夏雨波,等.2024b.雄安新区地下空间资源开发利用地质适宜性评价[J].地质通报,43(04):594-610. Google Scholar
[5]	韩博,夏雨波,裴艳东,等.2020.雄安新区地下空间工程地质特征及环境地质效应[J].工程勘察,48(03):1-8. Google Scholar
[6]	郝爱兵,吴爱民,马震,等.2018.雄安新区地上地下工程建设适宜性一体化评价[J].地球学报,39(5):513-522. Google Scholar
[7]	李海涛,凤蔚,王凯霖,等.2021.雄安新区地下水资源概况、特征及可开采潜力[J].中国地质,48(04):1112-1126. Google Scholar
[8]	李军辉,王晨清,王珊珊.2015.北京西山八大处文化景区工程建设场地稳定性及适宜性评价[J].城市地质,(s1):175-181. Google Scholar
[9]	林良俊,韩博,马震,等.2021.雄安多要素城市地质标准体系研究[J].水文地质工程地质,48(02):152-156. Google Scholar
[10]	林良俊,胡秋韵.2017.雄安新区地质调查锁定八项重点工作[J].资源与产业,19(04):5. Google Scholar
[11]	刘宏伟,王国明,马传明,等.2022.沉积平原区地下空间开发利用适宜性评价指标体系研究-以北京通州区和河北廊坊北三县为例[J].华北地质,45(04):68-74. Google Scholar
[12]	马震,黄庆彬,林良俊,等.2022.雄安新区多要素城市地质调查实践与应用[J].华北地质,45(01):58-68. Google Scholar
[13]	马震,夏雨波,李海涛,等.2021.雄安新区自然资源与环境-生态地质条件分析[J].中国地质,48(03):677-696. Google Scholar
[14]	史玉金,张先林,陈大平.2016.上海深层地下空间开发地质环境条件及适宜性评价[J].地质调查与研究,39(2):130-135. Google Scholar
[15]	夏雨波,郭旭,王冰,等.2022.雄安新区水土腐蚀性地质成因研究[J].华北地质,45(03):69-76. Google Scholar
[16]	夏雨波,王冰,李海涛,等.雄安新区浅层地下水化学成因及健康地质区划研究[J/OL].中国地质,1-18. Google Scholar
[17]	邢怀学,葛伟亚,李亮.2018.基于GIS 的丹阳城镇工程建设适宜性评价[J].华东地质,40(1):59-66. Google Scholar
[18]	杨丽芝,王国明,韩博,等.2023.城市地质环境问题分析与评价-以山东省聊城市为例[J].华北地质,46(02):51-62+68. Google Scholar
[19]	张竞,马震,吴爱民,等.2018.基于岩性光谱特征的雄安新区地面古河道识别研究[J].地球学报,39(5):542-548. Google Scholar
[20]	周广宇.2015.城乡总体规划中的用地建设适宜性评价-以河南省巩义市为例[J].建设科技,(22):82-85. Google Scholar
[21]	周亚龙,郭志娟,王乔林,等.基于土壤化学元素探讨雄安新区沉积地貌特征、物质来源及其与环境的关系[J/OL].中国地质,1-16. Google Scholar
[22]	Collins M G, Steiner F R, Rushman M J.2001.Land-use suitability analysis in the United States: historical development and promis-ing technological achievements[J].Environmental Management, 28(5):611-621. Google Scholar
[23]	Delgado O B, Mendoza M, Granados E L, et al.2008.Analysis of land suitability for the siting of inter-municipal landfills in the Cuitzeo Lake Basin, Mexico[J].Waste Management, 28(7):1137-1146. Google Scholar
[24]	Fan C J, Shen S G, Wang S H, et al.2011.Research on Urban Land Ecological Suitability Evaluation Based on Gravity-Resistance Model:A Case of Deyang City in China[J].Procedia Engineering, 21(1):676-685. Google Scholar
[25]	Gong J Z, Liu Y S, Chen W L.2012.Land suitability evaluation for devel-opment using a matter-element model:a case study in Zengcheng, Guangzhou, China[J].Land Use Policy, 29(2):464-472. Google Scholar
[26]	Li Q, Huang J, Wang C, et al.2017.Land Development Suitability Evaluation of Pingtan Island Based on Scenario Analysis and Landscape Ecological Quality Evaluation[J].Sustainability, 9(7):1292-1292. Google Scholar
[27]	Lu Z, Wu L, Zhuang X, etal.2016.Quantitative assessmentof engineering geological suitability for multilayer Urban Underground Space[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 59:65-76. Google Scholar
[28]	Pourebrahim S, Hadipour M, Mokhtar M B.2011.Integration of spatial suitability analysis for land use planning in coastal areas: case of Kuala Langat District, Selangor, Malaysia[J].Landscape and Ur-ban Planning, 101(1):84-97. Google Scholar
[29]	Shearera K S, Xiang W N.2009.Representing multiple voices in land-scape planning:a land suitability assessment study for a park landbanking program in Concord, North Carolina, USA[J].Landscape and Urban Planning, 93(2):111-122. Google Scholar
[30]	Uy P D, Nakagoshi N.2008.Application of land suitability analysis and landscape ecology to urban green space planning in Hanoi, Vietnam[J].Urban Forestry& Urban Greening, 7(1):25-40. Google Scholar
[31]	Xia Y B, Li H T, Wang B, et al.2022.Characterization of Shallow Groundwater Circulation Based on Chemical Kinetics: A Case Study of Xiong’an New Area, China[R].Water, 14, 1880. Google Scholar
[32]	Xu K, Kong C F, Li J F, et al.2011.Suitability evaluation of urban con-struction land based on geo-environmental factors of Hangzhou, China[J].Computers& Geosciences, 37(8):992-1002. Google Scholar
[33]	Yu Z, Xudong C.2016.A Study on the Choices of Construction Land Suitability Evaluation of Ecological Index[J].Procedia Computer Science, 91:180-183. Google Scholar
[34]	Zhang X R, Fang C L, Wang Z B, et al.2013.Urban construction land suitability evaluation based on improved multicriteria evaluation based on GIS(MCE-GIS):case of new Hefei City, China[J].Chi-nese Geographical Science, 23(6):740-753. Google Scholar