Resilient development of resource-based cities under the dual carbon goals

LIU Lingna; LEI Yalin; ZHANG Wanyi; FU Jingrui

doi:10.12097/gbc.2022.07.059

2024 Vol. 43, No. 8

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2024 > 43(8): 1361-1372

Next Article Previous Article

LIU Lingna, LEI Yalin, ZHANG Wanyi, FU Jingrui. 2024. Resilient development of resource-based cities under the dual carbon goals. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(8): 1361-1372. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2022.07.059

Citation:

LIU Lingna, LEI Yalin, ZHANG Wanyi, FU Jingrui. 2024. Resilient development of resource-based cities under the dual carbon goals. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(8): 1361-1372. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2022.07.059

Resilient development of resource-based cities under the dual carbon goals

1.
College of Humanities and Law, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
2.
Institution for Carbon-neutrality of Chinese Industries, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
3.
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
4.
School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
5.
Development Research Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China

More Information

Corresponding author: LEI Yalin, leiyalin@cugb.edu.cn

Received Date: 30 July 2022

Revised Date: 15 March 2023

Publish Date: 15 August 2024

Abstract

Abstract

Resource−based cities that rely on high−carbon development models face many risks in the process of green and low−carbon transformation and achieving the dual carbon goals. Transforming the pressure of emission reduction into the driving force for emission reduction within the city by improving urban resilience, and better handling the synergistic relationship between the dual carbon goals and high−quality development, is the key to the ultimate realization of sustainable development. This study regards urban resilience as the actual response of resource−based cities to the dual carbon goals. By constructing a resource−based city resilience assessment system, it quantitatively evaluates the differences in resilience levels of 30 resource−based cities in China from 2010 to 2019, and compares changes in carbon emissions with resource−based cities. The main results of the relationship between urban resilience are as follows: ①In terms of time evolution, the resilience of 30 resource−based cities increased over time, and the gap in resilience levels between cities continued to expand; in terms of spatial evolution, the resilience of resource−based cities show the characteristics of high in the east and low in the west, which is more obvious since 2013; in terms of the coordinated development of urban resilience, the degree of coordination between economic and ecological resilience is high, which is the resilience of resource−based cities under the dual carbon goals. ②Comparing the urban resilience with the carbon emissions of resource−based cities, the trend of their absolute values is rising, and the growth rate is decreasing first and then rising. Although the resource−based cities have not reached the peak, the growth rate of urban resilience is much higher than the growth rate of carbon emissions. Urban resilience is expected to be an important means of tackling climate change and achieving the dual carbon goals. Based on the above content, suggestions on building a resource−based urban resilience assessment system and safeguarding policy system with the dual carbon goals are put forward.
- resource-based cities /
- urban resilience /
- dual carbon goals /
- coordination degree

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Adger W N. 2000. Social and ecological resilience: Are they related[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 24(3): 347−364. doi: 10.1191/030913200701540465 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	Bai W. 2020. The practice and enlightenment of resilient city construction[J]. Macroeconomic Management, 12: 77−84 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[3]	Chen Y M, Li K C. 2017. Overseas studies progress and practice exploration on resilient city −Based on the perspective of public administration[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 33(1): 137−143 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[4]	Feng X Z, Cai B F, Wang M, et al. 2017. A comparative study on CO₂ emission of resource−based cities in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 27(2): 5−9(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[5]	Gao E X. 2016. Defensiveness, vulnerability and resilience: three paradigms of urban safety studies[J]. Chinese Public Administration, (11): 105−110(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[6]	Janssen M A, Ostrom E. 2006. Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation: A cross−cutting theme of the International Human Dimensions Program on Global Environmental Change[J]. Global Environmental Change, 16(3): 237−239. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	Johansson C , Abreu P C , Carstensen J , et al. 2016. Human activities and climate variability drive fast−paced change across the world's estuarine–coastal ecosystems[J]. Global Change Biology, 22(2): 513−529. Google Scholar
[8]	Li G, Kou C, Wang Y et al. 2020. System dynamics modelling for improving urban resilience in Beijing, China[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161: 104954. Google Scholar
[9]	Liu L N, Lei Y L. 2022. Research on the resilience changes and influencing factors of China's provincial capital cities[J]. Science & Technology and Economy, 35(205): 1−5(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[10]	McGlade C, Ekins P. 2015. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2℃[J]. Nature, 517(Jan. 8 TN. 7533): 187−190. Google Scholar
[11]	Nathwani J, Lu X, Wu C, et al. 2019. Quantifying security and resilience of Chinese coastal urban ecosystems[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 672: 51−60. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.322 CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	Premakumara J, Maeda T, Huang J. 2014. Building Resilient Cities: Lessons Learned from Four Asian Cities[R]. ISAP. Google Scholar
[13]	Pan J H. 2013. Low−carbon: the symbol of building an ecological city[J]. Informatization of China Construction, (23): 14−15(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[14]	Pan J H. 2022. Transformation of development paradigm and overall coordination of carbon neutrality revolution[J]. Yuejiang Academic Journal, 14(1): 19−33, 171−172(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[15]	Qiu B X. 2018. Methods and principles of designing resilient city based on complex adaptive system theory[J]. Urban Development Studies, 25(10): 1−3(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[16]	Reckien D, Salvia M, Oliver C, et al. 2018. How are cities planning to respond to climate change? Assessment of local climate plans from 885 cities in the EU−28[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191: 207−219. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.220 CrossRef Google Scholar
[17]	Rockefeller Foundation. 2014. City resilience framework [EB/OL]. Http: www. rockerfeller foundation. org/app/uploads/City-Resilience-Framework1. pdf. Google Scholar
[18]	Sharifi A, Yamagata Y. 2014. Major principles and criteria for development of an urban resilience assessment index[C]//International Conference & Utility Exhibition on Green Energy for Sustainable Development. IEEE. Google Scholar
[19]	Sun Y P, Liu L N. 2022. Actively respond to the impact of climate risks on economic resilience[N]. GuangMing Daily, 011(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[20]	Tan J, Zhang X, Liu L, et al. 2020. Research on the urban transformation performance of China’s resource−Based cities[J]. Economic Geography, 40(4): 57−64. Google Scholar
[21]	Walker B , Salt D. 2012. Resilience Practice−Describing the System[M]. Island Press/Center for Resource Economic. Google Scholar
[22]	Wang Z, Deng X, Wong C, et al. 2018. Learning Urban Resilience from a Social−Economic−Ecological System Perspective: a case study of Beijing from 1978−2015[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183: 343−357. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.128 CrossRef Google Scholar
[23]	Wang Y, Chen H, Long R, et al. 2022. Has the Sustainable Development Planning Policy Promoted the Green Transformation in China's Resource−based Cities? [J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 180: 106181. Google Scholar
[24]	Wei Q L. 2000. Data envelope analysis(DEA)[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 17: 1793−1808(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[25]	WHO. 2016. WHO household energy database[C]. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/airpollution/data/household-energy-database/en/. Google Scholar
[26]	Wu D. 2009. Study on the coordinated development evaluation of integrated transportation system based on DEA[D]. Master’s thesis of Beijing Jiaotong University (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[27]	Zhang L J, Zhang X. 2015. Weighted clustering method based on an improved CRITIC method[J]. Statistics & Decision, 22: 65−68(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[28]	Zhou W, Liu L N, Ge J P. 2021-10-29. To enhance ecological resilience and protect urban security[N]. China Natural Resources News, 003(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[29]	Zhu Y S, Wu H Y, Ma M, et al. Multi−scale Spatial Relationship Between Carbon Emissions and Influencing Factors in the Yangtze River Delta[J/OL]. Geological Bulletin of China: 1-10[2024-07-07]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.4648.P.20240319.0933.003.html(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[30]	白玮. 2020. 韧性城市建设的实践与启示[J]. 宏观经济管理, 12: 77−84. Google Scholar
[31]	陈玉梅, 李康晨. 2017. 国外公共管理视角下韧性城市研究进展与实践探析[J]. 中国行政管理, 33(1): 137−143. doi: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2017.01.23 CrossRef Google Scholar
[32]	高恩新. 2016. 防御性、脆弱性与韧性: 城市安全管理的三重变奏[J]. 中国行政管理, (11): 105−110. doi: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2016.11.18 CrossRef Google Scholar
[33]	刘玲娜, 雷涯邻. 2022. 中国省会城市韧性时空演变及影响因素研究[J]. 科技与经济, 35(205): 1−5. Google Scholar
[34]	潘家华. 2013. 低碳: 建设生态城市的标志[J]. 中国建设信息, (23): 14−15. Google Scholar
[35]	仇保兴. 2018. 基于复杂适应系统理论的韧性城市设计方法及原则[J]. 城市发展研究, 25(10): 1−3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2018.10.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[36]	孙永平, 刘玲娜. 2022. 积极应对气候风险对经济韧性的冲击[N]. 光明日报理论版, 011. Google Scholar
[37]	魏权龄. 2000. 数据包络分析(DEA)[J]. 科学通报, 17: 1793−1808. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2000.17.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[38]	吴丹. 2009. 基于DEA的综合交通运输系统协调发展评价研究[D]. 北京交通大学硕士学位论文. Google Scholar
[39]	张立军, 张潇. 2015. 基于改进CRITIC法的加权聚类方法[J]. 统计与决策, 22: 65−68. Google Scholar
[40]	周伟, 刘玲娜, 葛建平. 2021. 提升生态韧性, 守护城市安全[N]. 中国自然资源报, 003. Google Scholar
[41]	朱一姝, 吴涵宇, 马明, 等. 长江三角洲城市群碳排放及其影响因素的多尺度空间关系研究[J/OL]. 地质通报: 1-10[2024-07-07]. http://kns. cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.4648.P.20240319.0933.003.html. Google Scholar