China Geological SurveyHost
Advanced Search
Previous Article Next Article
2017 Vol. 36, No. 5
Article Contents
Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2017 > 36(5): 715-725
Next Article Previous Article

LIU Hao, XU Daliang, WEI Yunxu, DENG Xin, PENG Lianhong. Depositional age of the Dagushi Group in the Dahong Mountain, Hubei Prov-ince:Evidence from U-Pb ages of detrital zircons[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2017, 36(5): 715-725.
Citation: LIU Hao, XU Daliang, WEI Yunxu, DENG Xin, PENG Lianhong. Depositional age of the Dagushi Group in the Dahong Mountain, Hubei Prov-ince:Evidence from U-Pb ages of detrital zircons[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2017, 36(5): 715-725.
shu

Depositional age of the Dagushi Group in the Dahong Mountain, Hubei Prov-ince:Evidence from U-Pb ages of detrital zircons

  • 1.

    Wuhan Center of Geological Survey, CGS, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China

  • 2.

    Key Laboratory of Paleontology and Coevolution of Life, CGS, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China

More Information
Received Date:  18 July 2016
Revised Date:  17 April 2017
Publish Date:  25 May 2017
    Abstract

  • The Dagushi Group, spread on the northern margin of the Yangtze Craton, is a well-preserved succession of the Mesopro-terozoic strata in South China, unconformably overlain by the Huashan Group.It is generally considered to have the same age as the Shennongjia Group.However, the isotopic geochronological evidence of material source is relatively insufficient.Detrital zircon UPb dating results of sandstone from Taiyangsi Formation on the bottom of Dagushi Group are first reported in this paper.The dating re-sults demonstrate that the oldest and youngest ages are 3.1~3.2Ga and 1124Ma, respectively.There are two age peaks of 2.65Ga and 2.75Ga in the detrital zircon.Its detrital zircon ages are consistent with the multi-period magmatic activities in Kongling Complex and Yangpo Complex before Neoproterozoic.Nevertheless, the Shennongjia Group, widely distributed in western Hubei Province, was deposited from 1.4Ga to 1.1Ga with three age peaks of 1.6Ga, 2~2.1Ga and 2.7~2.8Ga.These data indicate that the Dagushi Group was deposited obviously later than the Shennongjia Group, and hence they do not belong to the same stratigraphic sequence.

    • FullText(HTML)
  • 加载中
    • References
  • [1] 赵银胜, 李金华.鄂北打鼓石群的微古植物群及其地层划分与对比[J].湖北地质, 1987, 1(1):11-27.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 熊兴武, 陈忆元.湖北京山中元古界打鼓石群沉积特征及其构造古地理意义[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报, 1991, 16(5):489-495.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 湖北省地质矿产局.全国地层多重划分对比研究——湖北省岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1996:1-284.

    Google Scholar

    [4] Meng Q R, Zhang G W. Geologic framwork and tectonic evolution of the Qingling orogen, central China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 323:183-196. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(00)00106-2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] 张国伟, 董云鹏, 赖绍聪, 等.秦岭-大别造山带南缘勉略构造带与勉略缝合带[J].中国科学(D辑)2003, 33(12):1121-1135. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2003.12.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Liu Y S, Hu Z C, Zong K Q, et al. Reappraisement and refinement of zircon U-Pb isotope and trace element analyses by LAICPMS[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(15):1535-1546. doi: 10.1007/s11434-010-3052-4

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] 侯可军, 李延河, 田有荣. LA-MC-ICP-MS锆石微区原位U-Pb定年技术[J].矿床地质, 2009, 28(4):481-492.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 江涛, 华媚春. 神农架地质兼论中国南部震旦系的三分问题[C]//湖北省地质学会. 湖北省地质学会1962年年会论文集(一). 1962.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 李铨, 冷坚.前寒武纪地质研究-神农架上前寒武系[M].天津:天津科学技术出版社, 1987:1-503.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 刘成新, 毛新武, 魏运许, 等.神农架群地层层序初探[J].资源环境与工程, 2004, 18:5-16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1211.2004.03.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] 李怀坤, 张传林, 相振群, 等.扬子克拉通神农架群锆石和斜锆石U-Pb年代学及其构造意义[J]岩石学报, 2013, 29(2):673-697.

    Google Scholar

    [12] Qiu X F, Ling W L, Liu X M, et al. Recognition of Grenvillian volcanic suite in the Shennongjia region and its tectonic significance for the South China Craton[J]. Precambrian Research, 2011, 191(3):101-19.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 邱啸飞, 凌文黎, 柳小明, 等.扬子克拉通北缘神农架群火山岩锆石Hf同位素特征[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(9):1394-401.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 肖志斌. 中元古代扬子北缘神农架地区沉积岩碎屑锆石研究[D]. 西北大学硕士学位论文, 2012.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 邓奇, 王剑, 汪正江, 等.扬子北缘元古宇马槽园群时代归属新证据-对地层对比和古地理格局的启示[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(4):631-638.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 邱艳生, 胡正祥, 杨青雄, 等.华南"马槽园群"年代及其地层学意义[J].资源环境与工程, 2013, 27(3):28-34.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 董云鹏, 周鼎武, 张国伟, 等.秦岭造山带南缘早古生代基性火山岩地球化学特征及其大地构造意义[J].地球化学, 1998, 27(5):432-441.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 赖绍聪, 张国伟, 董云鹏, 等.秦岭-大别勉略缝合带湖北周家湾变质玄武岩地球化学及其大地构造意义[J].矿物岩石, 1998, 18(2):1-8.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 石玉若, 张宗清, 刘敦一, 等.湖北省随州三里岗地区二长花岗岩Rb-Sr、40Ar/39Ar同位素年龄[J].地球学报, 2005, 26(1):17-20.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 董云鹏, 张国伟, 赵霞, 等.鄂北大洪山岩浆带地球化学及其构造意义——南秦岭勉略洋盆东延及其俯冲的新证据[J].中国科学(D辑), 2003, 33(12):1143-1152. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2003.12.003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] 董云鹏, 张国伟, 柳小明, 等.鄂北大洪山地区"花山群"的解体[J].中国区域地质, 1998, 17(4):371-397.

    Google Scholar

    [22] Gao S, Yang J, Zhou L, et al. Age and growth of the Archean Kongling terrain, south China, with emphasis on 3.3Ga granitoid gneisses[J]. American Journal of Science, 2011, 311(2):153-182 doi: 10.2475/02.2011.03

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Qiu Y M, Gao S, Mcnaughton N J, et al. First evidence of >3.2Ga continental crust in the Yangtze craton of south China and its impli-cations for Archean crustal evolution and Phanerozoic tectonics[J] Geology, 2000, 28(1):11-14. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)028<0011:FEOGCC>2.0.CO;2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] Zhang S B, Zheng Y F, Wu Y B, et al. Zircon U-Pb age and Hf-O isotope evidence for Paleoproterozoic metamorphic event in South China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2006, 151(3/4):265-288.

    Google Scholar

    [25] Zhang S B, Zheng Y F, Wu Y B, et al. Zircon isotope evidence for ≥ 3.5Ga continental crust in the Yangtze craton of China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2006, 146(1/2):16-34.

    Google Scholar

    [26] Jiao W F, Wu Y B, Yang S H, et al. The oldest basement rock in the Yangtze Craton revealed by zircon U-Pb age and Hf isotope composition[J]. Science in China, 2009, 52(9):1393-1399. doi: 10.1007/s11430-009-0135-7

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] 邱啸飞, 凌文黎, 柳小明.扬子陆核与神农架地块中元古代相互关系:来自锆石U-Pb年代学和Hf同位素的约束[J].地质科技情报, 2014, 33(2):1-7.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 高山, 张本仁.扬子地台北部太古宙TTG片麻岩的发现及其意义[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 1990, 15(6):675-679.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 高山, Qiu Y M, 凌文黎, 等.崆岭高级变质地体单颗粒锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年代学研究——扬子克拉通>3.2Ga陆壳物质的发现[J].中国科学, 2001, 31(1):27-35.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 柳小明, 高山, 凌文黎, 等.扬子克拉通35亿年碎屑锆石的发现及其地质意义[J].自然科学进展, 2005, 15(11):1334-1337. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-008X.2005.11.009

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] 张少兵, 郑永飞.扬子陆核的生长和再造:锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素研究[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(2):393-402.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 郑永飞, 张少兵.华南前寒武纪大陆地壳的形成和演化[J].科学通报, 2007, 52(1):1-10.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 焦文放, 吴元保, 彭敏, 等.扬子板块最古老岩石的锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素组成[J].中国科学(D辑), 2009, 39(7):972-978.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 赵敏, 魏君奇, 王建雄.黄陵野马洞基性岩脉中锆石的U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素组成[J].华南地质与矿产, 2012, 28(2):124-131.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 魏君奇, 景明明.崆岭杂岩中角闪岩类的年代学和地球化学[J].地质科学, 2013, 48(4):970-983.

    Google Scholar

    [36] Chen K K, Gao S, Wu Y B, et al. 2.6-2.7Ga crustal growth in Yangtze craton, South China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2013, 224:472-490. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.10.017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [37] 凌文黎, 高山, 郑海飞, 等.扬子克拉通黄陵地区崆岭杂岩SmNd同位素地质年代学研究[J].科学通报, 1998, 43(1):86-89.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 凌文黎, 高山, 张本仁, 等.扬子陆核古元古代晚期构造热事件与扬子克拉通演化[J].科学通报, 2000, 45(21):2343-2348. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2000.21.019

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] 熊庆, 郑建平, 余淳梅, 等.宜昌圈椅埫A型花岗岩锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素与扬子大陆古元古代克拉通化作用[J].科学通报, 2008, 53(22):2782-2792. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2008.22.017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] 彭敏, 吴元保, 汪晶, 等.扬子崆岭高级变质地体古元古代基性岩脉的发现及其意义[J].科学通报, 2009, 54(5):641-647.

    Google Scholar

    [41] 赵风清, 赵文平, 左义成, 等.崆岭杂岩中混合岩的锆石U-Pb年龄[J].地质调查与研究, 2006, 29(2):81-85.

    Google Scholar

    [42] Peng S B, Kusky T M, Jiang X F, et al. Geology, geochemistry, and geochronology of the Miaowan ophiolite, Yangtze craton:Implications for South China's amalgamation history with the Rodinian supercontinent[J]. Gondwana Research, 2012, 21(2/3):577-594.

    Google Scholar

    [43] Zhou G Y, Wu Y B, Gao S, et al. The 2.65Ga A-type granite in the northeastern Yangtze craton:Petrogenesis and geological implications[J]. Precambrian Research, 2015, 258:247-259. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2015.01.003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [44] 张丽娟, 马昌前, 王连训, 等.扬子地块北缘古元古代环斑花岗岩的发现及其意义[J].科学通报, 2011, 56(1):44-57.

    Google Scholar

    [45] Cui X, Zhu W B, Ge R F. Provenance and Crustal Evolution of the Northern Yangtze Block Revealed by Detrital Zircons from Neoproterozoic-Early Paleozoic Sedimentary Rocks in the Yangtze Gorges Area, South China[J]. Journal of Geology, 2014, 122(2):217-235. doi: 10.1086/674801

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] Liu X M, Gao S, Diwu C R, et al. Precambrian crustal growth of Yangtze Craton as revealed by detrital zircon studies[J]. American Journal of Science, 2008, 308(4):421-468. doi: 10.2475/04.2008.02

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] Wang L J, Griffin W L, Yu J H, et al. Precambrian crustal evolu-tion of the Yangtz Block tracked by detrital zircons from Neopro-terozoic sedimentary rocks[J]. Precambrian Research, 2010, 177:131-144. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2009.11.008

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    ① 湖北省区域地质测量队. 1:20万钟祥幅、应城幅区域地质调查报告. 1980.

    Google Scholar

    • Relative Articles
  • Cited by
  • Supplements
    • Proportional views
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(5)

Tables(1)

Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(430) PDF downloads(6) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020