China Geological SurveyHost
Advanced Search
Previous Article Next Article
2019 Vol. 38, No. 9
Article Contents
Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2019 > 38(9): 1484-1500
Next Article Previous Article

ZHANG Haihua, ZHANG Jian, HUANG Xin, QIU Liang, SU Fei, ZHENG Yuejuan, ZHANG Dejun. Zircon U-Pb age, geochemical characteristics and tectonic implications of detrital zircon from Linxi Formation in the Wulanhaote area, central Da Hinggan Mountains[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(9): 1484-1500.
Citation: ZHANG Haihua, ZHANG Jian, HUANG Xin, QIU Liang, SU Fei, ZHENG Yuejuan, ZHANG Dejun. Zircon U-Pb age, geochemical characteristics and tectonic implications of detrital zircon from Linxi Formation in the Wulanhaote area, central Da Hinggan Mountains[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(9): 1484-1500.
shu

Zircon U-Pb age, geochemical characteristics and tectonic implications of detrital zircon from Linxi Formation in the Wulanhaote area, central Da Hinggan Mountains

  • 1.

    Shenyang Center of Geological Survey, China Geological Survey, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning, China

  • 2.

    School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

More Information
Received Date:  10 May 2018
Revised Date:  22 August 2018
Publish Date:  15 September 2019
    Abstract

  • There are a set of thick layers of rocks in Wulanhaote of Inner Mongolia which are lack of fossil and suffered from contact metamorphism. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb isotope test was performed on the zircons from the clastic rock samples. The concordant-near concordant ages of 80 zircons were obtained. The 80 detrital zircons can be divided into three groups according to age and frequency distribution characteristics:242~294Ma with peak age at 261 Ma; 301~381Ma with peak age at 348, and 454~530Ma with peak age at 487Ma. In addition, other 7 zircons have ages of 824Ma, 836Ma, 859Ma, 867Ma, 1279Ma, 1556Ma and 2447Ma. The weighted average age for the youngest age group is 263.6±3.3Ma (MSWD=4.9, n=50), consistent with the minimum peak age of 261 Ma. It is inferred that the maximum deposition age of the Linxi Formation is 261 Ma. The major chemical composition of these rocks is SiO2 67.81%, Al2O3 18.22%, MgO 1.44%, CaO 0.41%, Na2O 1.54% and K2O 3.90%, with K2O/Na2O between 1.15 and 10.21, A12O3/(CaO + Na2O) between 4.87 and 26.38. The value of rare earth element ΣREE is in the range of 162.39×10-6~223.46×10-6, averagely 200.88×10-6. δEu is in the range of 0.58~0.71, averagely 0.64. δCe is between 1.00 and 1.05. The clastic rocks are characterized by LREE enrichment and HREE depletion. Trace elements are characterized by depletion of Nb, Ta, Sr and enrichment of Rb, Ba, La, Ce, Pb, Nd, Sm.These data show that the Linxi Formation was formed in an active continental marginal structural background. Based on detrital zircon age profile information, the authors hold that sediment sources in Linxi Formation were diverse and complex, in addition to blocks in the northeast, there existed provenance information for the North China plate and the Siberia plate at the same time, suggesting that the North China plate and the Siberia plate probably began the subduction collision process during the deposition period of the Linxi Formation.

    • FullText(HTML)
  • 加载中
    • References
  • [1] Wu F Y, Sun D Y, Li H M, et al.A-type granites in northeastern china:Age and geochemical constraints on their petrogenesis[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 187:143-173. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00018-9

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Wu F Y, Wilde S A, Zhang G L, et al. Geochronology and petrogenesis of the post-orogentic Cu Ni sulfide-bearing mafic ultramafic complexes in jilin Province, NE China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2004, 23:781-797. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(03)00114-7

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] 张艳斌, 吴福元, 翟明国, 等.和龙地块的构造属性与华北地台北缘东段边界[J].中国科学(D辑), 2004, 34(9):795-806.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 尚庆华.北方造山带内蒙古中、东部地区二叠纪放射虫的发现及意义[J].科学通报, 2004, 49(34):2574-2579.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 孙德有, 吴福元, 张艳斌, 等.西拉木伦河-长春-延吉板块缝合带的最后闭合时间——来自吉林大玉山花岗岩体的证据[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2004, 34(2):174-178.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 李锦轶, 高立明, 孙桂华, 等.内蒙古东部双井子中三叠世同碰撞壳源花岗岩的确定及其对西伯利亚与中朝古板块碰撞时限的约束[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(3):565-582.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 曹从周, 杨芳林, 田昌裂, 等.内蒙古贺根山地区蛇绿岩和中朝板块和西伯利亚板块之间的缝合带位置[C]//中国北方板块构造论文集, 第1集.北京: 地质出版社, 1983: 64-86.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 徐备, 陈斌.内蒙古北部华北板块与西伯利亚板块之间中古生代造山带的结构与演化[J].中国科学(D辑), 1997, 27(3):227-232.

    Google Scholar

    [9] Robinson P T, Zhou M F, Hu X F, et al. Geochemical constraintson the origin of the Hegenshan Ophiolite, Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 1999, 17:423-442. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(99)00016-4

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Nozaka T, Liu Y. Petrology of the Hegenshan ophiolite and its implication for the tectonic evolution of northern China[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2002, 202:89-104. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00774-4

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Tang K D. Tectonic development of Paleozoic foldbelts at the north margin of the Sino-Korean craton[J]. Tectonics, 1990, 9(2):249-260.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 邵济安.中朝板块北缘中段地壳演化[M].北京:北京大学出版社, 1991:1-136.

    Google Scholar

    [13] Hong D W, Huang H Z, Xiao Y J, et al. Permian alkaline aranites in central Inner Mongolia and their geodynamic significance[J]. Acta Geol.Sin., 1995, 8:27-39.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 李益龙, 周汉文, 钟增球, 等.华北与西伯利亚板块的对接过程:来自西拉木伦缝合带变形花岗岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄证据[J].地球科学, 2009, 34(6):931-938. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-2383.2009.06.007

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] 李益龙, 周汉文, 肖文交, 等.古亚洲构造域和西太平洋构造域在索伦缝合带东段的叠加:来自内蒙古林西县西拉木伦断裂带内变形闪长岩的岩石学、地球化学和年代学证据[J].地球科学, 2012, 37(3):433-450.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 韩国卿, 刘永江, 温泉波, 等.西拉木伦河缝合带北侧二叠纪砂岩碎屑锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年代学及其构造意义[J].地球科学, 2011, 36(4):687-702.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 叶栩松, 廖群安, 葛梦春.内蒙古锡林浩特、林西地区三叠纪过铝质花岗岩的成因及构造意义[J].地质科技情报, 2011, 30(3):57-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2011.03.007

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] 韩杰, 周建波, 张兴洲, 等.内蒙古林西地区上二叠统林西组砂岩碎屑锆石的年龄及其大地构造意义[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(2/3):258-269.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 梁仲发.东北北部及内蒙古东部晚二叠世的一些双壳类化石及几个有关地层问题[J].沈阳地质矿产研究所所刊, 第4号, 1982:130-148.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 黄本宏.大兴安岭地区石炭、二叠系及植物群[M].北京:地质出版社, 1993:1-141.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 郑月娟, 张健, 陈树旺, 等.内蒙古阿鲁科尔沁旗陶海营子剖面林西组化石新发现[J].地质通报, 2013, 22(8):1269-1276. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2013.08.013

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] 郑月娟, 张海华, 陈树旺, 等.内蒙古阿鲁科尔沁旗林西组砂岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及意义[J].地质通报, 2014, 33(9):1293-1307. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2014.09.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] 张永生, 牛绍武, 田树刚, 等.内蒙古林西地区上二叠统林西组叶肢介化石的发现及其意义[J].地质通报, 2012, 31(9):1394-1403. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2012.09.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] 和政军, 刘淑文, 任纪舜.内蒙古林西地区晚二叠世-早三叠世沉积演化及构造背景[J].中国区域地质, 1997, 16(4):403-427.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 王永争, 覃功炯, 欧强.内蒙古林西大井铜锡多金属矿区上二叠统林西组之研究[J].矿产与地质, 2001, 15(83):205-211.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 李福来, 曲希玉, 刘立, 等.内蒙古东北部上二叠统林西组沉积环境[J].沉积学报, 2009, 27(2):265-272.

    Google Scholar

    [27] 朱如凯, 许怀先, 邓胜徽, 等.中国北方地区二叠纪岩相古地理[J].古地理学报, 2007, 9(2):133-142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.2007.02.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] 余和中.松辽盆地及周边地区石炭纪-二叠纪岩相古地理[J].沉积与特提斯地质, 2001, 21(4):70-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3850.2001.04.011

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] 宋彪, 张玉海, 万渝生, 等.锆石SHRIMP样品靶制作、年龄测定及有关现象讨论[J].地质论评, 2002, 48(增刊):26-30.

    Google Scholar

    [30] Pearce N J G, Perkins W T, Westgate J A, et al. Acompilation of new and published major and trace element data for NIST SRM 610 and NIST SRM 612 glass reference materials[J]. Geostandards Newsletter, 1997, 21(1):115-144. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-908X.1997.tb00538.x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] Black L P, Kamo S L, Allen C M, et al. TEMORA 1:a new zircon standard for Phanerozoic U-Pb geochronology[J]. Chemical Geology, 2003, 200:155-170. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(03)00165-7

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] 李献华, 唐国强, 龚冰, 等. Qinghu (清湖)锆石:一个新的U-Pb年龄和O, Hf同位素微区分析工作标样[J].科学通报, 2013, 58(20):1954-1961.

    Google Scholar

    [33] Anderson T. Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report 204Pb[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 192:59-79. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00195-X

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] 张海华, 郑月娟, 陈树旺, 等.内蒙古巴林左旗二叠系碎屑锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb年龄及构造意义[J].地质学报, 2015, 89(10):1703-1717. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2015.10.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] Haskin L A, Haskin M A, Frey F A, et al. Relative and absolute terrestrial abundances of the rare earths[C]//Ahrens L H. Origin and Distribution of the Elements. Oxford: Pergamon, 1968: 889-912.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978008012835150074X

    Google Scholar

    [36] 张兴州, 乔德武, 迟效国, 等.东北地区晚古生代构造演化及其石油地质意义[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(2/3):205-212.

    Google Scholar

    [37] 王丹丹, 李世臻, 周新桂, 等.内蒙古东部上二叠统林西组砂岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年代学及其构造意义[J].地质论评, 2016, 62(4):1021-1040.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 宋卫卫, 周建波, 郭晓丹, 等.松辽地块大地构造属性:古生界碎屑锆石年代学的制约[J].世界地质, 2012, 31(3):522-535. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2012.03.009

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [39] 陈树旺, 张海华, 郑月娟, 等.内蒙古科右中旗-突泉地区晚二叠世林西组碎屑岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J].地质通报, 2015, 34(10):1869-1877. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2015.10.011

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [40] 高德臻, 将干清.内蒙古苏尼特左旗二叠系的重新厘定及大地构造演化分析[J].中国区域地质, 1998, 17(4):403-411.

    Google Scholar

    [41] 邓胜微, 万传彪, 杨建国.黑龙江阿城晚二叠世安加拉-华夏混生植物群——兼述古亚洲洋的关闭问题[J].中国科学(D辑), 2009, 39(12):1744-1752.

    Google Scholar

    [42] 李朋武, 高锐, 管烨, 等.内蒙古中部索伦林西缝合带封闭时代的古地磁分析[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006, 36(5):744-758.

    Google Scholar

    [43] 秦华峰, 李永飞, 黄晟, 等.内蒙古阿鲁科尔沁旗二叠纪地层古地磁研究结果及其构造意义[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(2/3):388-398.

    Google Scholar

    [44] 洪大卫, 黄怀曾, 肖宜君, 等.内蒙古中部二叠纪碱性花岗岩及其地球动力学意义[J].地质学报, 1994, 68(3):219-230. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.1994.03.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [45] Chen B, Jahn B M, Tian W. Evolution of the Solonker suture zone:constraints from zircon U-Pb ages, Hf isotopic ratios and whole-rock Nd-Sr isotope compositions of subduction-and collision-related magmas and forearc sediments[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2009, 34(3):245-257. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2008.05.007

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [46] 石玉若, 刘敦一, 简平, 等.内蒙古中部苏尼特左旗富钾花岗岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄[J].地质通报, 2005, 24(5):424-428. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2005.05.006

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [47] 石玉若, 刘敦一, 张旗, 等.内蒙古中部苏尼特左旗地区三叠纪A型花岗岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄及其区域构造意义[J].地质通报, 2007, 26(2):183-189. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2007.02.009

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [48] 刘建峰.内蒙古林西-东乌旗地区晚古生代岩浆作用及其对区域构造演化的制约[D].吉林大学博士学位论文, 2009.http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10183-2009093598.htm

    Google Scholar

    [49] 施光海, 刘敦一, 张福勤, 等.中国内蒙古锡林郭勒杂岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年代学及意义[J].科学通报, 2003, 48:2187-2192. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2003.20.017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [50] Wu F Y, Sun D Y, Ge W C, et al. Geochronology of the Phanerozoic granitoids in northeastern China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 4:1-30. doi: 10.3923/ajes.2011.1.8

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [51] 辛后田, 滕学建, 程银行.内蒙古东乌旗宝力高庙组地层划分及其同位素年代学研究[J].地质调查与研究, 2011, 34(1):1-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4135.2011.01.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [52] 潘世语, 迟效国, 孙巍, 等.内蒙古苏尼特右旗晚石炭世本巴图组火山岩地球化学特征及构造意义[J].世界地质, 2012, 31(1):40-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5589.2012.01.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [53] 裴福萍, 许文良, 杨德彬, 等.松辽盆地基底变质岩中锆石U-Pb年代学及其地质意义[J].科学通报, 2006, 51(24):2881-2887. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2006.24.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [54] Liu J F, Chi X G, Dong C Y, et al. Discovery of Early Paleozoic granites in the eastern Xiao Hinggan Mountains, northeastern China and their tectonic significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2008, 27:534-544.

    Google Scholar

    [55] Zhou J B, Wilde S A, Zhang X Z, et al. Pan-African metamorphic rocks of the Erguna massif in the Great Xing'an Range, NE China:evidence and tectonic implications[J]. Tectonophysics, 2011, 499(1/4):105-117.

    Google Scholar

    [56] Miao L C, Liu D Y, Zhang F Q, et al. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb ages of the Xinghuadukou Group in Hanjiayuanzi and Xinlin areas and the Zhalantun Group in Inner Mongolia, Da Hinggan mountains[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2007, 52(5):591-601. doi: 10.1360/csb2007-52-5-591

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [57] 刘敦一, 简平, 张旗, 等.内蒙古图林凯蛇绿岩中埃达克岩SHRIMP测年:早古生代洋壳消减的证据[J].地质学报, 2003, 77:318-327. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9665.2003.03.017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [58] Jian P, Liu DY, Kroner A, et al. Time scale of an Early to Mid-Paleozoic orogenic cycle of the long-lived Central Asian Orogenic belt, Inner Mongolia of China:Implications for continental growth[J]. Lithos, 2008, 101:233-259. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2007.07.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [59] Chen B, Janh B M, Wilde S, et al. Two contrasting Paleozoic magmatic belts in northern Inner Mongolia, China[J]. petrogenesis and tectonic implications[J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 328(1/2): 157-182.

    Google Scholar

    [60] Stem J R. Neoproterozoic crustal growth:the solid Earth system during a critical episode of Earth history[J]. Gondwana Research, 2008, 14:33-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2007.08.006

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [61] Wilde S A, Zhang X Z, Wu F Y. Extension of a newly identified 500Ma metamorphic terrain in Northeast China:Further U-Pb SHRIMP dating of the Mashan Complex, Heilongjiang Province, China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 328:115-130. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(00)00180-3

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [62] 章凤奇, 陈汉林, 董传万, 等.松辽盆地北部存在前寒武纪基底的证据[J].中国地质, 2008, 35(3):421-428. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2008.03.006

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [63] Guo J H, Sun M, Chen F K, et al. Sm-Nd and SHRIMP U-Pb zircon geochronology of high-pressure granulites in the Sanggan area, North China Craton:Timing of Paleoproterozoic continental collision[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2005, 24:629-642. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.01.017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [64] Kelty T K, Yin A, Dash B, et al. Detrital zircon geochronology of Paleozoic sedimentary rock in the Hangay-Hentey basin, northcentral Mongolia:implications for the tectonic evolution of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean in central Asia[J]. Tectonophysics, 2008, 451:97-122. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2007.11.063

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [65] Culler R L. The controls on the major and trace-element evolution of shales, siltstones and sandstones of Ordovician to Tertiary age in the Wet mountain region, Colorado, USA[J]. Chemical Geology, 1995, 123:107-131. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(95)00050-V

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [66] Savoy L E, Stevenson R K, Mounoy EW. Provenance of upper Devonnianlower Carboniferous miogeoclinal stata, Southeastern Canadian Cordillera:Link between tectonics and sedimentation[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2000, 70:181-193. doi: 10.1306/2DC40909-0E47-11D7-8643000102C1865D

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [67] 张英利, 王宗起, 闫臻, 等.库鲁克塔格地区新元古代贝义西组的构造环境:来自碎屑岩地球化学的证据[J].岩石学报, 2011, 27(6):1785-1796.

    Google Scholar

    [68] Allegre C T. Quantitative models of trace planet[J]. Earth Plant Sci Lett, 1978, 38(1):1-25. doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(78)90123-1

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [69] Girty G H, Ridge D L, Knaack C. Provenance and depositional setting of Paleozoic chert and argillite, Sierra Nevada, California[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1996, 66(1):107-118.

    Google Scholar

    [70] 余烨, 张昌民, 李少华, 等.惠州凹陷珠江组泥岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(1):40-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2014.01.006

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [71] Roser B P, Korech R J. Determination of tectonic setting of sandstone-mudstone suites using SiO2 content and K2O/Na2O ratio[J]. Journal of Geology, 1986, 94:635-650. doi: 10.1086/629071

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [72] Murry R W. Rare earth elements as indicators of different marine depositional environments in chert and shale[J]. Geology, 1990, 18:268-271. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1990)018<0268:REEAIO>2.3.CO;2

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [73] Hatch J R, Leventhal J S. Relationship between inferred redox potential of the depositional environmental and geochemistry of the upper Pennsylvanian (Missourian) Stark Shale Member of the Dennis Limestope Wabaunsee County, Kansas, USA[J]. Chemical Geology, 1992, 99:65-82. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(92)90031-Y

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [74] 汪凯明, 罗顺社.燕山地区中元古界高于庄组和杨庄组地球化学特征及环境意义[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2009, 28(4):356-364. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2009.04.007

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    • Relative Articles
  • Cited by
  • Supplements
    • Proportional views
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(10)

Tables(3)

Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(1891) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020