2021 Vol. 40, No. 2-3
Article Contents

WANG Jianqiang, ZHAO Qingfang, LIANG Jie, CHEN Jianwen, DONG Heping, LI Shuanglin, SUN Jing. Exploration guide of deepwater oil and gas resources along the Maritime Silk Road[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021, 40(2-3): 219-232.
Citation: WANG Jianqiang, ZHAO Qingfang, LIANG Jie, CHEN Jianwen, DONG Heping, LI Shuanglin, SUN Jing. Exploration guide of deepwater oil and gas resources along the Maritime Silk Road[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021, 40(2-3): 219-232.

Exploration guide of deepwater oil and gas resources along the Maritime Silk Road

More Information
  • Deepwater oil and gas has become the most important worldwide replacement resources for conventional oil and gas.The Maritime Silk Road is rich in oil and gas resources, and is the most active area for oil and gas exploration and development in the world.Significant breakthroughs have been made in deepwater oil and gas, but some areas are less explored and have less discovered oil and gas fields, so these areas exhibit great potential for exploration.The deepwater basins along the Maritime Silk Road mainly present "one horizontal and longitudinal" distribution pattern.The "one horizontal" mainly refers to the deepwater basin groups in the near east-west direction within the Neotethys tectonic domain and the "one longitudinal" mainly refers to the deepwater basin groups in the near north-south direction in the continental margin of East Africa.The latest deepwater oil and gas discoveries have confirmed that the basins along the Silk Road have the material basis for the formation of large oil and gas fields, and there exist efficient oil and gas migration channels.The overall exploration degree of deepwater oil and gas along the Maritime Silk Road is relatively low.The future oil and gas exploration in deep water area will focus on searching for two kinds of traps, including structure and lithology.As for exploration of oil and gas in deepwater area, the Bay of Bengal is targeted at lithologic traps formed by Cenozoic turbidite sand bodies, while Pakistan aims at lithologic traps formed by Cenozoic reefs and river sand bodies. East Africa coast is aimed at lithologic and stratigraphic traps formed by offshore reefs and seabed turbidite sand bodies developed in Mesozoic and Cenozoic, while Southeast Asia aims to search for large structure-controlled oil and gas fields.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 翟光明, 王世洪, 何文渊. 近十年全球油气勘探热点趋向与启示[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(S1): 14-19. doi: 10.7623/syxb2012S1003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] 张宁宁, 王青, 王建君, 等. 近20年世界油气新发现特征与勘探趋势展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(1): 44-53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.01.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] 童晓光, 张光亚, 王兆明, 等. 全球油气资源潜力与分布[J]. 地学前缘, 2014, 21(3): 1-9.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 杨丽丽, 王陆新, 潘继平. 全球深水油气勘探开发现状、前景及启示[J]. 中国矿业, 2017, 26(S2): 21-24.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 张功成, 屈红军, 张凤廉, 等. 全球深水油气重大新发现及启示[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(1): 1-34, 55.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 张功成, 米立军, 屈红军, 等. 全球深水盆地群分布格局与油气特征[J]. 石油学报, 2011, (3): 5-14.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 屈红军, 张功成. 全球深水富油气盆地分布格局及成藏主控因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(10): 1478-1487.

    Google Scholar

    [8] Yatheesh V, Dyment J, Bhattacharya G G, et al. Deciphering detailed plate kinematics of the Indian Ocean and developing a unified model for East Gondwanaland reconstruction: An Indian-Australian-French initiative[J]. Deep Continental Studies in India: Newsletter, 2013, 23(1): 2-9.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 李江梅, 李洪林, 韩喜球. 印度洋底大地构造图说明书[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2015.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 甘克文. 特提斯域的演化和油气分布[J]. 海相油气地质, 2000, (Z2): 21-29.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 康洪全, 贾怀存, 李明刚, 等. 地中海油气富集规律与未来勘探方向[J]. 科技导报, 2016, (23): 122-128.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 丘东洲. 亚洲特提斯域油气聚集地质特征[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2007, 14(2): 3-10.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 金之钧, 王骏, 张生根, 等. 滨里海盆地盐下油气成藏主控因素及勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2007, 29(2): 112-117.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 何登发, 董晓光, 温志新, 等. 全球大油气田形成条件与分布规律[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 李冬, 胡孝林, 郭刚, 等. 印尼加里曼丹岛东部主要含油气盆地油气富集差异[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2016, 36(4): 129-135.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 温志新, 王兆明, 宋成鹏, 等. 东非被动大陆边缘盆地结构构造差异与油气勘探[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(5): 671-680.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 崔哿, 金爱民, 邬长武, 等. 东非海岸构造演化及其对南、北主要富油气盆地控藏作用对比[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2020, 20(1): 101-113.

    Google Scholar

    [18] Bumby A J, Guiraud R. The geodynamic setting of the Phanerozoic basins of Africa[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2005, 43(1/3): 1-12.

    Google Scholar

    [19] Roberts D G, Bally A W. Regional geology and tectonics: Principles of geologic analysis[M]. London: Elsevier, 2012.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 于璇, 侯贵廷, 代双河, 等. 东非大陆边缘构造演化与油气成藏模式探析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(6): 147-154.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 胡良君. 非洲东海岸区域构造演化与构造样式及其对生储盖组合的控制作用[D]. 中国地质大学硕士学位论文, 2013.

    Google Scholar

    [22] Cruciani F, Barchi M R. The Lamu Basin deepwater fold-and-thrust belt: an example of a margin-scale, gravity-driven thrust belt along the continental passive margin of East Africa[J]. Tectonics, 2016, 35(3): 491-510. doi: 10.1002/2015TC003856

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] 姚永坚, 高红芳, 张道勇, 等. 东南亚地区油气分布规律与勘探现状[C]//中国地质学会学术年会, 2009.

    Google Scholar

    [24] A. ЗaσaHσapk, 朱佛宏(译), 单连芳(校). 孟加拉湾含油气盆地——南亚潜在的烃类储藏区[J]. 海洋石油, 2006, 26(1): 7-10.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 叶德燎. 东南亚石油资源与勘探潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2005, 10(1): 55-60, 64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2005.01.008

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] 许志刚, 韩文明, 孙玉梅. 东非大陆边缘构造演化过程与油气勘探潜力[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 1(3): 961-969. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2014.03.021

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] IHS. International energy oil & gas industry solutions[EB/OL]. (2014-12-30)[2020-04-28]. http://www.ihs.com/industry/oil-gas/international.aspx.2014.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 朱光辉, 李林涛. 孟加拉湾地区大陆边缘盆地勘探概况与油气富集主控因素[J]. 地质科技情报, 2012, 31(5): 112-118.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 刘铁树, 袭著纲, 骆宗强. 孟加拉盆地油气分布特征及主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015, 37(3): 361-366.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 韩冰, 李学杰, 吕建荣, 等. 孟加拉湾深水盆地油气勘探潜力[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2012, 28(4): 50-56.

    Google Scholar

    [31] 杨福忠, 洪国良, 祝厚勤, 等. 东南亚地区成藏组合特征及勘探潜力[J]. 地学前缘, 2014, 21(3): 112-117.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 姚永坚, 杨楚鹏, 康永尚, 等. 东南亚地区烃源岩特征及主控因素[J]. 地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 2013, 38(2): 367-378.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 周总瑛, 陶冶, 李淑筠, 等. 非洲东海岸重点盆地油气资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(5): 35-43.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 张光亚, 刘小兵, 温志新, 等. 东非被动大陆边缘盆地构造-沉积特征及其对大气田富集的控制作用[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2015, 20(4): 75-84.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 许志刚, 韩文明, 孙玉梅. 东非共轭型大陆边缘油气成藏差异性分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(5): 732-738.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 康玉柱. 全球主要盆地油气分布规律[J]. 中国工程科学, 2014, 16(8): 14-25.

    Google Scholar

    [37] Morley C K, King R, Hillis R, et al. Deepwater fold and thrust belt classification, tectonics, structure and hydrocarbon prospectivity: A review[J]. Earth Science Reviews, 2011, 104(1/3): 41-91.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 唐武, 郭佳, 赵志刚, 等. 文莱-沙巴盆地深水褶皱冲断带构造变形特征及成因机制[J]. 地球物理学报, 2018, 61(10): 4281-4295.

    Google Scholar

    [39] 陈宇航, 姚根顺, 唐鹏程, 等. 东非凯瑞巴斯盆地多期构造变形及对油气聚集的控制作用[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2016, 40(3): 491-502.

    Google Scholar

    [40] 陈宇航, 姚根顺, 吕福亮, 等. 东非鲁伍马盆地渐新统深水水道-朵体沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(9): 79-90.

    Google Scholar

    [41] 龚建明, 廖晶, Khalid M, 等. 巴基斯坦海域油气勘探方向探讨[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2019, 35(11): 1-6.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(11)

Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(1583) PDF downloads(13) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint