2024 Vol. 40, No. 4
Article Contents

HE Han-Zhou, DING Yi. 2024. Analysis of Geological Hazard Risk Regionalization in Southern Jiangxi Province. South China Geology, 40(4): 737-748. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0013.2024.04.012
Citation: HE Han-Zhou, DING Yi. 2024. Analysis of Geological Hazard Risk Regionalization in Southern Jiangxi Province. South China Geology, 40(4): 737-748. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0013.2024.04.012

Analysis of Geological Hazard Risk Regionalization in Southern Jiangxi Province

More Information
  • The mountainous and hilly terrain of the southern Jiangxi (Gan Nan) region is widely distributed, with a total of 10,417 geological hazards, which pose a significant threat to the safety of lives and property. Therefore, conducting geological hazard risk assessments for this region is crucial for prediction, forecasting, and disaster reduction. This study, based on detailed geological hazard survey data at a 1∶50,000 scale, analyzes the disaster-prone background and distribution characteristics of geological hazards and the main control factors in southern Jiangxi. On this basis, six susceptibility evaluation factors were identified: slope, slope structure, engineering geological rock group, soil thickness, geomorphological units, and the density of previously occurred disaster points. A comprehensive index method was used for susceptibility assessment. Additionally, a hazard assessment was conducted for the study area, taking into account the 20-year return maximum 24-hour rainfall and slope-cutting-induced factors. The risk assessment was further refined by incorporating vulnerability analysis. The results show that the main types of disasters in the study area are small-scale shallow landslides and debris flows, which predominantly occur in metamorphic and igneous rock residual slope deposits, with rainfall and slope cutting activities being the dominant controlling factors. The proportions of the extremely high-risk, high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk areas in southern Jiangxi are 0.8%, 45.7%, 40.3%, and 13.2%, respectively. The extremely high-risk and high-risk zones are mainly concentrated in the mountainous areas of Shicheng County and Xingguo County, while the medium-risk and low-risk zones are primarily found in the flat areas such as plains and hills. The findings of this study provide important guidance for the risk prevention and management of geological hazards in this region and similar geological environments.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 胡 鹏,王念秦,宋贵昌,赵世龙,乔丁丁,郝 业.2024.山区切坡活动引发地质灾害风险评估及其防控措施[J]. 灾害学,39(1):164-171. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2024.01.026

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] 贾丽娜,陈世昌.2024.基于AHP和GIS的舟曲地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 西北地质,57(1):23-33. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023094

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] 江西省地质矿产勘查开发局. 2017. 中国区域地质志•江西志[M]. 北京:地质出版社.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 李春燕,孟 晖,张若琳,李亚民.2017.中国县域单元地质灾害风险评估[J]. 水文地质工程地质,44(2):160-166.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 刘 帅,朱杰勇,杨得虎,马 博.2024.不同降雨工况条件下的崩滑地质灾害危险性评价[J]. 地质科技通报,43(2):253-267.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 卢全中,彭建兵,赵法锁.2003.地质灾害风险评估(价)研究综述[J]. 灾害学,18(4):60-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2003.04.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] 罗永明,杜成江,黄 鹏,郭乐龙.2024.桂东县切坡建房引发的地质灾害特征及防治对策[J]. 资源信息与工程,39(3):96-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-5391.2024.03.022

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] 马寅生,张业成,张春山,王金山.2004.地质灾害风险评价的理论与方法[J]. 地质力学学报,10(1):7-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6616.2004.01.002

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] 齐 信,唐 川,陈州丰,邵长生.2012.地质灾害风险评价研究[J]. 自然灾害学报,21(5):33-40.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 丘嘉荣,黄利兵,王金秋.2024.不同降雨工况条件下东江上游城镇崩滑灾害危险性评价——以广东省龙川县四都镇为例[J]. 华南地质,40(4):773-782.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 唐 川,马国超.2015.基于地貌单元的小区域地质灾害易发性分区方法研究[J]. 地理科学,35(1):91-98.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 吴丹瑞,吴安琪,何新玥,李 明.2017.赣南地区近58年来极端气候变化趋势分析[J]. 长江科学院院报,34(1):24-29+39. doi: 10.11988/ckyyb.20150809

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] 翟文华,王小东,吴明堂,吴晓亮,李倩倩.2023.基于频率比模型和随机森林模型耦合的地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 自然灾害学报,32(6):74-82.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 张春山,吴满路,张业成.2003.地质灾害风险评价方法及展望[J]. 自然灾害学报,12(1):96-102. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4574.2003.01.016

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] 张宏伟.2021.基于GIS的不同降雨工况下地质灾害危险性评价[J]. 华北自然资源,(4):103-105.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 张茂省,薛 强,贾 俊,徐继维,高 波,王佳运.2019.山区城镇地质灾害调查与风险评价方法及实践[J]. 西北地质,52(2):125-135.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 张平平,何 书,李 滨.2024.江西丘陵山区公路地质灾害危险性评价多耦合模型对比研究[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,35(4):135-145.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 张以晨,郎秋玲,陈亚南,张继权,田书文.2020.基于自然灾害风险评价框架的省级地质灾害风险区划方法探讨——以吉林省为例[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,31(6):104-110.

    Google Scholar

    [19] Sun X P, Zeng P, Li T B, Zhang T L, Feng X D, Jimenez R. 2021. Run-out distance exceedance probability evaluation and hazard zoning of an individual landslide[J]. Landslides, 18(4): 1295-1308. doi: 10.1007/s10346-020-01545-w

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Xu C, Dai F C, Xu X W, Lee Y H. 2012. GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China[J]. Geomorphology, 145-146: 70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.12.040

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Xu S H, Zhang M, Ma Y, Liu J P, Wang Y, Ma X R, Chen J. 2021. Multiclassification method of landslide risk assessment in consideration of disaster levels: a case study of Xianyang City, Shaanxi Province[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(10): 646. doi: 10.3390/ijgi10100646

    CrossRef Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(10)

Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(113) PDF downloads(12) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint