Implications to the Petrogenesis and Sn Mineralization of the Granite in the Tengshan’ao Sn deposit, the Nanling Metallogenic Belt

ZHANGZun-Zun; LINDong-Yong; YUYu-Shuai; LUYou-Yue; FUJian-Ming; LIJian-Feng; QINZheng-Wei; MALi-Yan; NINGYong-Yun; ZHANGJi-Tao

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2097-0013.2022.03.007

2022 Vol. 38, No. 3

Article Contents

Article navigation > South China Geology > 2022 > 38(3): 441-458

Next Article Previous Article

ZHANGZun-Zun, LINDong-Yong, YUYu-Shuai, LUYou-Yue, FUJian-Ming, LIJian-Feng, QINZheng-Wei, MALi-Yan, NINGYong-Yun, ZHANGJi-Tao. 2022. Implications to the Petrogenesis and Sn Mineralization of the Granite in the Tengshan’ao Sn deposit, the Nanling Metallogenic Belt. South China Geology, 38(3): 441-458. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0013.2022.03.007

Citation:

ZHANGZun-Zun, LINDong-Yong, YUYu-Shuai, LUYou-Yue, FUJian-Ming, LIJian-Feng, QINZheng-Wei, MALi-Yan, NINGYong-Yun, ZHANGJi-Tao. 2022. Implications to the Petrogenesis and Sn Mineralization of the Granite in the Tengshan’ao Sn deposit, the Nanling Metallogenic Belt. South China Geology, 38(3): 441-458. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0013.2022.03.007

Implications to the Petrogenesis and Sn Mineralization of the Granite in the Tengshan’ao Sn deposit, the Nanling Metallogenic Belt

1. Wuhan Center of China Geological Survey (Central South China Innovation Center for Geosciences), Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China
2. Research Center for Petrogenesis and Mineralization of Granitoid Rocks, China Geological Survey, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China
3. The No. 418 Geological Team, Hunan Development Bureau of Geology and Mineral Exploration, Loudi 417000, Hunan, China

Received Date: 09 April 2022

Revised Date: 11 July 2022

Abstract

Abstract

The Tengshan’ao Sn deposit, located in the south of the Dayishan Granitic Complex in the Nanling metallogenic belt, provides large-scale potential. Based on a detailed geological survey, the granites of the mining area have been systematically studied on petrography, geochemistry, zircon U-Pb dating, and Lu-Hf isotope in this paper. The results show that the age of the fine-grained two-mica monzonitic granite is 146.2±1.6 Ma, about 12 Ma away from that of the fine-grained two-mica monzonitic granite (158.2±1.2 Ma) containing phenocryst, indicating that at least two stages of magmatic intrusion have occurred in the mining area. The granites have consistent litho-geochemistry characteristics, which are rich in silicon, aluminum, and potassium, poor in calcium and magnesium with a low ΣREE content(average 91.0×10-6), and an REE pattern showing an obvious tetrad effect and a strong negative Eu anomaly (the δEu average is 0.03). A combination of the characteristics of high FeOT/MgO ratios (average 16.8) and the 10000×Ga/Al values (3.3-4.8) above 2.6, it is presumed to be the highly differentiated and aluminous A-type granite. The characteristics of trace elements and some of the zircon εHf(t) values (-3.88-6.54) are positive, indicating that the diagenetic magma is of mixed origin of crust-mantle materials, and has been formed in an extensional tectonic environment within the plate, which is in favor of the tin polymetallic mineralization.
- zircon U-Pb dating /
- Tengshan’ao tin deposit /
- Dayishan pluton /
- lithogenesis /
- southern Hunan /
- the Nanling metallogenic belt

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	陈骏,陆建军,陈卫锋,王汝成,马东升,朱金初,张文兰,季峻峰.2008.南岭地区钨锡铌钽花岗岩及其成矿作用[J].高校地质学报,14(4):459-473. Google Scholar
[2]	陈骏,王汝成,朱金初,陆建军,马东升.2014.南岭多时代花岗岩的钨锡成矿作用[J].中国科学:地球科学,44(1):111-121. Google Scholar
[3]	程顺波,付建明,马丽艳,卢友月.2014.南岭地区成钨、成锡花岗岩组合的几个判别标志[J].华南地质与矿产,30(4):352-360. Google Scholar
[4]	董超阁. 2018. 湖南锡田锡钨矿床和邓阜仙钨矿床成岩成矿年代学及动力学研究[D].中国科学院大学(中国科学院广州地球化学研究所)博士学位论文,93-111. Google Scholar
[5]	付建明,陈希清,马丽艳,程顺波.2010.南岭成矿带锡多金属找矿成果及找矿方向[J].矿床地质,29(S1):181-182. Google Scholar
[6]	付建明,程顺波,卢友月,马丽艳.2012.南岭地区钨锡多金属矿成矿规律及找矿方向[J].地球科学进展,27(S1):162-164. Google Scholar
[7]	付建明,马丽艳,程顺波,卢友月.2013.南岭地区锡(钨)矿成矿规律及找矿[J].高校地质学报,19(2):202-212. Google Scholar
[8]	贺文华. 2011.湖南大义山地区锡多金属矿成矿模式初探[J].华南地质与矿产,27(1):14-21. Google Scholar
[9]	侯可军,李延河,邹天人,曲晓明,石玉若,谢桂青.2007. LA-MC-ICP-MS锆石Hf同位素的分析方法及地质应用[J].岩石学报,23(10):2595-2604. Google Scholar
[10]	胡建,邱检生,王德滋,王汝成,张晓琳.2005.中国东南沿海与南岭内陆A型花岗岩的对比及其构造意义[J].高校地质学报,11(3):404-414. Google Scholar
[11]	华仁民,陈培荣,张文兰,陆建军.2005.论华南地区中生代3次大规模成矿作用[J].矿床地质, 24(2):99-107. Google Scholar
[12]	蒋少涌,赵葵东,姜海,苏慧敏,熊索菲,熊伊曲,徐耀明,章伟,朱律运.2020.中国钨锡矿床时空分布规律、地质特征与成矿机制研究进展[J].科学通报,65(33):3730-3745. Google Scholar
[13]	孔华,费利东,钟江临,王高,刘士杰,周伟平,全铁军.2014.湖南新生矿区花岗岩的锆石U-Pb年龄、Hf同位素特征及地质意义[J].中国有色金属学报,24(1):229-238. Google Scholar
[14]	李勇,张岳桥,苏金宝,李建华,董树文.2015.湖南大义山、塔山岩体锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造意义[J].地球学报,36(3):303-312. Google Scholar
[15]	李剑锋,卢友月,张遵遵,付建明,秦拯纬.2022.南岭大义山岩体研究与找矿进展[J/OL].地球科学. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1874.P.20220110.1521.010.html Google Scholar
[16]	刘铁生.2002.大义山矿田岩体型锡矿地质特征及矿床成因[J].中国地质,29(4):411-415. Google Scholar
[17]	路远发,李文霞,2021a.花岗岩类自然矿物岩石化学换算及程序设计[J].华南地质,37(4):445-457. Google Scholar
[18]	路远发,李文霞,2021b.Pb-Sr-Nd-Hf同位素参数计算及程序设计[J].华南地质,37(2):233-245. Google Scholar
[19]	马丽艳,刘树生,付建明,程顺波,卢友月,梅玉萍.2016.湖南塔山、阳明山花岗岩的岩石成因:来自锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学及Sr-Nd同位素证据[J].地质学报,90(2):284-303. Google Scholar
[20]	毛景文,谢桂青,程彦博,陈毓川.2009.华南地区中生代主要金属矿床模型[J].地质论评,55(3):347-354. Google Scholar
[21]	毛景文,谢桂青,郭春丽,陈毓川.2007.南岭地区大规模钨锡多金属成矿作用：成矿时限及地球动力学背景[J].岩石学报, 23(10):2329-2338. Google Scholar
[22]	毛景文,谢桂青,袁顺达,刘鹏,孟旭阳,周振华,郑伟.2018.环太平洋成矿带斑岩-矽卡岩型铜矿和与花岗岩有关的锡多金属矿研究现状与展望[J].岩石学报,34(9):2501-2517. Google Scholar
[23]	彭建堂,胡瑞忠,袁顺达,毕献武,沈能平.2008.湘南中生代花岗质岩石成岩成矿的时限[J].地质论评,54(5):617-625. Google Scholar
[24]	秦拯纬,付建明,邢光福,程顺波,卢友月,祝颖雪.2022.南岭成矿带中-晚侏罗世成钨、成锡、成铅锌（铜）花岗岩的差异性研究[J].中国地质,49(2):518-541. Google Scholar
[25]	舒良树,周新民,邓平,余心起.2006.南岭构造带的基本地质特征[J].地质论评,52(2):251-265. Google Scholar
[26]	隋清霖,祝红丽,孙赛军,陈登辉,赵晓健,王钊飞.2020.锡的地球化学性质与华南晚白垩世锡矿成因[J].岩石学报,36(1):23-34. Google Scholar
[27]	覃明飞,许少伟,李庚华.2019.广西栗木矿田水溪庙锡多金属矿床地质特征[J].现代矿业,35(5):109-112. Google Scholar
[28]	唐朝晖.2019.大义山锡矿田矿床地质特征及矿床成因[J].资源信息与工程,34(4):23-24+26. Google Scholar
[29]	王成辉,王登红,陈晨,刘善宝,陈振宇,孙艳,赵晨辉,曹圣华,凡秀君.2019.九岭式狮子岭岩体型稀有金属成矿作用研究进展及其找矿意义[J].地质学报,93(6):1359-1373. Google Scholar
[30]	王登红,陈振宇,黄凡,王成辉,赵芝,陈郑辉,赵正,刘新星.2014.南岭岩浆岩成矿专属性及相关问题探讨[J].大地构造与成矿学,38(2):230-238. Google Scholar
[31]	王正军,谢磊,王汝成,朱金初,车旭东,赵旭.2018.一种特殊类型的云英岩:湘南香花岭地区癞子岭云英岩成岩成矿特征[J].高校地质学报,24(4):467-480. Google Scholar
[32]	伍光英,潘仲芳,李金冬,肖庆辉,车勤建.2005.湘南大义山花岗岩地质地球化学特征及其与成矿的关系[J].中国地质,32(3):434-442. Google Scholar
[33]	伍光英,彭和求,贾宝华.2000.湘南大义山岩体地质特征及其侵位机制分析[J].华南地质与矿产, (3):1-7. Google Scholar
[34]	夏金龙,黄圭成,定立,丁丽雪,陈希清,季文兵. 2021.南岭地区诸广山复式岩体年代格架研究[J].华南地质, 37(3):280-297. Google Scholar
[35]	阳杰华,刘亮,刘佳,2017.华南中生代大花岗岩省成岩成矿作用研究进展与展望[J].矿物学报,37(6):791-800. Google Scholar
[36]	袁顺达.2017.南岭钨锡成矿作用几个关键科学问题及其对区域找矿勘查的启示[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,36(5):736-749+696. Google Scholar
[37]	曾志方.2013.湖南大义山锡矿田构造控矿作用与成矿机理研究[D].中国地质大学(武汉)博士学位论文,50. Google Scholar
[38]	张晓军,罗华,吴志华,范先旺,熊俊,杨杰,牟金燚.2014.湖南大义山矿田白沙子岭锡矿床Rb-Sr同位素等时线年龄及其地质意义[J].地球科学（中国地质大学学报）,39(10):1422-1432. Google Scholar
[39]	赵增霞,徐兆文,左昌虎,陆建军,王汝成,缪柏虎,路睿.2017.湖南桂阳大义山南体(太坪山单元)花岗岩形成时代及物质来源探讨[J].地质论评,63(2):395-412. Google Scholar
[40]	赵振华,包志伟,张伯友,熊小林.2000.柿竹园超大型钨多金属矿床形成的壳幔相互作用背景[J].中国科学:地球科学,30(S1):161-168. Google Scholar
[41]	赵振华,包志伟,张伯友.1998.湘南中生代玄武岩类地球化学特征[J].中国科学:地球科学,28(S2):7-14. Google Scholar
[42]	周厚祥,杨贵花,蒋中和,陈强春.2005.大义山锡矿田矿床地质特征及矿床成因[J].华南地质与矿产, (2):87-94. Google Scholar
[43]	朱金初,陈骏,王汝成,陆建军,谢磊.2008.南岭中西段燕山早期北东向含锡钨A型花岗岩带[J].高校地质学报,14(4):474-484. Google Scholar
[44]	Ballard J R, Palin M J, Campbell I H. 2002. Relative oxidation states of magmas inferred from Ce (IV)/Ce(III) in zircon: application to porphyry copper deposits of northern Chile [J]. Contribution to Mineralogy and Petrology, 144: 347-364. Google Scholar
[45]	Ballouard C, Poujol M, Boulvais P, Branquet Y, Tart`ese R, Vigneresse J L. 2016. Nb-Ta fractionation in peraluminous granites: A marker of the magmatic-hydrothermal transition [J]. Geology, 44 (3), 231-234. Google Scholar
[46]	Chen J, Halls C, Stanley C J. 1992. Tin-bearing skarns of South China: Geological setting and mineralogy [J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 7(3):225-248. Google Scholar
[47]	Eugster H P, Wones D R. 1962. Stability relations of the ferruginous biotite, Annite [J]. Journal of Petrology, 3(1):82-125. Google Scholar
[48]	Guo J, Lu Y Y, Fu J M, Ning Y Y, Zhang Z Z. 2019. Geology and Geochronology of the Maozaishan Sn Deposit, Hunan Province: Constraints from Zircon U-Pb and Muscovite Ar-Ar Dating [J]. Minerals, 9(12):773-789. Google Scholar
[49]	Hu X Y, Bi X W, Hu R Z, Shang L B, Fan W L. 2008. Experimental study on tin partition between granitic silicate melt and coexisting aqueous fluid [J]. Geochemical Journal, 42(2):141-150. Google Scholar
[50]	Kemp A I S, Hawkesworth C J, Foster G L, Paterson B A, Woodhead J D, Hergt J M, Gray C M, Whitehouse M J. 2007. Magmatic and crustal differentiation history of granitic rocks from Hf-O isotopes in zircon [J]. Science, 315:980-983. Google Scholar
[51]	King P L, White A J R, Chappell B W, Allen C M. 1997.Characterization and origin of aluminous A-type granites from the Lachlan fold belt, southeastern Australia [J]. Journal of Petrology, 38(3): 371–391. Google Scholar
[52]	Li Z X, Li X H. 2007. Formation of the 1300-km-wide intracontinental orogen and postorogenic magmatic province in Mesozoic South China: a flat-slab subduction model [J]. Geology, 35 (2): 179-182. Google Scholar
[53]	Liu Y S, Gao S, Hu Z C, Gao C G, Zong K Q, Wang D B. 2010. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the Trans-North China Orogen: U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons of mantle xenoliths[J]. Journal of Petrology, 51: 537-571. Google Scholar
[54]	Lu Y Y, Cao J Y, Fu J M, Yang X Y, Yang Q Z, Guo J, Cheng S B, Qin Z W, Zhang Z Z, Zhang T Y, Xia J, Zhao Z. 2021.Petrogenesis of the granite related to the Dashunlong Sn polymetallic deposit, Dayishan ore field, South China [J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 139:104478. Google Scholar
[55]	Lu Y Y, Li J F, Cao J Y, Fu J M, Cheng S B, Qin Z W, Ma L Y, Feng J P, Zhang Z Z, Chen X Q. 2022. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Late Jurassic Wujiaping Sn deposit, Dayishan ore field, South China: Implications to the petrogenesis and Sn mineralization [J]. Solid Earth Sciences, 7(1):72-86. Google Scholar
[56]	Mao J W, Cheng Y B, Chen M H, Franco P. 2013. Major Types and Time-space Distribution of Mesozoic ore Deposits in South China and their Geodynamic Settings [J]. Mineralium Deposita, 48(3):267-294. Google Scholar
[57]	Pearce J. 1996. Sources and Settings of Granitic Rocks [J]. Episodes, 19(4):120-125. Google Scholar
[58]	Schmidt C. 2018. Formation of hydrothermal tin deposits: raman spectroscopic evidence for an important role of aqueous sn (IV) species [J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 220:499-511. Google Scholar
[59]	Sun H R, Zhao Z, Yan G S, Lü Z C, Huang Z L, Yu X F. 2018. Geological and Geochronological Constraints on the Formation of the Jurassic Maozaishan Sn Deposit, Dayishan Orefield, South China [J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 94:212-224. Google Scholar
[60]	Sun S S, Mcdonough W F. 1989. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes [J]. Geological Society London Special Publications, 42(1): 313-345. Google Scholar
[61]	Taylor S R, McLennan S M. 1985. The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution [J]. The Journal of Geology, 94(4):57-72. Google Scholar
[62]	Thomas R, Förster H J, Rickers K, Webster J D. 2005. Formation of extremely F-rich hydrous melt fractions and hydrothermal fluids during differentiation of highly evolved tin-granite magmas: a melt/fluid-inclusion study [J]. Contribution to Mineralogy Petrology,148(5): 582-601. Google Scholar
[63]	Trail D, Watson E B, Tailby N D. 2012. Ce and Eu anomalies in zircon as proxies for the oxidation state of magmas[J]. GeochimIca et Cosmochimica Acta, 97:70-87. Google Scholar
[64]	Wang D H, Huang F, Wang Y, He H H, Li X M, Liu X X, Sheng J F, Liang T. 2020. Regional Metallogeny of Tungsten-tin-polymetallic Deposits in Nanling Region, South China [J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 120:1-24. Google Scholar
[65]	Whalen J B, Currie K L, Chappell B W.1987. A-type granites: geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis [J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 95:407-419. Google Scholar
[66]	Yu Y S, Zhou Y, Dai P Y, Xie F, Bao B, Liu C P. 2022. Triassic tungsten mineralization in Nanling metallogenic belt: a case study of the Zanshi tungsten deposit in the Yajiangqiao area, eastern Hunan Province, China [J]. Ore Geology Reviews, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.104710. Google Scholar
[67]	Zhang Z Z, Ning Y Y, Lu Y Y, Cao J Y, Fu J M, Zhao Z, Guo J, Ma L Y, Qin Z W, Li J F. 2021. Geological characteristics and metallogenic age of Tengshan’ao Sn deposit in Dayishan of South Hunan and its prospecting significance [J]. Solid Earth Sciences, 6: 37-49. Google Scholar
[68]	Zhao Z, Yang X Y, Li W Y, Zhang T Y, Lu Y Y, Zhang Z Z. 2022. Petrogenesis of the granite related to the Baishaziling Sn deposit, Dayishan ore field, Southern China [J]. Geochemistry, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2022.125873. Google Scholar
[69]	Zhou D, Sun Z, Chen H Z, Xu H H, Wang W Y, Pang X, Cai D S, Hu D K. 2008. Mesozoic paleogeography and tectonic evolution of South China Sea and adjacent areas in the context of Tethyan and Paleo-Pacific interconnections [J]. Island Arc, 17(2):186-207. Google Scholar
[70]	Zhou X M, Sun T, Shen W Z, Shu L S, Niu Y L. 2006. Petrogenesis of Mesozoic granitoids and volcanic rocks in South China: A response to tectonic evolution[J]. Episodes, 29(1):26-33. Google Scholar
[71]	Zhou X M, Li W X. 2000. Origin of Late Mesozoic igneous rocks in Southeastern China: implications for lithosphere subduction and underplating of mafic magmas [J]. Tectonophysics, 326: 269-287. Google Scholar