Development Efficiency Evaluation of Mineral Resources in Sichuan Province Based on DEA-Malmquist Model

Li Junbo; Pu Hua; Wu Hao; Wang Yueqi

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2022.01.011

2022 No. 1

Article Contents

Article navigation > Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources > 2022 > (1): 82-88

Next Article Previous Article

Li Junbo, Pu Hua, Wu Hao, Wang Yueqi. Development Efficiency Evaluation of Mineral Resources in Sichuan Province Based on DEA-Malmquist Model[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2022, (1): 82-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2022.01.011

Citation:

Li Junbo, Pu Hua, Wu Hao, Wang Yueqi. Development Efficiency Evaluation of Mineral Resources in Sichuan Province Based on DEA-Malmquist Model[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2022, (1): 82-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2022.01.011

Development Efficiency Evaluation of Mineral Resources in Sichuan Province Based on DEA-Malmquist Model

1.
School of Mathematics and Physics, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
2.
Geomathematics Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
3.
College of Management Science, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Received Date: 27 August 2021

Publish Date: 25 February 2022

Abstract

Abstract

Improving the efficiency of mineral resource development is conducive to strengthening the ability to guarantee resources, and is of great practical significance to promoting the sustainable development of the region. In order to explore the improvement path of mineral resource development efficiency in Sichuan Province, this paper uses DEA-BCC model and Malmquist index model to measure and evaluate the mineral resource development efficiency of 21 cities and prefectures in Sichuan Province from 2010 to 2018 from static and dynamic perspectives. The results show that the development level of mineral resources in Sichuan Province is gradually improving, and technological progress is the main driving force for efficiency improvement, but there is still much room for improvement in pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency. Secondly, there are differences in the efficiency of mineral resource development between regions. The development efficiency of the Chengdu Plain and Panxi Region has improved the most, while the improvement of mineral resource development efficiency in southern and northeastern Sichuan has been relatively slow. At the end of this article, countermeasures and suggestions are put forward based on the evaluation results to provide references for improving the efficiency of mineral resource development.
- Mineral resources development /
- DEA-BCC model /
- Malmquist index

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	鞠建华, 强海洋. 中国矿业绿色发展的趋势和方向[J]. 中国矿业, 2017, 26(2):7-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2017.02.002 CrossRef Google Scholar JU J H, QIANG H Y. The trend and direction of green development of the mining industry in China[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2017, 26(2):7-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2017.02.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	刘淑鹏, 张小伟. 基于区域协同减量化的矿山尾矿综合信息管理构想研究[J]. 矿产综合利用, 2021(4):17-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2021.04.003 CrossRef Google Scholar LIU S P, ZHANG X W. Research on comprehensive information management of mine tailings based on regional cooperative Reduction[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2021(4):17-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2021.04.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	袁宗仪. 建立我国矿产资源综合开发利用评价体系[J]. 矿产综合利用, 1993(5):31-36. Google Scholar YUAN Z Y. Establish an evaluation system for the comprehensive development and utilization of mineral resources in my country[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 1993(5):31-36. Google Scholar
[4]	罗德江, 吴昊, 何苏, 等. 基于犹豫模糊TOPSIS 的绿色矿山多属性评价方法[J]. 矿产综合利用, 2021(4):41-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2021.04.007 CrossRef Google Scholar LUO D J, WU H, HE S, et al. Multiattribute evaluation method for green mines based on hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2021(4):41-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2021.04.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
[5]	吴安兵, 郭科, 罗德江. 滇东南地区矿产资源开发效率的模糊层次综合评价[J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2014, 31(5):63-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4210.2014.05.010 CrossRef Google Scholar WU A B, GUO K, LUO D J. Evaluation of mineral resources development efficiencyof Southeast Yunnan Region based on fuzzy hierarchy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Land and Resources Science and Technology Management, 2014, 31(5):63-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4210.2014.05.010 CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	吴仲雄, 赵文彬. 广西优势矿产资源开发利用评价[J]. 中国矿业, 2006, 15(12):91-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2006.12.028 CrossRef Google Scholar WU Z X, ZHAO W B. Evaluation about the exploitation and utilization of Guangxi superior mineral resources[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2006, 15(12):91-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2006.12.028 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	李学全, 李松仁, 尹蒂. 矿产资源综合开发利用评价的多目标决策灰色关联度方法[J]. 矿产综合利用, 1996(2):39-43. Google Scholar LI X Q, LI S R, YIN D. Multi-objective decision-making grey relational degree method for the evaluation of comprehensive development and utilization of mineral resources[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 1996(2):39-43. Google Scholar
[8]	薛盈杉, 张军军, 曾小波. 基于AHP- 熵权法的金属矿山开发利用水平综合评价研究[J]. 矿产综合利用, 2021(4):66-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2021.04.010 CrossRef Google Scholar XUE Y S, ZHANG J J, ZENG X B. Comprehensive evaluation of exploitation and utilization level of metal mines based on AHP and entropy weight method[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2021(4):66-72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2021.04.010 CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	丁其光, 徐明. 矿产开发利用效率评价指标及方法初探[J]. 矿产综合利用, 2012(1):53-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2012.01.015 CrossRef Google Scholar DING Q G, XU M. Discussion of evaluation index framework for mineral development efficiency[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2012(1):53-55. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2012.01.015 CrossRef Google Scholar
[10]	成刚. 数据包络分析方法与MaxDEA软件[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2014. Google Scholar CHENG G. Data envelopment snalysis: method and MaxDEA software[M]. Beijing: Intellectual Property Press, 2014. Google Scholar
[11]	Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency ofdecision making units[J]. European Journal of Operational Re-search, 1979, 2(6):429-444. Google Scholar
[12]	Malmquist S. Index numbers and indifference surfaces[J]. Trabajos De Estadistica, 1953, 4(2):209-242. doi: 10.1007/BF03006863 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	Fare R, Grosskopf S, Lindgren B, et al. Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980-1989: Anon- parametric Malmquist approach[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1992, 3(1/2):85-101. Google Scholar