Citation: | Bo Li, Bei-bei Kou, Bin Li, Jing Li, Jing Zeng, Qing-lei Niu, Yu-tao Shao, Ke-wei Zhang, Hao-yu Yu, Ying-sheng Wang, 2022. Application of wellhead suction anchor technology in the second production test of natural gas hydrates in the South China Sea, China Geology, 5, 293-299. doi: 10.31035/cg2022027 |
Traditional suction anchor technology is mainly used in the fields of subsea structure bearing foundations, single-point mooring systems and offshore wind power. It is characterized by providing sufficient lateral and vertical bearing capacities and lateral bending moment. The anchor structure of a traditional suction anchor structure is improved with wellhead suction anchor technology, where a central pipe is added as a channel for drilling and completion operations. To solve the technical problems of a low wellhead bearing capacity, shallow built-up depth, and limited application of conductor jetting in the second production test of natural gas hydrates (NGHs) in the South China Sea (SCS), the China Geological Survey (CGS) took the lead in independently designing and manufacturing a wellhead suction anchor, which fulfilled the requirements of the production test. This novel anchor was successfully implemented in the second production test for the first time, providing a stable wellhead foundation for the success of the second production test of NGHs in the SCS.
API RP 2A-WSD. 2014. Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms-Working Stress Design. Washington D. C., American Petroleum Institute, 1–291. |
API RP 2GEO. 2014. Geotechnical and Foundation Design Considerations. First edition. Washington D. C., American Petroleum Institute, 1–108. |
Dendani H, Colliat JL. 2002. Girassol: design analysis and installation of the suction anchors. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas.OTC–14209-MS. doi: 10.4043/14209-MS. |
DNVGL RP C212. 2017. Offshore Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Norway, Det Norske Veritas, 1–181. |
DNVGL RP E303. 2017. Geotechnical Design and Installation of Suction Anchors in Clay. Norway, Det Norske Veritas, 1–48. |
Elgharbawy SL, Olson RE, Scott SA. 1999. Suction anchor installations for deep gulf of mexico applications. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, OTC-10992-MS. doi: 10.4043/10992-MS. |
Erbrich CT, Tjelta TI. 1999. Installation of bucket foundations and suction caissons in sand–geotechnical performance. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas.OTC–10990-MS. doi: 10.4043/10990-MS. |
Evans TG, Feyereisen S, Rheaume G. 2002. Axial capacities of jetted well conductors in Angola. The Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics 'Diversity and Sustainability'; Proceedings of an International Conference, London, UK.SUT–OSIG-02-325. |
Goodman LJ, Lee CN, Walker FJ. 1961. The feasibility of vacuum anchorage in soil. Géotechnique, 1(3), 356–359. doi: 10.1680/geot.1961.11.4.356. |
Guo R. 2019. Mechanical Behavior Analysis of Conductor Anchor Node. Beijing, China University of Petroleum, Master thesis, 1–62 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi:10.27643/d.cnki.gsybu.2019.000705. |
Han I, Kwon O, Oh M. 2016. A comparative study on standard analysis and CEL method of evaluation on the penetration of double suction plate anchor in clay. The Twelfth ISOPE Pacific/Asia Offshore Mechanics Symposium, Gold Coast, Australia. ISOPE-P-16-087. |
Huang Z, Yin F, Li Z, Liu YB. 2021. Numerical simulation of drag anchor trajectory in non-linear soil based on CEL method. The Thirty-first International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Rhodes, Greece, ISOPE-I-21-2158. |
Kan CB, Yang J, Yu XC, Fu C, Hu ND, Li L, Yang YM, Zhang C, Wang HH, Fatai A. 2018. Bearing characteristics of composite conductor structure: Deepwater conductor pipe with suction bucket foundation. Offshore Technology Conference Asia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. OTC-28541-MS. doi:10.4043/28541-MS. |
Kopperud E, Knudsen A, Dybvik SJ, Hardinges F, Mathis W. 2017. Technology update: Conductor anchor node optimizes efficiency of riserless deepwater exploration drilling. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 69(5), 19–21. SPE-0517-0019-JPT. doi:10.2118/0517-0019-JPT. |
Li JF, Ye JL, Qin XW, Qiu HJ, Wu NY, Lu HL, Xie WW, Lu JA, Peng F, Xu ZQ, Lu C, Kuang ZG, Wei JG, Liang QY, Lu HF, Kou BB, 2018. The first offshore natural gas hydrate production test in South China Sea. China Geology, 1(1), 5–16. doi:10.31035/cg2018003. |
Li WL, Gao DL, Yang J. 2019. Challenges and prospect of the drilling and completion technologies used for the natural gas hydrate reservoirs in sea areas. Oil Drilling and Production Technology, 41(6), 681–689 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13639/j.odpt.2019.06.001. |
Mackenzie B, Francis M, Garrett I, Teggart B. 2012. Conductor jetting experiences in deepwater offshore Ghana–an investigation into geotechnical and operational influences on success, and establishment of future best practice. The Offshore Site Investigation and Geotechnics:Integrated Technologies–Present and Future, London, UK.SUT–OSIG-12-13. |
Nazari M, Vermeulen O, Strandbakken T, Nystrøm PR, Eide A. 2020. Settlement assessment of dual suction anchor for Troll West PLEM. The thirtieth International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Shanghai, China.ISOPE–I-20-2150. |
Park JS, Lee J, Won J, Joo YS, Ryu M. 2015. Numerical simulation on suction anchor installation based on a coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian finite element method. The twenty-fifth International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Hawaii, USA.ISOPE–I-15-353. |
Prasertamporn P. 2016. Enhanced deepwater conductor jetting design for east Malaysia. The International Petroleum Technology Conference, Bangkok, Thailand.IPTC–18738-MS. doi: 10.2523/IPTC-18738-MS. |
Senpere D, Auvergne G A. 1982. Suction anchor piles-a proven alternative to driving or drilling. Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas.OTC–4206-MS. doi: 10.4043/4206-MS. |
Sivertsen T., Strand H. 2011. New well foundation concept, as used at a Norwegian sea well. The SPE Arctic and Extreme Environments Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, Russia. SPE-149584-MS. doi: 10.2118/149584-MS. |
Syazwan M, Shafei A, Paimin RM, Su'if MZ, Abidin HZ, Ismail Y, Natarajan S. 2016. Enhancement of structural conductor design and execution of jetting operations for ultra-deepwater wells in Brunei. The SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia.SPE–182427-MS. doi: 10.2118/182427-MS. |
Wang LQ, Pang R. 2011. The application of suction pile in the deepwater oil and gas field development engineering. Ship and Ocean Engineering, 40(2), 98–103. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-7953.2011.02.028. |
Wang Z, Zhuang YQ, Xu SF. 2012. Research status and progress of suction caisson for offshore wind turbines at home and abroad. China Water Transport, 12(8), 89–92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7973-C.2012.08.041. |
Wei HS, Yang J, Liu ZL, Ye JH, Zhang JB, Yan D, Li SZ, Zhang K, Wang WX. 2019. Study on safety control technology of surface conductor jetting penetration in ultra-deep water soft formation drilling. The 29th International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference, Hawaii, USA.ISOPE–I-19-600. |
Xu JZ, Shi QZ, Song A, Ding HY, Ma QJ. 1995. The first application and design of suction anchor in domestic offshore engineering. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Engineering), 1, 32–36. |
Xu JZ, Wang LY, Chen X, Bian QG. 2002. Development from Suction Anchors to Bucket Foundation Platforms: A Technical contemplation in engineering application of the suction foundation techniques in the Bohai Gulf. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Engineering), 14(1), 1–5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2002.01.001. |
Ye JL, Qin XW, Xie WW, Lu HL, Ma BJ, Qiu HJ, Liang JQ, Lu JA, Kuang ZG, Lu C, Liang QY, Wei SP, Yu YJ, Liu CS, Li B, Shen KX, Shi HX, Lu QP, Li J, Kou BB, Song G, Li B, Zhang HE, Lu HF, Ma C, Dong YF, Bian H. 2020. The second natural gas hydrate production test in the South China Sea. China Geology, 3(2), 197–209. doi: 10.31035/cg2020043. |
Zhang PW, Qiu KB, Terao Y, Koji K. 2020. 3D geomechanical evaluation of jetting operations for producing the hydrate chimneys in Sea of Japan. SPE Drilling and Completion, 35(02), 279–296. SPE-199886-PA. doi: 10.2118/199886-PA. |
Schematic diagram of structure comparison between a traditional suction anchor (a) and wellhead suction anchor (b).
Schematic diagram of the force loading on the wellhead suction anchor.
Comparison of horizontal wellbore trajectories with and without a wellhead suction anchor.
(a) Design drawing and (b) photograph of a single-pile wellhead suction anchor.
The single-pile wellhead suction anchor passing through the splash zone.
Variation curve of the hook load and penetration velocity with penetration depth.
The single-pile wellhead suction anchor installed in place.