| Citation: |
Mao-sheng Zhang, Hua-qi Wang, Ying Dong, Lin Li, Ping-ping Sun, Ge Zhang, 2020. Evaluation of urban underground space resources using a negative list method: Taking Xi’an City as an example in China, China Geology, 3, 124-136. doi: 10.31035/cg2020006
|
Evaluation of urban underground space resources using a negative list method: Taking Xi’an City as an example in China
-
Abstract
Utilization of urban underground space has become a vital approach to alleviate the strain on urban land resources, and to optimize the structure and pattern of the city. It is also very important to improve the city environment, build livable city and increase the capacity of the city. Based on the analysis of existing evaluation methods and their problems, a method for evaluating underground space resources based on a negative list of adverse factors affecting underground space development is proposed, to be primarily used in urban planning stages. A list of the adverse factors is established, including limiting factors, constraining factors and influencing factors. Taking Xi’an as an example, using a geographical information system platform, a negative list of adverse factors for the underground space resources in Xi’an City are evaluated, and preventive measures are proposed. Natural resources, exploitable resources, and the potential growth of exploitable underground space resources are evaluated. Underground space assessment in the different development stages of the city, collaborative utilization and safety evaluation for multiple subsurface resources, environmental impact and assessment, as well as evaluation methods based on big data and intelligent optimization algorithms are all discussed with the aim of serving city planning and construction.
-
-
References
[1] Bobylev N. 2007. Sustainability and vulnerability analysis of critical underground infrastructure. In: Managing Critical Infrastructure Risks. Springer, 445-469 pp. [2] Bobylev N. 2009. Mainstreaming sustainable development into a city’s Master plan: A case of Urban Underground Space use. Land Use Policy, 26, 1128–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.003 [3] Doyle MR. 2016. From hydro/geology to the streetscape: Evaluating urban underground resource potential. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 55, 83–95. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2016.01.021 [4] Fan XY. 2014. Research on user satisfaction of rail transit commercial space in Chongqing. Chongqing University. [5] Fattahi H, Shojaee S, Farsangi MAE, Mansouri H. 2013. Hybrid Monte Carlo simulation and ANFIS-subtractive clustering method for reliability analysis of the excavation damaged zone in underground spaces. Computers and Geotechnics, 54, 210–221. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.07.010 [6] He J, He HH, Zheng GS, Liu Y, Zhou YX, Xiao JZ, Wang CJ. 2019. 3D geological modelling of superficial deposits in Beijing City. Geology in China, 46(2), 244–254 (in Chinese with English abstract). [7] He JC, Zou YH, Ma YD, Chen George. 2011. Assistant design system of urban underground pipeline based on 3D virtual city. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 11, 1352–1358. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.12.203 [8] Kohlstedt K. 2015. Invisible Bicycles: Tokyo’s high-tech underground bike parking, Weburbanist. http://weburbanist.com/2015/03/26/invisible-bicyclestokyos-high-tech-underground-bike-parking/> (accessed 11.07.15). [9] Lee EH, Christopoulos G, Lu M, Heo MQ, Soh CK. 2016. Social aspects of working in underground spaces. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 55, 135–145. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.12.012 [10] Li XZ, Li CC, Parriaux A, Wu WB, Li HQ, Sun LP, Liu C. 2016. Multiple resources and their sustainable development in Urban Underground Space. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 55, 59–66. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.003 [11] Lin LJ, Li YM, Ge WY, Hu QY, Li XZ, Li Y, Meng H, Zhang LZ, Yang JF. 2017. General ideas for urban geological survey in China and key theory and techniques. Geology in China, 44(6), 1086–1101 (in Chinese with English abstract). [12] Lou HJ, Wang H, Xia J, Zhao SX. 2002. Application of geological information visualization-the direction in development of the study of urban environmental geology. Geology in China, 29(3), 330–334 (in Chinese with English abstract). [13] Pan YH, Tian Y, Liu XL, Gu DD, Hua G. 2016. Urban Big Data and the Development of City Intelligence. Engineering, 2, 171–178. doi: 10.1016/J.ENG.2016.02.003 [14] Parriaux A, Blunier P, Maire P, Tacher L, 2007. The DEEP CITY project: A global concept for a sustainable urban underground management. In: Paper Presented at the 11th ACUUS International Conference: “Underground Space: Expanding the Frontiers”, 255-260. [15] Qiao YK, Peng FL. 2016. Master planning for underground space in Luoyang: A case of a representative historic city in China. Procedia Engineering, 165, 119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.743 [16] Rienzo de F, Oreste P, Pelizza S. 2008. Subsurface geological-geotechnical modelling to sustain underground civil planning. Engineering Geology, 96, 187–204. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.11.002 [17] Shu Y, Peng FL, Wang X, Zhu HH. 2006. Study and practice of Urban Underground Space Planning in China. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2(7), 1125–1129 (in Chinese with English abstract). [18] United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2014. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights, ST/ESA/SER.A/ 352. United Nations, New York. [19] Wang YM, Elhag TMS. 2006. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(2), 309–319. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.09.040 [20] Wout B. 2016. Urban underground space: Solving the problems of today’s cities. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 55, 245–248. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.012 [21] Xie HH, Chen FL, Tao JH. 2016. Discussion about development and utilization of underground space in Fujian Center Cities. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 12(2), 299–305 (in Chinese with English abstract). [22] Yang R, Li, XZ, Wu WB, Xiong ZY, Cao L, Yu X. 2012. Assessment of application potential of shallow geothermal energy in Suzhou City. Renewable Energy Resources, 30(8), 74–77. [23] Yuan H, He Y, Wu YY. 2019. A comparative study on urban underground space planning system between China and Japan. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101541. [24] Zhang HH, Zheng XX. 2013. Study on development and utilization of urban underground space and its geological environment effect. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 7, 45–49 (in Chinese with English abstract). [25] Zhang LM, Wu XG, Ding LY, Skibniewski MJ. 2013. A novel model for risk assessment of adjacent buildings in tunneling environments. Building and Environment, 65, 185–194. [26] Zhang MS, Dong Y, Liu J. 2014. Discussion of urban geological work in new urbanization. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 50, 581–587 (in Chinese with English abstract). [27] Zhang MS, Wang HQ, Wang Y, Dong Y, Sun PP. 2018. Progress and prospect of urban geological survey in China. Northwestern Geology, 51(4), 1–9 (in Chinese with English abstract). [28] Zhou DK, Li XZ, Wang Q, Wang R, Wang TD, Gu Q, Xin YX. 2019. GIS-based urban underground space resources evaluation toward three dimensional land planning: A case study in Nantong, China. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 84, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.10.017 [29] Zhu HH, Huang XB, Li XJ, Zhang LY, Liu XZ. 2016. Evaluation of urban underground space resources using digitalization technologies. Underground Space, 1, 124–136. doi: 10.1016/j.undsp.2016.08.002 -
Access History
Figures(9)
Tables(7)
Export File
Citation
Mao-sheng Zhang, Hua-qi Wang, Ying Dong, Lin Li, Ping-ping Sun, Ge Zhang, 2020. Evaluation of urban underground space resources using a negative list method: Taking Xi’an City as an example in China, China Geology, 3, 124-136. doi: 10.31035/cg2020006
Format
Content
DownLoad:
-
Figure 1.
The limiting area of the underground space utilization within the second ring of Xi’an.
-
Figure 2.
The reasonable avoidance distances for faults of different activity. a−avoid distance of fault with the strong activity; b−avoid distance of fault with the medium activity; c−avoid distance of fault with the weak activity.
means weak activity of the faults;
means medium activity of the faults;
means strong activity of the faults.
-
Figure 3.
The avoidance distance for ground fissures. a−avoid distance of ground fissures with the strong activity; b−avoid distance of ground fissures with the medium activity; c−avoid distance of ground fissures with the weak activity.
means weak activity of the ground fissures;
means medium activity of the ground fissures;
means strong activity of the ground fissures.
-
Figure 4.
The evaluation figure of the constraining factors.
-
Figure 5.
Subsidence contours and distribution figure. a−land subsidence contours in Xi’an during 1960−2008; b−land subsidence area in Xi’an during 2007−2012.
-
Figure 6.
Loess collapsibility map in Xi’an.
-
Figure 7.
Sand liquefaction map in Xi’an.
-
Figure 8.
The evaluation figure of the influencing factors.
-
Figure 9.
The integrated evaluation of urban underground space resources.