Citation: | Yao-hong Shi, Qian-yong Liang, Jiang-pin Yang, Qing-meng Yuan, Xue-min Wu, Liang Kong, 2019. Stability analysis of submarine slopes in the area of the test production of gas hydrate in the South China Sea, China Geology, 2, 276-286. doi: 10.31035/cg2018122 |
In this paper, the mechanical properties of gas hydrate-bearing sediments (GHBS) were summarized and the instability mechanism of submarine hydrate-bearing slope (SHBS) was analyzed under the background of the test production of gas hydrate in the northern part of the South China Sea. The strength reduction finite element method (SRFEM) was introduced to the stability analysis of submarine slopes for the safety of the test production. Two schemes were designed to determine the physical and mechanical parameters of four target wells. Through the division of the hydrate dissociation region and the design of four working conditions, the range and degree of hydrate dissociation at different stages during the test production were simulated. Based on the software ABAQUS, 37 FEM models of SHBS were set up to analyze and assess the stability of the submarine slopes in the area of the test production. Necessary information such as safety factors, deformation, and displacement were obtained at different stages and under different working conditions. According to the calculation results, the submarine slope area is stable before the test production, and the safety factors almost remains the same during and after the test production. All these indicate that the test production has no obvious influence on the area of the test production and the submarine slopes in the area are stable during and after the test production.
[1] | Fang C, Zhang WD. 2010. Mechanism and analysis of landslide on the seabed due to the decomposition of gas hydrate. Studia Marina Sinica, 149–156 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[2] | Grozic JLH. 2007. Interplay between gas hydrates and submarine slope failure, submarine mass movements and their consequences. Springer Netherlands, 11–30. |
[3] | He J, Liang QY, Ma Y, Shi YH, Xia Z. 2018. Geohazards types and their distribution characteristics in the natural gas hydrate area on the northern slope of the South China Sea. Geology in China, 45(1), 15–28 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[4] | Hyodo M, Nakata Y, Yoshimoto N, Ebinuma T. 2005. Basic research on the mechanical behavior of methane hydrate-sediments mixture. Journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society Soils Foundation, 45(1), 75–85. |
[5] | Hyodo M, Li YH, Yoneda J, Nakata Y, Yoshimoto N, Song YC. 2013. Mechanical behavior of gas-saturated methane hydrate-bearing sediments. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 118(10), 5185–5194. doi: 10.1002/2013JB010233 |
[6] | Jiang MJ, Xiao Y, Liu F. 2010. Methodology for assessing seabed instability induced by exploitation of methane hydrate. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 32(9), 1412–1417 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[7] | Kong L, Zhang ZF, Yuan QM, Liang QY, Shi YH, Lin JQ. 2018. Multi-factor sensitivity analysis on the stability of submarine hydrate-bearing slope. China Geology, 1(3), 367–373. doi: 10.31035/cg2018051 |
[8] | Kurihara M, Sato A, Ouchi H, Narita H, Masuda Y, Saeki T, Fujii T. 2009. Prediction of gas productivity from eastern Nankai trough methane hydrate reservoirs. Spe Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 12(3), 477–499. |
[9] | Kwon TH, Cho GC. 2012. Submarine slope failure primed and triggered by bottom water warming in oceanic hydrate-bearing deposits. Energies, 5(8), 2849–2873. doi: 10.3390/en5082849 |
[10] | Li JF, Ye JL, Qin XW, Qiu HJ, Wu NY, Lu HL, Xie WW, Lu JA, Peng F, Xu ZQ, Lu C, Kuang ZG, Wei JG, Liang QY, Lu HF, Kou BB. 2018. The first offshore natural gas hydrate production test in South China Sea. China Geology, 1(1), 5–16. doi: 10.31035/cg2018003 |
[11] | Li XP, He SM. 2012. Progress in stability analysis of submarine slopes considering dissociation of gas hydrates. Environmental Earth Sciences, 66(3), 741–747. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1282-7 |
[12] | Liang QG, Li DW. 2008. Discussion on strength reduction FEM in geotechnical engineering. Rock & Soil Mechanics, 29(11), 3053–3058 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[13] | Liu F, Wu SG, Sun YB. 2010. A quantitative analysis for submarine slope instability of the northern South China Sea due to gas hydrate dissociation. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 53(4), 93–98 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[14] | Liu LP, Sun ZL, Zhang L, Wu NY, Qin YC, Jiang ZZ, Geng W, Cao H, Zhang XL, Zhai B, Xu CL, Shen ZC, Jia YG. 2019. Progress in global gas hydrate development and production as a new energy resource. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition), 93(3), 731–755. doi: 10.1111/1755-6724.13876 |
[15] | Liu YJ, Li ZM, Zhang LJ, Guo YQ. 2010. Analysis of the causes of new energy flammable ice and its environmental and geotechnical problems. Journal of Guangdong University of Technology, 27(3), 83–87 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[16] | Maslin M, Owen M, Betts R, Day S, Jones TD, Ridgwell A. 2010. Gas hydrates: past and future Geohazard. Philosophical Transactions, 368(1919), 2369–2693. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0065 |
[17] | Shi YH, Zhang XH, Lu XB, Wang SY, Wang AL. 2015. Experimental study on the static mechanical properties of hydrate-bearing silty-clay in the South China Sea. Chinese Journal of Theoretical & Applied Mechanics, 47(3), 521–528 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[18] | Song YC, Yang L, Zhao JF, Liu WG, Yang MJ, Li YH, Liu Y, Li QP. 2014. The status of natural gas hydrate research in China: a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31(2), 778–791. |
[19] | Sultan N, Cochonat P, Canals M, Cattaneo A, Dennielou B, Haflidason, Laberg JS, Long D, Mienert J, Trincardi F, Urgeles R, Vorren TO, Wilson C. 2004a. Triggering mechanisms of slope instability processes and sediment failures on continental margins: a geotechnical approach. Marine Geology, 213(1), 291–321. |
[20] | Sultan N, Cochonat P, Foucher JP, Mienert J. 2004b. Effect of gas hydrates melting on seafloor slope instability. Marine Geology, 213(1), 379–401. |
[21] | Wang LF, Fu SY, Liang JQ, Shang JJ, Wang JL. 2017. A review on gas hydrate developments propped by worldwide national projects. Geology in China, 44(3), 439–448 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[22] | Winters WJ, Pecher IA, Waite WF, Mason DH. 2004. Physical properties and rock physics models of sediment containing natural and laboratory-formed methane gas hydrate. American Mineralogist, 89(8–9), 1221–1227. |
[23] | Winters WJ, Waite WF, Mason DH, Gilbert LY, Pecher IA. 2007. Methane gas hydrate effect on sediment acoustic and strength properties. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 56(1–3), 127–135. |
[24] | Wu NY, Liu CL, Hao XL. 2018. Experimental simulations and methods for natural gas hydrate analysis in China. China Geology, 1(1), 61–67. doi: 10.31035/cg2018008 |
[25] | Yang SX, Liang JQ, Lu JA, Qu CW, Liu B. 2017. New understandings on the characteristics and controlling factors of gas hydrate reservoirs in the Shenhu area on the northern slope of the South China Sea. Earth Science Frontiers, 24(4), 1–14 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[26] | Zhang XH, Hu GH, Lu XB. 2012. Centrifuge experimental simulation of the effect of gas hydrate dissociation on the seabed stability. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 27(3), 301–310 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
[27] | Zhao SY, Zheng YR, Shi WM, Wang JL. 2002. Analysis on safety factor of slope by strength reduction FEM. Chinese Jounal of Geotechnical Engineering, 24(3), 343–346 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
Locations of the test production wells.
Seismic reflection maps of the profiles of the test production wells. a–seismic reflection map of Well SHSC-1; b–seismic reflection map of Well SHSC-2; c–seismic reflection map of Well SHSC-3; d–seismic reflection map of Well SHSC-4.
Division of drilling influence areas.
FEM model and FEM mesh of Well SHSC-4 (Scheme 1). a–FEM model; b–FEM mesh.
FEM model and FEM mesh of Well SHSC-4 (Scheme 2). a–FEM model; b–FEM mesh.
Contours of the plastic zone under different reduction coefficients (Well SHSC-4, during test production, Condition 4, Scheme 1). a–Plastic zone when Fr=1.0; b–plastic zone when Fr=3.406; c–plastic zone when Fr=4.754; d–plastic zone when Fr=4.769.
Relationship between reduction coefficient Fr and displacement of characteristic point (Condition 1, Scheme 1).
Contour of displacement (Fr=4.800, Well SHSC-4, Scheme 1).