2024 Vol. 40, No. 7
Article Contents

WU Bin. Geological architecture and tectonic evolution of Liaodong-Bodong Uplift tectonic belt, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2024, 40(7): 25-35. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2023.243
Citation: WU Bin. Geological architecture and tectonic evolution of Liaodong-Bodong Uplift tectonic belt, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2024, 40(7): 25-35. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2023.243

Geological architecture and tectonic evolution of Liaodong-Bodong Uplift tectonic belt, Bohai Bay Basin

  • To clarify the formation and evolution process of Liaodong-Bodong Uplift tectonic belt and its relationship with oil and gas in Bohai Bay Basin, by combining the latest three-dimensional seismic data in the study area, the tectonic characteristics and the uplift time of the tectonic belt was analyzed in detail, the structural deformation characteristics were compared, and the difference in the uplift time was determined, based on which the formation type and evolution model of the tectonic belt was established. It is considered that the Bodong Low Uplift in the tectonic belt is mainly controlled by the extensional fault, while the Liaodong Uplift is mainly controlled by the early extensional fault and the late strike slip fault. Except for the Liaodong Fault, all the main faults in the tectonic belt started to move in the sedimentary period of the Kongdian Formation and the fourth member of Shahejie Formation, or the Sha-4 Member for short, and the peak period is from the sedimentary period of Sha-3 Member and Dongying Formation, and the fault activity was relatively weak after the deposition of Guantao Formation. The uplift time of the tectonic belt rose gradually from south to north: Bodong Low Uplift rose at the end of the deposition of the Sha-4 Member, the southern section of Liaodong Uplift rose at the end of the deposition of the Sha-3 Member, and the northern section of Liaodong Uplift rose at the end of the deposition of the third member of Dongying Formation (or Dong-3 Member in short). The tectonic evolution could be divided into six stages: sedimentary period the Kongdian Formation to Sha-4 Member , sedimentary period of the Sha-3 Member, sedimentary period of the Sha 1 and 2 Members, sedimentary period of the Dong 3 Member, the end of the Dongying Formation, and the present. The tectonic evolution is closely related to the migration and accumulation of oil and gas. The formation time of the tectonic belt before that of the main hydrocarbon generation and expulsion period of the peripheral hydrocarbon generation depression, which is conducive to the accumulation of oil and gas near the tectonic belt. It was easy for oil and gas to accumulate in the bulge area of Bodong low uplift controlled by extensional fault, and for oil and gas to accumulate in the slope area controlled by strike slip fault.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 李曰俊,杨海军,张光亚,等. 重新划分塔里木盆地塔北隆起的次级构造单元[J]. 岩石学报,2012,28(8):2466-2478.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 吕丁友,张宏国,麻旭刚,等. 渤海东部凸起区与斜坡区油气勘探实践与认识[J]. 地质科技情报,2018,37(5):90-95.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 王应斌,王海军,孙和风. 渤东低凸起构造演化及成藏条件[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2010,31(2):151-158.

    Google Scholar

    [4] LEVORSEN A I. Geology of Petroleum [M]. 2nd ed. San Franciso:W. H. Freeman and Company,1967.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 漆家福. 渤海湾新生代盆地的两种构造系统及其成因解释[J]. 中国地质,2004,31(1):15-22.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 吴智平,薛雁,颜世永,等. 渤海海域渤东地区断裂体系与盆地结构[J]. 高校地质学报,2013,19(3):463-471.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 李伟,郭甜甜,吴智平,等. 平衡剖面方法在伸展、走滑作用叠加、配比关系分析中的应用:以渤海海域辽东湾坳陷为例[J]. 地质论评,2019,65(6):1501-1514.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 贾楠,刘池洋,张功成,等. 辽东湾坳陷新生代差异抬升事件的确定及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘,2015,22(3):77-87.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 彭靖淞,徐长贵,吴奎,等. 郯庐断裂带辽东凸起的形成与古辽中洼陷的瓦解[J]. 石油学报,2015,36(3):274-285.

    Google Scholar

    [10] CHENG Y J,WU Z P,YAN S Y,et al. Cenozoic tectonic evolution of Liaodong dome,Northeast Liaodong Bay,Bohai,offshore China,constraints from seismic stratigraphy,vitrinite reflectance and apatite fission track data[J]. Tectonophysics,2015,659:152-165. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2015.07.039

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] 葛建党. 郯庐断裂在渤中凹陷的构造特征与油气成藏的关系[J]. 海洋石油,2001,107(1):14-20.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 任云鹏,黄颖,鲁凤婷,等. 渤海海域渤东低凸起差异演化及控藏作用[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2022,38(2):55-61.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 张参,官大勇,王明臣,等. 渤海海域渤东低凸起中南段构造演化与油气成藏[J]. 东北石油大学学报,2014,38(6):68-75.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 蒋有录,刘培,宋国奇,等. 渤海湾盆地新生代晚期断层活动与新近系油气富集关系[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2015,36(4):5-13.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 朱伟林,吴景富,张功成,等. 中国近海新生代盆地构造差异性演化及油气勘探方向[J]. 地学前缘,2015,22(1):88-101.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 侯贵廷,钱祥麟,宋新民,等. 渤海湾盆地形成机制研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版),1998,34(4):503-509.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 柳永军,徐长贵,吴奎,等. 辽中南洼走滑反转带的形成及其 对油藏的控制作用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2016,35(3):16-21.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 夏庆龙,田立新,周心怀,等. 渤海海域构造形成演化与变形机制[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2012:58-63.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 徐守余. 渤海湾地区盆地动力学分析及油田地质灾害研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2004.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 朱日祥,徐义刚,朱光,等. 华北克拉通破坏[J]. 中国科学:地球科学,2012,42(8):1135-1159.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 李三忠,索艳慧,戴黎明,等. 渤海湾盆地形成与华北克拉通破坏[J]. 地学前缘,2010,17(4):64-89.

    Google Scholar

    [22] HUANG L,LIU C Y. Evolutionary characteristics of the sags to the east of Tan-Lu Fault Zone,Bohai Bay Basin (China):implications for hydrocarbon exploration and regional tectonic evolution[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences,2014,79:275-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2013.09.031

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] HUANG L,LIU C Y,ZHOU X H,et al. The important turning points during evolution of Cenozoic basin offshore the Bohai Sea:evidence and regional dynamics analysis [J]. Science China:Earth Sciences,2012,55(3):476-487.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 漆家福,邓荣敬,周心怀,等. 渤海海域新生代盆地中的郯庐断裂带构造[J]. 中国科学(D辑):地球科学,2008,38(s1):19-29.

    Google Scholar

    [25] ZHANG Y Q,MA Y S,YANG N,et al. Cenozoic extensional stress evolution in North China[J]. Journal of Geodynamics,2003,36:591-613. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2003.08.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [26] HSIAO L Y,GRAHAM S A,TILANDER N. Seismic reflection imaging of a major strike-slip fault zone in a rift system:Paleogene structure and evolution of the Tan-Lu Fault system,Liaodong Bay,Bohai,offshore China[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2004,88(1):71-97. doi: 10.1306/09090302019

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] 侯贵廷. 渤海湾盆地地球动力学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2014.

    Google Scholar

    [28] NORTHRUP C J,ROYDEN L H,BURCHFIEL B C. Motion of the Pacific plate relative to Eurasia and its potential relation to Cenozoic extension along the eastern margin of Eurasia[J]. Geology,1995,23:719-722.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 黄雷,周心怀,刘池洋,等. 渤海海域新生代盆地演化的重要转折期:证据及区域动力学分析[J]. 中国科学:地球科学,2012,42(6):893-904.

    Google Scholar

    [30] HU P P,YANG F L,TIAN L X,et al. Stress field modelling of the Late Oligocene tectonic inversion in the Liaodong Bay Subbasin,Bohai Bay Basin (northern China):implications for geodynamics and petroleum accumulation[J]. Journal of Geodynamics,2019,126:32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jog.2019.01.003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] TENG C Y,HAO F,ZOU H Y,et al. Tan-Lu Fault system and its significance in oil accumulation in the central Liaodong Bay subbasin,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2016,100(2):289-314. doi: 10.1306/10221515011

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] QI J F,YANG Q. Cenozoic structural deformation and dynamic processes of the Bohai Bay basin province,China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2010,27:757-771. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.08.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] 周玉琦,周荔青,郭念发. 中国东部新生代盆地油气地质[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2004.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 詹润,朱光,杨贵丽,等. 渤海海域新近纪断层成因与动力学状态[J]. 地学前缘,2013,20(4):151-165.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 罗群. 断裂控烃理论的概念、原理、模式与意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2010,37(3):113-124.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 李伟,戚建庆,周东红,等. 辽东湾坳陷辽西凸起的形成与演化[J]. 大地构造与成矿学,2019,43(5):911-923.

    Google Scholar

    [37] LEE W. Thickness maps as criteria for regional structural movements[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1954,38(6):1303-1304.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 辽河油田石油地质志编辑委员会. 中国石油地质志(卷三):辽河油田[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,1993:56-91.

    Google Scholar

    [39] 胜利油田石油地质志编辑委员会. 中国石油地质志(卷六):胜利油田[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,1993:18-84.

    Google Scholar

    [40] 大港油田石油地质志编辑委员会. 中国石油地质志(卷六):大港油田[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,1991:32-114.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(9)

Article Metrics

Article views(263) PDF downloads(178) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint