| Qingdao Institute of marine geology, China Geological Survey | Host |
| Citation: |
LYU Peng, LEI Lei, SUN Li, WANG Jianwei, YAN Hua, LIN Lixin, LIU Shipeng, GE Jiawang, WU Wenwen. Seismic prediction of tide-controlled sand reservoir in Pinghu Formation coal seam, W Gas Field, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(10): 66-76. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.182
|
Seismic prediction of tide-controlled sand reservoir in Pinghu Formation coal seam, W Gas Field, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin
-
Abstract
The Xihu Sag in the East China Sea is rich in oil and gas resources and has good exploration and development potential. Pinghu Formation, as an important oil-bearing horizon, has become the focus of exploration and development in the near future. Thin coal seams are widely developed in Pinghu Formation, which leads to multiple solutions of seismic amplitude, phase, and frequency of oil-bearing sand bodies, which seriously restricts the development and production. To identify oil-bearing sandstone under the influence of thin coal seams, reservoir earthquake prediction was carried out. First, the characteristics of tide-controlled sedimentary environment were analyzed in detail through core, well logging, and analytical laboratory data. Then, using rock physical analysis technology, the characteristics of pre-stack collection response of water-bearing sandstone and gas-bearing sand under the influence of thin coal seams were summarized. Finally, the geophysical properties were used to predict the reservoir of tide-controlled sand body, and the favorable target selection in the study area was realized in combination with the sedimentary characteristics. Results show that the Pinghu Formation mainly developed tide-controlled delta-tidal sedimentary environment, in which underwater distributary channel, estuary bar, and tidal sand bar were the dominant sedimentary microfacies. Under the influence of thin coal seam, the sand-body reservoir shows AVO type-Ⅱ response characteristics with wave crest in the short path and trough in the far path. Using prestack gathers response law to guide the P/S velocity ratio inversion, control reservoir quantitative prediction was completed. Based on the understanding of paleo-geomorphology and sedimentary microfacies, the potential of the tidal control environment in the study area could be accurately described, and No.3 sand body is a favorable and potential target. This method improved effectively the accuracy of reservoir prediction in the study area, and provided a technical support for the well location deployment of the deep coal measure tidal control sand body in the block.
-
-
References
[1] 江东辉,蒲仁海,苏思羽,等. 断陷盆地斜坡带大型油气田成藏条件:西湖凹陷平北缓坡断裂与岩性控藏有利区[J]. 天然气工业,2021,41(11):33-42. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.11.004 [2] 周荔青,江东辉,张尚虎,等. 东海西湖凹陷大中型油气田形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质,2020,42(5):803-812. doi: 10.11781/sysydz202005803 [3] 周心怀. 西湖凹陷地质认识创新与油气勘探领域突破[J]. 中国海上油气,2020,32(1):1-12. [4] 王泽宇,徐清海,侯国伟,等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷W井区平湖组潮汐沉积模式[J]. 海相油气地质,2021,26(2):159-169. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2021.02.008 [5] 王红岩,周祥林,胡伟,等. 西湖凹陷平北斜坡带含煤系地层储层预测[J]. 石油物探,2021,60(4):595-603. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2021.04.008 [6] 刘英辉,蔡华,段冬平,等. 西湖凹陷平湖地区平湖组海侵体系域潮控三角洲-潮坪沉积特征及模式[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2022,38(1):33-40. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.147 [7] 胡云亭,刘灵童,王文升,等. 基于沉积相控的优质储层预测:以鄂尔多斯盆地X区块下石盒子组致密砂岩气为例[J]. 断块油气田,2020,27(6):705-709. [8] 张兰,汪文基,何贤科,等. 东海西湖凹陷平湖组富煤环境相控储层预测技术[J]. 现代地质,2019,33(2):337-344. doi: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2019.02.09 [9] 李上卿,李纯洁. 东海西湖凹陷油气资源分布及勘探潜力分析[J]. 石油实验地质,2003,25(6):721-728. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6112.2003.06.015 [10] 蔡华,秦兰芝,刘英辉. 西湖凹陷平北斜坡带海陆过渡相源-汇系统差异性及其耦合模式[J]. 地球科学,2019,44(3):880-897. [11] 常吟善,段冬平,张兰,等. 西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带A气田沉积体系定量表征及海平面变化周期性探讨[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2021,41(3):12-21. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2020081302 [12] 吴峰,任培罡,谈明轩,等. 东海西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区平湖组沉积相演变及其主控因素分析[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2022,42(2):119-130. doi: 10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2021052401 [13] 徐长贵,赖维成. 渤海古近系中深层储层预测技术及其应用[J]. 中国海上油气,2005,17(4):231-236. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2005.04.004 [14] 王华,白云风,黄传炎,等. 歧口凹陷古近纪东营期古物源体系重建与应用[J]. 地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2009,34(3):448-456. [15] 侯国伟,李帅,秦兰芝,等. 西湖凹陷西部斜坡带平湖组源-汇体系特征[J]. 中国海上油气,2019,31(3):29-39. [16] 刘金水,陆永潮,秦兰芝. 源—汇系统分析方法在大型储集体研究中的应用:以西湖凹陷中央反转带花港组为例[J]. 石油实验地质,2019,41(3):303-310. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903303 [17] 漆家福. 裂陷盆地中的构造变换带及其石油地质意义[J]. 海相油气地质,2007,12(4):43-50. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2007.04.007 [18] 王启明,黄晓波,宛良伟,等. 石臼坨凸起东倾末端沙一、二段汇聚体系特征及砂体展布规律[J]. 中国海上油气,2017,29(4):60-67. [19] 张建林,林畅松,郑和荣. 断陷湖盆断裂、古地貌及物源对沉积体系的控制作用:以孤北洼陷沙三段为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2002,9(4):24-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2002.04.009 -
Access History
Figures(14)
Tables(3)
Export File
Citation
LYU Peng, LEI Lei, SUN Li, WANG Jianwei, YAN Hua, LIN Lixin, LIU Shipeng, GE Jiawang, WU Wenwen. Seismic prediction of tide-controlled sand reservoir in Pinghu Formation coal seam, W Gas Field, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(10): 66-76. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.182
Format
Content
DownLoad:
-
Figure 1.
Regional tectonic characteristics （a）, bedrock distribution （b）, and faults and gas fields in the study area （c） in Xihu Sag[10]
-
Figure 2.
Comprehensive column of the Cenozoic strata and third-order sequence stratigraphic unit of Pinghu Formation, Xihu Sag[10]
-
Figure 3.
Sandstone triangular classification diagram in the Lower Member of Pinghu Formation
-
Figure 4.
Sandstone sorting histogram
-
Figure 5.
Histogram of sandstone roundness
-
Figure 6.
Geological model models 1, 2, and 3
-
Figure 7.
Seismic response characteristics of different geological models
-
Figure 8.
Seismic gathers and AVO forward modeling of the Lower Member of Pinghu Formation in Well W5
-
Figure 9.
Seismic section of the Lower Member of Pinghu Formation passing through Well W6
-
Figure 10.
Transient seismic attributes along the target layer in the Lower Member of Pinghu Formation
-
Figure 11.
Vp/Vs inversion attribute of P10 layer
-
Figure 12.
Distribution of sand body thickness of P10 layer
-
Figure 13.
Paleomorphology of the Lower Member of Pinghu Formation
-
Figure 14.
Sedimentary microfacies of the target layer