Citation: | ZHENG Jingjia, XU Xiugang, SUN Yanfeng, JIANG Ruijing, XUE Ming. Stability of hydrate slope in vertical multi-well dynamic mining[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(6): 75-84. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2022.059 |
Natural gas hydrate is a clean energy occurring in the pores of seabed sediments. It has a large content and does not cause great harm to the environment, thus it has a good prospect and research value. Vertical wells as a main way of gas hydrates mining, the exploitation activities may alter the environmental conditions of the natural gas hydrate sediments, under which a large amount of gas and water would be released and result in overpressure in the strata, and the excessive pore pressure could reduce sediment consolidation strength, destroy the stability of the sediments, and induce submarine landslides. We established a high-precision underwater slope model with the aid of Flac3D software, and numerically simulated the slope stability in the process of vertical multi-well dynamic hydrate mining in finite difference method. The strata mechanical response and displacement changes caused by different influencing factors such as hydrate decomposition and well pressure change under different exploitation schemes were simulated. Using the safety factor method, the slope stability caused by hydrate mining was preliminarily analyzed. The results show that the stability of submarine slope decreases gradually with the increasing degree of hydrate decomposition under multi-well mining conditions. When the degree of hydrate decomposition reaches 80%, the safety factor will be lower than 1.0, and the slope will become unstable. With the decrease in well pressure, the stability of submarine slope also decreases gradually. When the well pressure drops below 4 Mpa, the safety factor will drop below 1.05, and the slope becomes less stable with a risk of submarine landslide.
[1] | MOORE D G. Submarine slides[J]. Developments in Geotechnical Engineering,1978,14(3):563-604. |
[2] | PRIOR D B, COLEMAN J M. Active slides and flows in under consolidated marine-sediments on the slopes of the Mississippi delta [C]//SAXOV S and NIEUWENHIUS J K. Marine Slides and Other Mass Movements. New York: Plenum Press, 1982. 21-49. |
[3] | SAXOV S. Marine slides-Some introductory remarks[J]. Marine Geotechnology,1990,9(4):110-114. |
[4] | 胡光海. 东海陆坡海底滑坡识别及致滑因素影响研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2010. |
[5] | 史慧杰,褚宏宪,高小慧. 海底斜坡稳定性研究进展及分析[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2013,29(3):42-45+59. |
[6] | 朱超祁,贾永刚,刘晓磊,等. 海底滑坡分类及成因机制研究进展[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2015,35(6):153-163. |
[7] | 刘锋. 南海北部陆坡天然气水合物分解引起的海底滑坡与环境风险评价[D]. 青岛: 中国科学院研究生院(海洋研究所), 2010. |
[8] | 杨晓云. 天然气水合物与海底滑坡研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2010. |
[9] | 秦志亮. 南海北部陆坡块体搬运沉积体系的沉积过程、分布及成因研究[D]. 青岛: 中国科学院研究生院(海洋研究所), 2012. |
[10] | 张亮,栾锡武. 南海北部陆坡稳定性定量分析[J]. 地球物理学进展,2012,27(4):1443-1453. doi: 10.6038/j.issn.1004-2903.2012.04.019 |
[11] | 马云. 南海北部陆坡区海底滑坡特征及触发机制研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2014. |
[12] | 周念圻. 海域天然气水合物降压开采甲烷逸散的模拟研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2019. |
[13] | 唐常锐,徐秀刚,孙秉才,等. 天然气水合物分解诱发海底滑坡影响因素分析及致灾风险评价[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2021,37(5):14-21. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.021 |
[14] | CHEN Y M,ZHANG L L,LIAO C C,et al. A two-stage probabilistic approach for the risk assessment of submarine landslides induced by gas hydrate exploitation[J]. Applied Ocean Research,2020,99(1):102158. |
[15] | NIXON M F,GROZIC J L H. Submarine slope failure due to gas hydrate dissociation:a preliminary quantification[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2007,44(3):314-325. doi: 10.1139/t06-121 |
[16] | 赵华金,杨邦成. 有限元强度折减法在海底斜坡稳定性分析中的研究现状[J]. 中国水运,2019,19(5):173-174. |
[17] | 李志佳,张顶立,房倩,等. 基于强度折减法的土质边坡稳定性影响因素分析[J]. 隧道建设,2013,33(10):854-859. |
[18] | 费康, 彭劼. CAE分析大系: ABAQUS岩土工程实例详解[M]. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2020. |
Schematic model of a submarine slope
Cloud images of the displacement obtained from three vertical wells in seven different schemes
Cloud images of the plastic zone distribution obtained from three vertical wells in seven different schemes
Variation curve of safety factor under different decomposition schemes
Cloud images of the displacement obtained from three vertical wells in five different well pressure schemes
Plastic zone distribution cloud images obtained from three vertical Wells with five different well pressure schemes
The safety factor curve