Structural trap characteristics and reservoir types in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin

ZHANG Zhou; HE Xinjian; TANG Xianjun; ZHU Honghao

doi:10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.139

2022 Vol. 38, No. 3

Article Contents

Article navigation > Marine Geology Frontiers > 2022 > 38(3): 27-35

Next Article Previous Article

ZHANG Zhou, HE Xinjian, TANG Xianjun, ZHU Honghao. Structural trap characteristics and reservoir types in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2022, 38(3): 27-35. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.139

Citation:

ZHANG Zhou, HE Xinjian, TANG Xianjun, ZHU Honghao. Structural trap characteristics and reservoir types in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2022, 38(3): 27-35. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2021.139

Structural trap characteristics and reservoir types in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin

Shanghai Branch of CNOOC（China） Limited, Shanghai 200335, China

Received Date: 10 May 2021

Publish Date: 28 March 2022

Abstract

Abstract

3D seismic data interpretation is systematically carried out by this paper in order to learn the distribution pattern, forming time and genetic mechanisms of the structural traps in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin. Combined with hydrocarbon accumulation conditions, both the main reservoir types and the characteristics of structural traps are revealed. The results show that fault traps and anticline traps dominate the Xihu Sag, among which fault traps are mainly distributed in the slope zone and anticline trap in the inversion zone of the Central Sag. Fault type traps are mainly formed in the rifting stage and controlled by extensional faults and associated structures, while anticline traps mainly formed in the inversion stage controlled by tectonic inversion under a compressional background.The oil and gas reservoirs in the structural traps of the Xihu Sag mainly include the types of faulted nose, faulted block, faulted anticline and anticline. Controlled by source-connected faults, all the oil and gas reservoirs have the characteristics of longitudinal superposition, which resulted in the hydrocarbon accumulations occurred in a pattern with the large in deep, the small in shallow and close to source and fault. In the Late Miocene Longjing movement, the main source faults were reactivated which controlled not only the types of faults and anticlinal traps, but also the accumulation of oil and gas in various structural traps.
- fault-type trap /
- anticlinal trap /
- structural inversion /
- extrusion stress /
- reservoir type /
- Xihu Sag

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	连小翠,张建培. 西湖凹陷反转构造样式与迁移规律[J]. 上海国土资源,2016,37(4):83-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1329.2016.04.022 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	张金亮, 常象春. 石油地质学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004: 188. Google Scholar
[3]	LEVORSON A I. Geology of petroleum[M]. AAPG Foundation, 2001, 85（4）: 724-726. Google Scholar
[4]	邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望: 以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33（2）: 173-187. Google Scholar
[5]	ZHANG J P,LI S Z,SUO Y H. Formation,tectonic evolution and dynamics of the East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Geological Journal,2016,51(S1):162-175. Google Scholar
[6]	ZHANG G H,LI S Z,SUO Y H,et al. Cenozoic positive inversion tectonics and its migration in the East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Geological Journal,2016,51(S1):176-187. Google Scholar
[7]	高伟中,谭思哲,田超,等. 西湖凹陷中央反转构造带圈闭油气充满度差异性原因分析[J]. 中国海上油气,2019,31(3):20-28. Google Scholar
[8]	周心怀. 西湖凹陷地质认识创新与油气勘探领域突破[J]. 中国海上油气,2020,32(1):1-12. Google Scholar
[9]	胡惠娟,胡玲英,陈健康. 东海西湖凹陷西部斜坡带圈闭类型及含油气性分析[J]. 上海地质,1996(1):56-62. Google Scholar
[10]	熊斌辉,王春红,张锦伟,等. 西湖凹陷龙井运动特征[J]. 中国海上油气,2008,20(2):77-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2008.02.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
[11]	谢月芳,陈敏娟,王坚勇. 东海西湖凹陷浙东中央背斜带中南部油气成藏规律与晚期剪切断层的关系探讨[J]. 海洋石油,2013,22(2):8-13. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2013.02.008 CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	蔡华,张建培,唐贤君. 西湖凹陷断裂系统特征及其控藏机制[J]. 天然气工业,2014,34(10):18-26. Google Scholar
[13]	周心怀,蒋一鸣,唐贤君. 西湖凹陷成盆背景、原型盆地演化及勘探启示[J]. 中国海上油气,2019,31(3):1-10. Google Scholar
[14]	赵志刚,王鹏,祁鹏,等. 东海盆地形成的区域地质背景与构造演化特征[J]. 地球科学,2016,41(3):546-554. Google Scholar
[15]	支家生. 东海陆架盆地的构造演化与油气分布[J]. 中国海上油气,1990,4(5):9-18,67,6-7. Google Scholar
[16]	张建培,张田,唐贤君. 东海陆架盆地类型及其形成的动力学环境[J]. 地质学报,2014,88(11):2033-2043. Google Scholar
[17]	张绍亮,张建培,唐贤君,等. 东海西湖凹陷断裂系统几何学特征及其成因机制[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2014,34(1):87-94. Google Scholar
[18]	杨丽娜,王丽顺. 西湖凹陷保俶斜坡断裂特征及与油气成藏的关系[J]. 海洋石油,2007,27(1):19-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2336.2007.01.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[19]	张建培. 东海西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带断裂系统特征及成因机制探讨[J]. 地质科学,2013,48(1):291-303. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0563-5020.2013.01.020 CrossRef Google Scholar
[20]	蔡华,张建培. 东海西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带断层特征及其封闭性[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2013,29(4):20-26. Google Scholar
[21]	李宁,覃军,江瀚,赵洪,汤睿. 西湖凹陷T气田油气分布特征与主控因素[J]. 断块油气田,2017,24(3):329-332. Google Scholar
[22]	胡惠娟,陶国保. 东海西湖凹陷第三纪岩浆活动与油气聚集的关系[J]. 海洋地质译丛,1997(3):13-19. Google Scholar
[23]	秘丛永. 西湖凹陷中央反转带和平湖斜坡带断裂特征及演化[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2015. Google Scholar
[24]	郭真,刘池洋,田建锋. 东海陆架盆地龙井运动构造影响及其发育背景[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2015(5):801-810. Google Scholar
[25]	龚建明,陈国威. 西湖凹陷东部断阶带火成岩的分布特征[J]. 中国海上油气(地质),1995,9(1):13-17. Google Scholar
[26]	蒋一鸣,邹玮,刘金水,等. 东海西湖凹陷中新世末反转背斜构造成因机制:来自基底结构差异的新认识[J]. 地球科学,2020,45(3):968-979. Google Scholar
[27]	唐贤君,蒋一鸣,张建培,等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷平北区断陷层断裂特征及其对圈闭的控制[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2019,35(8):34-43. Google Scholar