COASTLINE CRITERIA FOR LAND AREA OF THE HUANGHE RIVER DELTA AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE

YU Shoubing; FAN Yaoshen

doi:10.16028/j.1009-2722.2020.026

2021 Vol. 37, No. 2

Article Contents

Article navigation > Marine Geology Frontiers > 2021 > 37(2): 1-9

Next Article Previous Article

YU Shoubing, FAN Yaoshen. COASTLINE CRITERIA FOR LAND AREA OF THE HUANGHE RIVER DELTA AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2021, 37(2): 1-9. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2020.026

Citation:

YU Shoubing, FAN Yaoshen. COASTLINE CRITERIA FOR LAND AREA OF THE HUANGHE RIVER DELTA AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2021, 37(2): 1-9. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2020.026

COASTLINE CRITERIA FOR LAND AREA OF THE HUANGHE RIVER DELTA AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE

YU Shoubing^1,2,
FAN Yaoshen^1,2

1.
Yellow River Institute of Hydraulic Research, Yellow River Water Conservancy Commission of Ministry of Water Resources, Zhengzhou 450003, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Yellow River Sediment, Ministry of Water Resource, Zhengzhou 450003, China

Received Date: 19 March 2020

Publish Date: 28 February 2021

Abstract

Abstract

The land area of the Huanghe River Delta is significant to the integrated estuary administration and management, national land planning, conservation and development of natural reserves and oil-gas exploitation and development. The adopted criteria for the time being include high tide line, low tide line, 0 m line upon the Huanghai datum and −2 m line upon the Huanghai datum from measured data, and high tide line, low tide line, water body line from Remote sensing satellite images. There are large differences in the figures of land increment per 1×10⁸ t sediment or so-called “land increment efficiency” among the data from the Lijin Station, the modern delta, the Qingshuigou course, and the Qing 8 course. The coastline from satellite images have big differences in some periods, due to the broad tidal flat with gentle slope. It is suggested that the −2 m line on the Huanghai datum is proper for studies of coastal progradation and retrogradation, water course avulsion and migration, and influences on lower reaches of the River. The main problem of the existing studies on the sediment for coastline dynamic balance is that data are not sufficient from recession periods. In order to maintain long term stabilization of current course, more work is required to study the sediment budget and coastal dynamic balance along the Qingshuigou course.
- Huanghe River Delta /
- land area /
- coastline /
- land increment efficiency /
- sediment budget

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	庞家珍,司书亨. 黄河河口演变Ⅱ. 河口水文特征及泥沙淤积分布[J]. 海洋与湖沼,1980,11(4):296-305. Google Scholar
[2]	夏东兴,段焱,吴桑云. 现代海岸线划定方法研究[J]. 海洋学研究,2009,27(S):28-33. Google Scholar
[3]	于彩霞,许军,黄文骞,等. 海岸线及其测绘技术探讨[J]. 测绘工程,2015,24(7):1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7949.2015.07.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	洪尚池,吴致尧. 黄河河口地区海岸线变迁情况分析[J]. 海洋工程,1984(2):68-74. Google Scholar
[5]	庞家珍,姜明星,李福林. 黄河口径流、泥沙、海岸线变化及其发展趋势[J]. 海洋湖沼通报,2000(4):1-6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6482.2000.04.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	郭永盛. 近代黄河三角洲海岸的变迁[J]. 海洋科学,1980(1):30-34. Google Scholar
[7]	李希宁,刘曙光,李从先. 黄河三角洲冲淤平衡的来沙量临界值分析[J]. 人民黄河,2001,23(3):20-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2001.03.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	彭俊,陈沈良,李谷祺,等. 黄河三角洲岸线及现行河口区水下地形演变[J]. 地理学报,2012,67(3):368-373. doi: 10.11821/xb201203008 CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	姜明星,杨风栋,霍瑞敬,等. 黄河三角洲海岸及滨海区演变与河口流路、入海水沙的关系[J]. 海洋湖沼通报,2004(3):6-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6482.2004.03.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
[10]	濮静娟,王长耀. 利用卫星遥感资料研究河口三角洲、湖泊的动态[J]. 地理学报,1979,34(1):43-54. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.1979.01.005 CrossRef Google Scholar
[11]	席家治, 陆俭益, 丁六逸, 等. 黄河入海流路规划报告[R]. 郑州: 黄河水利委员会勘测规划设计院, 1989: 14. Google Scholar
[12]	吉祖稳,胡春宏,曾庆华,等. 运用遥感卫星照片分析黄河口近期演变[J]. 泥沙研究,1994(3):12-22. Google Scholar
[13]	栗云召,于君宝,韩广轩,等. 基于遥感的黄河三角洲海岸线变化研究[J]. 海洋科学,2012,36(4):99-106. Google Scholar
[14]	CHU Z X,SUN X G,ZHAI S K,et al. Changing pattern of accretion/erosion of the modern Yellow River (Huanghe) subaerial delta,China:based on remote sensing images[J]. Marine Geology,2006,227:13-30. Google Scholar
[15]	常军,刘高焕,刘庆生. 黄河口海岸线演变时空特征及其与黄河来水来沙关系[J]. 地理研究,2004,23(5):339-346. Google Scholar
[16]	CUI B L,LI X Y. Coastline change of the Yellow River Estuary and its response to the sediment and runoff (1976—2005)[J]. Geomorphology,2011,127:32-40. Google Scholar
[17]	薛允传,马圣媛,周成虎. 基于遥感和GIS 的现代黄河三角洲岸线变迁及发育演变研究[J]. 海洋科学,2009,33(5):36-40. Google Scholar
[18]	WANG K F. Evolution of Yellow River Delta coastline based on remote sensing from 1976 to 2014,China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2019,29(2):181-191. Google Scholar
[19]	李云驹,刘学工,马浩录,等. 黄河口尾闾变化的遥感分析[J]. 人民黄河,2006,28(7):1-2. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2006.07.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[20]	JIANG C,PAN S Q,CHEN S L. Recent morphological changes of the Yellow River (Huanghe) submerged delta:causes and environmental implications[J]. Geomorphology,2017,293:93-107. Google Scholar
[21]	陈俊卿,李小娟,杨金荣,等. 1996—2007年黄河新口门造陆分析[J]. 人民黄河,2009,31(3):38,102. Google Scholar
[22]	杨伟. 现代黄河三角洲海岸线变迁及滩涂演化[J]. 海洋地质前沿,2012,28(7):17-23. Google Scholar
[23]	黄海军,李成治,郭建军. 卫星影像在黄河三角洲岸线变化研究中的应用[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,1994,14(2):29-37. Google Scholar
[24]	赵庚星,张万清,李玉环,等. GIS 支持下的黄河口近期淤、蚀动态研究[J]. 地理科学,1999,19(5):442-445. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0690.1999.05.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[25]	何庆成,张波,李采. 基于RS、GIS 集成技术的黄河三角洲海岸线变迁研究[J]. 中国地质,2006,33(5):1118-1123. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2006.05.022 CrossRef Google Scholar
[26]	董芳,赵庚星,田文新,等. 基于遥感和GIS的黄河三角洲淤蚀动态研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2003,31(1):53-56. Google Scholar
[27]	程义吉,张建怀,杨晓阳. 黄河三角洲海岸线的演变特征分析[J]. 人民黄河,2011,33(10):118-120. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2011.10.044 CrossRef Google Scholar
[28]	BI N S,WANG H J,YANG Z S. Recent changes in the erosion–accretion patterns of the active Huanghe (Yellow River) delta lobe caused by human activities[J]. Continental Shelf Research,2014,90:70-78. Google Scholar
[29]	KONG D X,MIAO C Y,BORTHWICK A G L,et al. Evolution of the Yellow River Delta and its relationship with runoff and sediment load from 1983 to 2011[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2015,520:157-167. Google Scholar
[30]	WU X,BI N S,XU J P,et al. Stepwise morphological evolution of the active Yellow River (Huanghe) Delta lobe (1976–2013):dominant roles of riverine discharge and sediment grain size[J]. Geomorphology,2017,292:115-127. Google Scholar
[31]	郭文. 基于遥感的黄河三角洲海岸带淤蚀变化及其水沙阈值研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2018: 40. Google Scholar
[32]	胡春宏,吉祖稳,王涛. 黄河口海洋动力特性与泥沙的输移扩散[J]. 泥沙研究,1996(4):1-10. Google Scholar
[33]	王恺忱. 黄河河口发展影响预估计算方法[J]. 泥沙研究,1988(3):40-50. Google Scholar
[34]	许炯心. 黄河三角洲造陆过程中的陆域水沙临界条件研究[J]. 地理研究,2002,21(2):163-170. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2002.02.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[35]	郭永盛,许学工,范兆木,等. 黄河口区域演变的预测研究[J]. 海洋学报,1992,14(3):95-104. Google Scholar
[36]	王恺忱. 黄河河口的演变与治理[J]. 郑州:黄河水利出版社,2010:156-158. Google Scholar
[37]	李福林,姜明星. 黄河清水沟流路河口三角洲增长面积预测[J]. 海洋湖沼通报,1999(3):16-22. Google Scholar
[38]	李福林,庞家珍,姜明星. 黄河三角洲海岸线变化及其环境地质效应[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2000,20(4):17-21. Google Scholar
[39]	程义吉,杨晓阳,孙效功. 黄河口清8 汊河海域冲淤变化分析[J]. 人民黄河,2004,26(11):17-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2004.11.008 CrossRef Google Scholar
[40]	徐丛亮,陈沈良,陈俊卿. 新情势下黄河口出汊流路三角洲体系的演化模式[J]. 海岸工程,2018,37(4):35-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3682.2018.04.005 CrossRef Google Scholar
[41]	褚忠信,马向辉,张建启,等. 一般高潮线与2 m等深线反映黄河三角洲冲淤变化的对比[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2005,25(4):23-27. Google Scholar
[42]	李泽刚. 黄河口拦门沙的形成和演变[J]. 地理学报,1997,52(1):55-62. Google Scholar
[43]	陈沈良,张国安,陈小英,等. 黄河三角洲飞雁滩海岸的侵蚀及机理[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质,2005,25(3):9-14. Google Scholar
[44]	WANG S J,HASSAN M A,XIE X P. Relationship between suspended sediment load,channel geometry and land area increment in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Catena,2006,65:302-314. Google Scholar
[45]	李福林,庞家珍,姜明星,等. 黄河清水沟流路水沙组合和河口三角洲发育的宏观特性[J]. 海洋学报,2001,23(1):52-59. Google Scholar
[46]	王开荣,茹玉英,陈孝田,等. 黄河河口三角洲岸线动态平衡问题的探讨[J]. 泥沙研究,2007(6):66-70. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0468-155x.2007.06.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[47]	张治昊,胡春宏. 黄河口水沙过程变异及其对河口海岸造陆的影响[J]. 水科学进展,2007,18(3):337-341. Google Scholar
[48]	FAN Y S,CHEN S L,ZHAO B,et al. Shoreline dynamics of the active Yellow River delta since the implementation of Water-Sediment Regulation Scheme:a remotesensing and statistics-based approach[J]. Estuarine,Coastal and Shelf Science,2018,200:406-419. Google Scholar