2017 Vol. 33, No. 8
Article Contents

YUAN Xiaojie, HUANG Xiangqing, GAN Huayang, HUANG Lei. VARIATION IN CHEMICAL ELEMENTS OF GROUNDWATER ALONG THE SOUTH COAST OF HAINAN ISLAND AND SIGNIFICANCE TO SEAWATER INTRUSION[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2017, 33(8): 32-40. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2017.08005
Citation: YUAN Xiaojie, HUANG Xiangqing, GAN Huayang, HUANG Lei. VARIATION IN CHEMICAL ELEMENTS OF GROUNDWATER ALONG THE SOUTH COAST OF HAINAN ISLAND AND SIGNIFICANCE TO SEAWATER INTRUSION[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2017, 33(8): 32-40. doi: 10.16028/j.1009-2722.2017.08005

VARIATION IN CHEMICAL ELEMENTS OF GROUNDWATER ALONG THE SOUTH COAST OF HAINAN ISLAND AND SIGNIFICANCE TO SEAWATER INTRUSION

  • The data of 2014 from monitoring wells in South Coast of Hainan Island was studied during the times of neap tide and spring tide. Variation in chemical elements of the groundwater is adopted for revealing its relation with seawater intrusion. Our results show that chemical element concentration varies with tidal cycles, location of wells and surrounding environment. In the wells of QZ2 and QZ5, the contents of K+, Na+, Ca2+ are quite close, but Mg2+ is obviously different. In the well QZ2, it is 18.82% higher than that in well QZ5, suggesting that the well QZ2 is more severely affected by seawater. Na+ and Cl- are the dominant ions in both the wells of QZ2 and QZ5. The average ratio of Na+ is 83%~85%, Cl- is 87%~88%, showing effects of seawater. In the well QZ3, HCO3- is the dominant, the content is 62%~63%, and Ca2+ also occupies a large proportion, showing the predominance of fresh water. The SAR of QZ2 and QZ5 wells are 57.95~ 63.24 and 57.20~63.13 respectively. However, it is 2.17~4.42 in well QZ3, obviously lower than those in QZ2 and QZ5. As the conclusion, wells QZ2 and QZ5 have higher risk of salinization.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 晁会霞, 韩孝辉, 杨志华, 等.对海南岛大地构造特征的新探索[J].地学前缘, 2016, 23(4):200-211.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 唐少霞, 赵志忠, 毕华, 等.海南岛气候资源特征及其开发利用[J].海南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2008, 21(3):343-346.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 周祖光.海南岛地下水资源特征与开发利用[J].水资源保护, 2005, 21(3):48-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6933.2005.03.016

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] 王道儒, 吴钟解, 陈春华, 等.海南岛海草资源分布现状及存在威胁[J].海洋环境科学, 2012, 31(1):34-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6336.2012.01.008

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] 吴钟解, 吴瑞, 王道儒, 等.海南岛东、南部珊瑚礁生态健康状况初步分析[J].热带作物学报, 2011, 32(1):122-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2011.01.025

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] 郭占荣, 黄奕普.海水入侵问题研究综述[J].水文, 2003, 23(3):10-15. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0852.2003.03.003

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [7] 黄向青, 林进清, 甘华阳, 等.雷州半岛东岸地下水化学要素变化以及海水入侵特征[J].地下水, 2013, 35(3):38-42. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2013.03.013

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] 姚锦梅, 周训, 谢朝海.广西北海市海城区西段含水层海水入侵地球化学过程研究[J].地质学报, 2011, 85(1):136-144. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2011.01.018

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] 丁玲, 李碧英, 张树深.海岸带海水入侵的研究进展[J].海洋通报, 2004, 23(2):82-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6392.2004.02.013

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] 孙振宇, 宋献方, 卜红梅, 等.秦皇岛洋河-戴河流域浅层地下水咸化程度评价[J].安全与环境学报, 2015, 15(3):356-361.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 陈苑.硇洲岛地下水水质咸化和海水入侵主要成因及对策[J].大众科技, 2011(4):114-115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1151.2011.04.052

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] 黄栋声, 何军.广西北海市滨海地带咸化地下水化学特征[J].低碳世界, 2016(36):128-130.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 杜中, 李占斌, 李鹏, 等.海水入侵区地下水氯值统计及其规律运用[J].水资源与水工程学报, 2008, 19(4):83-85.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 常艳娥, 黎广钊.北海市海水养殖区海水入侵特征及对地下水的影响——以南流江三角洲平原为例[J].安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(18):11057-11060. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2011.18.122

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] 王丹, 陶志刚, 李昌存.唐山沿海海水入侵地下水水质评价[J].海洋地质前沿, 2006, 22(6):10-14.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 赵建.海水入侵水化学指标及侵染程度评价研究[J].地理科学, 1998, 18(1):16-24.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(5)

Tables(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(351) PDF downloads(12) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint