Professional Committee of Rock and Mineral Testing Technology of the Geological Society of China, National Geological Experiment and Testing CenterHost
2018 Vol. 37, No. 6
Article Contents

Zhe WANG, Ke-yan TAN, Ming-hui LIANG, Jing-yi CAI, Shi-tian HOU, Yue WANG, Peng JIANG. Surface Modification of Natural Mordenite and Its Application in Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2018, 37(6): 678-686. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201802110018
Citation: Zhe WANG, Ke-yan TAN, Ming-hui LIANG, Jing-yi CAI, Shi-tian HOU, Yue WANG, Peng JIANG. Surface Modification of Natural Mordenite and Its Application in Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2018, 37(6): 678-686. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201802110018

Surface Modification of Natural Mordenite and Its Application in Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution

More Information
  • BACKGROUNDNatural mordenite is widely used as a green and cheap porous material to remove heavy metals in environmental treatment. Currently, the removal rate of heavy metals by natural zeolites is from 60% to 90%, and improving its removal efficiency has been a hot topic. OBJECTIVESTo reconstruct and modify natural mordenite by tetraethyl orthosilicate, and determine its effect on the removal of heavy metals in water. METHODSThe morphology and structure of the modified mordenites were characterized by TEM, XRD and BET. RESULTSThe SiO2 hydrolyzed by tetraethyl orthosilicate can be combined with natural mordenite to form a new 'SiO2/mordenite'. The surface of the original mordenite is coated with the pore structure of the new nano-SiO2 without damaging the porous structure of the original mordenite. The modified mordenite combines the advantages of natural mordenite and nano-SiO2 pore structure, enhancing the adsorption of heavy metal ions. The highest adsorption rate of modified mordenite for Pb2+, Cd2+, Zn2+, and Mn2+ was 99.3%, 97.1%, 98.3%, and 97.0%, respectively. The modified mordenites were minimally desorbed during the entire process and have stable performance. Considering the cost and the appropriate adsorption rate, the best dosage of adsorption efficiency is selected. The optimal dosage of Pb2+, Cd2+, Zn2+ and Mn2+ solutions for the initial concentration of 10 mg/L is 0.5, 2, 2 and 5 g/L, respectively. It can provide a reference for a pilot experiment and scale applications. CONCLUSIONSCompared with roasting, acid, alkali, salt and organic modification, this modification method has a high adsorption rate for a variety of heavy metals, and shows the advantages of simple operation, low cost and environmental friendliness, making it a good application prospect.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Li Z Y, Ma Z W, van Der Kuijp T J, et al.A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China:Pollution and health risk assessment[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 468:843-853.

    Google Scholar

    [2] Li H X, Ji H B, Shi C J, et al.Distribution of heavy metals and metalloids in bulk and particle size fractions of soils from coal-mine brownfield and implications on human health[J].Chemosphere, 2017, 172:505-515. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.021

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Xu C, Zhou P J, Li H Y, et al.Contamination and spatial distribution of heavy metals in soil of Xiangxi River water-level-fluctuating zone of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J].Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 2017, 23(4):851-863. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2017.1288562

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Jia Y Y, Wang L, Qu Z P, et al.Distribution, contamin-ation and accumulation of heavy metals in water, sediments, and freshwater shellfish from Liuyang River, Southern China[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(7):7012-7020. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-1068-x

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [5] Momodu M A, Anyakora C A.Heavy metal contamination of ground water:The surulere case study[J].Research Journal of Environmental & Earth Sciences, 2010, 2(1):39-43.

    Google Scholar

    [6] Ferati F, Kerolli-Mustafa M, Kraja-Ylli A.Assessment of heavy metal contamination in water and sediments of Trepca and Sitnica rivers, Kosovo, using pollution indicators and multivariate cluster analysis[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015, 187(6):DOI10.1007/s10661-015-4524-4.

    Google Scholar

    [7] Kastyuchik A, Karam A, Aïder M.Effectiveness of alkaline amendments in acid mine drainage remediation[J].Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2016, 6:49-59.

    Google Scholar

    [8] Zhao Y N.Review of the natural, modified, and synthetic zeolites for zeavy metals removal from wastewater[J].Environmental Engineering Science, 2016, 33(7):443-454. doi: 10.1089/ees.2015.0166

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Son E B, Poo K M, Chang J S, et al.Heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions using engineered magnetic biochars derived from waste marine macro-algal biomass[J].Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 615:161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.171

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [10] Rahman M M, Adil M, Yusof A M, et al.Removal of heavy metal ions with acid activated carbons derived from oil palm and coconut shells[J].Materials (Basel), 2014, 7(5):3634-3650. doi: 10.3390/ma7053634

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [11] Hizal J, Tutem E, Guclu K, et al.Heavy metal removal from water by red mud and coal fly ash:An integrated adsorption-solidification/stabilization process[J].Desalination and Water Treatment, 2013, 51(37-39):7181-7193. doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.771289

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] Cao J S, Wang C, Fang F, et al.Removal of heavy metal Cu(Ⅱ) in simulated aquaculture wastewater by modified palygorskite[J].Environmental Pollution, 2016, 219:924-931. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.014

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] 谭科艳, 王喆, 蔡敬怡, 等.地球化学工程技术修复江西某Pb超标耕地的应用[J].地球学报, 2017, 38(6):953-960.

    Google Scholar

    Tan K Y, Wang Z, Cai J Y, et al.The application of geochemical engineering technology to the remediation of a Pb-polluted abandoned farmland in Jiangxi Province[J].Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2017, 38(6):953-960.

    Google Scholar

    [14] Ciosek A L, Luk G K.Kinetic modelling of the removal of multiple heavy metallic ions from mine waste by natural zeolite sorption[J].Water, 2017, 9(7):DOI:10.3390/w9070482.

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] Inglezakis V J, Fyrillas M M, Stylianou M A.Two-phase homogeneous diffusion model for the fixed bed sorption of heavy metals on natural zeolites[J].Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2018, 266:164-176. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.02.045

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Reeve P J, Fallowfield H J.Natural and surfactant modi-fied zeolites:A review of their applications for water remediation with a focus on surfactant desorption and toxicity towards microorganisms[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 205:253-261.

    Google Scholar

    [17] Wen J, Yi Y J, Zeng G M.Effects of modified zeolite on the removal and stabilization of heavy metals in contaminated lake sediment using BCR sequential extraction[J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 178:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.046

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Mulyati S, Arahman N, Syawaliah, et al.Removal of Me-tal Iron from Groundwater Using Aceh Natural Zeolite and Membrane Filtration[C]//Proceedings of 1st Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference (Aasec), 2017.

    Google Scholar

    [19] Tran H N, Viet P V, Chao H P.Surfactant modified zeolite as amphiphilic and dual-electronic adsorbent for removal of cationic and oxyanionic metal ions and organic compounds[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2018, 147:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.027

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [20] Liu Y, Lou Z M, Sun Y, et al.Influence of complexing agent on the removal of Pb(Ⅱ) from aqueous solutions by modified mesoporous SiO2[J].Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2017, 246:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.03.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Zendehdel M, Shoshtari-Yeganeh B, Cruciani G.Removal of heavy metals and bacteria from aqueous solution by novel hydroxyapatite/zeolite nanocomposite, preparation, and characterization[J].Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, 2016, 13(10):1915-1930. doi: 10.1007/s13738-016-0908-9

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [22] Kim S A, Kamala-Kannan S, Oh S G, et al.Simultaneous removal of chromium(Ⅵ) and Reactive Black 5 using zeolite supported nano-scale zero-valent iron composite[J].Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(5):447. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4855-z

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [23] Lin J, Zhan Y.Adsorption of humic acid from aqueous solution onto unmodified and surfactant-modified chitosan/zeolite composites[J].Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 200-202:202-213. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.06.039

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [24] 吴昆明, 郭华明, 魏朝俊.改性磁铁矿对水体中砷的吸附特性研究[J].岩矿测试, 2017, 36(6):624-632.

    Google Scholar

    Wu K M, Guo H M, Wei C J.Adsorption characteristics of arsenic in water by modified magnetite[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2017, 36(6):624-632.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 石太宏, 吕灿, 左莉娜.硅烷化改性沸石对重金属离子的吸附性能[J].环境工程学报, 2013, 7(3):1045-1052.

    Google Scholar

    Shi T H, Lü C, Zuo L N.Adsorption of heavy metal ions by silylation modified zeolite[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2013, 7(3):1045-1052.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 易发成.沸石的活化处理及其对铅、钴的吸附性研究[J].矿物岩石, 2005, 25(3):118-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6872.2005.03.026

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Yi F C.The activation treatment and Pb2+, Co2+ ions adsorption capability of zeolite[J].Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology, 2005, 25(3):118-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6872.2005.03.026

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] 郝鹏飞, 梁靖, 钟颖.改性沸石对含铅废水的处理研究[J].环境科学与管理, 2009, 34(6):106-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2009.06.031

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Hao P F, Liang J, Zhong Y.The research of modified zeolite to the disposal of leaded wastewater[J].Environmental Science and Management, 2009, 34(6):106-108. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2009.06.031

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] 陈溪, 崔天顺, 邓晓军, 等.改性沸石对镉(Ⅱ)的交换性能研究[J].工业安全与环保, 2015, 41(4):55-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-425X.2015.04.018

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Chen X, Cui T S, Deng X J, et al.Research on the Cd2+ ion exchange by modified zeolite[J].Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015, 41(4):55-57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-425X.2015.04.018

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [29] 李蘅, 张静, 徐文炘, 等.沸石处理选矿重金属废水初步研究[J].矿产与地质, 2015, 29(5):682-687. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5663.2015.05.025

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    Li H, Zhang J, Xu W X, et al.A preliminary study on treatment of heavy metal beneficiation wastewater by zeolite[J].Mineral Resources and Geology, 2015, 29(5):682-687. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5663.2015.05.025

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] Maretto M, Bianchi F, Vignola R, et al.Microporous and mesoporous materials for the treatment of wastewater produced by petrochemical activities[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 77:22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.070

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] 文叶轩, 郝硕硕, 朱家亮, 等.天然和改性沸石对铬吸附特征研究[J].中国陶瓷, 2015, 51(7):16-20.

    Google Scholar

    Wen Y X, Hao S S, Zhu J L, et al.Research on adsorption characteristics of chromium on natural and modified zeolite[J].China Ceramics, 2015, 51(7):16-20.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(7)

Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(2403) PDF downloads(72) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint