Research on the Correlation between Methane and Hydrogen in Acid-hydrolyzed Gases for Geochemical Exploration Samples

Zhong-yu LI; Jiang-hua ZHAO; Jun HE; Yan-guang LI; Wei-liang LI; Wei HAN

doi:10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201710240170

2018 Vol. 37, No. 3

Article Contents

Article navigation > Rock and Mineral Analysis > 2018 > 37(3): 313-319

Next Article Previous Article

Zhong-yu LI, Jiang-hua ZHAO, Jun HE, Yan-guang LI, Wei-liang LI, Wei HAN. Research on the Correlation between Methane and Hydrogen in Acid-hydrolyzed Gases for Geochemical Exploration Samples[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2018, 37(3): 313-319. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201710240170

Citation:

Zhong-yu LI, Jiang-hua ZHAO, Jun HE, Yan-guang LI, Wei-liang LI, Wei HAN. Research on the Correlation between Methane and Hydrogen in Acid-hydrolyzed Gases for Geochemical Exploration Samples[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2018, 37(3): 313-319. doi: 10.15898/j.cnki.11-2131/td.201710240170

Research on the Correlation between Methane and Hydrogen in Acid-hydrolyzed Gases for Geochemical Exploration Samples

Xi'an Geological Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Xi'an 710054, China

More Information

Corresponding author: Jiang-hua ZHAO, 676410267@qq.com

Received Date: 24 October 2017

Revised Date: 22 December 2017

Accepted Date: 21 March 2018

Abstract

Abstract

Acidolysis hydrocarbon is an important index with relatively high accuracy in the geochemical exploration for oil and gas and has been widely used. Detailed study of acid-hydrolyzed gases can help further explain its mechanism and help develop new analytical indicators. The content of acidolysis hydrocarbons and other gas released by hydrochloric acid in the samples from geochemical exploration for oil and gas by Gas Chromatography have been determined, and are presented in this paper. There is a positive correlation between the contents of methane and non hydrocarbon gas. The elements and mineral composition of the sample were measured by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) and X-ray Diffraction (XRD), respectively, whereas the gas-liquid inclusion composition was analyzed by Laser Raman Spectroscopy after sample smashing. The conclusions are as follows:(1) The content of methane and hydrogen in the acidolysis hydrocarbons is independent of the elemental composition of the sample and is positively related to the carbonate minerals. The contents of methane and hydrogen can reflect the situation of deep oil and gas. (2) Two kinds of gas do not exist in the form of physical adsorption but in the smaller space. It is proved that the analysis method of acid hydrolysis hydrocarbon has high stability. (3) There is direct evidence that two kinds of gases exist in the inclusions at the same time, which infers that two types of gases have the same source. Due to the correlation between methane and hydrogen, the content of hydrogen from acidolysis hydrocarbons will be a new analysis index in the geochemical exploration for oil and gas.
- geochemical exploration for oil and gas /
- acidolysis hydrocarbons /
- inclusion /
- methane /
- hydrogen

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	李广之, 胡斌.中国油气化探分析技术新进展与发展方向[J].天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(6):1171-1185. Google Scholar Li G Z, Hu B.The latest progress of the analytical techniques of the petroleum geochemocal exploration China:Problems and development direction[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(6):1171-1185. Google Scholar
[2]	吴传璧.中国油气化探50年[J].地质通报, 2009, 8(11):1572-1604. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2009.11.007 CrossRef Google Scholar Wu C B.Fifty years history of Chinese oil and gas geo-chemical exploration[J].Geological Bulletin of China, 2009, 8(11):1572-1604. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2009.11.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	Schumacher D.Surface geochemical exploration for oil and gas:New life for an old technology[J].The Leading Edge, 2000, 19(3):258-261. doi: 10.1190/1.1438582 CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	蒋涛, 汤玉平, 李武, 等.分析和认识我国油气化探技术[J].物探与化探, 2011, 35(1):7-11. Google Scholar Jiang T, Tang Y P, Li W, et al.Analysis and understanding of oil and gas exploration technology in China[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2011, 35(1):7-11. Google Scholar
[5]	杨少平, 孙跃, 弓秋丽."十一五"以来化探方法技术研究主要进展[J].物探与化探, 2014, 38(2):194-199. doi: 10.11720/j.issn.1000-8918.2014.2.02 CrossRef Google Scholar Yang S P, Sun Y, Gong Q L.The main progress in the research of geochemical exploration methods since 11th Five-Year[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 38(2):194-199. doi: 10.11720/j.issn.1000-8918.2014.2.02 CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	汤玉平, 姚亚明.我国油气化探的现状与发展趋势[J].物探与化探, 2006, 30(6):475-479. Google Scholar Tang Y P, Yao Y M.Current situation and development trend of oil and gas geochemical exploration in China[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2006, 30(6):475-479. Google Scholar
[7]	贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2):129-136. Google Scholar Jia C Z, Zheng M, Zhang Y F.Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2):129-136. Google Scholar
[8]	缪九军, 荣发准, 李广之.酸解烃技术在油气勘探中的应用[J].物探与化探, 2005, 29(3):209-212. Google Scholar Miao J J, Rong F Z, Li G Z.Application of acidolysis hydrocarbon technology in oil and gas exploration[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2005, 29(3):209-212. Google Scholar
[9]	陈卫明, 肖细炼, 李庆霞, 等.气相色谱法测定油气化探样品中酸解烃的研究[J].岩矿测试, 2015, 34(6):698-703. Google Scholar Chen W M, Xiao X L, Li Q X, et al.Determination of acidolysis hydrocarbons in oil/gas geochemical exploration samples by gas chromatography[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2015, 34(6):698-703. Google Scholar
[10]	王振平, 傅晓泰.油气垂向化探酸解烃异常识别[J].石油勘探与开发, 1996, 23(1):39-42. Google Scholar Wang Z P, Fu X T.Identification of acidolysis hydrocarbon anomaly in vertical geochemical prospecting for oil and gas[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1996, 23(1):39-42. Google Scholar
[11]	梁前勇, 熊永强, 赵克斌, 等.高精度地表油气化探技术的发展及应用——以济阳凹陷垛石桥地区土壤酸解烃为例[J].地球化学, 2014, 43(2):141-148. Google Scholar Liang Q Y, Xiong Y Q, Zhao K B, et al.Development and application of high-precision surface geochemical exploration technique for petroleum:Take the soil acid-extraction hydrocarbons in Duoshiqiao area, Jiyang Depression as an example[J].Geochimica, 2014, 43(2):141-148. Google Scholar
[12]	程党性, 邓秀芹, 孙勃, 等.西峰油区酸解烃指标异常与长8油藏关系[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(4):48-55. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.04.05.05 CrossRef Google Scholar Cheng D X, Deng X Q, Sun B, et al.Relationship between unusual index of soil acid hydrolysis hydrocarbon and Chang 8 oil pool in Xifeng oil area[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(4):48-55. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.04.05.05 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	赵妮霞, 申鹏.油气包裹体研究进展及其在油气成藏中的应用[J].辽宁化工, 2012, 41(8):818-821. Google Scholar Zhao N X, Shen P.Research progress in the oil inclusion and its application in oil and gas accumulation[J].Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2012, 41(8):818-821. Google Scholar
[14]	施伟军, 蒋宏, 席斌斌.油气包裹体成分及特征分析方法研究[J].石油实验地质, 2009, 31(6):643-648. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200906643 CrossRef Google Scholar Shi W J, Jiang H, Xi B B.Studies of analysis approaches of oil and gas inclusion composition and characteristics[J].Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2009, 31(6):643-648. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200906643 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	胡国艺, 单秀琴, 李志生, 等.流体包裹体烃类组成特征及对天然气成藏示踪作用——以鄂尔多斯盆地西北部奥陶系为例[J].岩石学报, 2005, 21(5):1461-1466. Google Scholar Hu G Y, Shan X Q, Li Z S, et al.The component and isotope characteristics of hydrocarbon in fluid inclusions and its affection on the gas reservoir formation:The case of Ordovcian reservoir in the northwest area of Ordos Basin[J].Acta Petrologica Sinca, 2005, 21(5):1461-1466. Google Scholar
[16]	付孝悦, 孙庭金, 温景萍.南盘江盆地含烃非烃气藏的发现及意义[J].天然气工业, 2005, 25(5):26-28. Google Scholar Fu X Y, Sun T J, Wen J P.Discovery of hydrocarbon bearing nonhydrocarbon gas reservoirs in Nanpangjiang Basin and its significance[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(5):26-28. Google Scholar
[17]	史建南, 曾治平, 周陆扬, 等.中国沉积盆地非烃气成因机制研究[J].特种油气藏, 2003, 10(2):5-9. Google Scholar Shi J N, Zeng Z P, Zhou L Y, et al.Genetic mechanism of non-hydrocarbon gas in China sedimentary basin[J].Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2003, 10(2):5-9. Google Scholar
[18]	曹春辉, 张铭杰.四川盆地志留系龙马溪组页岩气气体地球化学特征及意义[J].天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(8):1604-1612. Google Scholar Cao C H, Zhang M J.Geochemical characteristics and implications of shale gas in Longmaxi Formation Sichuan Basin, China[J].Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(8):1604-1612. Google Scholar
[19]	李吉鹏, 王国建, 汤玉平.一种痕量氦氖氢的检测方法及其化探效果[J].物探与化探, 2013, 37(2):251-254. Google Scholar Li J P, Wang G J, Tang Y P.A detection method for trace helium, neon and hydrogen and its effect in oil and gas exploration[J].Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2013, 37(2):251-254. Google Scholar
[20]	刘德汉, 戴金星, 肖贤明, 等.普光气田中高密度甲烷包裹体的发现及形成的温度和压力条件[J].科学通报, 2010, 55(4-5):359-366. Google Scholar Liu D H, Dai J X, Xiao X M, et al.High density methane inclusions in Puguang gasfield:Discovery and a T-P genetic study[J].Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010, 55(4-5):359-366. Google Scholar
[21]	任鹏程, 苏亮, 刘卿, 等.小麦中元素含量相关性分析的方法比较[J].中国食品卫生杂志, 2017, 29(2):140-144. Google Scholar Ren P C, Su L, Liu Q, et al.Method comparison of correlation analysis of element content in wheat[J].Chinese Journal of Food Hygiene, 2017, 29(2):140-144. Google Scholar
[22]	王建其, 柳小明.X射线荧光光谱法分析不同类型岩石中10种主量元素的测试能力验证[J].岩矿测试, 2016, 35(2):145-151. Google Scholar Wang J Q, Liu X M.Proficiency testing of the XRF method for measuring 10 major elements in different rock types[J].Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2016, 35(2):145-151. Google Scholar
[23]	罗松英, 曹建劲, 吴政权.内蒙古草原拜仁达坝矿区地表土壤的X射线衍射和近红外光谱分析[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2014, 34(8):2268-2272. Google Scholar Luo S Y, Cao J J, Wu Z Q.XRD and NIR analysis of the soil overlying the Bairendaba deposit of the Inner Mongolia[J].Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2014, 34(8):2268-2272. Google Scholar
[24]	凡慧, 马诗淳, 王春芳, 等.产氢细菌FSC-15对稻草秸秆厌氧发酵产甲烷的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(2):251-255. Google Scholar Fan H, Ma S C, Wang C F, et al.Effect of the hydrogen-producing bacterium FSC-15 on methanogenesis during rice straw anaerobic fermentation[J].Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2017, 23(2):251-255. Google Scholar