Citation: | ZHAO Wenhuan, LONG Gan, LI Jinhua. Analysis of Stress Distribution Law of Surrounding Rock of Rectangular Roadway with Different Specifications Based on Complex Variable Function[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2024, 44(4): 111-123. doi: 10.13779/j.cnki.issn1001-0076.2024.04.013 |
Given the widespread use of rectangular tunnels, in order to deeply analyze the degree and pattern of the influence of factors such as the size and lateral pressure coefficient of rectangular tunnels on the stress of the surrounding rock of the tunnels. This article regards the solution of the surrounding rock of a rectangular roadway as an elastic mechanics orifice problem, and uses the theory of complex variables and Schwartz Chistoffel mapping function, combined with conformal transformation for analysis ζ Complex plane unit circle ζ Analysis function of φ0(ζ)、ψ0(ζ), After expanding the Laurent series, obtain the complex potential function φ(ζ)、ψ(ζ). After further deduction, the analytical solution for the circumferential stress of the surrounding rock of the rectangular tunnel was finally determined. Based on this, the polar coordinate expression of the circumferential stress was used to deeply analyze the stress variation law and degree of influence of the surrounding rock of the rectangular tunnel under the changes in the size and lateral pressure coefficient of the rectangular tunnel. The results showed that taking the first three calculations of the mapping function, the mapping roadway section had approached the theoretical section, which could ensure the accuracy requirements; with the increase of the width−height ratio of the roadway, the peak stress around the surrounding rock of the roadway increased first and then decreased with the width−height ratio of 1 as the dividing point. The stress of surrounding rock of roadway side decreased with the increase of width−height ratio, and the stress of surrounding rock of roadway roof and floor increased with the increase of width−height ratio. The larger the lateral pressure coefficient was, the larger the peak stress of the surrounding rock was, and the smaller the peak stress of the roof and floor was. The stress of side wall surrounding rock increased with the increase of lateral pressure, and the two were positively correlated. The stress of roof and floor decreased with the increase of lateral pressure, and the two were negatively correlated.
[1] | 王沉, 屠世浩, 李召鑫, 等. 深部“三软”煤层回采巷道断面优化研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2015, 44(1): 9−15. WANG C, TU S H, LI Z X, et al. Section optimization of deep gateways in three soft coal seam[J]. Journal of China University of Mining&Technology, 2015, 44(1): 9−15. |
[2] | 杨巨文, 唐治, 何峰, 等. 圆形巷道围岩弹性应力场的复变函数解析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2015, 15(1): 148−152. YANG J W, TANG Z, HE F, et al. Analysis of the complexfunctions of the surrounding rock stress field in the elastic circular tunnels[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2015, 15(1): 148−152. |
[3] | 赵瑜, 卢义玉, 陈浩. 深埋隧道三心拱洞室平面应变模型试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(3): 68−74. ZHAO Y, LU Y Y, CHEN H. A plane strain modeling study of a three−center arch for deep tunnels[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(3): 68−74. |
[4] | 吴浩, 马丹, 左宇军, 等. 大断面六角形进路围岩应力解析与数值验证[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2022, 39(5): 951−960. WU H, MA D, ZUO Y J, et al. Analytical solution and numerical verification of surroundingrock stress in large−section hexagonal route[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2022, 39(5): 951−960. |
[5] | 黄松,王俊,乔登攀,等. 基于复变函数不同形状的巷道围岩应力分析[J]. 有色金属(矿山部分), 2023, 75(4): 134−141. HUANG S, WANG J, QIAO D P, et al. Stress analysis of roadway surrounding rock with different shapes based on complex function[J]. Nonferrous Metals(Mining Section), 2023, 75(4): 134−141. |
[6] | 尹华. 梯形巷道断面优化分析[J]. 矿山压力与顶板管理, 2001(4): 88−89. YIN H. Optimization analysis of trapezoidalroadway[J]. Ground Pressure and Strata Control, 2001(4): 88−89. |
[7] | 李明, 茅献彪. 基于复变函数的矩形巷道围岩应力与变形粘弹性分析[J]. 力学季刊, 2011, 32(2): 195−202. LI M, MAO X B. Based om the complex variable functions of rectangular roadway surrounding rock stress and deformation viscoelastic analysis[J]. Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics, 2011, 32(2): 195−202. |
[8] | 于远祥, 谷拴成. 矩形巷道围岩松动范围实测及控制技术研究[J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(6): 828−835. YU Y X, GU S C. Measurement of loosened surrounding rock scope in the rectangular roadway and its control techniques research[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2013, 30(6): 828−835. |
[9] | 王志强, 黄鑫, 武超, 等. 基于复变函数理论的巷道围岩稳定性分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(4): 58−66. WANG Z Q, HUANG X, WU C, et al. Stability analysis of roadway surrounding rock based on complex variable function theory[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2022, 50(4): 58−66. |
[10] | 王平, 冯涛, 蒋运良, 等. 软弱再生顶板巷道围岩失稳机理及其控制原理与技术[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(10): 2953−2965. WANG P, FENG T, JIANG Y L, et al. Control principle and technology and instability mechanism of surrounding rock in weak regenerated roof[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(10): 2953−2965. |
[11] | 刘金高, 王润富. 马蹄形孔口和梯形孔口的应力集中问题[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1995, 17(5): 57−64. LI J G, WANG R F. The stress concentration of U−shaped and ladder−shaped holes[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 17(5): 57−63. |
[12] | EXADAKTYLOSG E, STAVROPOULOU M C. Aclosed−form elastic solution for stresses and displacementsaround tunnels[J]. International Journal of RockMechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(7): 905−916. doi: 10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00079-5 |
[13] | 皇甫鹏鹏, 张路青, 伍法权. 基于高效保角变换的单个复杂洞室围岩应力场解析解研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(Supp.2): 3905−3913. HUANGFU P P, ZHANG L Q, WU F Q. Research on analytical solution of stress field ofsurrounding rock of single hole with arbitrary shape basedon highly−efficient conformal mapping[J]. ChineseJournal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(Supp.2): 3905−3913. |
[14] | BATISTA M. On the stress concentration around a hole in an infinite plate subject to a uniform load at infinity[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2011, 53(4): 254−261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.01.006 |
[15] | 朱大勇, 钱七虎, 周早生, 等. 复杂形状洞室围岩应力弹性解析分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1999, 18(4): 34−36. ZHU D Y, QIAN Q H, ZHOU Z S, et al. Elastic solution to stresses of rock masses aroundopenings with complex shape[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 1999, 18(4): 34−36. |
[16] | 祝江鸿, 杨建辉, 施高萍, 等. 单位圆外域到任意开挖断面隧洞外域共形映射的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(1): 175−183. ZHU J H, YANG J H, SHI G P, et al. Calculating method on the conformal mapping from theexterior of unit circle to the exterior of cavern with thearbitrary excavation cross section[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(1): 175−183. |
[17] | 施高萍, 祝江鸿, 李保海, 等. 矩形巷道孔边应力的弹性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(9): 2587−2593+2601. SHI G P, ZHU J H, LI B H, et al. Elastic analysis of hole−edge stress of rectangular roadway[J]. Rock and SoilMechanics, 2014, 35(9): 2587−2593+2601. |
Mechanical model for stress analysis of rectangular tunnels
Z−plane rectangle to ζ map of unit circle in complex plane
Conformal mapping to rectangular roadway contour under rectangular coordinates at different aspect ratios
Circumferential stress distribution of surrounding rock with different w values in polar coordinates when λ = 0.8
Stress distribution map of surrounding rock under different aspect ratios (a—lateral pressure coefficient of 0.6; b—lateral pressure coefficient of 1.0; c—lateral pressure coefficient of 1.4; d—lateral pressure coefficient of 1.8; e—lateral pressure coefficient of 2.2)
Circumferential stress distribution of surrounding rock with different λ values in polar coordinates when w = 1.0
Stress distribution map of surrounding rock under different lateral pressure coefficients (a—aspect ratio of 0.6; b—aspect ratio of 1.0; c—aspect ratio of 1.4; d—aspect ratio of 1.8; e—aspect ratio of 2.2)
Variation law of the maximum stress concentration coefficient Kc with lateral pressure coefficient(a) and aspect ratio(b)
Numerical calculation model
Stress cloud maps under different lateral pressure coefficients when the aspect ratio of 1 (a—lateral pressure coefficient is 0.8; b—lateral pressure coefficient is 1.0); c—side pressure coefficient is 1.4)
Stress cloud maps under different aspect ratios with a lateral pressure coefficient of 1 (a—aspect ratio of 0.6; b—aspect ratio of 1.0); c—aspect ratio of 1.4)