Citation: | NING Jiangfeng, ZENG Jianhong, XU Hanbing, GENG Liang, CUI Rui, YANG Zhehui. Effect of Fe3+ on the Activation of Fluorite and Its Flotation Separation from Calcite in Floating Scheelite Tailings[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2024, 44(2): 74-79. doi: 10.13779/j.cnki.issn1001-0076.2024.02.010 |
In the flotation of scheelite, fluorite and calcite, the addition of inhibitors often increases the difficulty of the subsequent flotation separation of fluorite and calcite. The activation effect of Fe3+ on suppressed fluorite in floating scheelite tailings and its effect on flotation separation from calcite were studied through flotation test, adsorption capacity test, Zeta potential measurement and solution chemical calculation. The results of single mineral flotation test showed that the inhibition effect of Fe3+ on calcite was much greater than that of fluorite. When water glass was added separately, two minerals were inhibited simultaneously. Under the conditions of pH 8.0, 300 mg/L sodium silicate and 1.5×10−4 mol/L sodium oleate, the recovery rates of fluorite and calcite were 13.49% and 16.83%, respectively. When Fe3+ was introduced into the water glass system, Under the conditions of pH 8.0, 75 mg/L sodium silicate, 3×10−4 mol/L Fe3+ and 1.5×10−4 mol/L sodium oleate, the flotation recovery rates of fluorite and calcite were 82.01% and 15.64%, respectively. The addition of Fe3+ can improve the floatability of suppressed fluorite and selectively activate fluorite in water glass system. The mechanism analysis showed that Fe3+ was more likely to adsorb on the surface of calcite, which hindered the adsorption of sodium oleate. The hydrolyzed components Fe(OH)2+ and Fe(OH)4− of Fe3+ in solution selectively reacted with the hydrolyzed components Si(OH)4 and SiO(OH)3− of water glass on fluorite surface to form Fe+− water glass polymer after adding Fe3+ to water glass system. The hydrolyzed components of water glass on the surface of fluorite were reduced, and the floatability of fluorite was restored. However, Fe+− water glass polymer were more adsorbed on the surface of calcite, which further inhibited the flotation of calcite.
[1] | 李敬, 张寿庭, 商朋强, 等. 萤石资源现状及战略性价值分析[J]. 矿产保护与利用, 2019, 39(6): 66−72. LI J, ZHANG S T, SHANG P Q, et al. Fluorite resources present situation and strategic value analysis[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2019, 39(6): 66−72. |
[2] | 李育彪, 杨旭. 我国萤石资源及选矿技术进展[J]. 矿产保护与利用, 2022, 42(2): 49−58. LI Y B, YANG X. Overview of fluorite resources and processing technology in china[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2022, 42(2): 49−58. |
[3] | 曾小波, 印万忠. 共伴生型萤石矿浮选研究进展与展望[J]. 矿产综合利用, 2021(1): 1−7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2021.01.001 ZENG X B, YIN W Z. Research progress and prospect of flotation of associated fluorite minerals[J]. Comprehensive Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2021(1): 1−7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6532.2021.01.001 |
[4] | 李纪, 李晓东, 黄伟生. 钨尾矿浮选回收萤石预处理实验研究[J]. 有色金属(选矿部分), 2013(5): 28−30. LI J, LI X D, HUANG W S. Experimental study on pretreatment of fluorite recovered from tungsten tailings by flotation[J]. Nonferrous Metals (Mineral Processing Section), 2013(5): 28−30. |
[5] | 曾礼强, 蒋巍, 陈文胜, 等. 钨矿浮选残余药剂对伴生萤石浮选的影响研究及实践[J]. 中国钨业, 2021(6): 32−40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0622.2021.06.004 ZENG L Q, JIANG W, CHEN W S, et al. Effect of tungsten ore flotation residual reagent on the flotation of associated fluorite[J]. Tungsten Industry in China, 2021(6): 32−40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0622.2021.06.004 |
[6] | 匡敬忠, 邹耀伟, 李琳, 等. 改性水玻璃和捕收剂KC2对萤石与方解石, 石英浮选分离的作用效果[J]. 化工矿物与加工, 2016, 45(10): 21−24. KUANG J Z, ZOU Y W, LI L, et al. Effects and action mechanism of modified sodium silicate and KC2 collector on flotation separation of fluorite from calcite and quartz[J]. Chemical Minerals and Processing, 2016, 45(10): 21−24. |
[7] | 汤家焰, 何嘉宁, 鲁向锦, 等. 油酸钠体系中铈离子对萤石和方解石浮选的影响[J]. 矿冶工程, 2023, 43(2): 48−51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-6099.2023.02.011 TANG J Y, HE J N, LU X J, et al. Effect of Ce3+ in sodium oleate system on flotation of fluorite and calcite[J]. Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, 2023, 43(2): 48−51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-6099.2023.02.011 |
[8] | DENG R D, YANG X F, HU Y, et al. Effect of Fe(Ⅱ) as assistant depressant on flotation separation of scheelite from calcite[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2018, 118: 133−140. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2017.12.017 |
[9] | QIAN W, DONG L Y, JIAO F, et al. Use of citric acid and Fe(Ⅲ) mixture as depressant in calcite flotation[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A:Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2019, 578: 1−8. |
[10] | 宁江峰, 李茂林, 崔瑞, 等. Fe3+与水玻璃组合抑制剂对萤石和方解石浮选分离的影响[J]. 矿产保护与利用, 2020, 40(6): 64−70. NING J F, LI M L, CUI R, et al. Effect of Fe3+ and sodium silicate as combination inhibitors on flotation separation of fluorite and calcite[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2020, 40(6): 64−70. |
[11] | 王淀佐, 胡岳华. 浮选溶液化学[M]. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 1988: 336−337. WANG D Z, HU Y H. Flotation solution chemistry[M]. Changsha: Hu’nan Science and Technology Press, 1988: 336−337. |
[12] | DONG L Y, JIAO F, QIN W Q, et al. Effect of acidified water glass on the flotation separation of scheelite from calcite using mixed cationic/anionic collectors[J]. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 444: 747−756. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.097 |
[13] | FENG B, LUO X P, WANG J Q, et al. The flotation separation of scheelite from calcite using acidified sodium silicate as depressant[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2015, 80: 45−49. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2015.06.017 |
[14] | WEI Z, HU Y H, HAN H S, et al. Selective flotation of scheelite from calcite using Al−Na2SiO3 polymer as depressant and Pb−BHA complexes as collector[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2018, 120: 29−34. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2018.01.036 |
XRD analysis of fluorite(a) and calcite(b)
Flotation flow
Effect of Fe3+ on flotation recovery of two minerals
Effect of Fe3+ on flotation recovery of two suppressed minerals in water glass system
Effect of pH on flotation recovery of two minerals
Effect of Fe3+ (a) and Fe3+ in water glass system(b) on the adsorption capacity of sodium oleate on the surface of two minerals
Effect of pH on the Zeta potential of fluorite (a) and calcite (b) in different solutions
Hydrolysis composition of Fe3+ (a) and sodium silicate (b)