Zhengzhou Institute of Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological SciencesHost
2020 Vol. 40, No. 4
Article Contents

Ying JIANG, Zangfang YU, Dongyun LIANG, Bo LI, Nianhua AI. Process Mineralogy Study on an Iron Ore Deposit Associated with Gallium and Germanium in Fujian Province, China[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2020, 40(4): 89-96. doi: 10.13779/j.cnki.issn1001-0076.2020.04.011
Citation: Ying JIANG, Zangfang YU, Dongyun LIANG, Bo LI, Nianhua AI. Process Mineralogy Study on an Iron Ore Deposit Associated with Gallium and Germanium in Fujian Province, China[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2020, 40(4): 89-96. doi: 10.13779/j.cnki.issn1001-0076.2020.04.011

Process Mineralogy Study on an Iron Ore Deposit Associated with Gallium and Germanium in Fujian Province, China

  • Multiple technics including microscope, X-ray diffraction (XRD), SEM energy dispersive spectrometer, electron probe micro-analyzer (EPMA) and mineral liberation analyser (MLA) were adopted to study the mineral compositions, dissemination characteristics and occurrences of gallium and germanium-bearing minerals in a sedimentary hydrothermal iron ore associated with gallium and germanium in Fujian Province, China. The substitution mechanisms of gallium and germanium are also discussed. The results show that the main valuable metal in the ores is iron, accompanied by the valuable metal elements of gallium, germanium, molybdenum and silver. Magnetite is the predominant iron mineral and the most important gallium and germanium-bearing phase. Gallium and germanium enter the lattice of carrier minerals mainly in the form of isomorphism replacement and show diverse occurrences. Most magnetite in the ores is embedded in gangue minerals, with extremely uneven distribution of grain size. The grain size mostly ranges from 0.005 to 0.32 mm, and the proportion of grain size less than 0.01 mm is as high as 16.26%, resulting the grinding and dissociation difficult. The method of magnetic separation can be used to recover magnetite firstly, followed by hydrometallurgical means of acid leaching, purification and extraction to recover iron, gallium and germanium from magnetite concentrate. The theoretical grades and recovery rates of gallium and germanium of the ore are 27×10-6, 40% and 112×10-6, 82%, respectively.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 梁冬云, 李波.稀有金属矿工艺矿物学[M].北京:冶金工业出版社, 2015.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 涂光帜, 高振敏, 胡瑞忠, 等.分散元素地球化学与成矿机制[M].北京:北京地质出版社, 2003.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 罗泰义, 戴向东, 朱丹, 等.镓的成矿作用及其在峨眉山大火成岩省中的成矿效应[J].矿物学报, 2007.27(3/4):281-286.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 王宁, 石莉, 陈娟, 等.粉煤灰中镓的赋存状态及综合回收利用研究[J].矿物学报, 2007.(增刊):396-397.

    Google Scholar

    [5] R. HOLL, M. KLING, E. SCHROLL. Metallogenesis of germanium-A review [J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2007, 30: 145-180. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2005.07.034

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] 胡瑞忠, 苏文超, 戚华文, 等.锗的地球化学、赋存状态和成矿作用[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2000, 19(4):215-217.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 谷团, 刘玉平, 李朝阳.分散元素的超常富集与共生[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2000, 19(1) :60-63.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 章明, 顾雪祥, 付绍洪, 等.锗的地球化学性质与锗矿床[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2003.22(1):82-87.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 庄汉平, 卢家烂, 傅家谟, 等.临沧超大型锗矿床锗赋存状态研究[J].中国科学(D辑), 1998.28(增刊):37-42.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 陈述荣, 谢家亨, 许超南, 等.福建龙岩马坑铁矿床成因的探讨[J].地球化学, 1985(4):350-357.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(4)

Tables(7)

Article Metrics

Article views(723) PDF downloads(97) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint