Bearing capacity evaluation and function zoning of geo-resources and environment in Tongjiang-Fuyuan area on the border between China and Russia

LI Xiao; WANG Xiaoguang; HE Haiyang; WANG Changqi; ZHU Wei; CAI He; CHEN Lin; TANG Nan

doi:10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.12.012

2023 Vol. 42, No. 12

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2023 > 42(12): 2165-2173

Next Article Previous Article

LI Xiao, WANG Xiaoguang, HE Haiyang, WANG Changqi, ZHU Wei, CAI He, CHEN Lin, TANG Nan. 2023. Bearing capacity evaluation and function zoning of geo-resources and environment in Tongjiang-Fuyuan area on the border between China and Russia. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(12): 2165-2173. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.12.012

Citation:

LI Xiao, WANG Xiaoguang, HE Haiyang, WANG Changqi, ZHU Wei, CAI He, CHEN Lin, TANG Nan. 2023. Bearing capacity evaluation and function zoning of geo-resources and environment in Tongjiang-Fuyuan area on the border between China and Russia. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(12): 2165-2173. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.12.012

Bearing capacity evaluation and function zoning of geo-resources and environment in Tongjiang-Fuyuan area on the border between China and Russia

1.
Shenyang Center, China Geological Survey, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Natural Resource Coupling Process and Effects, Beijing 100055, China
3.
Dadong Branch of Shenyang Public Security Bureau, Shenyang 110000, Liaoning, China

More Information

Corresponding author: CHEN Lin, 392446434@qq.com

Received Date: 06 September 2021

Revised Date: 25 February 2022

Publish Date: 15 December 2023

Abstract

Abstract

In order to promote geo-resources and environment protection and new type urbanization of Tongjiang-Fuyuan area on the border between China and Russia, a comprehensive approach was employed.This involved analytic hierarchy process, expert Consultation Method, and GIS technology to establish an evaluation index system for assessing the carrying capacity of geo-resources and environment.The evaluation system was based on the investigation of regional resource endowment, hydrogeological, engineering geological, environmental geological conditions and human activity patterns.Furthermore, the bearing background and status of geo-resources and environment were evaluated respectively.The comprehensive evaluation of bearing capacity was further realized by coupling the results of the background and status evaluations, and the geo-resources and environment function zoning was carried out according to the needs of regional social and economic development.The results showed that the level of overall geo-resources and environment carrying capacity in the study area was medium-strong, accounting for 98% of the whole area.The main factor restricting the carrying capacity was the groundwater environmental quality, and the risk and susceptibility of geological disasters such as bank collapse of boundary river were low.Based on the analysis of the evaluation results, the study area was divided into three types of geo-resources and environment functional areas: ecological type, livable type, and agricultural type.Some measures such as strengthening ecological protection and restoration, improving living environment and strengthening source control of non-point source pollution were put forward to provide scientific reference for promoting the development of characteristic tourism industry and agricultural economy in border areas.
- Sino-Russian border /
- port cities /
- geo-resources and environment /
- carrying capability /
- index system /
- evaluation /
- function zoning /
- environment geological survey engineering

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, et al. Economic growth, carrying capacity and the environment[J]. Science, 1995, 268(1): 89-90. Google Scholar
[2]	Finizio A, Villa S. Environment risk assessment for pesticides: A tool for decision-makers[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2000, 22(3): 235-241. Google Scholar
[3]	Francesco G, Mario B, Giuseppe P, et al. Environmental geology applied to geoconservation in the interaction between geosites and linear infrastructures in south-eastern Italy[J]. Geoheritage, 2015, 7(1): 33-46. doi: 10.1007/s12371-015-0145-0 CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	Khanna P, Babu P R, George M S. Carrying-capacity as a basis for sustainable development. A case study of National Capital Region in India[J]. Progress in Planning, 1999, 52(2): 101-166. doi: 10.1016/S0305-9006(99)00004-5 CrossRef Google Scholar
[5]	Lane M. The carrying capacity imperative: Assessing regional carrying capacity methodologies for sustainable land-use planning[J]. Land Use Policy, 2010, 27(4): 1038-1045. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.01.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	Maltus T R. An essay on the principle of population[M]. London: StPaul's Church-Yard, 1798. Google Scholar
[7]	Turer D, Nefeslioglu H A, Zorlu K, et al. Assessment of geo-environmental problems of the Zonguldak Province(NW Turkey)[J]. Environmental Geology, 2008, 55(5): 1001-1014. doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-1049-3 CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	Vliet W V. Sustainable development, global restructuring and immigrant housing[J]. Habitat International, 1996, 20(3): 346-358. Google Scholar
[9]	CJJ 57-2012. 城乡规划工程地质勘察规范(中华人民共和国行业标准)[S]. 2012. Google Scholar
[10]	DD 2008-01. 地下水污染地质调查评价规范(中国地质调查局地质调查技术标准)[S]. 2008. Google Scholar
[11]	DZ/T 0130-2006. 地质矿产实验室测试质量管理规范(中华人民共和国地质矿产行业标准)[S]. 2006. Google Scholar
[12]	初禹, 张贵达, 王少华, 等. 资源一号02C卫星数据在河流塌岸调查中的应用-以中俄界河抚远县段为例[J]. 黑龙江工程学院学报, 2015, 29(4): 6-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4679.2015.04.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	戴慧敏, 赵君, 刘国栋, 等. 东北黑土地质量调查成果[J]. 地质与资源, 2020, 29(3): 299. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1947.2020.03.014 CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	邓雪, 李家铭, 曾浩建, 等. 层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(7): 93-100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0984.2012.07.012 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	樊杰. 玉树地震灾后恢复重建资源环境承载能力评价[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010. Google Scholar
[16]	樊杰, 周成虎, 顾行发. 国家汶川地域灾后重建规划资源环境承载能力评价[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009. Google Scholar
[17]	封志明, 杨艳昭, 闫慧敏, 等. 百年来的资源环境承载力研究: 从理论到实践[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(3): 379-395. Google Scholar
[18]	何海洋. 东宁-绥芬河地区地质环境承载力驱动机制与监测预警研究[D]. 吉林大学博士学位论文, 2020. Google Scholar
[19]	黑龙江省地质环境监测总站. 黑龙江省矿山地质环境调查与评估报告[R]. 2004. Google Scholar
[20]	姜月华, 林良俊, 陈立德, 等. 长江经济带资源环境条件与重大地质问题[J]. 中国地质, 2017, 44(6): 1045-1061. Google Scholar
[21]	李春燕, 邢丽霞, 李亚民, 等. 基于ArcGIS的国土开发适宜性评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2014, 24(S3): 175-178. Google Scholar
[22]	李瑞敏, 鞠建华, 王轶, 等. 地质环境问题的地质指标体系框架及其构建方法[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30(11): 94-99. Google Scholar
[23]	李瑞敏, 孟晖. 国土资源环境承载力评价技术要求(试行)(地质部分)[S]. 国土资源部, 2016. Google Scholar
[24]	李霄, 王晓光, 柴璐, 等. 沉积盆地地下水无机氮来源示踪及其演化模式[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41(4): 1856-1867. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6923.2021.04.040 CrossRef Google Scholar
[25]	孟晖, 李春燕, 张若琳, 等. 全国地质环境承载能力评价[J]. 地质通报, 2021, 40(4): 451-459. Google Scholar
[26]	孙秀波, 崔健, 代雅建, 等. 辽宁锦州地区土地资源承载力评价[J]. 地质通报, 2022, 41(8): 1487-1493. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2022.08.014 CrossRef Google Scholar
[27]	王爱平, 周焱, 李枋燕, 等. 指标权重方法比较研究——以湄潭县基本农田划定为例[J]. 贵州大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 32(2): 135-140. Google Scholar
[28]	王念秦, 李仁伟, 蒲凯超, 等. 中国地质环境承载力评价研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2019, 42(1): 150-155. Google Scholar
[29]	王思敬. 中国城市发展中的地质环境问题[J]. 第四纪研究, 1996, 16(2): 115-122. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7410.1996.02.003 CrossRef Google Scholar
[30]	王晓光, 李霄, 何海洋, 等. 中俄蒙经济走廊哈大齐和绥芬河——同江地区地质环境综合调查成果报告[R]. 中国地质调查局沈阳地质调查中心, 2020. Google Scholar
[31]	王欣宝, 李瑞敏, 孙超, 等. 河北省地质资源环境承载能力评价方法[J]. 地质通报, 2020, 39(1): 94-101. Google Scholar
[32]	魏路, 刘建奎, 肖永红, 等. 安徽省地质环境承载能力评价[J]. 地质通报, 2020, 39(1): 102-107. Google Scholar
[33]	闫文晓. 地质环境条件在国土空间规划中的应用研究[J]. 上海国土资源, 2019, 40(2): 1038-1045. Google Scholar
[34]	殷志强, 李瑞敏, 李小磊, 等. 地质资源环境承载能力研究进展与发展方向[J]. 中国地质, 2018, 45(6): 1103-1115. Google Scholar
[35]	于洋, 韩鹏, 杨楠, 等. 中原城市群核心城市资源环境承载力研究[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 54(2): 407-414. Google Scholar
[36]	张丽, 李瑞敏, 许书刚, 等. 江苏宜兴市地质资源环境承载能力评价[J]. 地质通报, 2020, 39(1): 131-137. Google Scholar
[37]	中国国土资源航空物探遥感中心. 中俄界河塌岸地质灾害动态遥感监测成果报告[R]. 2006. Google Scholar
[38]	中国人民解放军建字七一四部队. 三江平原同江—抚远地区综合水文地质图[Z]. 1978. Google Scholar