2025 Vol. 44, No. 6
Article Contents

GUAN Linlin, WANG Qingzhi, GAO Quanfang, LIU Lin, LI Yanjing. 2025. The potential of normal-pressure shale gas exploration of the Ordovician Wufeng Formation and the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Wulong area, Chongqing. Geological Bulletin of China, 44(6): 982-992. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2024.01.003
Citation: GUAN Linlin, WANG Qingzhi, GAO Quanfang, LIU Lin, LI Yanjing. 2025. The potential of normal-pressure shale gas exploration of the Ordovician Wufeng Formation and the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Wulong area, Chongqing. Geological Bulletin of China, 44(6): 982-992. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2024.01.003

The potential of normal-pressure shale gas exploration of the Ordovician Wufeng Formation and the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Wulong area, Chongqing

    Fund Project: Supported by Sinopec Technology Department projects (Nos.P24115; P23221)
More Information
  • Author Bio: GUAN Linlin, female, born in 1990, master, assistant researcher, mainly engaged in shale gas exploration research; E-mail: guanlinlin_upc@163.com
  • Objective

    To clarify the geological characteristics and preservation conditions of the Ordovician Wufeng Formation and the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation shale gas, and to analyze the potential of the shale gas under normal pressure, this paper provides a reference for the efficient development of the Wulong area.

    Methods

    Based on the knowledge and achievements of shale gas exploration and development in southeast Chongqing, the research was conducted through the aspects of geological knowledge, regional tectonic evolution and fine seismic interpretation.

    Results

    The static evaluation indexes are superior and have good shale gas exploration potential of the Ordovician Wufeng Formation and the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in this area. The difference of single well productivity is mainly due to the influence of tectonics between Wulong, Jiaoshiba and Nanchuan area. The compressive stress of Yanshan period was dominant in Wulong area, which was conducive to the transformation and preservation of shale gas reservoirs, and the extension stress was dominant in the Himalayan period, which made local shale gas preservation conditions deteriorate due to formation denudation, fracture development, stress release and other factors.

    Conclusions

    The Wulong area has the characteristics of "deep−water shelf facies controlling hydrocarbon generation, tectonic movement periods controlling shale gas preservation, and tectonic styles controlling shale gas enrichment". The eastern graben is located in the extensional tectonic zone, and the fault opening leads to poor preservation conditions, which is not conducive to shale gas exploration and development. The central uplift area in the southern depression and the fault−developed fold area in the central part under compressive stress are favorable targets for shale gas exploration.

  • 加载中
  • [1] Bai W H, Xu S H, Liu Z Q, et al. 2024. Classification of shale gas enrichment patterns based on structural styles: A case study of the Wufeng Formation and Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. North China Geology, 47(1): 52−65 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [2] Chen S B, Zhu Y M, Wang H Y, et al. 2011. Shale gas reservoir characterisation: A typical case in the southern Sichuan Basin of China[J]. Energy, 36(11): 6609−6616.

    Google Scholar

    [3] Feng D J, Li W P. 2022. Controlling effect of structure on shale gas of the Silurian Longmaxi Formation in Wulong−Baima area, Eastern Marginal zone of Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 24(1): 7−14 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [4] Gao Q F. 2019. The high−quality shale characteristics of Wufeng Formation−Longmaxi Formation in Wulong Syncline and the best target of horizontal well[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 6(3): 99−105 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [5] Guo T L, Jiang S, Zhang P X, et al. 2020. Progress and direction of exploration and development of normally−pressured shale gas from the periphery of Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 42(5): 837−844.

    Google Scholar

    [6] Guo T L, Zhang H R. 2014. Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 41(1): 31−40.

    Google Scholar

    [7] He G S, He X P, Gao Y Q, et al. 2020. Enrichment model of normal−pressure shale gas in the Jinfo slope of the basin−margin transition zone in Southeast Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 40(6): 50−60 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [8] He M P. 2023. Development characteristics and gas−bearing factors of high−quality shallow ordinary−pressure shale reservoirs in Wufeng−Longmaxi Formation in Wulong area[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 10(3): 64−73 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [9] He X P, He G S, Gao Y Q, et al. 2018. Geological characteristics and enrichment laws of normal−pressure shale gas in the basin−margin transition zone of SE Chongqing[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 38(12): 1−14 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [10] He X P, Qi Y P, He G S, et al. 2019. Further understanding of main controlling factors of normal pressure shale gas enrichment and high yield in the area with complex structure of the southeast area of Chongqing[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 9(5): 32−39 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [11] He X P, He G S, Gao Y Q, et al. 2023. Progress in and research direction of key technologies for normal−pressure shale gas exploration and development[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 43(6): 1−14 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [12] Jiang Z X, Song Y, Tang X L, et al. 2020. Controlling factors of marine shale gas differential enrichment in southern China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 47(3): 617−628 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [13] Li J L, Yin C, Wang M F, et al. 2019. Preservation condition differences in Jiaoshiba area, Fuling, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 41(3): 341−347 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [14] Ma J, Guan L L, Gao Q F, et al. 2022. Exploration and discovery of normal pressure shale gas in shallow anticline in southeast Chongqing area[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 27(3): 47−60 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [15] Ma X H. 2019. Enrichment laws and scale effective development of shale gas in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 6(3): 240−249.

    Google Scholar

    [16] Shan X L, Xing J, Su S Y, et al. 2023. Shale lithofacies and gas−bearing characteristics of the lower Paleozoic Wufeng Formation−Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation in Changning area, southern Sichuan[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 53(5): 1323−1337 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [17] Tang J G, Wang K M, Qin D C, et al. 2021. Tectonic deformation and its constraints to shale gas accumulation in Nanchuan area, southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 40(5): 11−21 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [18] Wei X F, Li Y P, Wei Z H, et al. 2017. Effects of preservation conditions on enrichment and high yield of shale gas in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 39(2): 147−153.

    Google Scholar

    [19] Wei X F, Liu Z J, Wang Q, et al. 2020. Analysis and thinking of the difference of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas enrichment between Dingshan and Jiaoshiba areas in southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 31(8): 1041−1051.

    Google Scholar

    [20] Xiong X L, Zhang J W, Meng Y, et al. 2024. Structural analysis of multi−stage superimposed deformation in the southwestern Sichuan Basin: An example from the Ziliujing anticline[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(10): 1788−1800 (in Chinese with English abstract

    Google Scholar

    [21] Xue G, Xiong W, Zhang P X. 2023. Genesis analysis and effective development of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: A case of Wufeng−Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in southeast margin of Sichuan Baisn[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 13(5): 668−675 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [22] Zhang Y, Li Y J, Pan L, et al. 2023. The influence of structural characteristics on the preservation conditions of shale gas in Nanchuan area, Chongqing[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(5): 680−686 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [23] Zou Y T, Duan J B, Zhao Y J, et al. 2015. Tectonic characteristics and evolution of the high and steep fault folding belt in east Sichuan[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 89(11): 2046−2051 (in Chinese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar

    [24] 拜文华, 徐思煌, 刘昭茜, 等. 2024. 基于构造样式的页岩气富集模式分类——以四川盆地五峰-龙马溪组为例[J]. 华北地质, 47(1): 52−65.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 冯动军, 李王鹏. 2022. 川东盆缘带武隆—白马地区构造对志留系龙马溪组页岩气的控制作用[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 24(1): 7−14.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 高全芳. 2019. 武隆向斜五峰组−龙马溪组优质页岩特征及水平井靶窗优选[J]. 非常规油气, 6(3): 99−105. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-8471.2019.03.017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] 何贵松, 何希鹏, 高玉巧, 等. 2020. 渝东南盆缘转换带金佛斜坡常压页岩气富集模式[J]. 天然气工业, 40(6): 50−60.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 何梅朋. 2023. 武隆地区五峰组−龙马溪组优质浅层常压页岩储层发育特征及含气性影响因素[J]. 非常规油气, 10(3): 64−73.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 何希鹏, 何贵松, 高玉巧, 等. 2018. 渝东南盆缘转换带常压页岩气地质特征及富集高产规律[J]. 天然气工业, 38(12): 1−14. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.12.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [30] 何希鹏, 齐艳平, 何贵松, 等. 2019. 渝东南构造复杂区常压页岩气富集高产主控因素再认识[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 9(5): 32−39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2019.05.004

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [31] 何希鹏, 何贵松, 高玉巧, 等. 2023. 常压页岩气勘探开发关键技术进展及攻关方向[J]. 天然气工业, 43(6): 1−14. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2023.06.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [32] 姜振学, 宋岩, 唐相路, 等. 2020. 中国南方海相页岩气差异富集的控制因素[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 47(3): 617−628. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.03.18

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [33] 李金磊, 尹成, 王明飞, 等. 2019. 四川盆地涪陵焦石坝地区保存条件差异性分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 41(3): 341−347. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201903341

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [34] 马军, 关琳琳, 高全芳, 等. 2022. 渝东南地区背斜型浅层常压页岩气勘探发现[J]. 中国石油勘探, 27(3): 47−60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2022.03.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [35] 单玄龙, 邢健, 苏思远, 等. 2023, 川南长宁地区下古生界五峰组−龙马溪组一段页岩岩相与含气性特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 53(5): 1323−1337.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 汤济广, 汪凯明, 秦德超等. 2021. 川东南南川地区构造变形与页岩气富集[J]. 地质科技通报, 40(5): 11−21.

    Google Scholar

    [37] 魏祥峰, 刘珠江, 王强, 等. 2020. 川东南丁山与焦石坝地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气富集条件差异分析与思考[J]. 天然气地球科学, 31(8): 1041−1051.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 熊小林, 张金武, 孟也, 等. 2024, 四川盆地西南部多期叠加变形构造解析: 以自流井背斜为例[J]. 地质通报, 43(10): 1788−1800.

    Google Scholar

    [39] 薛冈, 熊炜, 张培先. 2023. 常压页岩气藏成因分析与有效开发——以四川盆地东南缘地区五峰组−龙马溪组页岩气藏为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 13(5): 668−675.

    Google Scholar

    [40] 张勇, 李彦婧, 潘兰, 等. 2023. 构造特征对重庆南川地区页岩气保存条件的影响[J]. 地质通报, 42(5): 680−686.

    Google Scholar

    [41] 邹玉涛, 段金宝, 赵艳军, 等. 2015. 川东高陡断褶带构造特征及其演化[J]. 地质学报, 89(11): 2046−2051.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(7)

Tables(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(188) PDF downloads(102) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint