2024 Vol. 43, No. 4
Article Contents

HAN Bo, MA Zhen, XIA Yubo, ZHANG Xi, GAO Yihang, GUO Xu, LIU Hongwei, ZUO Haiquan, MIAO Jinjie, BAI Yaonan, LI Zhuang. 2024. Evaluation on geological suitability of development and utilization of underground space resources in Xiong’an New Area. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(4): 594-610. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2023.03.043
Citation: HAN Bo, MA Zhen, XIA Yubo, ZHANG Xi, GAO Yihang, GUO Xu, LIU Hongwei, ZUO Haiquan, MIAO Jinjie, BAI Yaonan, LI Zhuang. 2024. Evaluation on geological suitability of development and utilization of underground space resources in Xiong’an New Area. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(4): 594-610. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2023.03.043

Evaluation on geological suitability of development and utilization of underground space resources in Xiong’an New Area

More Information
  • Xiong’an New Area development is a grand project and a national event. The development and utilization of underground space resources can promote high-quality construction and sustainable development of the New Area. This paper establishes the evaluation index system of geological environment suitability for the development and utilization of underground space resources through the analytic hierarchy process and evaluates the geological environment suitability of underground space resources at different depths. The results show that the evaluation indexes can be divided into five categories and 11 indexes for the development and utilization of underground space in Xiong’an New Area. The main influence indexes are water-bearing sand layer, land subsidence, liquefied sand and corrosion of soil and water, etc. According to shallow, sub-deep and deep underground space, the suitability evaluation results were divided into suitable areas, less suitable areas and sensitive areas. The total area of suitable areas and less suitable areas accounted for about 80% of the New Area, indicating that the overall geological suitability of underground space development and utilization is good in Xiong’an New Area. The evaluation results provide reliable technical support for the high-quality construction and sustainable development in Xiong’an New Area.

  • 加载中
  • [1] Admiraal H, Cornaro A. 2016. Why underground space should be included in urban planning policy and how this will enhance an urban underground future[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 55: 214−220. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.013

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [2] Chen Z L, Chen J Y, Liu H, et al. 2018. Present status and development trends of underground space in Chinese cities: evaluation and analysis[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 71: 253−270. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.027

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [3] Edelenbos J, Monnikhof R, Haasnoot J, et al. 1998. Strategic study on the utilization of underground space in the Netherlands[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 13(2): 159−165. doi: 10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00043-1

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [4] Li X Z, Li C, Parriaux A, et al. 2016. Multiple resources and their sustainable development in Urban Underground Space[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 55: 59−66.

    Google Scholar

    [5] Nathan D, Mark B, John D, et al. 2018. Going underground: An exploration of the interfaces between underground urban transport infrastructure and its environment[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 81: 450−462. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.027

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [6] Saaty T L. 1997. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15(3): 234−281.

    Google Scholar

    [7] Saaty T L. 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1): 9−26. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] Wout B. 2016. Urban underground space: Solving the problems of today’ s cities[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 55: 245−248. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.11.012

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [9] Zhou D K, Li X Z, Wang Q, et al. 2019. GIS−based urban underground space resources evaluation toward three−dimensional land planning: A case study in Nantong, China[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 84(1): 1−10.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 蔡鹤生, 周爱国, 唐朝晖. 1998. 地质环境质量评价中的专家—层次分析定权法[J]. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 23(3): 299−302.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 程光华, 王睿, 赵牧华, 等. 2019. 国内城市地下空间开发利用现状与发展趋势[J]. 地学前缘, 26(3): 39−47.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 葛伟亚, 王睿, 张庆, 等. 2021. 城市地下空间资源综合利用评价工作构想[J]. 地质通报, 40(10): 1601−1608. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2021.10.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] 郭朝斌, 王志辉, 刘凯, 等. 2019. 特殊地下空间应用与研究现状[J]. 中国地质, 46(3): 482−492. doi: 10.12029/gc20190304

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [14] 郭骏瀚, 刘凯, 邓岳飞, 等. 2023. 基于熵权优化法的地下空间资源地质适宜性评价[J]. 地质通报, 42(2/3): 385−396.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 郝爱兵, 吴爱民, 马震, 等. 2018. 雄安新区地上地下工程建设适宜性一体化评价[J]. 地球学报, 39(5): 513−522.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 韩博, 夏雨波, 裴艳东, 等. 2020. 雄安新区地下空间工程地质特征及环境地质效应[J]. 工程勘察, 48(3): 1−8.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 蒋杰, 葛伟亚, 马青山, 等. 2021. 南昌市中心城区地下空间开发地质适宜性评价[J]. 地质通报, 40(5): 734−744.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 李鹏岳, 王东辉, 李胜伟, 等. 2021a. 山前冲积平原型城市地下空间开发利用地质适宜性评价——以成都市为例[J]. 地质通报, 40(10): 1644−1655.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 李鹏岳, 韩浩东, 王东辉, 等. 2021b. 城市地下空间资源开发利用适宜性评价现状及发展趋势[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 41(1): 121−128.

    Google Scholar

    [20] 李晓昭, 王睿, 顾倩, 等. 2019. 城市地下空间开发的战略需求[J]. 地学前缘, 26(3): 32−38.

    Google Scholar

    [21] 刘宏伟, 王国明, 马传明, 等. 2022. 沉积平原区地下空间开发利用适宜性评价指标体系研究——以北京通州区和河北廊坊北三县为例[J]. 华北地质, 45(4): 68−74.

    Google Scholar

    [22] 龙睿, 张发旺, 栾崧, 等. 2020. 广州市城区地下空间开发利用适宜性评价研究[J]. 西北地质, 53(4): 194−206.

    Google Scholar

    [23] 马邦闯, 谭飞, 焦玉勇, 等. 2020. 基于粗糙集与AHP的地下空间开发地质适宜性评价模型构建方法研究[J]. 安全与环境工程, 27(6): 153−159.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 马震, 夏雨波, 李海涛, 等. 2021. 雄安新区自然资源与环境-生态地质条件分析[J]. 中国地质, 48(3): 677−696.

    Google Scholar

    [25] 马震, 黄庆彬, 林良俊, 等. 2022. 雄安新区多要素城市地质调查实践与应用[J]. 华北地质, 45(1): 58−68.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 潘朝, 吴立, 左清军, 等. 2013. 基于模糊数学的武汉市地下空间开发地质适宜性评价[J]. 安全与环境工程, 20(2): 19−23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1556.2013.02.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] 彭建, 柳昆, 郑付涛, 等. 2010. 基于AHP的地下空间开发利用适宜性评价[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 6(4): 688−694.

    Google Scholar

    [28] 王兰化, 马武明, 李明明, 等. 2015. 天津滨海新区地下空间开发适宜性评价[J]. 地质调查与研究, 38(4): 299−304.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 王成善, 周成虎, 彭建兵, 等. 2019. 论新时代我国城市地下空间高质量开发和可持续利用[J]. 地学前缘, 26(3): 1−8.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 夏友, 马传明. 2014. 郑州市地下空间资源开发利用地质适宜性评价[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 10(3): 493−497.

    Google Scholar

    [31] 夏雨波, 郭旭, 韩博, 等. 2021. 雄安新区水土质量与地质调查评价项目成果报告[R]. 中国地质调查局天津地质调查中心.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 夏雨波, 郭旭, 王冰, 等. 2022. 雄安新区水土腐蚀性地质成因研究[J]. 华北地质, 45(3): 69−76.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 邢怀学, 窦帆帆, 葛伟亚, 等. 2022. 城市地下空间开发利用地质适宜性三维评价指标体系研究——以杭州市为例[J]. 地质论评, 68(2): 607−614.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 杨木壮, 张建峰, 郑先昌. 2009. 城市地下空间开发利用的潜在不利影响及其对策[J]. 现代城市研究, 24(8): 24−28.

    Google Scholar

    [35] 杨文采, 田钢, 夏江海, 等. 2019. 华南丘陵地区城市地下空间开发利用前景[J]. 中国地质, 46(3): 447−454.

    Google Scholar

    [36] 谭飞, 汪君, 焦玉勇, 等. 2021. 城市地下空间适宜性评价研究国内外现状及趋势[J]. 地球科学-中国地质大学学报, 46(5): 1896−1908.

    Google Scholar

    [37] 张明阳, 王一鸣, 叶文荣, 等. 2020. 温州市规划区地下空间开发地质环境适宜性评价[J]. 土木工程学报, 53(S1): 378−384.

    Google Scholar

    [38] 张晓波, 刘凯, 蒋鹏, 等. 2023. 基于约束条件的深圳市南山S区地下空间开发地质适宜性评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 50(4): 213−224.

    Google Scholar

    [39] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 2010. GB 50011—2010: 建筑抗震设计规范[S].

    Google Scholar

    [40] 邹承杰. 2018. 河北省容城县中更新世以来的钻孔沉积物地球化学特征及古气候演化[D]. 河北地质大学硕士学位论文.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(18)

Tables(10)

Article Metrics

Article views(927) PDF downloads(56) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint