Understanding the evolution of relationships among natural resource, social economy, and eco-environment

WANG Jun; SUN Yuqin; ZHAO Caisheng; YANG Zhiwei; PENG Jian

doi:10.12097/gbc.2023.03.002

2024 Vol. 43, No. 8

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2024 > 43(8): 1289-1296

Next Article Previous Article

WANG Jun, SUN Yuqin, ZHAO Caisheng, YANG Zhiwei, PENG Jian. 2024. Understanding the evolution of relationships among natural resource, social economy, and eco-environment. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(8): 1289-1296. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2023.03.002

Citation:

WANG Jun, SUN Yuqin, ZHAO Caisheng, YANG Zhiwei, PENG Jian. 2024. Understanding the evolution of relationships among natural resource, social economy, and eco-environment. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(8): 1289-1296. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2023.03.002

Understanding the evolution of relationships among natural resource, social economy, and eco-environment

1.
Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation (Land Science and Technology Innovation Center), Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China
2.
Technology Innovation Center for Integrated Ecosystem Restoration and Sustainable Utilization, Ministry of Natural Resources, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHAO Caisheng, zhaocsh@126.com

Received Date: 02 March 2023

Revised Date: 16 July 2023

Publish Date: 15 August 2024

Abstract

Abstract

The concept of human−nature community of life emphasizes the interdependent relationship between human and nature, and its intrinsic elements are universally linked and mutually influential. In this study, the interconnections and evolutionary mechanisms among natural resource, social economy, and eco−environment were delved, and then the interrelationship among the elements of the complex system was explored. Further analysis of the evolutionary paths of the elements of natural resources, socio−economic factors, and the ecological environment from primitive civilization, agricultural civilization, and industrial civilization to ecological civilization provides theoretical support and practical guidance for current ecological civilization transformation. This study initially explores the evolving relationships between natural resource, social economy, and eco−environment, providing scientific cognition for the concept of community of life between human and nature and theoretical support for promoting the construction of ecological civilization and achieving the goal of sustainable development.
- human and natural life community /
- natural resource /
- social economy /
- eco-environment /
- evolving relationship

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Adams D, Adams K, Ullah S, et al. 2019. Globalisation, governance, accountability and the natural resource ‘Curse’: Implications for socio−economic growth of oil−rich developing countries[J]. Resources Policy, 61: 128−140. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.02.009 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	Ahmed Z, Asghar M M, Malik M N, et al. 2020. Moving towards a sustainable environment: The dynamic linkage between natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China[J]. Resources Policy, 67: 101677. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	Chen C, Tabssum N, Nguyen H P. 2019. Study on ancient Chu town urban green space evolution and ecological and environmental benefits[J]. Nature Environment & Pollution Technology, 18(5): 1733−1738. Google Scholar
[4]	de Mello K, Taniwaki R H, de Paula F R, et al. 2020. Multiscale land use impacts on water quality: Assessment, planning, and future perspectives in Brazil[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 270: 110879. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110879 CrossRef Google Scholar
[5]	Fu B. 2021. Several Key Points in Territorial Ecological Restoration[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 36(1): 64−69 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[6]	Fu B, Liu Y X. 2019. The theories and methods for systematically understanding land resource[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 64(21): 2172−2179(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[7]	Fu Y J, Tan C H, Liu X H, et al. 2022. Definition, classification, observation and monitoring of natural resources and their application in territorial planning and governance[J]. Geology in China, 49(4): 1048−1063 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[8]	Ge J P, Wang Y B, Zhang H T, et al. 2023. Theoretical Analysis and System Reconstruction of Natural Resource Classification[J], Natural Resource Economics of China, 36(6): 4−13 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[9]	Goldberg L, Lagomasino D, Thomas N, et al. 2020. Global declines in human‐driven mangrove loss[J]. Global change biology, 26(10): 5844−5855. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15275 CrossRef Google Scholar
[10]	Gu Y, Wu Y, Liu J, et al. 2020. Ecological Civilization and Government Administrative System Reform in China[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155: 104654. Google Scholar
[11]	Kong F B, Yang W C, Xu C Y, 2023. Coordinated relationship and influencing factors of ecological environment and socio−economic coupling of urban agglomeration around Hangzhou Bay in China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(6): 2287−2297 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[12]	Hassan S T, Baloch M A, Mahmood N, et al. 2019a. Linking Economic Growth and Ecological Footprint through Human Capital and Biocapacity[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47: 101516. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	Hassan S T, Xia E, Khan N H, et al. 2019b. Economic growth, natural resources, and ecological footprints: Evidence from Pakistan[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26: 2929−2938. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3803-3 CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	Lin B, Zhou Y. 2022. Measuring the green economic growth in China: Influencing factors and policy perspectives[J]. Energy, 241: 122518. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122518 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	Liu C, Yang M, Hou Y, et al. 2021. Spatiotemporal evolution of island ecological quality under different urban densities: A comparative analysis of Xiamen and Kinmen Islands, Southeast China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 124: 107438. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107438 CrossRef Google Scholar
[16]	Ma G X, Zhou X F, Peng F, et al. 2019. Cost of ecological degradation accounting in China in 2015[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 39(6): 1008−1015 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[17]	Mahtta R, Fragkias M, Güneralp B, et al. 2022. Urban land expansion: The role of population and economic growth for 300+ cities[J]. Npj Urban Sustainability, 2(1): 5. doi: 10.1038/s42949-022-00048-y CrossRef Google Scholar
[18]	Mcginnis M D, Ostrom E. 2014. Social−ecological system framework: Initial changes and continuing challenges[J]. Ecology and Society, 19(2): 374−386. Google Scholar
[19]	Meng F, Guo J, Guo Z, et al. 2021. Urban ecological transition: The practice of ecological civilization construction in China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 755: 142633. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142633 CrossRef Google Scholar
[20]	Nathaniel S P, Yalçiner K, Bekun F V. 2021. Assessing the environmental sustainability corridor: Linking natural resources, renewable energy, human capital, and ecological footprint in brics.[J]. Resources Policy, 70: 101924. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101924 CrossRef Google Scholar
[21]	Ostrom E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social−ecological systems[J]. Science, 325(5939): 419−422. doi: 10.1126/science.1172133 CrossRef Google Scholar
[22]	Partelow S. 2018. A review of the social−ecological systems framework[J]. Ecology and Society, 23(4): https://www.jstor.org/ stable/26796887. Google Scholar
[23]	Peng J, Li B, Dong J Q, et al. 2020. Basic logic of territorial ecological restoration[J]. China Land Science, 34(5): 18−26 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[24]	Peng J, Lü D N, Zhang T, et al. 2019. Systematic cognition of ecological protection and restoration of mountains−rivers−forests−farmlands− lakes−grasslands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 39(23): 8755−8762 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[25]	Shackleton C M, Mograbi P J, Drimie S, et al. 2019. Deactivation of field cultivation in communal areas of south Africa: patterns, drivers and socio−economic and ecological consequences[J]. Land Use Policy, 82: 686−699. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.009 CrossRef Google Scholar
[26]	Soga M, Gaston K J. 2020. The ecology of human–nature interactions[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 287(1918): 20191882. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1882 CrossRef Google Scholar
[27]	Testa F, Pretner G, Iovino R, et al. 2021. Drivers to green consumption: A systematic review[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23: 4826−4880. Google Scholar
[28]	Whitburn J, Linklater W, Abrahamse W. 2020. Meta‐analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior[J]. Conservation Biology, 34(1): 180−193. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13381 CrossRef Google Scholar
[29]	Wang J, Ying L X, Zhong L N. 2020. Thinking for the transformation of land consolidation and ecological restoration in the new era[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35: 26−36 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[30]	Wang J, Zhong L N. 2019. Application of ecosystem service theory for ecological protection and restoration of mountain−river−forest− field−lake−grassland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8702−8708(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[31]	Wang J Y, Bing L F, Yin Y, et al. 2021. Accounting for the cost of ecological degradation in Fuzhou City, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 32(11): 3781−3792 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[32]	Wang Y J, Liu Y X, Song S, et al. 2021. Research progress of the Water−Food−Energy−Ecosystem Nexus[J]. Advance in Earth Science, 36(7): 684−693 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[33]	Wei J Q, Zheng C, Cui M Y, et al. 2023. Analysis on the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem function in loess hilly region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 31(5): 1490−1500(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[34]	Xiao Y, Wang R, Wang F, et al. 2022. Investigation on spatial and temporal variation of coupling coordination between socioeconomic and ecological environment: A case study of the loess plateau, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 136: 108667. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108667 CrossRef Google Scholar
[35]	Xu L, Ao C, Liu B, et al. 2023. Ecotourism and sustainable development: A scientometric review of global research trends[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(4): 2977−3003. Google Scholar
[36]	Yang Z, Chen Y, Guo G, et al. 2021. Characteristics of land surface temperature clusters: Case study of the central urban area of Guangzhou[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 73: 103140. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103140 CrossRef Google Scholar
[37]	Yang Z, Chen Y, Qian Q, et al. 2019. The coupling relationship between construction land expansion and high−temperature area expansion in China’s three major urban agglomerations[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(17): 6680−6699. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2019.1590877 CrossRef Google Scholar
[38]	Yang Z, Chen Y B, Wu Z F, et al. 2018. The coupling between construction land expansion and urban heat island expansion in Guangdong−Hong Kong−Macao Greater Bay[J]. Journal of Geo−information Science, 20(11): 1592−1603 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[39]	Zafar M W, Zaidi S A H, Khan N R, et al. 2019. The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States[J]. Resources Policy, 63: 101428. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101428 CrossRef Google Scholar
[40]	Zhang D, Mohsin M, Rasheed A K, et al. 2021. Public spending and green economic growth in Bri region: Mediating role of green finance[J]. Energy Policy, 153: 112256. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112256 CrossRef Google Scholar
[41]	Zheng Z H, Wu Z F, Chen Y B, et al. 2021. Analyzing the ecological environment and urbanization characteristics of the Yangtze River delta urban agglomeration based on Google Earth Engine [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 41(2): 717−729 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[42]	傅伯杰. 2021. 国土空间生态修复亟待把握的几个要点[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 36(1): 64−69. Google Scholar
[43]	傅伯杰, 刘焱序. 2019. 系统认知土地资源的理论与方法[J]. 科学通报, 64(21): 2172−2179. Google Scholar
[44]	付宇佳, 谭昌海, 刘晓煌, 等. 2022. 自然资源定义、分类, 观测监测及其在国土规划治理中的应用[J]. 中国地质, 49(4): 1048−1063. doi: 10.12029/gc20220402 CrossRef Google Scholar
[45]	葛建平, 王艺博, 张洪涛, 等. 2023. 自然资源分类的学理解析与体系重构[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 36(6): 4−13. Google Scholar
[46]	孔凡斌, 杨文才, 徐彩瑶. 2023. 环杭州湾城市群生态环境与社会经济耦合协调关系及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 43(6): 2287−2297. Google Scholar
[47]	马国霞, 周夏飞, 彭菲, 等. 2019. 2015年中国生态系统生态破坏损失核算研究[J]. 地理科学, 39(6): 1008−1015. Google Scholar
[48]	彭建, 李冰, 董建权, 等. 2020. 论国土空间生态修复基本逻辑[J]. 中国土地科学, 34(5): 18−26. doi: 10.11994/zgtdkx.20200427.124442 CrossRef Google Scholar
[49]	彭建, 吕丹娜, 张甜, 等. 2019. 山水林田湖草生态保护修复的系统性认知[J]. 生态学报, 39(23): 8755−8762. Google Scholar
[50]	王军, 应凌霄, 钟莉娜. 2020. 新时代国土整治与生态修复转型思考[J]. 自然资源学报, 35(1): 26−36. Google Scholar
[51]	王军, 钟莉娜. 2019. 生态系统服务理论与山水林田湖草生态保护修复的应用[J]. 生态学报, 39(23): 8702−8708. Google Scholar
[52]	王娇月, 邴龙飞, 尹岩, 等. 2021. 福州市生态系统破坏损失评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 32(11): 3781−3792. Google Scholar
[53]	王奕佳, 刘焱序, 宋爽, 等. 2021. 水−粮食−能源−生态系统关联研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 36(7): 684−693. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2021.073 CrossRef Google Scholar
[54]	魏嘉琪, 郑诚, 崔梦莹, 等. 2023. 黄土丘陵区生物多样性与生态系统功能响应关系的分析[J]. 草地学报, 31(5): 1490−1500. Google Scholar
[55]	杨智威, 陈颖彪, 吴志峰, 等. 2018. 粤港澳大湾区建设用地扩张与城市热岛扩张耦合态势研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 20(11): 1592−1603. doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2018.180242 CrossRef Google Scholar
[56]	郑子豪, 吴志峰, 陈颖彪, 等. 2021. 基于Google Earth Engine的长三角城市群生态环境变化与城市化特征分析[J]. 生态学报, 41(2): 717−729. Google Scholar