Research progress of groundwater pollution source analysis methods

RAN Zeyu; JIA Yongfeng; JIANG Yonghai; SHI Zheming; SHANG Changjian; ZANG Yongge; CHEN Fan; LIAN Xinying

doi:10.12097/gbc.2022.05.052

2024 Vol. 43, No. 1

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2024 > 43(1): 153-162

Next Article Previous Article

RAN Zeyu, JIA Yongfeng, JIANG Yonghai, SHI Zheming, SHANG Changjian, ZANG Yongge, CHEN Fan, LIAN Xinying. 2024. Research progress of groundwater pollution source analysis methods. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(1): 153-162. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2022.05.052

Citation:

RAN Zeyu, JIA Yongfeng, JIANG Yonghai, SHI Zheming, SHANG Changjian, ZANG Yongge, CHEN Fan, LIAN Xinying. 2024. Research progress of groundwater pollution source analysis methods. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(1): 153-162. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2022.05.052

Research progress of groundwater pollution source analysis methods

1.
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences/Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, China
2.
School of Water Resources and Environment, China University of Geosciences (Beijing) , Beijing 100083, China
3.
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences/Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Simulation and Control of Groundwater Pollution, Beijing 100012, China
4.
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100840, China

More Information

Corresponding author: LIAN Xinying, lxyxy1984@126.com

Received Date: 24 May 2022

Revised Date: 02 April 2023

Publish Date: 15 January 2024

Abstract

Abstract

Groundwater pollution is concealed, and the pollution process is slow and difficult to manage. In recent years, China has attached great importance to the protection of groundwater environment. The research on groundwater pollution source analysis technology, which supports the protection concept of ‘prevention first’, has become a research hotspot in the field of groundwater pollution prevention and control. This paper introduces the
main technical methods of groundwater pollution source analysis at home and abroad, including isotope method, fluorescence spectroscopy, geological statistics, principal component analysis, positive matrix factorization, self-organizing mapping technology, the basic principles of these six common methods and their application and research dynamics in the field of groundwater pollution identification, summarizes the advantages and disadvantages and applicability of the methods, and looks forward to the application prospects and development trends of the above methods in the research of groundwater pollution.
- groundwater pollution /
- source analysis /
- isotope method /
- positive matrix factorization /
- self-organizing mapping technology

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Chen R H, Teng Y G, Chen, H Y, et al. 2019. Groundwater pollution and risk assessment based on source apportionment in a typical cold agricultural region in Northeastern China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 696: 133972. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133972 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	Chen W, Westerhoff P, Jerry A, et al. 2003. Fluorescence Excitation-Emission Matrix Regional Integration to Quantify Spectra for Dissolved Organic Matter[J]. Environ. Sci. Technol., 37: 5701−5710. doi: 10.1021/es034354c CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	Cheng H F, Hu Y. 2010. Lead (Pb) isotopic fingerprinting and its applications in lead pollution studies in China: a review[J]. Environmental Pollution, 158(5): 1134−1146. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.12.028 CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	Constantinos F, Phaedon K, Evangelos T. 2022. Application of geostatistical methods to groundwater salinization problems: A review[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 615: 128566. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128566 CrossRef Google Scholar
[5]	Frank T, Marco S, Heinz J. 2012. Artificial sweeteners—a recently recognized class of emerging environmental contaminants: a review[J]. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 403: 2503−2518. doi: 10.1007/s00216-012-5892-z CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	Glaser B. 2005. Compound-specific stable-isotope (δ¹³C) analysis in soil science[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 168(5): 633−648. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200521794 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	Hamed H, Johannesson K H, Gonzalez-pinzon R, et al. 2022. Groundwater geochemistry, quality, and pollution of the largest lake basin in the Middle East: Comparison of PMF and PCA-MLR receptor models and application of the source-oriented HHRA approach[J]. Chemosphere, 288: 132489. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132489 CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	Huang X Y, Zhang D, Zhao Z Q, et al. 2021. Determining hydrogeological and anthropogenic controls on N pollution in groundwater beneath piedmont alluvial fans using multi-isotope data[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 229: 106844. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2021.106844 CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	Kanagaraj G, Elango L. 2018. Chromium and fluoride contamination in groundwater around leather tanning industries in southern India: implications from stable isotopic ratio δ⁵³C-δ⁵²Cr, geochemical and geostatistical modelling[J]. Chemosphere, 220: 943−953. Google Scholar
[10]	Kohonen T. 1982. Analysis of a simple self-organizing process[J]. Biological Cybernetics, 44(2): 135−140. doi: 10.1007/BF00317973 CrossRef Google Scholar
[11]	Kohonen T. 1997. Exploration of very large databases by self-organizing maps[C]//Proceedings of international conference on neural networks (icnn'97). IEEE, 1: PL1-PL6. Google Scholar
[12]	Lee K J. 2019. The combined use of self-organizing map technique and fuzzy c-means clustering to evaluate urban groundwater quality in Seoul metropolitan city, South Korea[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 569: 685−697. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.031 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	Li M , Rui Z, Wang J S, et al. 2018, Apportionment and evolution of pollution sources in a typical riverside groundwater resource area using PCA-APCS-MLR model[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 218: 70-83. Google Scholar
[14]	Li X D, Masuda H, Kusakabe M, et al. 2006. Degradation of groundwater quality due to anthropogenic sulfur and nitrogen contamination in the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Geochemical Journal, 40(4): 309−332. doi: 10.2343/geochemj.40.309 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	Malsburg C. 1973. Self-organization of orientation sensitive cells in the striate cortex[J]. Kybernetik, 14: 85−100. doi: 10.1007/BF00288907 CrossRef Google Scholar
[16]	Mao H R, Wang G C, Rao Z, et al. 2021. Deciphering spatial pattern of groundwater chemistry and nitrogen pollution in Poyang Lake Basin (eastern China) using self-organizing map and multivariate statistics[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329: 129697. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129697 CrossRef Google Scholar
[17]	Nazzal Y, Yousef Z, Faisal K, et al. 2015. The combination of principal component analysis and geostatistics as a technique in assessment of groundwater hydrochemistry in arid environment[J]. Current Science: A Fortnightly Journal of Research, 108(6): 1138−1145. Google Scholar
[18]	Nisi B, Raco B, Dotsika E. 2016. Groundwater contamination studies by environmental isotopes: A review[J]. Threats to the Quality of Groundwater Resources, 40: 115−150. Google Scholar
[19]	Paatero P, Tapper U. 1994. Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values[J]. Environmetrics, 5(2): 111−126. doi: 10.1002/env.3170050203 CrossRef Google Scholar
[20]	Rashid A, Farooqi A, et al. 2020. Geochemical modeling, source apportionment, health risk exposure and control of higher fluoride in groundwater of sub-district Dargai, Pakistan[J]. Chemosphere, 243: 125409. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125409 CrossRef Google Scholar
[21]	Schmidt T, Zwank L, Elsner M, et al. 2004. Compound-specific stable isotope analysis of organic contaminants in natural environments: a critical review of the state of the art, prospects, and future challenges[J]. Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, 378(2): 283. Google Scholar
[22]	Taghvaee S, Sowlat M H, Mousavi A. 2018. Source apportionment of ambient PM2.5 in two locations in central Tehran using the Positive Matrix Factorization(PMF)model[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 628/629: 672−686. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.096 CrossRef Google Scholar
[23]	Torres J A, Mora A, Knappett P S K, et al. 2020. Tracking nitrate and sulfate sources in groundwater of an urbanized valley using a multi-tracer approach combined with a Bayesian isotope mixing model[J]. Water Research, 182: 115962. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115962 CrossRef Google Scholar
[24]	Torres J A, Mora A, Mahlknecht J, et al. 2021. Determining nitrate and sulfate pollution sources and transformations in a coastal aquifer impacted by seawater intrusion—A multi-isotopic approach combined with self-organizing maps and a Bayesian mixing model[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 417: 126103. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126103 CrossRef Google Scholar
[25]	Voltaggio M, Spadoni M, Sacch: E, et al. 2015. Assessment of groundwater pollution from ash ponds using stable and unstable isotopes around the Koradi and Khaperkheda thermal power plants (Maharashtra, India)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 518/519: 616−625. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.083 CrossRef Google Scholar
[26]	Zhang Y Z, Liu Y D, Zhou A G, et al. 2021. Identification of groundwater pollution from livestock farming using fluorescence spectroscopy coupled with multivariate statistical methods[J]. Water Research, 206: 117754. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117754 CrossRef Google Scholar
[27]	陈宇男. 2017. 基于三维荧光光谱法的有机农药废水快速检测实验研究[D]. 合肥工业大学硕士学位论文. Google Scholar
[28]	郭涛, 陈海洋, 滕彦国, 等. 2017. 东北典型农产区流域地下水水质评价与污染源识别[J]. 北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 53(3): 316−322. Google Scholar
[29]	郝红, 高博, 陆瑾, 等. 2013. 铅同位素示踪技术在水环境中的应用研究综述[C]//中国环境科学学会编. 2013 年水资源生态保护与水污染控制研讨会论文集, 194-200. Google Scholar
[30]	何小松, 余红, 席北斗, 等. 2014. 填埋垃圾浸提液与地下水污染物组成差异及成因[J]. 环境科学, 35(4): 1399−1406. Google Scholar
[31]	侯景儒. 1997. 中国地质统计学(空间信息统计学)发展的回顾与前景[J]. 地质与勘探, (1): 53−58. Google Scholar
[32]	李先国, 彭学伟, 张庆红. 2009. 单体同位素分析在有机污染物研究中的应用进展[J]. 中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版), 39(6): 1251−1256. Google Scholar
[33]	林斯杰, 齐永强, 杨梦曦, 等. 2020. 基于PCA-SOM的北京市平谷区地下水污染溯源[J]. 环境科学研究, 33(6): 1337−1344. Google Scholar
[34]	刘国卿, 张干, 彭先芝. 2004. 单体同位素技术在有机环境污染中的研究进展[J]. 地球与环境, (1): 23−27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9250.2004.01.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[35]	龙玉桥, 崔婷婷, 李伟, 等. 2017. 地质统计学法在地下水污染溯源中的应用及参数敏感性分析[J]. 水利学报, 48(7): 816−824. Google Scholar
[36]	马春龙, 施小清, 许伟伟, 等. 2021. 基于自组织神经网络的污染场地多监测指标相关性分析[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 48(3): 191−202. Google Scholar
[37]	孟瑞芳, 孟舒然. 2021. 基于正定矩阵因子分析模型的滹沱河冲洪积扇地下水污染源解析[J]. 环境污染与防治, 43(5): 586-591. Google Scholar
[38]	庞凤梅, 吴文良, 孟凡乔, 等. 2011. 利用氮、氧稳定同位素识别地下水硝酸盐污染源研究进展[J]. 农业环境与发展, 28(4): 64−69. Google Scholar
[39]	彭莉, 虞敏达, 何小松, 等. 2018. 垃圾填埋场地下水溶解性有机物光谱特征[J]. 环境科学, 39(10): 4556−4564. Google Scholar
[40]	王会霞, 史浙明, 姜永海, 等. 2021. 地下水污染识别与溯源指示因子研究进展[J]. 环境科学研究, 34(8): 1886−1898. Google Scholar
[41]	王晓红, 魏加华, 成志能, 等. 2013. 地下水有机污染源识别技术体系研究与示范[J]. 环境科学, 34(2): 662−667. Google Scholar
[42]	吴娜娜, 钱虹, 李亚峰, 等. 2017. 多种同位素追踪水体硝酸盐污染来源[J]. 沈阳大学学报(自然科学版), 29(3): 103−106. Google Scholar
[43]	许明明, 余成龙, 姜建芳, 等. 2022. 建筑垃圾填埋场周边地下水化学组分来源解析[J]. 地质通报, 41(12): 2125−2137. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2022.12.005 CrossRef Google Scholar
[44]	闫颖, 张晓文, 郭波莉. 2020. 铅-镉-锌-汞稳定同位素在重金属污染源解析中的研究进展[J]. 环境化学, 39(10): 2712−2721. Google Scholar
[45]	杨琰, 蔡鹤生, 刘存富, 等. 2004. NO₃^-中¹⁵N和¹⁸O同位素新技术在岩溶地区地下水氮污染研究中的应用-以河南林州食管癌高发区研究为例[J]. 中国岩溶, (3): 40−46. Google Scholar
[46]	张凯, 郑新辉, 李晓楠, 等. 2020. 我国西南某区域地下水污染评价及其污染源解析[J]. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 48(5): 64−73. Google Scholar
[47]	张琳, 张永涛, 刘君, 等. 2009. 有机单体同位素分析技术在地下水污染中的研究现状[J]. 地质科技情报, 28(5): 125−130. Google Scholar
[48]	张应华, 仵彦卿, 温小虎, 等. 2006. 环境同位素在水循环研究中的应用[J]. 水科学进展, 17(5): 732−747. Google Scholar
[49]	赵丽, 刘靖宇, 卫杰, 等. 2020. 某城市生活垃圾填埋场地下水“三氮”及溶解性有机质特征研究[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 39(3): 68−74. Google Scholar
[50]	赵然, 韩志伟, 申春华, 等. 2020. 典型岩溶地下河流域水体中硝酸盐源解析[J]. 环境科学, (41): 2664−2670. Google Scholar
[51]	智国铮. 2021. 三维荧光光谱技术在水环境中的研究与应用进展[J]. 四川环境, 40(5): 257−261. doi: 10.14034/j.cnki.schj.2021.05.040 CrossRef Google Scholar
[52]	周广峰, 刘欣. 2011. 主成分分析法在水环境质量评价中的应用进展[J]. 环境科学导刊, 30(1): 75−78. Google Scholar
[53]	周建华, 李晓伟, 陈锋. 2020. 污染物源解析技术正定矩阵因子分析法的现状研究[J]. 北华航天工业学院学报, 30(4): 10−12,25. Google Scholar
[54]	周圆, 李怀波, 郑凯凯, 等. 2020. 印染工业园区集中废水处理达标难点及DOM 特征解析[J]. 环境工程学报, (8): 1−10. Google Scholar
[55]	左海英. 2015. 地下水中典型挥发性有机污染物单体碳氢同位素方法研究及应用[D].中国地质大学(北京)博士学位论文. Google Scholar