China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Natural ResourcesHost
地质出版社Publish
2023 Vol. 47, No. 2
Article Contents

WANG Li-Li, DU Gong-Xin, GAO Xin-Cheng, WANG Ning, WANG Wei-Hong. 2023. FWI seismic low frequency recovery method based on the U-Net. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 47(2): 391-400. doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2023.1125
Citation: WANG Li-Li, DU Gong-Xin, GAO Xin-Cheng, WANG Ning, WANG Wei-Hong. 2023. FWI seismic low frequency recovery method based on the U-Net. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 47(2): 391-400. doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2023.1125

FWI seismic low frequency recovery method based on the U-Net

  • The lack of low-frequency data in actual seismic data makes the full waveform inversion (FWI) tend to fall into the local minimum,resulting in poor inversion quality and unreliable results.In view of this,data-driven low-frequency recovery mapping was adopted in this study.First,high-pass and low-pass filters were employed to separate high-frequency and low-frequency data from raw data,respectively,and then data preprocessing was carried out.The processed data were used as the training set of the model.Then,the model was built based on the U-Net to establish the mapping relationship between high and low frequencies.To effectively prevent the model from overfitting,the dropout layer and batch processing layer were added based on the U-Net model.Finally,the trained model was used to predict the corresponding low-frequency data from the high-frequency data and conduct inverse data preprocessing.The errors between the predicted low-frequency data after inverse data preprocessing and the real low-frequency data were compared and analyzed,The effectiveness of multi-scale FWI was verified using the depression and Marmousi models.The experimental results show that the average relative errors between the predicted low-frequency data and the real low-frequency data were 5.02% and 13.32%,respectively for training and test data,indicating small errors and high data coincidence.The inversion results of the depression model,the Marmousi model,and actual data show that the prediction of low-frequency data significantly improved the inversion quality and delivered a great performance in the processing of data with much noise.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Tarantola A. Linearized inversion of seismic reflection data[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1984, 32(6):998-1015.

    Google Scholar

    [2] Wu R S, Luo J, Wu B. Seismic envelope inversion and modulation signal model[J]. Geophysics, 2014, 79(3):WA13-WA24.

    Google Scholar

    [3] Bo?mann F, Ma J. Asymmetric chirplet transform for sparse representation of seismic data[J]. Geophysics, 2015, 80(6):WD89-WD100.

    Google Scholar

    [4] Shin C, Cha Y H. Waveform inversion in the Laplace domain[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2008, 173(3):922-931.

    Google Scholar

    [5] Li Y E, Demanet L. Full-waveform inversion with extrapolated low-frequency data[J]. Geophysics, 2016, 81(6):R339-R348.

    Google Scholar

    [6] Hu W. FWI without low frequency data-beat tone inversion[C]// SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014,Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2014:1116-1120.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 刘张聚, 童思友, 方云峰, 等. 基于时域加权的拉普拉斯—频率域弹性波全波形反演[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2021, 56(2):302-312.

    Google Scholar

    [8] Liu Z J, Tong S Y, Fang Y F, el at. Full waveform inversion of elastic wave in Laplace frequency domain based on time domain weighting[J] Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2021, 56(2):302-312.

    Google Scholar

    [9] Jin Y, Hu W, Wu X, et al. Learn low wavenumber information in FWI via deep inception based convolutional networks[C]// 2018 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting,OnePetro, 2018.

    Google Scholar

    [10] Sun H, Demanet L. Low frequency extrapolation with deep learning[C]// SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018,Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2018:2011-2015.

    Google Scholar

    [11] Ovcharenko O, Kazei V, Kalita M, et al. Deep learning for low-frequency extrapolation from multioffset seismic data[J]. Geophysics, 2019, 84(6):R989-R1001.

    Google Scholar

    [12] Ovcharenko O, Kazei V, Peter D, et al. Transfer learning for low frequency extrapolation from shot gathers for FWI applications[C]// 81st EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2019,European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2019(1):1-5.

    Google Scholar

    [13] Sun H, Demanet L. Deep learning for low frequency extrapolation of multicomponent data in elastic full waveform inversion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60:1-11.

    Google Scholar

    [14] Fang J, Zhou H, Elita Li Y, et al. Data-driven low-frequency signal recovery using deep-learning predictions in full-waveform inversion[J]. Geophysics, 2020, 85(6):A37-A43.

    Google Scholar

    [15] Hu W, Jin Y, Wu X, et al. Progressive transfer learning for low-frequency data prediction in full waveform inversion[J]. Geophysics, 2021, 86(4):1-82.

    Google Scholar

    [16] Mousavi A, Baraniuk R G. Learning to invert:Signal recovery via deep convolutional networks[C]// 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics,Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP),IEEE, 2017:2272-2276.

    Google Scholar

    [17] Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net:Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[C]// International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention,Springer,Cham, 2015:234-241.

    Google Scholar

    [18] Zeiler M D. Adadelta:an adaptive learning rate method[J]. Computer Science, 2012:1-6.

    Google Scholar

    [19] Bunks C, Saleck F M, Zaleski S, et al. Multiscale seismic waveform inversion[J]. Geophysics, 1995, 60(5):1457-1473.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(932) PDF downloads(70) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint