3DVSP channel gather cutting technique based on tensile ratio and its application

ZHANG Jie

doi:10.11720/wtyht.2022.2325

2022 Vol. 46, No. 1

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration > 2022 > 46(1): 169-174

Next Article Previous Article

ZHANG Jie. 2022. 3DVSP channel gather cutting technique based on tensile ratio and its application. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 46(1): 169-174. doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2022.2325

Citation:

ZHANG Jie. 2022. 3DVSP channel gather cutting technique based on tensile ratio and its application. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 46(1): 169-174. doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2022.2325

3DVSP channel gather cutting technique based on tensile ratio and its application

ZHANG Jie

SINOPEC Geophysical Research Institute,Nanjing 211103,China

Received Date: 23 October 2020

Revised Date: 20 February 2022

Publish Date: 25 February 2022

Abstract

Abstract

3DVSP common detection point gathers produce different tensile distortion effects at different offsets after conventional processing,especially at the shallow layer and large offset,which affects the imaging quality of the superimposed section.In view of such a situation,the author analyzed the stretch effect reason,deduced the stretch rate formula,and proposed a trace-set cutting method based on stretch rate:to calculate the stretch rate of each point in the trace set of common detection points point by point,determine the range of effective stretch rate,and cut the points with excessive stretch rate.The results of model analysis and actual data processing show that the method is correct and effective.
- 3DVSP /
- tensile rate /
- gather cutting /
- stacking profile imaging

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Dunkin J W, Levin F K. The effect of normal moveout on a seismic pulse[J]. Geophysics, 1973,38(4):635-642. Google Scholar
[2]	Rupert G B, Chun J H. The block move sum normal moveout correction[J]. Geophysics, 1975,40(1):17-24. Google Scholar
[3]	崔宝文, 王维红. 频谱代换无拉伸动校正方法研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2007,22(3):960-965. Google Scholar
[4]	Cui B W, Wang W H. Spectrum borrowing stretch-free normal moveout correction[J]. Progess in Geophysics, 2007,22(3):960-965. Google Scholar
[5]	孙成禹, 谢俊法, 闫月锋, 等. 一种无拉伸畸变的动校正方法[J]. 石油物探, 2016,55(5):664-673. Google Scholar
[6]	Sun C Y, Xie J F, Yan Y F, et al. A NMO correction method without stretching distortion[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2016,55(5):664-673. Google Scholar
[7]	赵波, 史政军. 消除动校正拉伸影响的方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 1995,30(3):417-421. Google Scholar
[8]	Zhao B, Shi Z J. A method for removing NMO correction lengthening[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 1995,30(3):417-421. Google Scholar
[9]	夏洪瑞, 葛川庆, 邹少峰. 动校拉伸现象分析及消除[J]. 石油物探, 2005,44(3):220-223. Google Scholar
[10]	Xia H R, Ge C Q, Zou S F. Analysis and elimination of dynamic tensile phenomenon[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2005,44(3):220-223. Google Scholar
[11]	王铁兴, 王德利, 孙婧, 等. 基于三维稀疏反演的混合震源数据分离与一次波估计[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2020,50(3):895-904. Google Scholar
[12]	Wang T X, Wang D L, Sun J, et al. Separation and primary estimation of blended data by 3D sparse inversion[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2020,50(3):895-904. Google Scholar
[13]	董凤树, 陈浩林, 刘原英. 基于褶积模型的动校正及其实现方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2007,42(4):387-391. Google Scholar
[14]	Dong F S, Chen H L, Liu Y Y. Dynamic correction based on convolution model and its realization method[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2007,42(4):387-391. Google Scholar
[15]	王睿, 王德利, 胡斌, 等. 基于f-x EMD波场分离的绕射多次波压制方法[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2021,51(2):597-606. Google Scholar
[16]	Wang R, Wang D L, Hu B, et al. Diffracted multiple elimination based on f-x EMD Wavefield Separation[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2021,51(2):597-606. Google Scholar
[17]	Miller R D. Normal moveout stretch mute on shallow refleetion data[J]. Geophysics, 1992,57(11):1502-1507. Google Scholar
[18]	孔庆丰, 王延光, 左建军, 等. 垦71区块井间地震资料处理研究与应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2008,32(2):175-179. Google Scholar
[19]	Kong Q F, Wang Y G, Zuo J J, et al. The study and application of cross-well seismic data processing in Ken 71 block[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2008,32(2):175-179. Google Scholar
[20]	曹文俊, 李振春, 王小六. 广角地震处理方法研究进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2004,19(2):296-299. Google Scholar
[21]	Cao W J, Li Z C, Wang X L. Research progress of wide Angle seismic processing methods[J]. Progess in Geophysics, 2004,19(2):296-299. Google Scholar
[22]	张军华, 吕宁, 田连玉, 等. 地震资料去噪方法技术综合评述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2006,21(2):546-553. Google Scholar
[23]	Zhang J H, Lyu N, Tian L Y, et al. A comprehensive review of denoising methods and techniques for seismic data[J]. Progess in Geophysics, 2006,21(2):546-553. Google Scholar
[24]	荆双伟, 曹思远, 张浩然, 等. 抗噪性加权抛物线Radon变换的地震道重建[J]. 物探与化探, 2015,39(6):1205-1210. Google Scholar
[25]	Jing S W, Cao S Y, Zhang H R, et al. Seismic trace reconstruction approach based on noise immunity weighted parabolic radon transform[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015,39(6):1205-1210. Google Scholar
[26]	田文辉, 李振春, 孙小东. 对共反射面叠加的进一步探讨[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2006,21(3):932-937. Google Scholar
[27]	Tian W H, Li Z C, Sun X D. A further study on the superposition of common reflection surfaces[J]. Progess in Geophysics, 2006,21(3):932-937. Google Scholar
[28]	于茜. 利用VSP子波替换提高地面地震资料的分辨率[J]. 物探与化探, 2010,34(4):546-548. Google Scholar
[29]	Yu Q. The enhancement of eht resolution of surface seismic data by using wavelet of VSP replacement method[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2010,34(4):546-548. Google Scholar
[30]	孙乃泉, 陈占国. 等效偏移距在垂直地震剖面中的研究及应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2015,39(3):589-594. Google Scholar
[31]	Sun N Q, Chen Z G. The study and application of equivalent offset migration of VSP[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015,39(3):589-594. Google Scholar
[32]	杨飞龙, 孙渊, 路婧, 等. VSP 高斯射线束法叠加成像[J]. 物探与化探, 2015,39(3):627-632. Google Scholar
[33]	Yang F L, Sun Y, Lu J, et al. The Gaussian beam stack imaging method of VSP[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015,39(3):627-632. Google Scholar