Yan-mei GE. Direct Determination of High Grade Gold in Ore by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Aqua Regia Sampling Preparation[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2014, 33(4): 491-496.
Citation: |
Yan-mei GE. Direct Determination of High Grade Gold in Ore by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Aqua Regia Sampling Preparation[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2014, 33(4): 491-496.
|
Direct Determination of High Grade Gold in Ore by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Aqua Regia Sampling Preparation
-
Abstract
Atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) was applied to the determination of gold in ores with high grade gold, effectively avoiding the problems caused by the fire assay gravimetric and volumetric method with forcyanide quinone, such as the large amount of toxic chemical reagents required and limits of measurement conditions. Foam enrichment-Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS) can determine the grade of gold reached up to 500 μg/g in gold ore, but this method adds the filter residue separation, diluted and foam ashing, redissolving process based on the conventional FAAS method. Due to the increase in time of the operation process, the analysis efficiency is not high with increasing probability of error. In this paper, a fast analysis method for high grade gold ore is described. The gold ore sample was dissolved by aqua regia, followed by filtering of the residue. The filtrate with constant volume without preconcentration and separation was determined with FAAS. The precision of the method (RSD) is 1.6%, which is an improvement on the precision of FAAS itself and meets the monitoring requirements of rapid analysis for high grade gold ore samples. The gold ore sample collected from Heilongjiang province (a production monitoring samples), an inspection gold ore sample and a national standard gold ore sample were selected to study the established method in this paper, foam adsorption-FAAS method, cyanide quinone capacity method and fire assay gravimetric method. The results show that the accuracy of the iron content directly affects the high grade gold determination. When the gold sample size was 50-110 μg/g, 110-164 μg/g and 164-218 μg/g, the amount of iron content allowed in the samples was no more than 10%, 20% and 25%, respectively. Based on these studies, this presented method is suitable for gold ore samples with more than 50 μg/g gold and less than 10% Fe. The average content of iron in the earth's crust is 5.63%, and the iron content of most national standard reference gold ore materials are close to the average value. The iron content in general gold ores are rarely at a higher level. Therefore, this method is highly suitable. Compared with the method of foam adsorption-FAAS, the operation processes of foam adsorption-ashing-redissolving were eliminated, which greatly improved the analysis efficiency.
-
-
References
[1] |
何小辉,白金峰,陈卫明,张勤.流动注射-火焰原子吸收光谱法测定地质样品中的常量金[J].岩矿测试,2011,30(1): 79-82.
Google Scholar
|
[2] |
刘向磊,文田耀,孙文军,姚维利,王腾飞,吴俊文.聚氨酯泡塑富集硫脲解脱-石墨炉原子吸收光谱法测定地质样品中金铂[J].岩矿测试, 2013,32(4):576-580.
Google Scholar
|
[3] |
付文慧,艾兆春,葛艳梅,李亚.火焰原子吸收光谱法测定高品位金矿石中的金[J].岩矿测试,2013,32(3): 427-430.
Google Scholar
|
[4] |
迟清华.金在地壳、岩石和沉积物中的丰度[J].地球化学,2002, 31(4): 347-353.
Google Scholar
|
[5] |
杨理勤,宋艳合,李文良,卿敏.金标准样品定值中全金量的湿法分析[J].岩矿测试,2004,23(1):75-76.
Google Scholar
|
[6] |
袁健中,石英.活性炭吸附火焰原子吸收法测定地矿样品中金[J].黄金,2001,22(5):44-46.
Google Scholar
|
[7] |
熊昭春.我国泡塑分离富集技术发展十年[J].岩矿测试,1992,11(1):84-86.
Google Scholar
|
[8] |
谈建安,黑文龙,黄兴华,陈月源.泡塑吸附-电感耦合等离子体发射光谱法测定矿石中的金[J].岩矿测试,2009,28(2):147-150.
Google Scholar
|
[9] |
戴庆平,顾庆超,楼书聪.矿物岩石分析[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1979:191-193.
Google Scholar
|
[10] |
罗德燊,周玲,杜建军,刘新玲,李明.泡沫塑料吸附硫脲解脱原子吸收法测定金[J].分析化学,1980,8(1):77-81.
Google Scholar
|
[11] |
郑大中. 聚氨酯泡沫塑料富集金若干问题的探讨[J].黄金,1989,10(11):47.
Google Scholar
|
[12] |
林贞钦.原子吸收光谱测定中背景吸收的影响与消除[J].金属矿山,1994,22(3):51-53.
Google Scholar
|
[13] |
徐瑞松,马跃良,吕惠萍.Au及伴生元素生物地球化学效应研究:以广东河台金矿为例[J].地球化学,1996,25(2):196-203.
Google Scholar
|
[14] |
唐肖玫,姚敬劬.化学物相分析方法研究矿石中金的赋存状态[J].岩矿测试,1992,11(1):162-167.
Google Scholar
|
[15] |
马民涛.金的亲硫性分析[J].地质与勘探,1992,28(3):51-54.
Google Scholar
|
[16] |
陈尚迪.金的地球化学与金的成矿与找矿[J].成都地质学院学报,1987,14(4):8-17.
Google Scholar
|
[17] |
赵爱林,李景春,王力,金成洙.金矿床研究的回顾与展望[J].地质与资源,2003,12(2):125-128.
Google Scholar
|
[18] |
符永际.高炭金矿石中金的测定[J].湿法冶金,2008,27(4):252-253.
Google Scholar
|
[19] |
冯月斌.含金矿样的溶样方法和干扰元素的消除[J].黄金,2003,24(2):50-52.
Google Scholar
|
[20] |
宋林山,汪立今.金矿床中的矿物学特点及找矿标志[J].金属矿山,2007,37(8):354-358.
Google Scholar
|
[21] |
DZ/T 0130—2006,地质实验室测试质量管理规范[S].
Google Scholar
|
[22] |
岩石矿物分析编委会.岩石矿物分析(第四版 第二分册)[M].北京:地质出版社,2011:683.
Google Scholar
|
-
-
Access History