Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of the Husite Pluton in Kekesala, West Tianshan

WU Le; LI Yongjun; WANG Zuopeng; LI Shunling; WANG Zhenyu; DUAN Fenghao

2018 Vol. 51, No. 2

Article Contents

Article navigation > Northwestern Geology > 2018 > 51(2): 26-36

Next Article Previous Article

WU Le, LI Yongjun, WANG Zuopeng, LI Shunling, WANG Zhenyu, DUAN Fenghao. Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of the Husite Pluton in Kekesala, West Tianshan[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2018, 51(2): 26-36.

Citation:

Geochemical Characteristics and Geological Significance of the Husite Pluton in Kekesala, West Tianshan

1.
School of Earth Science & Resources, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China
2.
School of Earth Science & Resources, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China;Key Laboratory for the Study of Focused Magmatism and Giant Ore Deposits, MLR, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China

Received Date: 25 November 2017

Revised Date: 31 January 2018

Publish Date: 15 June 2018

Abstract

Abstract

The Husite pluton serves as the ore-forming rock body of Kekesala Fe-Cu deposit, which is composed of quartz diorite, granodiorite, monzogranite and orthoclase granite. All of their ages are Late Devonian. This pluton has SiO₂ content of 63.30%~69.16%, with high alkali content, rich potassium and low sodium (average K₂O+Na₂O content of 7.28%; average K₂O/Na₂O ratio of 1.08), belonging to quasi-aluminum and weakly peraluminous, high-K calc-alkaline series. This pluton has high LREE/HREE ratio (averaging in 8.32) and has negative Eu anomalies (δEu=0.45~0.79, with an average value of 0.71). It is rich in large ionic lithophile elements (LILEs:Rb, Th, K, Zr and Hf), but is depleted in high strength elements (HFSEs:Nb, Ta, Ti), showing the characteristics of volcanic arc granite. No post-orogenic or intracontinental granite with an age of 295 Ma (molybdenite Re-Os age) has been found in this area. Therefore, the geochemical characteristics of the Husite pluton can prove that the age of this pluton serves as the only basis for indirectly providing the ore-forming age of the Keshala iron-copper deposit. The Early Permian Mo mineralization and Keshala iron-copper mineralization in the area should be the products of two metallogenic events.
- volcanic arc granite /
- lithogeochemical characteristics /
- Kekesala /
- Husite pluton

FullText(HTML)

References

陈毓川, 刘德权, 唐延龄. 中国天山矿产及成矿体系[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2008.

Google Scholar

CHEN Yuchuan, LIU Dequan, TANG Yanling, et al. China Tianshan mineral and metallogenic system[M]. BeiJing:Geological Publishing House, 2008.

Google Scholar

程松林, 冯京, 涂其军,等. 新疆莱历斯高尔铜钼矿地质特征及找矿前景[J]. 新疆地质, 2009, 27(3):236-241.

Google Scholar

CHENG Songlin, FENG Jing, TU Qijun, et al. Geological characteristics and prospecting of Lailisigaoer copper and molybdenum minem, Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2009, 27(3):236-241.

Google Scholar

冯京, 薛春纪, 吴淦国,等. 西天山莱利斯高尔-达巴特一带与斑岩相关的铜钼金矿产预测[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2011,1-317.

Google Scholar

FENG Jing, XUE Chunji, WU Ganguo, et al. Prediction of Copper, Molybdenum and Gold Associated with Porphyry in the Larishjell-Darbat Area, Western[M]. BeiJing:Geological Publishing House, 2011, 1-317.

Google Scholar

顾雪祥, 章永梅, 王新利,等. 新疆西天山可克萨拉-艾木斯呆依铁铜矿床成岩成矿年代学及其地质意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(6):195-209.

Google Scholar

GU Xuexiang, ZHANG Yongmei, WANG Xinli, et al. Geochronology of intrusive rocks and associated ores of the Kelesala-Ai-musidaiyi Fe-Cu deposit in the West Tianshan, Xinjiang and its geologic significance[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(6):195-209.

Google Scholar

高虎. 新疆精河艾木斯呆依-可克萨拉铁铜矿床地球化学特征及成因探讨[D]. 中国地质大学(北京), 2014.

Google Scholar

GAO Hu. Geology, geochemistry and Genesis of Aimusidaiyi-kekesala iron-copper deposit in Jinhe, Xinjiang[D]. China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2014.

Google Scholar

姜常义, 吴文奎, 谢广成,等. 西天山北部石炭纪火山岩特征与沟弧盆体系[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 1993, 12(3):224-231.

Google Scholar

JIANG Changyi, WU Wenkui, XIE Guangcheng, et al. Characteridtics of Carboniferous volcanic rocks and the Trench-Arc Basin System in Northern part of West Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 1993, 12(3):224-231.

Google Scholar

李大鹏, 杜杨松, 庞振山,等. 西天山阿吾拉勒石炭纪火山岩年代学和地球化学研究[J]. 地球学报, 2013(2):176-192.

Google Scholar

LI Dapeng, DU Yangsong, PANG Zhenshan, et al. Zircon U-Pb Chronology and Geochemistry of Carboniferous Volcanic Rocks in Awulale Area, Western Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2013, 34(2):176-192.

Google Scholar

李永军, 吴乐, 李书领,等. 伊宁地块石炭纪火山岩及其对构造演化的约束[J]. 岩石学报, 2017, 33(1):1-15.

Google Scholar

LI Yongjun, WU Le, LI Shuling, et al. Tectonic evolution of Yining Block:Insights from Carboniferous volcanic rocks[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2017, 33(1):1-15.

Google Scholar

李书领, 李永军, 吴乐,等. 新疆西天山可克萨拉铁铜矿床辉钼矿Re-Os同位素测年及其地质意义[J]. 西北地质, 2017, 50(4):81-90.

Google Scholar

LI Shuling, LI Yongjun, WU Le, et al. The Molybdenite Re-Os Isotopic Dating of the Kekesala Fe-Cu Deposit in West Tianshan, Xinjiang and Its Geologic Singnificance[J]. Nothwestern Geology, 2017, 50(4):81-90.

Google Scholar

刘潜, 于津海, 苏斌,等. 福建锦城187Ma花岗岩的发现——对华南沿海早侏罗世构造演化的制约[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(12):3575-3589.

Google Scholar

LIU Qian, YU Jinhai, SU Bin, et al. Discovery of the 187Ma granite in Jincheng area, Fujian Province:Constraint on Early Jurassic tectonic evolution of southeastern China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(12):3575-3589.

Google Scholar

茹艳娇, 徐学义, 李智佩,等. 西天山乌孙山地区大哈拉军山组火山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造环境[J]. 地质通报, 2012, 31(1):50-62.

Google Scholar

RU Yanjiao, XU Xueyi, LI Zhipei, et al. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age and tectonic background of the Dahalajunshan Formation volcanic rocks in Wusunshan area, West Tianshan Mountains[J]. Geologcal Bulletin of China, 2012, 31(1):50-62.

Google Scholar

童英, 王涛, 洪大卫,等. 北疆及邻区石炭-二叠纪花岗岩时空分布特征及其构造意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2010, 29(6):619-641.

Google Scholar

TONG Ying, WANG Tao, HONG Dawei, et al. Spatial and temporal distribution of the Carboniferous-Permian granitoids in northern Xinj iang and its adjacent areas, and its tectonic significance[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2010, 29(6):619-641.

Google Scholar

万阈, 袁鹏, 胡志军,等. 新疆博罗科努山可克萨拉铜矿床地质特征及找矿远景[J]. 新疆地质, 2016, 34(2):218-223.

Google Scholar

WANG Fa, YUAN Peng, HU Zhijun, et al. Geological Characteristics and Prospecting Potential of Kokoxala Copper Deposit in BoluoKoen Mountains[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2016, 34(2):218-223.

Google Scholar

万阈, 袁永江, 袁鹏,等. 呼斯特岩体矽卡岩型铜铁矿成矿地质特征及找矿潜力分析[J]. 新疆地质, 2011, 29(1):50-54.

Google Scholar

WAN Fa, YUAN Yongjiang, YUAN Peng, et al. Metallogenic Geological Characteristics and Prospecting Potential of Skarn-type Cu-Fe Deposit in Husite Pluton Mass[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2011, 29(1):50-54.

Google Scholar

王新利, 顾雪祥, 彭义伟,等. 新疆博罗科努成矿带东段矽卡岩型铁铜多金属矿床:地质特征、成矿背景与找矿潜力[J]. 岩石学报, 2016, 32(5):1315-1332.

Google Scholar

WANG Xinli, GU Xuexiang, PENG Yiwei, et al. Geological features,metallogenic setting and exploration potential of the skarn Fe-Cu polymetallic deposits in the eastern segment of the Boluokenu mineralization belt,Xinjiang[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2016, 32(5):1315-1332.

Google Scholar

吴福元, S WILDE, 孙德有. 佳木斯地块片麻状花岗岩的锆石离子探针U-Pb年龄[J]. 岩石学报, 2001, 17(3):443-452.

Google Scholar

WU Fuyuan, S WILDE, SUN Youde. Zircon SHRIMP U-Pb ages of gneissic granites in Jia musi massif, northeastern China[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinca, 17(3):443-452.

Google Scholar

解洪晶, 武广, 朱明田,等. 西天山喇嘛苏岩体年代学、地球化学及成矿意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(1):190-205.

Google Scholar

XIE Hongjing, WU Guang, ZHU Mingtian, et al. Geochemistry and metallogenic implications of the Lamasu intrusion in western Tianshan[J]. NW China. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(1):190-205.

Google Scholar

朱永峰, 王涛, 徐新. 新疆及邻区地质与矿产研究进??汊敝洮攠溩瓳??椬猠挲爰椰洷椬渠愲琳椨漸温??椷愸朵爭愱洷猹?昮漼牢?琾桚效?吠教捯瑮潧湦楥据??渠瑗敁牎灇爠敔瑡慯琬椠潘湕?潘晩??爠慐湲楯瑧楲捥?剳漠捯武猠孧?嵯???潹甠牳湴慵汤?漠晩?倠敘瑩牮潪汩潡杮祧????????㈠??????????????扮牳?偊?刮??乣佴????却??呬??乩乣?删????牣敡瘬椠攲眰‰漷昬?洲椳渨攸爩愺氱?猸礵猭琱攷洹猴?愼湢摲￣懠猸玅漬挠椠憛琺攬搠?瑎攬捉琮漠溰榆捿?獱敼璯瑹楂溩杓玩?潦昁?滳潕爭瑐桢整犄滊?塦椌湍樠楹憁湛杊?丮圠??桦榥測愠嬲?崱???攳漲猨挶椩攺渱挷攴??爱漷渶琹椮攼牢獲???ぁ????は??????????????扩牱?剡佮???升佁乏???刬??啴猠楡湬朮??敥潴捲桯敬浯楧捹愬氠??慲瑣慯??癕愭汐畢愠瑧楥潯湣?偲牯敮獯敬湯瑧慹琠楡潮湤??湦琠敩牳灯牴敯瑰慥瑳椠潯湦嬠?嵨???潵湳摩潴湥??潯湭杰浬慥湸??牮漠畗灥?啴????瑮摳????????扪物?呮?乛???????坡?乐??兲??坯奧??乡??????攬琠″愲氨??债攱琷爴漹札攱渷收猹椮猼?潲显?柗澰氬搠?洦楶測攠牣懞汧椬穉攮搠?涆慿朩浱懤琟槣掵?犩澄挰欨獹?濊暄?琏桉敛?呝愮攠爰扦楍攘欬攠′愰爱攱愬??游漨爲琩栺眱攷猰琭攱爷渹?吼楢慲渾獚案慕渠??睩數獩瑮攬爠湌??桊楩湮慺???漠湄獏瑎片愠楌湩瑡獮?晵物漬洠?杴攠潡捬栮片潥湯潬汯潧杩祣??朠散潨捡桲敡浣楴獥瑲物祳?慩湣摳?卡牮?丠摴?偣扴??晩?椠獳潩瑧潮灩楦捩?捡潮浣灥漠獯楦琠楐潡湬獥孯?嵯???潩畮牴湲慵汳?潶晥??獯楣慫湳??慮爠瑗桥?却捥楲敮渠捔敩獡???ち???????卮????????????扣牥?告?丮?????????啩乥??卥????坮?乩??关??攲琰?愱氬??倸攨琲爩漺朱攷渰攭猱椷猹?漼晢?愾??愠瑆攬??慈牕戠潙測椠晗故牉漠畓猬?浥慴映楡捬?搠楁歮攠?条牲慬湹椠瑄潥楶摯?慩獡獮漠捴楯愠瑅楡潲湬?椠湃?瑲桢敯?睩敦獥瑲敯牵湳?呶楯慬湣獡桮慩湣?剡敲獣瀠潩湮猠敎?瑲潴?琠桔敩?杮敳潨摡祮測愠济楗挠獃?潩普?漺捇敥慯湣楨捲?獮畯扬摯畧捩瑣楡潬渠孡?嵤???楯瑣桨潥獭???ぬㄠ???獤??っ???ひ????????????扲牯?呫?乛???????坲?乡??兯??坁女??乮??????攠瑓?慩汥???敳漬挠栲爰漱渳漬氠漷朸礨?愲温携?朰攰漭挱栱攳洮椼獢瑲爾祃?潌晌??慓琠敗?偊愮氠敎潡穴潵楲捥?浡慮杤洠慯瑲楩捧?牮漠捯武猠?椭湴?瑰桥攠??慡浮慩獴略??慷扩慴瑨攠?慡牲整慩??湬潡牲琠桲睥敦獥瑲敥牮湣?吠楴慯渠獳桯慵湴??睡敳獴瑥??栠楁湵慳???癬楩摡敛湊捝攮?晃潯牮?慲?瑢敵捴瑩潯湮楳挠?瑯爠慍湩獮楥瑲楡潬湯?晹爠潡浮?愠牐捥?瑲潯?灯潧獹琬?挱漹永氲椬猠椳漲渺愱氰‵猷攭琱琰椸渵朮嬼?嵲???楁瑐桐潅獌??自???????????????????????打爭?坹?乥???????啥婳??????卥?啌????敡瑮?慆汯???療潥汬畴瑛楊潝渮?潔晲?据慳污捣?慩汯歮慳氠楯湦攠?瑨潥?慒汯歹慡汬椠湓敯?浩慥杴浹愠瑯楦猠浅?瑩桮牢潵畲杧桨??慡牲扴潨渠楓晣敩牥潮畣獥?挬漠渱瘹改爲本攠游挳攨?琭漲?债攱爭洲椶愮渼?瑲爾慆湏獌捅留爠牓攠湆琬?瑖故捎瑔潕湒楅捌獌??睇攬猠瑇敒牅湅??桄椠湈攬猠敥?吠楡慬渮猠桔慨湥嬠?嵬???湰瑯整牡湳慳瑩楣漠湲慯汣??漺畃牨湡慲污?潴晥??慳牴瑩档?匬挠楣敬湡捳敳獩???ちぴ????????????????????戠牦?坲??卥佴乲?????杴湩散漠畭獯?健敬瑳牛潊?朮攠湅敡獲楴獨嬭?嵣???潣牥搠牒敥捶桩瑥??氬甠眱改爸??ㄠ????????????戮爼?卲唾乇?协?半?????位丬传啘???圠?????栠敡浬椮挠慐污?慥湯摺??獣漠瑴潥灣楴捯?卩祣猠瑥敶浯慬瑵楴捩獯?漠景?传捴敨慥渠楔捩??慳獨慡汮琠獏???浥灮氬椠据慯瑲楴潨湷獥?晴潥牲??慃湨瑩汮敡??潝洮瀠潔獥楣瑴楯潮湯?慨湹摳?偣牳漬挠攱猹猹攸猬嬠?崸???攭漴氩漺朲椱挳愭氲″匱漮挼楢敲琾祈??漠湃搬漠湘?十灏攠捗椬愠汚?偁畏戠汇椬挠慥瑴椠潡湬献???????????????????????扩牳?奩?乳?????????啹乮??卩????坣?????卭???攠瑕?慰汥??偐敡瑬牥潯杺敯湩散猠楣獯?潰晥?瀠潤獥瑰?潳物潴杳攠湩楮挠?獯祲整湨楥瑲敮猠?楩湮?瑩桡敮?匬甠汮畯?潴牨潷来敳湴楥捲?戠敃汨瑩???慊獝琮??桲楥渠慇??敬潯?捹栠牒潥湶潩汥潷杳椬挠愲氰??本攠漲挸栨攳洩椺挳愰永?愳渲搸?丼摢?匾牍?楃獕潌瑌潏灃楈挠?攠癔椬搠敇湁捍敂孌?崠???栮攠浇楥捯慣汨??敩潣污潬朠祡??㈠でづ??????????ㄠ???straints on subduction zone magmatism[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1991, 102(3-4):358-374.

Google Scholar

PEARCE J A. Trace

Google Scholar

Relative Articles

Cited by

Supplements

Proportional views