Chengdu Center, China Geological SurveyHost
Advanced Search
Previous Article Next Article
2022 Vol. 42, No. 3
Article Contents
Article navigation > Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology > 2022 > 42(3): 413-425
Next Article Previous Article

ZHANG Di, LIU Wei, ZHOU Yexin, MU Bixin, ZHOU Zhi, HAO Jingyu, ZHAO Ankun, LU Junze, YU Qian. 2022. Biostratigraphic correlation of graptolites from Late Ordovician to Early Silurian on the southwestern margin of the Yangtze region. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 42(3): 413-425. doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2022.06005
Citation: ZHANG Di, LIU Wei, ZHOU Yexin, MU Bixin, ZHOU Zhi, HAO Jingyu, ZHAO Ankun, LU Junze, YU Qian. 2022. Biostratigraphic correlation of graptolites from Late Ordovician to Early Silurian on the southwestern margin of the Yangtze region. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 42(3): 413-425. doi: 10.19826/j.cnki.1009-3850.2022.06005
shu

Biostratigraphic correlation of graptolites from Late Ordovician to Early Silurian on the southwestern margin of the Yangtze region

  • 1. Chengdu Center, China Geological Survey, Chengdu 610081, China;

  • 2. Key Laboratory of Sedimentary Basins and Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Natural Resources, Chengdu 610081, China;

  • 3. Sichuan Institute of Coal Field Geological Engineering Exploration and Designing, Chengdu 610072, China;

  • 4. Oil and Gas Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100083, China;

  • 5. Sinopec Exploration Company, Chengdu 610041, China

More Information
Received Date:  02 January 2022
Revised Date:  27 May 2022
    Abstract
  • Based on the data of graptolite biozonations of section outcrops and drilling cores in the southwestern margin of Yangtze region, the isochronous stratigraphic framework of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation black shales is established. By comparing the horizontal and verticalchanges of black shales' TOC, the thickness of depositions, and the thickness of high-quality shales, the relationship between the graptolite biozones and the depositional environments of high-quality shales is defined. The results show that the high-quality shales in Butuo, Jinyang, Ganluo, and Well Yunyongdi 3 are below graptolite biozones of WF2-LM4 while strata of LM5-LM6 are obviously thickened. In Daguan-Suijiang area, Well Yunyongdi 2, Well Xindi 2, and Well Suijiang B, the graptolite biozones and sedimentary environment are stable, but their exploration effects are obviously different. The highest level of high-quality shale is of the LM4 graptolite biozone, which may extend to the LM6 graptolite biozone gradually. Beside the Kangdian Oldland, high-quality Wufeng-Longmaxi black shales range from WF2 to LM4 graptolite biozones while away from the the Kangdian Oldland the black shales possess a higher horizon. High-quality shale of WF2-LM5 graptolite biozones well developed in Dajingping and Jiaodingshan areas. The thickness of the strata in the Jiaodingshan area of Hanyuan is obviously thinner, but it becomes thicker in the Dajingping area of Tianquan, indicating a special geological setting. This research results provide a basis for the favorable areas of shale gas exploration in the southwestern margin of the Yangtze region.
    • FullText(HTML)
  • 加载中
    • References
  • Liu Z H,Thomas J A,Guo X S,et al., 2017.Paleo-evironment cyclicity in the Early Silurian Yangtze Sea (South China):Tectonic or Glacio-eustatic control[J]? Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 466(1):59-76.

    Google Scholar

    Nie H K, Li D H, Liu G X, et al., 2020.An overview of the geology and production of the Fuling shale gas field, Sichuan Basin, China[J].Energy Geoscience, 1(3-4):147-164.

    Google Scholar

    Sun Z Y, Fan J X, Wu L, et al., 2019.Stratigraphy of the Lungmachi black shales from the Huaying drill core in southwestern China and its palaeogeographic implications[J].Palaeoworld, 28(3):295-302.

    Google Scholar

    Wang H Y, Shi Z S, Zhao Q, et al., 2020.Stratigraphic framework of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in and around the Sichuan Basin, China:Implications for targeting shale gas[J].Energy Geoscience, 1(3-4):124-133.

    Google Scholar

    陈孝红,张保民,陈林,等,2018.鄂西宜昌地区晚奥陶世-早志留世页岩气藏的主控地质因素与富集模式[J].地球学报,39(3):257-268.

    Google Scholar

    陈旭,陈清,甄勇毅,等,2018.志留纪初宜昌上升及其周缘龙马溪组黑色笔石页岩的圈层展布模式[J].中国科学:地球科学,48(9):1198-1206.

    Google Scholar

    陈旭,樊隽轩,王文卉,等,2017.黔渝地区志留系龙马溪组黑色笔石页岩的阶段性渐进展布模式[J].中国科学:地球科学,47(6):720-732.

    Google Scholar

    陈旭,樊隽轩,张元动,等,2015.五峰组及龙马溪组黑色页岩在扬子覆盖区内的划分与圈定[J].地层学杂志,39(4):351-358.

    Google Scholar

    陈旭,王红岩,赵群,等,2021.中国扬子区奥陶纪末至志留纪初含页岩气地层[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社.

    Google Scholar

    冯洪真,俞剑华,方一亭,1991.四川汉源轿顶山地区晚奥陶世五峰期地层及化石组合[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),3(4):387-397.

    Google Scholar

    郭旭升,2014.南方海相页岩气"二元富集"规律:四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识[J].地质学报,88(7):1209-1218.

    Google Scholar

    何贵松,万静雅,周頔娜,等,2019.南川地区南页1井五峰组-龙马溪组页岩特征与生物地层[J].地层学杂志,43(4):376-388.

    Google Scholar

    何心一,唐兰,陈建强,2009.川南甘洛黔北仁怀地区晚奥陶世和早志留世四射珊瑚新资料及其地质意义[J].古生物学报,48(1):9-22.

    Google Scholar

    胡正国,1980.大渡河下游地区的"达尔曼虫层"[J].地层学杂志,4(1):29-36.

    Google Scholar

    金泰淳,叶少华,江新胜,等,1989.四川二郎山地区志留纪地层及古生物[M].成都:中国地质科学院成都地质矿产研究所所刊,11:1-224.

    Google Scholar

    刘宝珺,许效松,潘杏南,等,1993.中国南方古大陆沉积地壳演化与成矿[M].北京:科学出版社:1-236.

    Google Scholar

    梁峰,拜文华,邹才能,等,2016.渝东北地区巫溪2井页岩气富集模式及勘探意义[J].石油勘探与开发,43(3):350-358.

    Google Scholar

    梁峰,王红岩,拜文华,等,2017.川南地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩笔石带对比及沉积特征[J].天然气工业,37(7):20-26.

    Google Scholar

    梁峰,张琴,熊小林,等,2019.四川盆地及周缘五峰组-龙马溪组富有机质页岩沉积演化模式[J].沉积学报,37(4):847-857.

    Google Scholar

    梁峰,2018.中上扬子地区五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气富集模式及有利区优选评价[D].中国矿业大学:1-158.

    Google Scholar

    刘伟,许效松,冯心涛,等,2010.中上扬子上奥陶统五峰组含放射虫硅质岩与古环境[J].沉积与特提斯地质,30(3):65-70.

    Google Scholar

    罗超,王兰生,石学文,等,2017.长宁页岩气田宁211井五峰组-龙马溪组生物地层[J].地层学杂志,41(2):142-152.

    Google Scholar

    牟传龙,葛祥英,周恳恳,等,2015.川西南晚奥陶世五峰期岩相古地理[J].中国地质,42(1):192-198.

    Google Scholar

    穆恩之,李积金,葛梅钰,等,1981.华中区晚奥陶世古地理图及其说明书[J].地层学杂志,5(3):165-170.

    Google Scholar

    穆恩之,1950.关于笔石的演化和分类[J].地质论评,(4-6):171-183.

    Google Scholar

    穆恩之,1957.谈谈笔石的生活环境[N].地质知识,(6):22-25.

    Google Scholar

    聂海宽,何治亮,刘光祥,等,2020b.四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩气优质储层成因机质[J].天然气工业,40(6):31-41.

    Google Scholar

    聂海宽,金之钧,边瑞康,等,2016.四川盆地及其周缘上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组页岩气"源-盖控藏"富集[J].石油学报,37(5):557-571.

    Google Scholar

    聂海宽,金之钧,马鑫,等,2017.四川盆地及邻区上奥陶统五峰组-下志留统龙马溪组底部笔石带及沉积特征[J].石油学报,38(2):160-174.

    Google Scholar

    聂海宽,李东晖,姜涛,等,2020a.基于笔石带特征的页岩等时地层测井划分方法及意义——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].石油学报,41(3):273-283.

    Google Scholar

    聂海宽,汪虎,何治亮,等,2019.常压页岩气形成机制、分布规律及勘探前景——以四川盆地周缘五峰组-龙马溪组为例[J].石油学报,40(2):131-143.

    Google Scholar

    曲红军,1988.轿顶山式锰矿岩相古地理特征及成矿规律探讨[J].地质与勘探,24(11):7-13.

    Google Scholar

    曲红军,1992.试论古构造对轿顶山式锰矿的控制作用[J].地质与勘探,28(6):1-5.

    Google Scholar

    唐鹏,黄冰,吴荣昌,等,2017.论上扬子区上奥陶统大渡河组[J].地层学杂志,41(2):119-133.

    Google Scholar

    童川川,包书景,周志,等,2018.贵州正安奥陶-志留纪之交五峰-龙马溪组黑色页岩的划分与对比[J].地层学杂志,42(2):206-212.

    Google Scholar

    王红岩,郭伟,梁峰,等,2018.川南自201井区奥陶系-志留系间黑色页岩生物地层[J].地层学杂志,42(4):455-460.

    Google Scholar

    王红岩,郭伟,梁峰,等,2015.四川盆地威远页岩气田五峰组和龙马溪组黑色页岩生物地层特征与意义[J].地层学杂志,39(3):289-293.

    Google Scholar

    王红岩,郭伟,梁峰,等,2017.宣汉-巫溪地区五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩生物地层特征及分层对比[J].天然气工业,37(7):27-33.

    Google Scholar

    王玉满,董大忠,李新景,等,2015.四川盆地及其周缘下志留统龙马溪组层序与沉积特征[J].天然气工业,35(3):12-21.

    Google Scholar

    王玉满,李新景,陈波,等,2018.中上扬子地区埃隆阶最厚斑脱岩层分布特征及地质意义[J].天然气地球科学,29(1):42-54.

    Google Scholar

    王玉满,李新景,董大忠,等,2017.上扬子地区五峰组-龙马溪组优质页岩沉积主控因素[J].天然气工业,37(4):9-20.

    Google Scholar

    武学进,陈清,李关访,等,2020.黔北习科1井五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩的地层划分与对比[J].地层学杂志,44(1):1-11.

    Google Scholar

    熊强青,王中鹏,张娣,等,2020.下扬子巢湖地区皖含地1井五峰组-高家边组下段生物地层[J].地层学杂志,44(1):46-55.

    Google Scholar

    叶少华, 1991.塔形螺旋笔石(Spirograptus turriculatus)在四川二郎山的发现[J].地层学杂志,15(1):68-68.

    Google Scholar

    余谦,汪正江,刘家洪,等,2020.云南大关-永善地区页岩气资源调查评价与区块优选[R].成都:中国地质调查局成都地质调查中心.

    Google Scholar

    张娣,余谦,陆俊泽,等,2020.云南永善-大关地区五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩生物地层划分与沉积环境探讨:以新地2井为例[J].地球科学,45(3):739-751.

    Google Scholar

    周志,姜振学,李世臻,等,2020.鄂西建始地区五峰组-龙马溪组黑色页岩生物地层特征[J].地球科学,46(2):432-443.

    Google Scholar

    邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等,2015.中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(一)[J].石油勘探与开发,42(6):689-701.

    Google Scholar

    邹才能,龚剑明,王红岩,等,2019.笔石生物演化与地层年代标定在页岩气勘探开发中的重大意义[J].中国石油勘探,24(1):1-6.

    Google Scholar

    • Relative Articles
  • Cited by
  • Supplements
    • Proportional views
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Export Citation
PDF
XML

Article Metrics

Article views(1404) PDF downloads(78) Cited by(0)

Access History

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    版权所有：中国地质调查局发展研究中心 copyright @2020