The major magmatic events in the Qimantag Mountain of Tibeatan Plateau since Paleozoic and its implications

LIU Dongliang; LI Haibing; SUN Zhiming; PEI Junling; WANG Huan; PAN Jiawei; WANG Meng

2016 Vol. 35, No. 12

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2016 > 35(12): 2014-2026

Next Article Previous Article

LIU Dongliang, LI Haibing, SUN Zhiming, PEI Junling, WANG Huan, PAN Jiawei, WANG Meng. The major magmatic events in the Qimantag Mountain of Tibeatan Plateau since Paleozoic and its implications[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(12): 2014-2026.

Citation:

LIU Dongliang, LI Haibing, SUN Zhiming, PEI Junling, WANG Huan, PAN Jiawei, WANG Meng. The major magmatic events in the Qimantag Mountain of Tibeatan Plateau since Paleozoic and its implications[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2016, 35(12): 2014-2026.

The major magmatic events in the Qimantag Mountain of Tibeatan Plateau since Paleozoic and its implications

1. Key Laboratory for Continental Dynamics of Ministry Land Resources, Institute of Geology/Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China;
2. Center for Continental Dynamics, CGS, Beijing 100037, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Paleomagnetism of Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Institute of Geomechanics/Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
4. Consulting Center of China National Coal Association, Beijing 100013, China

Received Date: 09 December 2015

Revised Date: 01 January 2016

Publish Date: 15 December 2016

Abstract

Abstract

In this study, four LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb ages (405.7±1.3Ma, 420.8±1.6Ma, 423.9±1.5Ma and 421.0±1.7Ma) were obtained in Kucaogou area, Qimantag Mountain, suggesting Late Silurian to Early Devonian. These zircons with high Th/U ratios are typical magmatic zircons, so these ages can present the granite and diorite petrogenetic ages. In combination with previously published results, the authors hold that two major magmatic events occurred respectively in 350~500Ma and 200~350Ma, corresponding to Early Paleozoic and Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic, respectively. The Early Paleozoic magma is the major mag-ma (> 60%), which is distributed in the north and west of the Qimantag Mountain. The major magma in the East Kunlun Mountains, which accounts for over 77% of the magma formed since Paleozoic, occurred during Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic. The magma formed during Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic and distributed in the southeast Qimantag Mountain is close to the East Kunlun Mountains, which means that this magmatic activity was probably influenced by the magmatic activity of East Kunlun Mountains. These results also imply that the activity of the Qimantag Ocean was stronger than that of the East Kunlun Ocean during Early Paleozoic, and the Qimantag Mountain and East Kunlun Mountains gradually formed a united orogenic belt since Late Paleozoic.
- Qimantag Mountain /
- LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age /
- East Kunlun Mountains /
- Tibetan Plateau /
- Paleozoic

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Li W, Neubauer F, Liu Y J, et al. Paleozoic evolution of the Qimantagh magmatic arcs, Eastern Kunlun Mountains: Constraints from zircon dating of granitoids and modern river sands[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2013, 77: 183-202. Google Scholar
[2]	Meng F C, Cui M H, Wu X K, et al. Heishan mafic-ultramafic rocks in the Qimantag area of Eastern Kunlun, NW China: Remnants of an early Paleozoic incipient island arc[J]. Gondwana Research, 2015, 27(2): 745-759. Google Scholar
[3]	Wang C, Liu L, Xiao P X, et al. Geochemical and geochronologic constraints for Paleozoic magmatism related to the orogenic collapse in the Qimantagh-South Altyn region, northwestern China[J]. Lithos, 2014, 202-203: 1-20. Google Scholar
[4]	王增振, 韩宝福, 丰成友, 等. 新疆白干湖地区花岗岩年代学、地球化学研究及其构造意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2014, 33(4): 597-616. Google Scholar
[5]	高永宝, 李文渊, 钱兵, 等. 东昆仑野马泉铁矿相关花岗质岩体年代学、地球化学及Hf同位素特征[J]. 岩石学报, 2014, 30(6): 1647-1665. Google Scholar
[6]	丰成友, 王松, 李国臣, 等. 青海祁漫塔格中晚三叠世花岗岩: 年代学、地球化学及成矿意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(2): 665-678. Google Scholar
[7]	郭通珍, 刘荣, 陈发彬, 等. 青海祁漫塔格山乌兰乌珠尔斑状正长花岗岩LA-MC-ICPMS锆石U-Pb定年及地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2011, 30(8): 1203-1211. Google Scholar
[8]	孟繁聪, 崔美慧, 吴祥珂, 等. 东昆仑祁漫塔格花岗片麻岩记录的岩浆和变质事件[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(6): 2107-2122. Google Scholar
[9]	谈生祥, 拜永山, 常革红, 等. 祁漫塔格地区晋宁期变质侵入岩(体)的发现及其地质意义[J]. 西北地质, 2004, 37(1): 69-73. Google Scholar
[10]	马文, 李社宏, 张志青, 等. 祁漫塔格中部元古代高钾(变质)侵入岩体的发现及其地质意义[J]. 西北地质, 2013, 46(1): 32-39. Google Scholar
[11]	崔美慧, 孟繁聪, 吴祥珂. 东昆仑祁漫塔格早奥陶世岛弧: 中基性火成岩地球化学、Sm-Nd同位素及年代学证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(11): 3365-3379. Google Scholar
[12]	王秉璋, 罗照华, 李怀毅, 等. 东昆仑祁漫塔格走廊域晚古生代-早中生代侵入岩岩石组合及时空格架[J]. 中国地质, 2009, 36(4): 769-782. Google Scholar
[13]	Liu D L, Li H B, Sun Z M, et al. Apatite fission track dating constrains the Cenozoic initial synchronous uplift of the Qiman Tagh Mountain, North Tibetan Plateau, comparing with the different LA-ICPMS U-Pb age of granite[J]. Gondwana Research, 2017, 41: 438-450. Google Scholar
[14]	王秉璋, 罗照华, 潘彤, 等. 青藏高原祁漫塔格地区早古生代火山岩岩石构造组合和LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄[J]. 地质通报, 2012, 31(6): 860-874. Google Scholar
[15]	张志青, 刘立保, 赵海霞, 等. 青海祁漫塔格小盆地北基性岩墙群地质特征及意义[J]. 青海大学学报: 自然科学版, 2013, 31(4): 57-64. Google Scholar
[16]	祁生胜, 邓晋福, 叶占福, 等. 青海祁漫塔格地区晚泥盆世辉绿岩墙群LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造意义[J]. 地质通报, 2013, 32(9): 1385-1393. Google Scholar
[17]	佘宏全, 张德全, 景向阳, 等. 青海省乌兰乌珠尔斑岩铜矿床地质特征与成因[J]. 中国地质, 2007, 34(2): 306-314. Google Scholar
[18]	谈生祥, 郭通珍, 董进生, 等. 青海乌兰乌珠尔地区晚志留世过铝质花岗岩地质特征及意义[J]. 青海大学学报: 自然科学版, 2011, 29(1): 36-43. Google Scholar
[19]	郝娜娜, 袁万明, 张爱奎, 等. 东昆仑祁漫塔格晚志留世-早泥盆世花岗岩: 年代学、地球化学及形成环境[J]. 地质论评, 2014, 60(1): 201-215. Google Scholar
[20]	李国臣, 丰成友, 王瑞江, 等. 新疆白干湖钨锡矿田东北部花岗岩锆石SIMS U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及构造意义[J]. 地球学报, 2012, 33(2): 216-226. Google Scholar
[21]	高永宝, 李文渊, 李侃, 等. 东昆仑祁漫塔格白干湖-戛勒赛矿带成岩成矿时代及钨锡成矿作用[J]. 西北地质, 2012, 45(4): 229-241. Google Scholar
[22]	高永宝, 李文渊. 东昆仑造山带祁漫塔格地区白干湖含钨锡矿花岗岩: 岩石学、年代学、地球化学及岩石成因[J]. 地球化学, 2011, 40(4): 324-336. Google Scholar
[23]	周建厚, 丰成友, 沈灯亮, 等. 新疆祁漫塔格维宝矿区西北部花岗闪长岩年代学、地球化学及其构造意义[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89(3): 473-486. Google Scholar
[24]	李世金, 孙丰月, 丰成友, 等. 青海东昆仑鸭子沟多金属矿的成矿年代学研究[J]. 地质学报, 2008, 82(7): 949-955. Google Scholar
[25]	刘云华, 莫宣学, 喻学惠, 等. 东昆仑野马泉地区景忍花岗岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2006, 22(10): 2457-2463. Google Scholar
[26]	丰成友, 王雪萍, 舒晓峰, 等. 青海祁漫塔格虎头崖铅锌多金属矿区年代学研究及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报: 地球科学版, 2011, 41(6): 1806-1817. Google Scholar
[27]	瞿泓滢, 丰成友, 裴荣富, 等. 青海祁漫塔格虎头崖多金属矿区岩体热年代学研究[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89(3): 498-509. Google Scholar
[28]	谌宏伟, 罗照华, 莫宣学, 等. 东昆仑喀雅克登塔格杂岩体的SHRIMP年龄及其地质意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2006, 25(1): 25-32. Google Scholar
[29]	王国良, 任二峰, 保广普, 等. 青海祁漫塔格晚泥盆世侵入岩锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 矿产勘查, 2013, 4(4): 421-434. Google Scholar
[30]	吴祥珂, 孟繁聪, 许虹, 等. 青海祁漫塔格玛兴大坂晚三叠世花岗岩年代学, 地球化学及Nd-Hf同位素组成[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 27(11): 3380-3394. Google Scholar
[31]	郝娜娜, 袁万明, 曹建辉, 等. 东昆仑喀雅克登塔格晚泥盆世花岗闪长岩的发现与地质意义[J]. 西北地质, 2014, 47(1): 107-115. Google Scholar
[32]	奚仁刚, 校培喜,伍跃中,等. 东昆仑肯德可克铁矿区二长花岗岩组成、年龄及地质意义[J]. 西北地质, 2010, 43(4): 195-202. Google Scholar
[33]	肖晔, 丰成友, 刘建楠, 等. 青海肯德可克铁多金属矿区年代学及硫同位素特征[J]. 矿床地质, 2013, 32(1): 177-186. Google Scholar
[34]	潘晓萍, 李荣社, 于浦生, 等. 祁漫塔格地区肯德可克铁钴多金属矿围岩时代及其意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2013, 32(1): 53-62. Google Scholar
[35]	常有英, 李建放, 张军, 等. 青海那陵郭勒河东晚三叠世侵入岩形成环境及年代学研究[J]. 西北地质, 2009, 42(1): 57-65. Google Scholar
[36]	肖爱芳, 黎敦朋, 李新林, 等. 新疆库木库里盆地演化[J]. 陕西地质, 2005, 23(1): 59-69. Google Scholar
[37]	Xia W C, Zhang N, Yuan XP, et al. Cenozoic Qaidam basin, China: A stronger tectonic inversed, extensional rifted basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85(4): 715-736. Google Scholar
[38]	Fang X M, Zhang W L, Meng Q Q, et al. High-resolution magneto stratigraphy of the Neogene Huaitoutala section in the eastern Qaidam Basin on the NE Tibetan Plateau, Qinghai Province, China and its implication on tectonic uplift of the NE Tibetan Plateau[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2007, 258(1/2): 293-306. Google Scholar
[39]	Lu H J, Xiong S F. Magnetostratigraphy of the Dahonggou section, northern Qaidam Basin and its bearing on Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Qilian Shan and Altyn Tagh Fault[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 288(3/4): 539-550. Google Scholar
[40]	Sun Z M, Yang Z Y, Pei J L, et al. Magnetostratigraphy of Paleogene sediments from northern Qaidam Basin, China: Implications for tectonic uplift and block rotation in northern Tibetan plateau[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005, 237(3/4): 635-646. Google Scholar
[41]	Searle M P, Elliott J R, Phillips R J, et al. Crustal -lithospheric structure and continental extrusion of Tibet[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2011, 168(3): 633-672. Google Scholar
[42]	Tapponnier P, Xu Z Q, Roger F, et al. Oblique stepwise rise and growth of the Tibet Plateau[J]. Science, 2001, 294(5547): 1671-1677. Google Scholar
[43]	许志琴, 杨经绥, 李海兵, 等. 造山的高原: 青藏高原的地体拼合、碰撞造山及隆升机制[M].北京: 地质出版社, 2007: 1-458. Google Scholar
[44]	姜春发, 杨经绥, 冯秉贵. 昆仑开合构造[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1992: 1-224. Google Scholar
[45]	李荣社, 计文化, 赵振明, 等. 昆仑早古生代造山带研究进展[J]. 地质通报, 2007, 26(4): 373-382. Google Scholar
[46]	莫宣学, 罗照华, 邓晋福, 等. 东昆仑造山带花岗岩及地壳生长[J]. 高校地质学报, 2007, 13(3): 403-414. Google Scholar