Ecological zoning from the perspective of coupling ecosystem service supply and demand in the Chishui River Basin

SUN Yuqin; WANG Jun; YANG Zhiwei

doi:10.12097/gbc.2023.02.023

2024 Vol. 43, No. 8

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2024 > 43(8): 1315-1324

Next Article Previous Article

SUN Yuqin, WANG Jun, YANG Zhiwei. 2024. Ecological zoning from the perspective of coupling ecosystem service supply and demand in the Chishui River Basin. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(8): 1315-1324. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2023.02.023

Citation:

SUN Yuqin, WANG Jun, YANG Zhiwei. 2024. Ecological zoning from the perspective of coupling ecosystem service supply and demand in the Chishui River Basin. Geological Bulletin of China, 43(8): 1315-1324. doi: 10.12097/gbc.2023.02.023

Ecological zoning from the perspective of coupling ecosystem service supply and demand in the Chishui River Basin

1.
Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation Center (Land Science and Technology Innovation Center), Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China
2.
Technology Innovation Center for Integrated Ecosystem Restoration and Sustainable Utilization of Ministry of Natural Resources, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

More Information

Corresponding author: WANG Jun, wangjun@lcrc.org.cn

Received Date: 23 February 2023

Revised Date: 22 September 2023

Publish Date: 15 August 2024

Abstract

Abstract

Ecological zoning from the perspective of coupling the supply and demand of the ecosystem services is instrumental in promoting the sustainable development of social−ecological system. In this study, the ecosystem services supply (ESS) and ecosystem services demand (ESD) the between 2010 and 2020 in Chishui River Basin were investigated. The coupling degrees were calculated based on the changes in ESS and ESD between 2010 and 2020. According to the results of coupling degree, the 409 study units (streets/towns) were divided into four categories. The averaged ESS changes for the high order of coupling degrees zonation, high order of uncoupling degree zonation, low order of uncoupling degree zonation and low order of uncoupling degree zonation are 1.7 ± 2.1, −0.9 ± 2.2, 5.9 ± 6.4 and −0.1 ± 0.5, respectively. The averaged ESD changes are 0.6 ± 1.1, 2.1 ± 2.4, 0.7 ± 2.4 and −0.5 ± 0.4, respectively. The 61 streets/towns with high order of coupling degrees represented for conversation−oriented zone in which should focus on conservation on the key and typical landscapes, improve the existing ecosystem network and highlight the regional social−ecological complex functions. The 140 streets/towns with high order of uncoupling degree represented for key restoration zone, in which focused on incorporating key areas for ecological restoration into regional development planning. The 63 streets/towns with low order of uncoupling degree represented for network−oriented zone, focusing at establishing ecological corridors and networks to improve the connectivity, so as to maintain important the continuous supply of ecosystem services in the region. The 145 streets/towns with low order of uncoupling degree represented for ecological livelihood−oriented zone focusing at alternative livelihood through ecological branding and products value gaining. The finding of the ecological zoning scheme of the Chishui River Basin reflects the differences in the spatial allocation of regional environmental resources and can provide technical guidance on spatial planning for ecological conservation and restoration.
- ecosystem services /
- coupling relationship between supply and demand /
- ecological restoration zoning /
- ecological restoration strategy /
- Chishui River Basin

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Cai H, He Z W, An Y L, et al. 2014. Correlation intensity of vegetation coverage and topographic factors in Chishui Watershed based on RS and GIS[J]. Earth and Environment, 42(4): 518−524(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[2]	Chen Z, Yu B, Yang C, et al. 2021. An extended time series (2000–2018) of global NPP−VIIRS−like nighttime light data from a cross−sensor calibration[J]. Earth System Science Data, 13(3): 889−906(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.5194/essd-13-889-2021 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	Dao R N, Bao Y H. 2019. Dynamic of the drought based on the ecological partition in Inner Mongolia during 1980−2015[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 26(3): 159−165(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[4]	Dan Y Z, Peng J, Zhang Z M, et al. 2020. Territorially ecological restoration zoning based on the framework of degradation pressure, supply state and restoration potential: A case study in the Pearl River Delta region [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40(23): 8451−8460(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[5]	Fu B J. 2021. Several key points in territorial ecological restoration[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 36(1): 64−69(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[6]	Guo C H, Zhang M S, Wang Y, et al. 2023. Ecological restoration of China's territorial space in Yulin section of the Yellow River Basin through nature−based solutions[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 42(10): 1745−1756 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[7]	Li J Z, Wang M, Feng W J, et al. 2022. The characteristics and driving factors of spatiotemporal changes in the ecosystem service value in Xiangxi, Hunan, China[J]. Remote Sensing for Natural Resources, 34(3): 207−217(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[8]	Li X, Yu X, Wu K, et al. 2021. Land−use zoning management to protecting the regional key ecosystem services: A case study in the city belt along the Chaobai River, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 762: 143167. Google Scholar
[9]	Liu F, Liu H. 2023. Effectiveness and challenges of aquatic ecological restoration of Chishui River in upper Yangtze River[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 38(12): 1883−1893(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[10]	Liu Q, Li G, Zhang C, et al. 2019. Study on dynamic changes in ecosystem service values in Qinglong County based on coefficient correction[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco−Agriculture, 27(6): 971−980 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[11]	Liu X, Liu L, Peng Y. 2017. Ecological zoning for regional sustainable development using an integrated modeling approach in the Bohai Rim, China[J]. Ecological Modelling, 353: 158−166. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.027 CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	Lu H T, Stringer L C, Yan Y, et al. 2023. Mapping ecosystem service supply and demand: Historical changes and projections under SSP−RCP scenarios[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(4): 1–17(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[13]	Ma L, Liu H, Peng J, et al. 2017. A review of ecosystem services supply and demand[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 72(7): 1277−1289(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[14]	Peng J, Yang Y, Xie P, et al. 2017. Zoning for the construction of green space ecological networks in Guangdong Province based on the supply and demand of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(13): 4562−4572(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[15]	Peng J, Li B, Dong J Q. 2020a. Basic logic of territorial ecological restoration[J]. China Land Science, 34(5): 18−26(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[16]	Peng J, Lyu D N, Dong J Q, et al. 2020b. Processes coupling and spatial integration: Characterizing ecological restoration of territorial space in view of landscape ecology[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35(1): 3−13(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200102 CrossRef Google Scholar
[17]	Villamagna A M, Angermeier P L, Bennett E M. 2013. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Ecosystem Service Provision and Delivery [J]. Ecological Complexity, 15(9): 114–21. Google Scholar
[18]	Wang J, Ying L X, Zhong L N. 2020. Thinking for the transformation of land consolidation and ecological restoration in the new era[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 35: 26−36 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200104 CrossRef Google Scholar
[19]	Wang J, Zhong L N. 2019. Application of ecosystem service theory for ecological protection and restoration of mountain−river−forest− field−lake−grassland[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(23): 8702−8708(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[20]	Wang J, Peng J, Fu B J. 2023. Integrated ecological protection and restoration in the Guangdong−Hong Kong−Macao Greater Bay area: thoughts and suggestions[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 38(2): 288−293(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[21]	Wang S, Zhang Q, Wang Z F, et al. 2022. GIS−based ecological risk assessment and ecological zoning in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(11): 4654−4664 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[22]	Wang Y, Zhang M, Chen H J, et al. 2023. Ecological protection– restoration practice of mountains rivers forests farmlands lakes grasslands sands in the Jialu River Basin[J]. Northwestern Geology, 56(3): 121−128 (in Chinese with English abstract) . Google Scholar
[23]	Wang Z Y, Huang C L, Li L, et al. 2022. Ecological zoning planning and dynamic evaluation coupled with Invest−HFI−Plus model: A case study in Bortala Mongolian autonomous prefecture[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(14): 5789−5798 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[24]	Xie G D, Zhang C X, Zhang L M, et al. 2015. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 30(8): 1243−1254(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[25]	Xie L X, Bai Y P, Che L, et al. 2022. Construction of ecological zone based on value−risk ecological function area in the Upper Yellow River [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 36(1): 196−207(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[26]	Xin R, Skov−petersen H, Zeng J, et al. 2021. Identifying key areas of imbalanced supply and demand of ecosystem services at the urban agglomeration scale: A case study of the Fujian Delta in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 791: 148173. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148173 CrossRef Google Scholar
[27]	Xu Q, Yang R, Zhuang D, et al. 2021. Spatial gradient differences of ecosystem services supply and demand in the Pearl River Delta region[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279: 123849. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123849 CrossRef Google Scholar
[28]	Xu Z, Peng J, Dong J, et al. 2022. Spatial correlation between the changes of ecosystem service supply and demand: An ecological zoning approach[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 217: 104258. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104258 CrossRef Google Scholar
[29]	Yan Y, Zhu J Y, Wu G, et al. 2017. Review and prospective applications of demand, supply, and consumption of ecosystem services [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(8): 2489−2496(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[30]	Yang C, Zeng W, Yang X. 2020. Coupling coordination evaluation and sustainable development pattern of geo−ecological environment and urbanization in Chongqing municipality, China[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 61: 102271. Google Scholar
[31]	Yang Z W, Chen Y B, Wu Z F, et al. 2018. The coupling between construction land expansion and urban heat island expansion in Guangdong−Hong Kong−Macao Greater Bay [J]. Journal of Geo−information Science, 20(11): 1592−1603 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[32]	Yang Z, Chen Y, Qian Q, et al. 2019. The coupling relationship between construction land expansion and high−temperature area expansion in China’s three major urban agglomerations[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 40(17): 6680−6699. Google Scholar
[33]	Yang S F, An Y L, Wang P B, et al. 2015. Study of ecological red−line zones in guizhou chishui river basin[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 24(8): 1405−11(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[34]	Yue W Z, Hou L, Xia H X, et al. 2022. Territorially ecological restoration zoning and optimization strategy in Guyuan City of Ningxia, China: Based on the balance of ecosystem service supply and demand[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 33(1): 149−158(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[35]	Zhao C C, Pan J H. 2022. Ecological safety pattern identification and optimization based on the ecological supply and demand in Gansu section of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 42(17): 6973−6984(in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[36]	Zhao W W, Liu Y, Feng Q, et al. 2018. Ecosystem services for coupled human and environment systems[J]. Progress in Geography, 37(1): 139−151(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2018.01.015 CrossRef Google Scholar
[37]	Zhao Y, Wang N, Luo Y, et al. 2022. Quantification of ecosystem services supply−demand and the impact of demographic change on cultural services in Shenzhen, China[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 304: 114280. Google Scholar
[38]	Zhang Y Y, Sun M Y, Yang R J, et al. 2022. Impact of land−use change on ecosystem service value in Southwest China[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 12(1): 207−214 (in Chinese with English abstract). Google Scholar
[39]	蔡宏, 何政伟, 安艳玲, 等. 2014. 基于RS和GIS的赤水河流域植被覆盖度与各地形因子的相关强度研究[J]. 地球与环境, 42(4): 518−524. Google Scholar
[40]	道日娜, 包玉海. 2019. 基于生态分区的1980—2015年内蒙古干旱动态[J]. 水土保持研究, 26(3): 159−165. Google Scholar
[41]	丹宇卓, 彭建, 张子墨, 等. 2020. 基于“退化压力−供给状态−修复潜力”框架的国土空间生态修复分区——以珠江三角洲为例[J]. 生态学报, 40(23): 8451−8460. Google Scholar
[42]	傅伯杰. 2021. 国土空间生态修复亟待把握的几个要点[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 36(1): 64−69. Google Scholar
[43]	郭迟辉, 张茂省, 王尧, 等. 2023. 基于自然解决方案的黄河中游国土空间生态修复——以陕西榆林国土空间生态修复为例[J]. 地质通报, 42(10): 1745−1756. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.10.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[44]	李静芝, 王苗, 冯文静, 等. 2022. 湘西州地区生态系统服务价值时空特征及驱动分析[J]. 自然资源遥感, 34(3): 207−217. Google Scholar
[45]	刘飞, 刘焕章. 2023. 长江上游赤水河示范区水生态修复的成效与挑战[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 38(12): 1883−1893. Google Scholar
[46]	刘倩, 李葛, 张超, 等. 2019. 基于系数修正的青龙县生态系统服务价值动态变化研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 27(6): 971−980. Google Scholar
[47]	卢慧婷, Stringer L C, 严岩, 等. 2023. 西南地区生态系统服务供需历史变化与SSP-RCP情景预测[J]. 生态学报, 43(4): 1–17. Google Scholar
[48]	马琳, 刘浩, 彭建, 等. 2017. 生态系统服务供给和需求研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 72(7): 1277−1289. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201707012 CrossRef Google Scholar
[49]	彭建, 杨旸, 谢盼, 等. 2017. 基于生态系统服务供需的广东省绿地生态网络建设分区[J]. 生态学报, 37(13): 4562−4572. Google Scholar
[50]	彭建, 李冰, 董建权, 等. 2020a. 论国土空间生态修复基本逻辑[J]. 中国土地科学, 34 (5): 18–26. Google Scholar
[51]	彭建, 吕丹娜, 董建权, 等. 2020b. 过程耦合与空间集成: 国土空间生态修复的景观生态学认知[J]. 自然资源学报, 35: 3−13. Google Scholar
[52]	王军, 应凌霄, 钟莉娜. 2020. 新时代国土整治与生态修复转型思考[J]. 自然资源学报, 35: 26−36. Google Scholar
[53]	王军, 钟莉娜. 2019. 生态系统服务理论与山水林田湖草生态保护修复的应用[J]. 生态学报, 39(23): 8702−8708. Google Scholar
[54]	王军, 彭建, 傅伯杰. 2023. 关于粤港澳大湾区一体化生态保护修复的思考与建议[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 38(2): 288−293. Google Scholar
[55]	王舒, 张骞, 王子芳, 等. 2022. 基于GIS的三峡库区生态风险评估及生态分区构建[J]. 生态学报, 42(11): 4654−4664. Google Scholar
[56]	王尧, 张茂省, 陈华军, 等. 2023. 佳芦河流域山水林田湖草沙生态保护修复实践研究[J]. 西北地质, 56(3): 121−128. doi: 10.12401/j.nwg.2023095 CrossRef Google Scholar
[57]	王子尧, 黄楚梨, 李倞, 等. 2022. 耦合InVEST-HFI-PLUS模型的生态分区规划与动态评估——以博尔塔拉蒙古自治州为例[J]. 生态学报, 42(14): 5789-5798. Google Scholar
[58]	谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 2015. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 30(8): 1243−1254. Google Scholar
[59]	谢丽霞, 白永平, 车磊, 等. 2021. 基于价值—风险的黄河上游生态功能区生态分区建设[J]. 自然资源学报, 36(1): 196−207. Google Scholar
[60]	严岩, 朱捷缘, 吴钢, 等. 2017. 生态系统服务需求、供给和消费研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 37(8): 2489−2496. Google Scholar
[61]	杨智威, 陈颖彪, 吴志峰, 等. 2018. 粤港澳大湾区建设用地扩张与城市热岛扩张耦合态势研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 20(11): 1592−1603. Google Scholar
[62]	杨世凡, 安裕伦, 王培彬, 等. 2015. 贵州赤水河流域生态红线区划分研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 24(8): 1405−1411. Google Scholar
[63]	岳文泽, 侯丽, 夏皓轩, 等. 2022. 基于生态系统服务供需平衡的宁夏固原生态修复分区与优化策略[J]. 应用生态学报, 33(1): 149−158. Google Scholar
[64]	赵诚诚, 潘竟虎. 2022. 基于供需视角的黄河流域甘肃段生态安全格局识别与优化[J]. 生态学报, 42(17): 6973−6984. Google Scholar
[65]	赵文武, 刘月, 冯强, 等. 2018. 人地系统耦合框架下的生态系统服务[J]. 地理科学进展, 37(1): 139−151. Google Scholar
[66]	张钰莹, 孙美莹, 杨荣金, 等. 2022. 西南地区土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 12(1): 207−214. Google Scholar