Citation: | HUAN Hengfei, GUO Changlai, CUI Jian, NI Jin, SHI Xufei, MA Hongwei. Application of audio magnetotelluric sounding to the seawater intrusion survey of Jinzhou[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021, 40(10): 1720-1728. |
The invasion of sea and salt water in big and small Linghe region of Jinzhou City has seriously affected the local economy and people's quality of life. In order to find out the boundary change and pollution scope of the sea and salt water in the study area, five AMT profiles have been completed. The profile data is inversed by the improved NLCG method. The two-dimensional inversion results directly reflect the distribution range of the salt and fresh water in the study area, and give the boundary location of the salt and fresh water. The results show that the transgressive range of L0 and L1 profile does not expand, the transgressive range of L2 profile is expanding, part of fresh water has been polluted by the underground ancient saline water at L3 profile, and the fresh water is not polluted at L4 profile, which are basically consistent with the hydrogeological drilling and mechanical well survey data. In a word, AMT method is feasible and effective to study the occurrence state and change rule of sea and salt water in the Jinzhou area, which can provide basic geophycical data for environmental hydrogeology investigation.
[1] | Swartz J H. Resistivity-studies of some salt-water boundaries in the Hawaiian Islands[J]. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 1937, 18(2): 387-393. doi: 10.1029/TR018i002p00387 |
[2] | 刘青勇, 董广清. 电阻率法在防治莱州湾地区海水入侵中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 1999, 23(5): 368-372. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8918.1999.05.010 |
[3] | 唐心强, 康桂红, 大年邦雄, 等. Wenner法探测淡盐界面的调查研究[J]. 地下水, 2006, 28(3): 83-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1184.2006.03.027 |
[4] | Adepelumi A, Ako B D, Ajayi T R, et al. Delineation of saltwater intrusion into the freshwater aquifer of Lekki Peninsula, Lagos, Nigeria[J]. Environmental Geology, 2009, 56(5): 927-933. doi: 10.1007/s00254-008-1194-3 |
[5] | Hodlur G K, Dhakate R, Sirisha T, et al. Resolution of freshwater and saline water aquifers by composite geophysical data analysis methods[J]. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2010, 55(3): 414-434. doi: 10.1080/02626661003738217 |
[6] | 杨学明, 苏永军, 杜东, 等. 音频大地电磁法在海水入侵动态监测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2013, 37(2): 301-305. |
[7] | 苏永军, 黄忠峰, 匡海阳, 等. EH4电磁成像系统在莱州湾地区探测海水入侵界限的调查研究[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2014, 37(4): 264-268. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4135.2014.04.004 |
[8] | 苏永军, 范剑, 刘宏伟, 等. 高密度电阻率法探测海水入侵咸淡水界限初步调查研究——以莱州湾为例[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2014, 37(3): 177-181. |
[9] | El-Kaliouby H, Abdalla O. Application of time-domain electromagnetic method in mapping saltwater intrusion of a coastal alluvial aquifer, North Oman[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2015, 115: 59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2015.02.003 |
[10] | 何玉海. 高密度电法在莱州湾海水入侵调查中的研究与应用[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2016, 35(2): 301-305. |
[11] | Kazakis N, Pavlou A, Vargemezis G, et al. Seawater intrusion mapping using electrical resistivity tomography and hydrochemical data. An application in the coastal area of eastern Thermaikos Gulf, Greece[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 543: 373-387. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.041 |
[12] | 刘宏伟, 黄忠峰, 郭旭, 等. 地球物理技术在识别海(咸) 水入侵界线中的应用[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2016, 32(9): 58-63. |
[13] | 陈松, 刘磊, 刘怀庆, 等. 北部湾咸淡水分界面划分中的电法应用分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2019, 34(4): 1592-1599. |
[14] | Prashant K, Prarabdh T, Anand S, et al. Electrical resistivity and induced polarization signatures to delineate the near-surface aquifers contaminated with seawater invasion in Digha, West-Bengal, India[J]. Catena, 2021, 207: 1-17. |
[15] | 余海忠, 冯书才, 曾奇. 采用物探方法研究深圳西部海水入侵现状[J]. 山西建筑, 2015, 41(14): 56-58. |
[16] | 余年, 庞方. 音频大地电磁测深法在地热勘查中的应用研究[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2010, 37(3): 135-138. |
① | 辽宁工程勘察院.辽宁省锦州市市区及凌海市地质灾害调查与区划报告. 2005. |
Hydrogeological map of the study area
Apparent resistivity and impedance phase curves of some points for AMT measurements
Apparent resistivity and impedance phase curves of some check points for AMT measurements
Apparent resistivity inversion (a) and inferred interpretation (b) of section L0
Apparent resistivity inversion (a) and inferred interpretation (b) of section L1
Apparent resistivity inversion (a) and inferred interpretation (b) of section L2
Apparent resistivity inversion (a) and inferred interpretation (b) of section L3
Apparent resistivity inversion (a) and inferred interpretation (b) of section L4