Practice and exploration of rural ecological space planning

ZHANG Longlong; ZHU Xiaohua; XING Zhijun; LI Haijiao; ZHANG Xiaohui

2021 Vol. 40, No. 9

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2021 > 40(9): 1592-1600

Next Article Previous Article

ZHANG Longlong, ZHU Xiaohua, XING Zhijun, LI Haijiao, ZHANG Xiaohui. Practice and exploration of rural ecological space planning[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021, 40(9): 1592-1600.

Citation:

ZHANG Longlong, ZHU Xiaohua, XING Zhijun, LI Haijiao, ZHANG Xiaohui. Practice and exploration of rural ecological space planning[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021, 40(9): 1592-1600.

Practice and exploration of rural ecological space planning

1.
National Research Center for Geoanalysis, Beijing 100037, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Eco-geochemistry, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100037, China
3.
Beijing Oriental Landscape Environment Co., Ltd., Beijing 100015, China
4.
Beijing Haiya Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100038, China

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHU Xiaohua, zglzby@163.com

Received Date: 27 January 2021

Revised Date: 11 August 2021

Publish Date: 15 September 2021

Abstract

Abstract

Ecological sensitive areas, fragile areas, poor areas, geological disaster frequent areas are often superimposed in the regional space.A rural ecological restoration plan in Guizhou Province was taken as a case, on the basis of constructing the standard system of quantitative and differentiated evaluation of object elements, to fully evaluate background of natural ecological space.It is to comprehensively excavate the resources attributes such as humanities, industrial and mining relics, geological disasters and so on, implant the ecological industry in combination with the local characteristics, match the environmental color through plant planting, and satisfy the people's sense demand to the beautiful countryside.Based on the study on natural recovery law process, it aims to restore the function of regional ecosystem in minimum cost way, to promote the construction of beautiful villages, and to meet the local vision of getting rid of poverty.The sustainable and near-natural ecological planning analysis of "emphasizing nature, gathering humanity, developing industry and less intervention" is of great significance for our countryside to walk on an ecological road, a tourist road, an industrial road and an economic road.Meanwhile, it provides a new idea for the transformation of geological survey work in the new period.
- spatial planning /
- rural /
- evaluation /
- near-natural

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	张京祥, 张尚武, 段德罡, 等. 多规合一的实用性村庄规划[J]. 城市规划, 2020, 44(3): 74-83. Google Scholar
[2]	戴世续, 周骏, 洪双勇, 等. 新时期浙江乡村振兴规划编制思路探索——以浙江临安区高虹龙门农村综合改革规划为例[J]. 建筑与文化, 2020, 198(9): 103-105. Google Scholar
[3]	尹向东, 邓木林, 刘国威. 面向国土空间规划的现状调查体系思考[J/OL]. 规划师, 2021, (2): 41-44, 49[2021-04-11]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/45.1210.tu.20210329.1631.038.html. Google Scholar
[4]	苏涵, 陈皓. "多规合一"的本质及其编制要点探析[J]. 规划师, 2015, 31(2): 57-62. Google Scholar
[5]	侯淑珺, 赵梅红. 国土空间规划背景下的村庄规划探析[J]. 农村实用技术, 2020, (7): 147-148. Google Scholar
[6]	白中科. 亟待建立山水林田湖草生态保护修复试验示范科学范式[J]. 土地科学动态, 2019, (5): 5-8. Google Scholar
[7]	郑洋, 郝润梅, 米园, 等. 西部地区村级规划体系构建研究[J/OL]. 中国国土资源经济, 2020: 1-9[2020-11-03]. https://doi.org/10.19676/j.cnki.1672-6995.000496. Google Scholar
[8]	王向荣, 林箐. 自然的含义[J]. 城市环境设计, 2013, (5): 130/133: 128-129. Google Scholar
[9]	李智, 张小林, 陈媛, 等. 基于城乡相互作用的中国乡村复兴研究[J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(6): 144-150. Google Scholar
[10]	范凌云, 徐昕, 刘雅洁. 乡村振兴背景下苏南乡村生态营建规划策略[J]. 规划师, 2019, 35(11): 24-31. Google Scholar
[11]	刘志超. 新型空间规划体系下的县级"三生空间"布局与"三线"划定[J]. 规划师, 2019, 35(5): 27-31. Google Scholar
[12]	于贵瑞, 何洪林, 周玉科. 大数据背景下的生态系统观测与研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(8): 832-837. Google Scholar
[13]	吴次芳, 叶艳妹, 吴宇哲, 等. 国土空间规划[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2019. Google Scholar
[14]	何冬华, 姚江春, 袁媛. 广州生态空间用途管制方法探讨[J]. 规划师, 2019, 35(5): 32-37. Google Scholar
[15]	周劲. 三线·三生·三控: 城乡布局结构的宏观管控机制[J]. 规划师, 2019, 35(5): 5-12. Google Scholar
[16]	曾鹏, 朱柳慧, 蔡良娃. 基于三生空间网络的京津冀地区镇域乡村振兴路径[J]. 规划师, 2019, 35(15): 60-66. Google Scholar
[17]	陈坤秋, 龙花楼. 土地整治与乡村发展转型: 互馈机理与区域调控[J]. 中国土地科学, 2020, 34(6): 1-9. Google Scholar
[18]	刘玲, 赵廷宁, 赵平, 等. 生产建设损毁土地生态修复规划设计坡度分级研究[J]. 矿山测量, 2017, 45(2): 103-107. Google Scholar
[19]	GB/T 15772-2008. 水土保持综合治理规划通则[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009. Google Scholar
[20]	GB/T 26424-2010. 森林资源规划设计调查技术规程[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011. Google Scholar
[21]	GB 50487-2008. 水利水电工程地质勘察规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2009. Google Scholar
[22]	GB/T 38360-2019. 裸露坡面植被恢复技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国质检出版社, 2020. Google Scholar
[23]	GB 50218-2014. 工程岩体分级标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2015. Google Scholar
[24]	GB 50500-2013. 建设工程工程量清单计价规范[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2013. Google Scholar
[25]	GB 50007-2011, 建筑地基基础设计规范[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012. Google Scholar
[26]	GB/T 50145-2007. 土的工程分类标准[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2008. Google Scholar
[27]	ASTM D 2487-2006. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)[S]. International ASTM, 2008. Google Scholar
[28]	崔庆伟. 风景园林学视角下的中国采石干扰土地修复治理现况反思[J]. 中国园林, 2017, 33(5): 18-23. Google Scholar
[29]	农业农村部. 全国乡村产业发展规划(2020-2025年)[Z]. 2020-07-09// http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-07/17/content_5527720.htm. Google Scholar
[30]	Yu K J, Work with and by nature: the essence of territorial spatial planning and ecological restoration[J]. Landscabe Architecture Frontiers, 2020, 8(1): 4-9. Google Scholar
[31]	周永章, 刘楠, 陈川, 等. 开启区块链地质应用新时代[J]. 地质通报, 2020, 39(1): 1-6. Google Scholar
[32]	Cheng Q, Zhao M. A New International Initiative for Facilitating Data-Driven Earth Science Transformation[J]. Geological Society London Special Publications, 2020, 499(1): SP499-2019-158. Google Scholar