Quaternion model for sustainable exploration and development of mines (QMM)

SHU Siqi; ZHANG Hongtao; PEI Rongfu; XIANG Junfeng; SUN Zhangtao

2017 Vol. 36, No. 8

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2017 > 36(8): 1476-1482

Next Article Previous Article

SHU Siqi, ZHANG Hongtao, PEI Rongfu, XIANG Junfeng, SUN Zhangtao. Quaternion model for sustainable exploration and development of mines (QMM)[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2017, 36(8): 1476-1482.

Citation:

SHU Siqi, ZHANG Hongtao, PEI Rongfu, XIANG Junfeng, SUN Zhangtao. Quaternion model for sustainable exploration and development of mines (QMM)[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2017, 36(8): 1476-1482.

Quaternion model for sustainable exploration and development of mines (QMM)

1.
China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China
2.
Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100037, China
3.
Center of Geological Liberary, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100081, China

More Information

Corresponding author: PEI Rongfu, prirf@sohu.com

Received Date: 09 December 2016

Revised Date: 01 July 2017

Publish Date: 25 August 2017

Abstract

Abstract

The problem of sustainable exploration and development of mines is studied from geological, environmental, technical and economic perspectives. A quaternion model for sustainable exploration and development of mines is developed based on the analytic hierarchy process. This model demonstrates that the exploration and development activities could be deemed reasonable only when they are geologically ore-bearing and technically viable and do not harm the environment while maximizing the economic benefit. Assessment on the Jiama Cu polymetallic deposit in Gangdise metallogenic belt in Tibet based on this model shows that the current exploration and development program of this deposit is reasonable, which is consistent with the real condition.
- sustainable exploration and development of mines /
- green mines /
- ecological environment /
- exploration and development technology /
- economic evaluation /
- three rates /
- three wastes

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	古德生, 李夕兵, 等.现代金属矿床开采科学技术[M].北京:冶金工业出版社, 2009:1-20. Google Scholar
[2]	俞沧海.矿床技术经济评价[J].有色金属设计, 2002, 29(2):46-49. Google Scholar
[3]	裴荣富, 梅燕雄.矿产勘查的双控论与合理域模型[J].矿床地质, 2001, 20(4):307-12. Google Scholar
[4]	裴荣富, 李进文, 梅燕雄.金属成矿省等级体制成矿[J].矿床地质, 2004, 23(2):131-41. Google Scholar
[5]	裴荣富, 梅燕雄, 李进文.固体矿产合理勘查开发与矿业可持续发展[J].中国钨业, 2005, 20(2):11-15. Google Scholar
[6]	裴荣富, 李莉, 王浩琳.矿产地质勘查与矿业可持续发展的科学技术模拟[J].矿产保护与利用, 2009, 1:7-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0076.2009.01.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	赵鹏大, 池顺都, 陈永清.查明地质异常:成矿预测的基础[J].高校地质学报, 1996, 2(4):361-373. Google Scholar
[8]	赵鹏大, 陈永清.地质异常矿体定位的基本途径[J].地球科学(中国地质大学学报), 1998, 23(2):111-114. Google Scholar
[9]	张洪涛, 唐金荣, 齐亚斌, 等.矿产资源资产资本理论与实践[M].北京:地质出版社, 2014:10-20. Google Scholar
[10]	舒思齐, 张洪涛, 周平, 等.基于"三资"理论的矿产资源全球配置研究[J].中国矿业, 2015, 24(1):56-59. Google Scholar
[11]	Camm T W. Simplified cost models for prefeasibility mineral evalu-ations[J]. Bureau of Mines Information Circular, 9298, 1991:1-35. Google Scholar
[12]	Singer D A, Menzie W D, Long K R A. Simplified economic filter for underground mining of massivesulfide deposits[M]. U.S. Geo-logical Survey Open File Report, 2000:1-20. Google Scholar
[13]	Singer D A, Menzie W D. Quantitative mineral resource assess-ments:an integrated approach[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 2000. Google Scholar
[14]	Long K R, Singer D A. A simplified economic Filter for open-pit miningand heap-leach recovery of copper in the United States[M]. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 2001:1-218. Google Scholar
[15]	许志琴, 杨经绥, 李化启, 等.中国大陆印支碰撞造山系及其造山机制[J].岩石学报, 2012, 28(6):1697-1709. Google Scholar
[16]	秦志鹏, 汪雄武, 唐菊兴, 等.西藏甲玛铜多金属矿床围岩蚀变特征及成矿流体运移规律浅析[J].矿产与地质, 2013, 27(1):65-69. Google Scholar
[17]	唐菊兴, 王登红, 汪雄武, 等.西藏甲玛铜多金属矿矿床地质特征及其矿床模型[J].地球学报, 2010, 31(4):495-506. Google Scholar