2018 Vol. 37, No. 11
Article Contents

LI Jing, LIU Guichun, LIU Junping, HU Shaobin, ZENG Wentao, SUN Baidong, ZHANG Hu, DENG Renhong, ZHANG Zhibin, LIU Fagang, DUAN Xiangdong, YU Saiying, WANG Xiaofeng, ZHAO Yunjiang, ZHOU Kun. New progress in the study of early Pre-Cambrian geology of central Yunnan Province[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(11): 1957-1969.
Citation: LI Jing, LIU Guichun, LIU Junping, HU Shaobin, ZENG Wentao, SUN Baidong, ZHANG Hu, DENG Renhong, ZHANG Zhibin, LIU Fagang, DUAN Xiangdong, YU Saiying, WANG Xiaofeng, ZHAO Yunjiang, ZHOU Kun. New progress in the study of early Pre-Cambrian geology of central Yunnan Province[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(11): 1957-1969.

New progress in the study of early Pre-Cambrian geology of central Yunnan Province

More Information
  • Stratigraphic sequence of Mesoproterozoic "Kunyang Group" in central Yunnan Province is an important basic geological problem of long controversy, and such a situation has restricted deployment of geological surveying work and exploration effect and also constrained further development of early Pre-Cambrian geological research in central Yunnan Province. Based on previous work, " Regional Geology of Yunnan"(The second edition, revised) and "1:50000 Erjie Sheet Regional Geological Survey", the authors put forward a series of significant new ideas concerning stratigraphic sequence, epoch of early Pre-Cambrian, records of important geological events, and co-evolution of early life and environment, by means of field substantial geological survey and zircon isotope dating. On the basis of these new ideas, the authors suggest some new tasks about early Pre-Cambrian geological research in central Yunnan Province.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 《中国地层典》编委会, 陈晋镳等.中国地层典.中元古界[M].北京:地质出版社, 1999:39-40.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 张远志, 张定辉, 刘世荣, 等.云南省岩石地层[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1996:8-21.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 花友仁.对东川铜矿区地层划分和区域构造的探讨[J].地质论评, 1959, 4(2):155-162.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 吴懋德, 段锦荪, 陈良忠.云南昆阳群地质[M].昆明:云南科技出版社, 1990:1-224.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 莫向云.云南东川昆阳群地层[M].昆明:云南科技出版社, 2013:1-119.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 孙家骢.论昆阳群的划分及对比[J].昆明工学院学报, 1983, 1(1):1-16.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 李希勋, 吴懋德, 段锦荪.昆阳群的层序及顶底问题[J].地质论评, 1984, 30(5):399-408. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0371-5736.1984.05.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [8] 尹福光, 孙志明, 白建科.东川、滇中地区中元古代地层格架[J].地层学杂志, 2011, 35(1):49-54.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 李天福.东川矿区"小溜口组"地层特征与因民组的接触关系[J].云南地质, 1993, 4(1):1-11.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 陆松年, 郝国杰, 相振群.前寒武纪重大地质事件[J].地学前缘, 2016, 23(6):140-155.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 张旗, 钱青, 翟明国, 等. Sanukite(赞岐岩)的地球化学特征、成因及其地球动力学意义[J].岩石矿物学杂志, 2005, 24(2):117-125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2005.02.005

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [12] 夏林圻.超大陆构造、地幔动力学和岩浆-成矿响应[J].西北地质, 2013, 46(3):1-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2013.03.001

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [13] Abderrazak E A, Stefan B, et al. Large colonial organism with coordinated growth in oxygenated environments 2.1 Gyr ago[J]. Nature, 2010, 1(466):100-104.

    Google Scholar

    [14] Tang H S, Chen Y J, Santosh M, et al. C-O isotope geochemistry of the Dashiqiao magnesite belt, North China Craton:implications for the Great Oxidation Event and ore genesis[J]. Geological Journal, 2013, 48(5):467-483. doi: 10.1002/gj.v48.5

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [15] McDonald B, Camille A P. Is the Lomagundi Event present on the Rae craton? A case study from the Murmac Bay Group[J]. Can. J. Earth Sci., 2016, 53:457-465. doi: 10.1139/cjes-2015-0186

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [16] Maheshwari A, Sial A N, et al. A positive δ13C carb anomaly in Paleoproterozoic carbonates of the Aravalli Craton, Western India:support for a global isotopic excursion[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2002, 21:59-67. doi: 10.1016/S1367-9120(02)00014-7

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [17] Mastera S, Bekkerb A, Hofmannc A. A review of the stratigraphy and geological setting of the Palaeoproterozoic Magondi Supergroup, Zimbabwe-Type locality for the Lomagundi carbon isotope excursion[J]. Precambrian Research, 2010, 182:254-273. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2010.08.013

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [18] Lebeau O, Busigny V, Chaduteau C, et al. Organic matter removal for the analysis of carbon and oxygenisotope compositions of siderite[J]. Chemical Geology, 2014, 372(5):54-61.

    Google Scholar

    [19] Bekker A, Karhu J A, Kaufman A J. Carbon isotope record for the onset of the Lomagundi carbon isotope excursion in the Great Lakes area, North America[J]. Precambrian Research, 2006, 148(1):145-180.

    Google Scholar

    [20] Anil Maheshwari, Alcides N. Sial, et al. Global nature of the Paleoproterozoic Lomagundi carbon isotope excursion:A review of occurrences in Brazil, India, and Uruguay[J]. Precambrian Research, 2010, 182:274-299. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2010.06.017

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [21] Chakrabarti G, Shome D, Kumar S, et al. Carbon and oxygen isotopic variations in stromatolitic dolomites of Palaeoproterozoic Vempalle Formation, Cuddapah Basin, India[J]. Carbonates & Evaporites, 2011, 26(2):181-191.

    Google Scholar

    [22] Préat A, Bouton P, Thiéblemont D, et al. Paleoproterozoic high δ13C dolomites from the Lastoursville and Franceville basins (SE Gabon):Stratigraphic and synsedimentary subsidence implications[J]. Precambrian Research, 2011, 189(1):212-228.

    Google Scholar

    [23] Martin A P, Condon D J, Prave A R, et al. A review of temporal constraints for the Palaeoproterozoic large, positive carbonate carbon isotope excursion (the Lomagundi-Jatuli Event)[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2013, 127:242-261.

    Google Scholar

    [24] 关平, 王颖嘉.全球古元古代碳同位素正异常的数据分析与成因评述[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 45(5):906-914. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0479-8023.2009.05.026

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [25] Kazumi Ozaki, Eiichi Tajika. Widespread euxinia in the aftermath of the Lomagundi event:insights from a modeling study of ocean biogeochemical dynamics[J].Geophysical Research Abstracts, 2015, (17):2015-7929.

    Google Scholar

    [26] 周邦国, 王生伟, 孙晓明, 等.云南东川望厂组熔结凝灰岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄及其意义[J].地质论评, 2012, 58(2):359-368. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0371-5736.2012.02.018

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [27] 朱华平, 范文玉, 周邦国, 等.论东川地区前震旦系地层层序:来自锆石SHRIMP及LA-ICP-MS测年的证据[J].高校地质学报, 2011, 17(3):452-461. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2011.03.010

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    [28] 赵秀鲲, 单卫国.武定"迤纳厂组"的层位归属及其滑覆-变质[J].云南地质, 1993, 12(1):60-66.

    Google Scholar

    [29] 施林道, 姜福芝, 卢海亚, 等.云南易门铜矿成因新见及其找矿意义[J].矿床地质, 1988, (2):14-22.

    Google Scholar

    [30] 高建国.易门狮山铜矿床地球化学特征与成矿关系[J].云南地质, 1996, (3):257-265.

    Google Scholar

    [31] 张立生.论凤山铜矿床的再生成因[J].矿产与地质, 1992, (6):431-439.

    Google Scholar

    [32] 高建国.易门铜矿三家厂矿田成矿元素特征分析[J].昆明理工大学学报(理工版), 1991, (4):10-22.

    Google Scholar

    [33] 张立生.云南易门狮山铜矿床的喷气沉积成因[J].中国地质科学院南京地质矿产研究所所刊, 1989, (4):52-71.

    Google Scholar

    [34] 叶现韬, 朱维光, 钟宏, 等.云南武定迤纳厂Fe-Cu-REE矿床的锆石U-Pb和黄铜矿Re-Os年代学、稀土元素地球化学及其地质意义[J].岩石学报, 2013, 29(4):1167-1186.

    Google Scholar

    [35] Mao H K, Hu Q Y, Yang L X, et al. When water meets iron at Earth's core-mantle boundary[J]. National Science Review, 2017, 4:870-878. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwx109

    CrossRef Google Scholar

    成都地质调查中心.1: 5万马树、甘沟等4幅.2014.

    Google Scholar

    云南省地质矿产勘查开发局.1: 5万青龙厂幅. 1994.

    Google Scholar

    云南省地质调查院. 1: 5万二街、易门等4幅. 2018.

    Google Scholar

    云南省地质局. 1: 5万禄丰县幅. 1996.

    Google Scholar

    云南省地质局. 1: 5万洼垤街幅. 1992.

    Google Scholar

    云南省地质局. 1: 20万武定幅. 1969.

    Google Scholar

    云南省地质矿产局. 1: 5万大麦地幅. 1991.

    Google Scholar

    云南省地质矿产局. 1: 5万武定县幅. 1992.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(1487) PDF downloads(9) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint