Chemical speciation and bioavailability of five heavy metals in soil of Beijing plain area in two years

AN Yonglong; HUANG Yong; SUN Zhao; DENG Kaiwen; LI Di; HUANG Dan

2018 Vol. 37, No. 6

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2018 > 37(6): 1142-1149

Next Article Previous Article

AN Yonglong, HUANG Yong, SUN Zhao, DENG Kaiwen, LI Di, HUANG Dan. Chemical speciation and bioavailability of five heavy metals in soil of Beijing plain area in two years[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(6): 1142-1149.

Citation:

AN Yonglong, HUANG Yong, SUN Zhao, DENG Kaiwen, LI Di, HUANG Dan. Chemical speciation and bioavailability of five heavy metals in soil of Beijing plain area in two years[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(6): 1142-1149.

Chemical speciation and bioavailability of five heavy metals in soil of Beijing plain area in two years

Beijing Institute of Geo-exploration Technology, Beijing 102218, China

Received Date: 14 March 2017

Revised Date: 20 June 2017

Publish Date: 25 June 2018

Abstract

Abstract

To effectively monitor the overall variation trend of the chemical forms for 5 heavy metals (As, Cd, Hg, Pb and Zn) in the soil in Beijing plain area during the year 2015 and 2016, the authors employed the Tessier sequential extraction method to ana-lyze the morphological characteristics of these soil heavy minerals. The authors studied the factors controlling the bio-availability of these heavy minerals. The results show that there is only minor change in the morphology of soil heavy metals in these 2 years. The element with highest effective concentration is Cd (45.67%), which thus poses greatest potential ecological risk. The following ele-ment is Zn with concentration of 12.16%. Though Zn is largely incorporated in carbonates, the mobility of Zn is reduced by the al-kaline soil, thus having less ecologically hazardous effect. The elements As, Hg and Pb are immobile with little potential hazards on ecology. The orders of activity coefficients and migration coefficients of the heavy metal elements in topsoil in the study area are Cd > Zn > Pb > As > Hg and Cd > As > Zn > Pb=Hg respectively. This suggests that Cd has the highest values in both the 2-year biological activity coefficient and transfer coefficient, implying a strong biological activity and migration capability, while other soil heavy metals have smaller activity coefficients and migration coefficients, indicating relatively low potential ecological risks. In the study area, the factors that affect the bio-availability of heavy metals are complex, and the dominant one is the total amount of heavy metal elements, followed by pH, organic matter, CEC, and other physical and chemical properties, and the connections of these factors are complicated.
- Beijing /
- soil /
- heavy metal /
- morphology /
- bioavailability

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	Zhong X L, Zhou S L, Zhu Q, et al. Fraction distribution and bioavailability of soil heavy metals in the Yangtze River Delta:A case study of Kunshan City in Jiangsu province, China[J]. Journal of haz-ardous materials, 2011, 198(30):13-21. Google Scholar
[2]	陈涛, 常庆瑞, 刘京.长期污灌农田土壤Cd赋存形态及其有效性的空间变异研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(7):1322-1327. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2014.07.010 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	覃朝科, 农泽喜, 黄伟, 等.广西某铅锌矿区农田土壤重金属形态分布特征[J].安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(15):146-149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2016.15.051 CrossRef Google Scholar
[4]	陈怀满.环境土壤学(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社, 2005:187-193. Google Scholar
[5]	郭世鸿, 侯晓龙, 邱海源, 等.基于形态学分析铅锌矿不同功能区土壤重金属元素的分布特征及污染评价[J].地质通报, 2015, 34(11):2047-2053. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2015.11.008 CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	Bhuiyan M A H, Parvez L, Islam M A, et al. Heavy metal pollution of coal mine-affected agricultural soils in the northern part of Bangladesh[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 173:384-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.085 CrossRef Google Scholar
[7]	Yenilmez F, Kuter N, Emil M K, et al. Evaluation of pollution levels at an abandoned coal mine site in Turkey with the aid of GIS[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 86:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2010.11.012 CrossRef Google Scholar
[8]	贾赵恒, 罗瑶, 沈友刚, 等.大冶龙角山矿区农田土壤重金属形态分布及其来源[J].农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(2):264-271. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2016-1116 CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	崔邢涛, 王学求, 栾文楼.河北中南部平原土壤重金属元素存在形态及生物有效性分析[J].中国地质, 2015, 42(2):655-663. Google Scholar
[10]	庞文品, 秦樊鑫, 吕亚超, 等.贵州兴仁煤矿区农田土壤重金属化学形态及风险评估[J].应用生态学报, 2016, 27(5):1468-1478. Google Scholar
[11]	Tessier A, Campbell P G C, Blsson M. Sequential Extraction Procedure for the Speciation of Partculate Trace Metals[J].Analytical Chemistry, 1979, 51(7):844-851. doi: 10.1021/ac50043a017 CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	Adriano D C. Trace Elements in Terrestrial Environments:Biogeochemistry, Bioavailability and Risk of Metals, 2nd ed[M]. Springer, New York, 2001. Google Scholar
[13]	胡绵好, 袁菊红, 黄和平.南昌市城市污泥重金属形态分布及其生物活性研究[J].水土保持通报, 2010, 30(5):63-67. Google Scholar
[14]	Kidd P S, Dominguez-Rodriguez M J, Diez J, et al. Bioavailability and plant accumulation of heavy metals and phosphorus in agricultural soils amended by long-term application of sewage sludge[J]. Chemosphere, 2007, 66:1458-1467. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
[15]	Pueyo M, Lopex-Sanchez J F, Rauret G. Assessment of CaCl₂, Na-NO₃ and NH₄NO₃ Extraction Procedures for the Study of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn Extraction in Contaminated Soils[J]. Analytica Chimiea Acta, 2004, 504(2):217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.047 CrossRef Google Scholar
[16]	张萌, 毋燕妮, 解静芳, 等.太原市污灌区土壤镉存在形态与生物可利用性研究[J].环境科学学报, 2015, 35(10):3276-3283. Google Scholar
[17]	孙海, 张亚玉, 孙长伟, 等.林下参土壤中重金属形态分布及生态风险评估[J].农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(5):928-934. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2014.05.015 CrossRef Google Scholar
[18]	刘勇, 岳玲玲, 李晋昌.太原市土壤重金属污染及其潜在生态风险评价[J].环境科学学报, 2011, 31(6):1285-1293. Google Scholar
[19]	王振中, 张友梅, 邓继福, 等.重金属在土壤生态系统中的富集及毒性效应[J].应用生态学报, 2006, 17(10):1948-1952. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-9332.2006.10.033 CrossRef Google Scholar
[20]	傅晓文, 陈贯虹, 迟建国, 等.胜利油田石油污染土壤中重金属的形态分析[J].山东科学, 2015, 28(4):58-64. doi: 10.3976/j.issn.1002-4026.2015.04.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[21]	成杭新, 庄广民, 赵传冬, 等.北京市土壤Hg污染的区域生态地球化学评价[J].地学前缘, 2008, 15(5):126-145. Google Scholar
[22]	吴昆明, 朱立新, 马生明, 等.冲积平原区土壤中重金属元素的存在形态分析[J].分析测试学报, 2004, 23(2), 41-43. Google Scholar
[23]	McCarty L S, Mackay D. Enhancing eco-toxicological modeling and assessment, body residues and modes of action[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1993, 27:1719-1728. Google Scholar
[24]	安永龙, 黄勇, 刘清俊, 等.苹果产地土壤环境与地质背景研究[J].城市地质, 2016, 11(3):36-43. Google Scholar
[25]	栾文楼, 刘洪微, 温小亚, 等.冀东平原土壤重金属元素的存在形态及有效性分析[J].中国地质, 2010, 37(2):508-514. Google Scholar
[26]	刘清俊, 黄勇, 胡省英, 等.北京城区土壤中Hg、Pb、Cd、Cu及Zn化学形态及环境效应[J].城市地质, 2015, 10(4):11-15. Google Scholar
[27]	Li J X, Yang X E, He Z L, et al. Fractionation of lead in paddy soils and its bioavailability to rice plants[J]. Geoderma., 2007, 141(3/4):174-180. Google Scholar
[28]	叶宏萌, 李国平, 郑茂钟, 等.武夷山茶园土壤中五种重金属的化学形态和生物有效性[J].环境化学, 2016, 35(10):2071-2078. doi: 10.7524/j.issn.0254-6108.2016.10.2016022304 CrossRef Google Scholar
[29]	徐聪珑, 贾丽, 张文卿, 等.吉林省镍矿区土壤重金属Cu、Ni、Pb、Zn的形态分布特征及活性[J].吉林农业大学学报, 2016, 38(3):313-319. Google Scholar
[30]	张江华, 王葵颖, 李皓, 等.陕西潼关金矿区土壤Pb和Cd生物有效性的影响因素及其意义[J].地质通报, 2014, 33(8):1188-1195. Google Scholar
[31]	黄碧捷.土壤重金属生物可利用性研究趋势展望[J].江汉大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(6):38-43. Google Scholar
[32]	胡宁静, 骆永明, 黄朋, 等.碱性土壤对Pb的吸附特性:内圈吸附和形成沉淀的XAFS证据[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2011, 33(2):560-564. Google Scholar
[33]	周国华.土壤重金属生物有效性研究进展[J].物探与化探, 2014, 38(6):1097-1106. doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2014.6.01 CrossRef Google Scholar
[34]	蔡奎, 段亚敏, 栾文楼, 等.石家庄农田区土壤重金属Cd、Cr、Pb、As、Hg形态分布特征及其影响因素[J].地球与环境, 2014, 42(6):742-749. Google Scholar
[35]	戴前进, 冯新斌, 仇广乐, 等.陕西省潼关采金地区汞污染的初步研究[J].环境化学, 2004, 23(4):460-464. Google Scholar