A preliminary study of the structure and reformation of the Permian and Carboniferous strata in Yingen-Ejin basin and its periphery

XU Wei; WEI Jianshe; HAN Wei; DANG Ben; NIU Yazhuo; HAN Xiaofeng; SONG Bo; XUE Ning

2018 Vol. 37, No. 1

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2018 > 37(1): 132-143

Next Article Previous Article

XU Wei, WEI Jianshe, HAN Wei, DANG Ben, NIU Yazhuo, HAN Xiaofeng, SONG Bo, XUE Ning. A preliminary study of the structure and reformation of the Permian and Carboniferous strata in Yingen-Ejin basin and its periphery[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(1): 132-143.

Citation:

XU Wei, WEI Jianshe, HAN Wei, DANG Ben, NIU Yazhuo, HAN Xiaofeng, SONG Bo, XUE Ning. A preliminary study of the structure and reformation of the Permian and Carboniferous strata in Yingen-Ejin basin and its periphery[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2018, 37(1): 132-143.

A preliminary study of the structure and reformation of the Permian and Carboniferous strata in Yingen-Ejin basin and its periphery

1.
School of Earthscience & Resources; Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China
2.
China Key Laboratory for the Study of Focused Magmatism and Giant Ore Deposits, MLR/Xi'an Geological Survey Center, China Geo logical Survey, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China
3.
Wuqi Oil Production Plant, Yanchang Oli Field Co., Ltd., Wuqi 717600, Shaanxi, China

More Information

Corresponding author: WEI Jianshe, upcwjs@126.com

Received Date: 20 June 2017

Revised Date: 22 September 2017

Publish Date: 25 January 2018

Abstract

Abstract

In this study, structure deformation features of the Carboniferous, Permian and Meso-Cenozoic strata were analyzed in Yingen-Ejin basin and its periphery, and geological survey was conducted mainly based on geophysical prospecting and drilling in the interior of the basin. The deformation of the Carboniferous and Permian outcrops is stronger than that in the interior of the basin, and stronger in Beishan than in Honggeershan. The tectonic deformation stages and dynamic mechanism after Permian were preliminarily discussed. Four tectonic stages, i.e., Late Variscan, Early Yanshanian, Late Yanshanian and Himalayan tectonic movement, were distinguished. The deformation was strong in the first period. The second phase deformation is the strongest in the region in that large-scale nappe structure and regional uplift were formed during this period; the overall tectonic pattern was formed in the Late Jurassic. The third and fourth stages were mainly characterized by differential uplifting and subsidence, with the dynamic mechanism being separately controlled by the remote effects of the subductions of the Pacific plate under the North China block and the subduction of the India plate under the Eurasia. The source rock of Carboniferous-Permian was buried most deeply with the formation of oil until the end of Early Cretaceous. Furthermore, the structural activities were insignificant after the Early Cretaceous, which was favorable for the formation of hydrocarbon reservoir.
- Yingen-Ejin basin /
- Carboniferous /
- Permian /
- structure and reformation

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	韩伟, 卢进才, 魏建设.内蒙古银额盆地尚丹凹陷中生代构造活动的磷灰石裂变径迹约束[J].地质学报, 2015, 89(12):1-9. Google Scholar
[2]	韩伟, 卢进才, 张云鹏, 等.内蒙古西部额济纳旗及其邻区磷灰石裂变径迹研究及其油气地质意义[J].大地构造与成矿学, 2014, 38 (3):647-655. Google Scholar
[3]	卢进才, 陈高潮, 魏仙样, 等.内蒙古西部额济纳旗及邻区石炭系—二叠系沉积建造与生烃条件——石炭系—二叠系油气地质条件研究之一[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(6): 811-826. Google Scholar
[4]	卢进才, 陈高潮, 魏仙样, 等.内蒙古西部额济纳旗及邻区石炭系—二叠系的储集条件——石炭系—二叠系油气地质条件研究之二[J].地质通报, 2011, 30(6): 827-837. Google Scholar
[5]	卢进才, 陈高潮, 魏仙样, 等.北山红石山地区晚古生代火山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造意义[J].岩石学报, 2013, 29(8): 2685-2694. Google Scholar
[6]	魏建设, 卢进才, 魏仙样, 等.内蒙古西部额济纳旗及邻区石炭系—二叠系烃源岩演化特征及影响因素[J].地质通报, 2011, 12: 1299-1307. Google Scholar
[7]	郑亚东, 王士政, 王玉芳.中蒙边界区新发现的特大型推覆构造及伸展变质核杂岩[J].中国科学(B辑), 1990, 7(2): 22-33. Google Scholar
[8]	Zheng Y, Zhang Q, Wang Y, et al. Great Jurassic thrust sheets in Beishan (North Mountains)-Gobi areas of China and southern Mon-golia[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 1996, 18(9): 1111-1126. doi: 10.1016/0191-8141(96)00038-7 CrossRef Google Scholar
[9]	郑亚东, 王涛.中蒙边界区中生代推覆构造与伸展垮塌作用的运动学和动力学分析[J].中国科学(D辑), 2005, 35(4): 291-303. Google Scholar
[10]	王涛, 郑亚东, 刘树文, 等.中蒙边界亚干变质核杂岩糜棱状钾质花岗岩——早中生代收缩与伸展构造体制的转换标志[J].岩石学报, 2002, 018(02): 177-186. Google Scholar
[11]	王峰, 王驹, 范洪海, 等.甘肃北山旧井地区晚第四纪活动断裂分布及其构造意义[J].地质论评, 2005, 51(3):250-258. Google Scholar
[12]	夏林圻, 夏祖春, 徐学义, 等.天山及邻区石炭纪—早二叠世裂谷火山岩岩石成因[J].西北地质, 2008, 41(4): 1-68. Google Scholar
[13]	牛亚卓, 魏建设, 史冀忠, 等.甘肃北山地区北部上石炭统火山岩LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其构造意义[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(11): 1720-1727. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2013.11.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
[14]	牛亚卓, 卢进才, 魏建设, 等.甘蒙北山地区下石炭统绿条山组时代修正及其构造意义[J].地质通报, 2014, 60(3): 567-575. Google Scholar
[15]	Chen Y, Gilder S, Halim N, et al. New paleomagnetic constraints on central Asian kinematics: Displacement along the Altyn Tagh fault and rotation of the Qaidam Basin[J]. Tectonics, 2002, 21(5): 1042-1061. Google Scholar
[16]	李海兵, 杨经绥, 许志琴, 等.阿尔金断裂带对青藏高原北部生长、隆升的制约[J].地学前缘, 2006, 13(4): 59-79. Google Scholar
[17]	孙知明, 李海兵, 裴军令, 等.阿尔金断裂走滑作用对青藏高原东北缘山脉形成的古地磁证据[J].岩石学报, 2012, 28(6):1928-1936. Google Scholar
[18]	董树文, 张岳桥, 陈宣华, 等.晚侏罗世东亚多向汇聚构造体系的形成与变形特征[J].地球学报, 2008, 29(3): 306-317. Google Scholar
[19]	王廷印, 高军平, 王金荣, 等.内蒙阿拉善北部地区碰撞期和后造山期岩浆作用[J].地质学报, 1998, 72(2): 126-137. Google Scholar
[20]	邵济安, 张履桥, 牟保磊, 等.大兴安岭中南段中生代的构造演化[J].中国科学, 1998, 25(3): 193-200. Google Scholar
[21]	邵济安, 牟保磊, 张履桥, 等.华北东部中生代构造格局转换过程中的深部与浅部响应[J].地质论评, 1999, 46(1):32-40. Google Scholar
[22]	董树文, 张岳桥, 龙长兴, 等.中国侏罗纪构造变革与燕山运动新诠释[J].地质学报, 2007, 81(11): 1449-1461. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2007.11.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[23]	季强, 陈文, 王五力, 等.中国辽西中生代热河生物群[M].北京:地质出版社, 2004: 1-357. Google Scholar
[24]	季强, 柳永清, 陈文, 等.再论道虎沟生物群的时代[J].地质论评, 2005, 51(6):609-612. Google Scholar
[25]	水谷伸治郎, 邵济安, 张庆龙.那丹哈达地体与东亚大陆边缘中生代构造的关系[J].地质学报, 1989, 60(3):204-216. Google Scholar
[26]	Maruyama S, Liou J G, Seno T. Mesozoic and Cenozoic evolution of Asia[C]//Ben-Avraham Z. The evolution of the Pacific Ocean margins. Oxford University Press, 1989: 75-99. Google Scholar
[27]	Maruyama S, Isozaki Y, Kimura G, et al. Paleogeographic maps of the Japanese islands: plate tectonic systhesis from 750Ma to the present[J]. The Island Arc, 1997, 6: 121-142. doi: 10.1111/iar.1997.6.issue-1 CrossRef Google Scholar
[28]	Isozaki Y. Jurassic accretion tectonics of Japan[J]. The Island Arc, 1997, 6(1): 25-51. doi: 10.1111/iar.1997.6.issue-1 CrossRef Google Scholar
[29]	邓晋福, 苏尚国, 刘翠, 等.关于华北克拉通燕山期岩石圈减薄的机制与过程的讨论:是拆沉, 还是热侵蚀和化学交代[J].地学前缘, 2006, 13(2): 105-119. Google Scholar
[30]	吴福元, 葛文春, 孙德有, 等.中国东部岩石圈减薄研究中的几个问题[J].地学前缘, 2003, 10(3): 51-60. Google Scholar
[31]	洪大卫, 王涛, 童英, 等.华北地台和秦岭-大别-苏鲁造山带中生代花岗岩与深部地球动力学过程[J].地学前缘, 2003, 10(3): 231-256. Google Scholar
[32]	Deng J F, Su S G, Niu Y L, et al. A possible model for the lithospheric thinning of North China Craton: Evidence from the Yan-shanian (Jura-Cretaceous) magmatism and tectonism[J]. Lithos, 2007, 96:22-35. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2006.09.009 CrossRef Google Scholar
[33]	Zhai M G, Fan Q C, Zhang H F, et al. Lower crustal processes leading to Mesozoic lithospheric thinning beneath eastern North China: Underplating, replacement and delamination[J].Lithos., 2007, 96:36-54. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2006.09.016 CrossRef Google Scholar
[34]	Zhang H F, Sun M, Zhou X H, et al. Geochemical constraints on the origin of Mesozoic alkaline intrusive complexes from the North China Craton and tectonic implications[J]. Lithos, 2005, 81: 297-317. doi: 10.1016/j.lithos.2004.12.015 CrossRef Google Scholar
[35]	Xu Y G, Huang X L, Ma J L, et al. Crust-mantle interaction during the tectono-thermal reactivation of the North China Craton: constraints from SHRIMP zircon U-Pb chronology and geochemistry of Mesozoic plutons from western Shandong[J].Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 2004, 147: 750-767. doi: 10.1007/s00410-004-0594-y CrossRef Google Scholar
[36]	Gao S S, Liu K H, Chen C. Significant crustal thinning beneath the Baikal rift zone: New constraints from receiver function analysis[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, 31: (20):L20610. doi: 10.1029/2004GL020813 CrossRef Google Scholar
[37]	姜耀辉, 蒋少涌, 赵葵东, 等.辽东半岛煌斑岩SHRIMP锆石UPb及其对中国东部岩石圈减薄开始时间的制约[J].科学通报, 2005, 50(19): 2167-2168. Google Scholar
[38]	周新华, 张宏福.中生代华北岩石圈地幔高度化学不均一性与大陆岩石圈转型[J].地球科学, 2006, 31(1): 12-13. Google Scholar
[39]	翟明国, 朱日祥, 刘建明, 等.华北东部中生代构造体制转折的关键时限[J].中国科学(D辑), 2003, 33(10): 913-920. Google Scholar
[40]	王涛, 郑亚东, 张进江, 等.华北克拉通中生代伸展构造的几个问题及其在岩石圈减薄研究中的意义[J].地质通报, 2007, 26(9): 1154-1166. Google Scholar
[41]	Sun Z, Yang Z, Pei J, et al. New Early Cretaceous paleimagnetic data from volcanic and red beds of the eastern Qaindam Block and its implications for tectonics of Central Asia[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2006, 243:268-281. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.12.016 CrossRef Google Scholar
[42]	卢进才, 陈高潮, 李玉红, 等.银额盆地及邻区石炭系—二叠系油气地质条件与资源远景[M].北京:地质出版社, 2012: 1-439. Google Scholar
[43]	卫平生, 张虎权, 林卫东, 等.银根-额济纳旗盆地油气勘探远景[J].天然气工业, 2005, 25(3):7-10. Google Scholar
①	甘肃省地质调查局. 中华人民共和国1: 20万区域地质测量报告及地质图-红柳大泉幅. 1977. Google Scholar
②	宁夏回族自治区地质局. 中华人民共和国1: 20万区域地质测量报告及地质图-乌力吉幅. 1980. Google Scholar
③	宁夏回族自治区地质局. 中华人民共和国1: 20万区域地质测量报告及地质图-银根幅. 1980. Google Scholar
④	甘肃省地质调查局. 中华人民共和国1: 20万区域地质图-六驼山幅、路井幅、五道明幅. 1979. Google Scholar
⑤	甘肃省地质调查局. 中华人民共和国1: 20万区域地质图-黑鹰山幅、因格井幅. 1980. Google Scholar
⑥	甘肃省地质调查局. 中华人民共和国1: 20万区域地质图-石板井幅. 1972. Google Scholar
⑦	甘肃省地质调查局. 中华人民共和国1: 20万区域地质图-旧寺墩幅. 1970. Google Scholar
⑧	甘肃省地质调查局. 中华人民共和国1: 20万区域地质图-拐子湖幅. 1981. Google Scholar
⑨	宁夏回族自治区地质局1: 20万区域地质图-哈日奥日布格幅. 1982. Google Scholar