Zircon U-Pb age of the felsite porphyry veins in western Fuzhou basin of Fujian Province and its geological significance

LIN Musen; WU Lingxiao; WANG Cuizhi

2019 Vol. 38, No. 10

Article Contents

Article navigation > Geological Bulletin of China > 2019 > 38(10): 1726-1732

Next Article Previous Article

LIN Musen, WU Lingxiao, WANG Cuizhi. Zircon U-Pb age of the felsite porphyry veins in western Fuzhou basin of Fujian Province and its geological significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(10): 1726-1732.

Citation:

LIN Musen, WU Lingxiao, WANG Cuizhi. Zircon U-Pb age of the felsite porphyry veins in western Fuzhou basin of Fujian Province and its geological significance[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2019, 38(10): 1726-1732.

Zircon U-Pb age of the felsite porphyry veins in western Fuzhou basin of Fujian Province and its geological significance

Zijin College of Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China

Received Date: 10 December 2017

Revised Date: 09 April 2018

Publish Date: 15 October 2019

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents U-Pb zircon geochronology, petrology, and major and trace elements of Cretaceous felsite porphyry veins in western Fuzhou basin, Fujian Province. These data were used to investigate the genetic relationship between felsite porphyry and Fuzhou composite granite body. Felsite porphyry shows purplish gray color and is mainly composed of orthoclase phenocrysts, and the well-developed flow structure is present on the margin. Felsite porphyry veins have a NE-trending strike and intruded into Fuzhou composite granite body. Felsite porphyry shows the features of calc-alkali and I-type granites, with the emplacement age being 97.4Ma; it was formed in the transition period between early Fuzhou composite granite body (111~100Ma) and late Fuzhou composite granite body (95~90Ma). The geochemical characteristics between the above three phase rock types present a graduallychanged transitional relation on the time scale. That is, this felsite porphyry is the product of the tectonic regimes conversion between Early and Late Cretaceous in southeastern China. The authors thus hold that the transformation age may be 97Ma.
- felsite porphyry /
- zircon U-Pb age /
- Late Cretaceous /
- western Fuzhou basin /
- geological significance

FullText(HTML)

References

[1]	吴郭泉.福州复式岩体的组成及其演化[J].岩石学报, 1991, (2):81-88. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0569.1991.02.011 CrossRef Google Scholar
[2]	王德滋, 沈渭洲.中国东南部花岗岩成因与地壳演化[J].地学前缘, 2003, 10(3):209-220. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2003.03.020 CrossRef Google Scholar
[3]	邱检生, 肖娥, 胡建, 等.福建北东沿海高分异I型花岗岩的成因:锆石U-Pb年代学、地球化学和Nd-Hf同位素制约[J].岩石学报, 2008, 24(11):2468-2484. Google Scholar
[4]	邢光福, 陈荣, 杨祝良, 等.东南沿海晚白垩世火山岩浆活动特征及其构造背景[J].岩石学报, 2009, 25(1):77-91. Google Scholar
[5]	李良林, 周汉文, 陈植华, 等.福建沿海晚中生代花岗质岩石成因及其地质意义[J].地质通报, 2013, 32(7):1047-1062. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2013.07.010 CrossRef Google Scholar
[6]	林清茶, 程雄卫, 张玉泉, 等.活动大陆边缘花岗岩类演化——以福州复式岩体为例[J].地质学报, 2011, 85(7):1128-1133. Google Scholar
[7]	朱雪丽.福州复式岩体花岗岩年代学、地球化学及岩石成因[D].中国地质大学(北京)硕士学位论文, 2015: 1-60.http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11415-1015389671.htm Google Scholar
[8]	单强, 曾乔松, 李建康, 等.福建魁岐晶洞花岗岩锆石U-Pb年代学及其地球化学研究[J].岩石学报, 2014, 30(4):1155-1167. Google Scholar
[9]	福建省地质矿产局.福建省区域地质志(及附图)[M].北京:地质出版社, 1985. Google Scholar
[10]	Martin H, Bonin B, Didier J, 等.中国东南部福州花岗质杂岩的岩石学和地球化学[J].地球化学, 1991, 6(2):101-111. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.1991.02.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[11]	李真, 邱检生, 蒋少涌, 等.福建金山花岗质复式岩体的元素和同位素地球化学及其成因研究[J].地质学报, 2009, 83(4):515-527. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2009.04.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
[12]	黄萱, 孙世华, DePaolo D J, 等.福建省白垩纪岩浆岩Nd、Sr同位素研究[J].岩石学报, 1986, (2):50-63. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0569.1986.02.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
[13]	林瑶瑕.福建沿海A型花岗岩带的基本特征及其大地构造意义[J].大地构造与成矿学, 1987, (4):311-323. Google Scholar
[14]	凌洪飞, 沈渭洲, 黄小龙.福建省花岗岩类Nd-Sr同位素特征及其意义[J].岩石学报, 1999, 15(2):255-262. Google Scholar
[15]	邱检生, 王德滋, 蟹泽聪史, 等.福建沿海铝质A型花岗岩的地球化学及岩石成因[J].地球化学, 2000, 29(4):313-321. Google Scholar
[16]	董传万, 周超, 顾红艳, 等.福建湄洲岛镁铁质岩墙群与寄主花岗岩的形成时差、地球化学及成因[J].吉林大学学报, 2011, 41(3):735-744. Google Scholar
[17]	张贵山.福建晚中生代以来基性-超基性岩的年代学、地球化学及其地球动力学意义[D].中国科学院研究生院(地球化学研究所)博士学位论文, 2006: 1-108.http://www.irgrid.ac.cn/handle/1471x/178952 Google Scholar
[18]	杨永峰, 董传万, 闫强, 等.浙闽沿海晚中生代伸展构造作用:来自福建沿海中-基性岩墙群的证据[J].矿物岩石, 2010, 30(2):87-94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6872.2010.02.015 CrossRef Google Scholar
[19]	熊欣, 王翠芝, 王林刚, 等.福州闽侯长安闪长岩岩体的地球化学特征及其地质意义[J].地质与勘探, 2011, 47(6):1035-1043. Google Scholar
[20]	Li Z, Qiu J S, Yang X M. A review of the geochronology and geochemistry of Late Yanshanian (Cretaceous) plutons along the Fujian coastal area of southeastern China:implications for magma evolution related to slab break-off and rollback in the Cretaceous[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 128:232-248. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.09.007 CrossRef Google Scholar
[21]	Ludwig K R. User's manual for isoplot/EX version 3.00:a geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel[J]. Berkeley Geochronology Center, Special Publication, 2003, 4:1-70. Google Scholar
[22]	李昌年.构造岩浆判别的地球化学方法及其讨论[J].地质科技情报, 1992, 11(3):73-78. Google Scholar
[23]	Zhao Z H, Zhou L D. REE geochemistry of some alkali-rich intrusive rocks in China[J]. Science in China (Series D:Earth Sciences), 1997, (2):145-158. Google Scholar
[24]	Sun S S, McDonough W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts:implications for mantle composition and processes[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 1989, 42(1):313-345. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1989.042.01.19 CrossRef Google Scholar
[25]	Watson E B, Wark D A, Thomas J B. Crystallization thermometers for zircon and rutile[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2006, 151(4):413-433. doi: 10.1007/s00410-006-0068-5 CrossRef Google Scholar
[26]	Ferry J M, Watson E B. New thermodynamic models and revised calibrations for the Ti in-zircon and Zr-in-rutile thermometers[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 2007, 154(4):429-437. doi: 10.1007/s00410-007-0201-0 CrossRef Google Scholar
[27]	李小伟, 莫宣学, 赵志丹, 等.关于A型花岗岩判别过程中若干问题的讨论[J].地质通报, 2010, 29(23):278-285. Google Scholar
[28]	Whalen J B, Carrie K L, Chappell B W. A type granites:Geochemical characteristics, discrimination and petrogenesis[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1987, 95(4):407-419. doi: 10.1007/BF00402202 CrossRef Google Scholar
[29]	Pearce J A. Sources and settings of granitic rocks[J]. Episodes, 1996, 19(4):120-125. doi: 10.18814/epiiugs/1996/v19i4/005 CrossRef Google Scholar
[30]	Peccerillo A, Taylor S R. Geochemistry of Eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, northern Turkey[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1976, 58(1):68-81. Google Scholar
[31]	Yang J, Zhao Z, Hou Q, et al. Petrogenesis of Cretaceous (133-84Ma) intermediate dykes and host granites in southeastern China:Implications for lithospheric extension, continental crustal growth, and geodynamics of Palaeo-Pacific subduction[J]. Lithos, 2018, 296:195-211. Google Scholar
[32]	吴福元, 李献华, 杨进辉, 等.花岗岩成因研究的若干问题[J].岩石学报, 2007, 23(6):1217-1238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0569.2007.06.001 CrossRef Google Scholar
[33]	徐夕生.华南花岗岩-火山岩成因研究的几个问题[J].高校地质学报, 2008, 14(3):283-294. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7493.2008.03.001 CrossRef Google Scholar