2020 Vol. 39, No. 10
Article Contents

XU Kaitong, WANG Nashen, SHEN Biao, Lü Rui, MA Kai, WANG Guan, HUANG Yujia, JIA Chunzi, ZHANG Chaoyang, LI Guifang, WANG Xuemei. Maihanhada Formation Reservoir sensitivity of Permian inBabei sag Yin'E Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2020, 39(10): 1600-1607.
Citation: XU Kaitong, WANG Nashen, SHEN Biao, Lü Rui, MA Kai, WANG Guan, HUANG Yujia, JIA Chunzi, ZHANG Chaoyang, LI Guifang, WANG Xuemei. Maihanhada Formation Reservoir sensitivity of Permian inBabei sag Yin'E Basin[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2020, 39(10): 1600-1607.

Maihanhada Formation Reservoir sensitivity of Permian inBabei sag Yin'E Basin

More Information
  • Reservoir sensitivity is the degree of sensitivity to various factors that cause damage to the reservoir. The main purpose of reservoir susceptibility analysis is to study the damage degree of various sensitive factors to reservoirs and to propose preventive measures to improve the final recovery rate of crude oil. In order to study the damage to the reservoirs in the Permian reservoirs in the Babei depression of the Yingen-Ejinaqi basin, the authors carried out a large number of laboratory experiments on the core of the reservoir. The reservoir sensitivity test was used to evaluate the reservoir sensitivity. The standard was evaluated for the sensitivity of the area. The results show that the reservoirs of the Permian buried Khan Formation are intermediately strong, sensitive, weakly alkaline, moderate to strong, and slightly weak and medium weak. In the future exploration and development, the protection of oil and gas as well as the increase in the choice of measures can be used to respond to the corresponding measures.

  • 加载中
  • [1] 王纳申.银额盆地巴北凹陷白垩系油气成藏条件研究[D].西安石油大学硕士学位论文, 2019.

    Google Scholar

    [2] 吕道平, 杨胜来, 马铨峥, 等.致密储油层敏感性实验研究[J].石油化工高等学校学报, 2017, (2):34-39.

    Google Scholar

    [3] 单祥, 徐洋, 郭华军, 等.准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷北斜坡玛131井区块三叠系百口泉组储层敏感性评价[J].地质科技情报, 2017, (1):176-182.

    Google Scholar

    [4] 张惠, 王纳申, 孟祥振, 等.银额盆地苏红图坳陷北部埋汗哈达组碎屑锆石U-Pb测年及其地质意义[J].地质通报, 2019, 38(4):656-666.

    Google Scholar

    [5] 王纳申, 张译丹, 黄家旋, 等.用微地震技术评价姬塬油田体积压裂的效果[J].物探与化探, 2017, (1):165-170.

    Google Scholar

    [6] 王纳申.姬塬地区延长组低渗透油田增产措施应用讨论[J].石化技术, 2015, (10):246-248.

    Google Scholar

    [7] 徐会林, 王新海, 魏少波, 等.四川盆地高石梯-磨溪区块震旦系储层敏感性实验评价[J].岩性油气藏, 2015, (2):13-17, 25.

    Google Scholar

    [8] 何永宏.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田长8储层敏感性研究[J].断块油气田, 2014, (1):87-91.

    Google Scholar

    [9] 成赛男, 田继军, 张鹏辉.伊通盆地莫里青断陷西北缘双阳组二段储层敏感性流动实验评价[J].油气地质与采收率, 2013, (3):76-78, 116.

    Google Scholar

    [10] 吴春燕, 沈英, 程玉群, 等.下寺湾地区延长组长7陆相页岩气储层敏感性实验[J].地质科技情报, 2015, (5):81-85.

    Google Scholar

    [11] 段春节, 魏旭光, 李小冬, 等.深层高压低渗透砂岩油藏储层敏感性研究[J].地质科技情报, 2013, (3):94-99.

    Google Scholar

    [12] 高波, 张旭东, 黄小凤, 等.渤海油田储层敏感性快速预测方法[J].石油钻采工艺, 2012, (S1):67-69.

    Google Scholar

    [13] 李芳芳, 高旺来, 杨胜来, 等.安塞油田高52区低渗油藏储层敏感性研究[J].特种油气藏, 2012, (4):126-129, 157.

    Google Scholar

    [14] 吴雄军, 蒋官澄, 赵琳, 等.径向基神经网络优化及在储层敏感性定量预测中的应用[J].油气地质与采收率, 2012, (1):107-110, 118.

    Google Scholar

    [15] 徐辉, 田荣斌, 李珊, 等.张家垛阜三段储层敏感性和油水相渗特征[J].油气藏评价与开发, 2011, (6):48-51.

    Google Scholar

    [16] 曾伟, 董明, 孔令明, 等.鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格气田中、下二叠统砂岩储层敏感性影响因素分析[J].天然气勘探与开发, 2011, (3):31-34, 37, 88.

    Google Scholar

    [17] 李丽.稠油水淹及储层评价方法研究[J].国外测井技术, 2020, 41(5):16-19.

    Google Scholar

    [18] 任杰, 田永敏, 王军, 等.普光气田礁滩相储层特征及分类评价[J].断块油气田, 2020, (5):579-584.

    Google Scholar

    [19] 李渭, 白薷, 姜亭, 等.蒙额参3井石炭二叠系干泉组页岩储层含气性及可压性评价[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 50(5):831-839.

    Google Scholar

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(9)

Tables(7)

Article Metrics

Article views(1112) PDF downloads(2) Cited by(0)

Access History

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint